TPMMuckraker

Taitz: Ex-Client's Letter Renouncing Me In Birther Case May Be A Forgery

Spread the word and support this article. Share it on Digg!


Orly Taitz and Capt. Connie Rhodes

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Oh sweet irony.

Birther attorney Orly Taitz tells TPMmuckraker she believes a letter sent by her now ex-client renouncing Taitz -- in a case alleging that Barack Obama's birth certificate is a forgery -- may itself be a forgery. It's worth noting that Taitz submitted as evidence in the original filing in the "birther soldier" case of Army Capt. Connie Rhodes a "Kenyan birth certificate" that is itself an obvious forgery.

In the e-mail to TPMmuckraker (read it in full below), Taitz claims she was acting like any attorney would by not seeking "additional consent" from her client before filing what she refers to as a "Motion for reconsideration." It was actually an emergency request for stay of deployment -- which seems like the kind of thing you'd want to consult an Iraq-bound client about.

As for Rhodes' letter, in which she states her intention to file a bar complaint against her former attorney, Taitz writes:

I don't know if this letter came from her, since she is in Iraq now and the Office -max store from where it came, states that they don't send faxes for customers. The signature on her notarized letter from Kansas and this letter looks different.

Not to go too far down the rabbit hole, but the Rhodes letter, which was filed with the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, checks out as far as it can be checked.

In her letter Rhodes said she was "faxing this as was advised by Tim, who works in the District Clerk's office." We called the district office in question, in Columbus, Georgia, and one Tim, who said he could not talk to the press, answered the phone. And as you can see here, the Office Max from which Rhodes faxed the letter is right down the road from that very court office. (We've also left a message for the clerk of the court.)

We asked Taitz who, in her view, would have forged the Rhodes letter, and she wrote back she doesn't have "any more info." And ended by saying, ominously, that "I will have my hands full for the next couple of months" on various Birther actions around the country.

Here's her full response to our request for comment about the Rhodes letter:

I don't know if this letter came from her, since she is in Iraq now and the Office -max store from where it came, states that they don't send faxes for customers. The signature on her notarized letter from Kansas and this letter looks different.
Regardless, whether it is her or not, there is no ground for accusations. She authorized me to proceed with the legal action. Motion for reconsideration is a routine procedure and attorney is not required to get an additional consent from the client. Any attorney will confirm that. That is particularly true in exigent circumstances like these.
It appears Connie was pressured by the military. It appear to be a concerted effort to quash all free speech, particularly any legal challenges to Obama's legitimacy, Attorney Hemenway in DC was threatened with sanctions of $10,000, I was threatened with sanctions. Connie Rhodes was threatened with high costs of litigation to be paid to the Department of Defense and Department of Justice. It is possible that this letter was written to avoid paying high litigation costs.
The most important question is still on the table: why would the judge levy $10,000 in sanctions instead of instructing Obama to produce a real Hospital birth certificate with a name of the hospital name of the doctor and signatures , so we can locate this birthing file? Why go to such extend? The only answer is: that the administration is scared, they know they have nothing to show for except for the piece of JPG garbage that Obama posted on the Internet (no name of the hospital, no name of the doctor).
Well, all good that ends good. This threat of sanctions gives me an opportunity to demand rule 11 discovery and get all of Obama' records through the back door

Orly Taitz DDS Esq

Late Update: Clerk of Court Gregory Leonard tells TPMmuckraker that, while it's up to the judge to assess the legitimacy of the Rhodes letter, he did hear from the Columbus district office, and authorized Rhodes to submit the letter initially by fax because she was en route to Iraq. It has to be followed up by the original letter, he said.

Join the Conversation!

83 comments

Recommend Recommend (10)

September 21, 2009 2:09 PM   

Sweet jaysus in a speedo, when will this nutter go away? It pisses me off that she gets the amount of press that she does.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 2:51 PM    in reply to Dusty

She gets the press because she's provocative and gets a reaction out of people. The news business is a business and they want to get the most readers/listeners/viewers/visitors. Posting stories that make people say "HOLY S&%T!!!!" is the way to do that.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 4:24 PM    in reply to jdb316

Gee, and I thought the 'news' was where we learned the truth or important events that take place in these united states..not where idiots like Orly can get their fifteen minutes of fame.

Fox needs to give that clown her own show..right before or after Beck's b.s.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 8:15 PM    in reply to Dusty

It used to be that way many moons ago when the news departments were not considered entertainment or money making operations.

Obama said it right this weekend. The media loves a brawl (not his exact words) but similar. I've stopped watching everything except Rachel and Keith.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 9:39 PM    in reply to jdb316

There may be a bit of the "holy shit" element to her coverage, but to a larger extent she serves the purposes of the right-wing and their media sycophants. The purpose is to delegitimize Obama and his agenda. The whole point is to return Republicans to power. All this craziness makes a lot more sense if you keep that in mind.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

mJJ

user-pic

September 22, 2009 11:02 PM    in reply to jdb316

Yes, as my Mom used to say when was young and did something naughty and got caught and I would try to explain, she used to say, "Your explanation sounds like an excuse NOT a reason".

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 3:20 PM    in reply to Dusty

Trying to wrap my head around a visual image of Jesus in a speedo.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 4:25 PM    in reply to LindyLou

Don't try too hard ok? ;)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 8:25 PM    in reply to Dusty

I'm enjoying it. Each appeaqrance offerws at least one "teaching moment":

According to Oily Tits:

"Motion for reconsideration is a routine procedure and attorney is not required to get an additional consent from the client."

False.

"Any attorney will confirm that."

A few may. The vast majority will not only not affirm it, they will vociferously assert the opposite.

"That is particularly true in exigent circumstances like these."

What exigent circumstances? The there is no case? The threat of sanctions?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 22, 2009 12:06 AM    in reply to Dusty

"Sweet Jesus in a speedo". I LOVE the visual.

And you know....I bet Jesus would let loose with a big belly laugh at the thought as well.

One man's sacrilegious is another man's irony.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 2:22 PM   

I LOVE her signature-- DDS Esq.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 6:18 PM    in reply to eve cairo

She's just letting us know we're in good hands, or something.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 7:54 PM    in reply to eve cairo

In this case I believe the DDS stands for Demented Dumb Shit.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 9:03 PM    in reply to eve cairo

She's a serious loonie whom we should ignore, but she provides too many giggles for me. DDS Esq indeed, but Jon Stewart said it best: "all your legal/dental/realty needs" can be provided by her.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 2:29 PM   

How does one satisfy her complaint? Even if she gets what she asks, I am sure she would accuse the original birth certificate was forged, or that the officials who presented the doc were covering up, etc etc. There's no way to deal rationally with her.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 7:26 PM    in reply to jtpm

Ironically, she would have no case even if Obama had been born in Kenya. The purported marriage of his parents in Hawaii was invalid since his father was married to another woman at the time. Children of unwed parents derive their citizenship from the mother.

Either way you slice it, Obama's claim on citizenship is rock solid, and equal to or stronger than that of John McCain, who was born in Panama.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 8:28 PM    in reply to Dogger

And McCain has a better claim than Oily Tits.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

R

user-pic

September 21, 2009 2:29 PM   

THAT is a captain in my army! No freakin way she makes height and weight standards

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 3:30 PM    in reply to R

Remember when Shrub and Rummie lowered the recruiting standards to make up for flagging numbers?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 4:52 PM    in reply to R

From what I understand, that Captain is a doctor. For some reasons doctors,and nuclear physisist don't have exactly the same height/weight requirements as "grunts".

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 5:25 PM    in reply to mcrose68

If she can administer emergency care, sew up wounds, pull out metal fragments and otherwise do what it takes to maximize a soldier's chances of survival, I don't really care that much how tall she is.

However, if she actually believes Obama is from Kenya, I would have some questions about her medical ability.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 2:29 PM   

How do I contact Orly regarding becoming her eye lash supplier? Contract would be worth a fortune.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 2:54 PM    in reply to Bushie

Try contacting the drag queen who sells Orly her eyelash glue.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 4:28 PM    in reply to Bushie

Forgeries?
Methinks the lady doth project too much.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 4:29 PM    in reply to Bushie

With the eyelashes, she looks like a lost droog from A Clockwork Orange

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 2:34 PM   

Hoboy. There is no discovery on rule 11 motions. She'll have to ask for it. Doesn't sound like she's done that yet. And I think hizzoner won't take kindly to that being the sum and substance of her responsive filing. She also has no grounds to request a rule 45 subpoena, as there's no active case anymore.

Furthermore, "order to show cause" means "tell me why I shouldn't". She's going to lose. She can appeal, but the standard of review is "abuse of discretion," meaning that unless the trial judge is smoking dope, his ruling stands. The appeals courts really defer to the trial judge on these kinds of issues. She's in a hole and rented an oil derrick.

Finally, the client's request is irrelevant to the presence of an ethical violation. It might help the fine some, but it doesn't change the fact that she didn't do the homework that she was supposed to do.

This just gets weirder. God forbid she starts doing real estate transactions.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 3:47 PM    in reply to rumpole

Can the California Bar require a psychiatric test as condition of continued right to practice? How about the Board of Dental Examiners or the Real Estate practice board?

Someone should. That woman is crazy.

If Taitz is an example of California lawyers then perhaps John Yoo is easier to understand. California must not have any minimum competency requirements for the practice of law.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 4:06 PM    in reply to Richardxx

Can the California Bar require a psychiatric test as condition of continued right to practice?

No. It's going to take a while (at least a year) but Taitz will eventually be reprimanded or even disbarred for her actions. In the meantime, she will be the subject of continuing laughter and amazement

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 8:38 PM    in reply to richard f

YYAAAYYYY!

Comic relief is too rare in politics -- unless politics is itself a legitmate form of entertainment.

I want FUN, damn it! And Oily Tits is as good an opportunity as any. Better, even, than O'Beck.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 6:11 PM    in reply to Richardxx

Yoo isn't a member of the California Bar, else someone would have nailed his disingenuous, incompetent, corrupt ass.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 8:17 PM    in reply to Bushie

ROFLMAO!!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 2:38 PM   

Ms. Taitz should be interviewed for this afternoon's Situation Room on CNN with Wolf Blitzer. We could call it a meeting of the minds, on a level playing field.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

TJF

user-pic

September 21, 2009 3:13 PM    in reply to BronxInTN

Betcha Orly would beat Wolf on Jeopardy! just by blurting out random answers.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 2:40 PM   

I'll tell you what, TPM. I just can't get enough coverage of Taitz. Seriously. Keep it coming. And hopefully you can figure out a way to up it a notch -- with every email exchange you have with her, word-for-word, or those others have had with her or phone calls or anything all all. Reprint and post anything she utters anywhere on the planet. More! More! More! Frankly, one post a day on her is simply not enough. Please, I beg you to do at least 2-3 stories a day on her. Keep 'em coming. Inquiring minds want to know.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 3:50 PM    in reply to twirling fartknocker

So you think the next cable channel will be a 24-hour per day all-Taitz channel? Should we start selling advertising?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 4:49 PM    in reply to Richardxx

Yes, and I want a cut of TPM's revenue for the ingenious idea that they never thought of, that is running Taitz stories every single day with no shame for their disregard for relevancy considerations. Weight every Taitz story on the front page as if something real and important actually happened. Give it the very top front page spot over and over.

I guess that's why TPM is "doubling" up on staff, so that we can have plenty more deep and meaningful stories like this. If this and the other stories on every last republican fart and burb are any indication, I simply can't wait.

Go Team!!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 8:46 PM    in reply to twirling fartknocker

I agree!

I don't think she's insane. I think she's both an utterly incompetent lawyer -- if she's even that -- and dumber than a box of dead and unresusitatable rocks.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 2:49 PM   

Suppose you went to the dentist, lay back in the chair, and all of a sudden there was Orly Taitz looming over your helpless choppers. Might make you wish for Laurence Olivier instead.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 8:49 PM    in reply to SqueakyRat

Or Jonathan Haze.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 2:50 PM   

The more we hear from Orly, the more it seems like judicial sanction will be insufficient - she doesn't need to be jailed for contempt, she needs to get some treatment for whatever's making her so paranoid. Maybe some of that evil "socialized" healthcare...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 8:18 PM    in reply to Matt Jones

You can't make someone not be a racist. This is what this woman is, a racist.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 2:54 PM   

Motion for reconsideration is a routine procedure and attorney is not required to get an additional consent from the client. Any attorney will confirm that.

I am an attorney, and that is just absolutely not true. It is just plain and simply flat-out false. If you are taking steps to seek reconsideration, particularly where you have been instructed not to file anything again, you had better damn well get your client's consent.

This woman is looking to get jailed. No question about it. She has gone well over the edge and wants martyr status, and will take the jail time.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 3:12 PM    in reply to LarsThorwald

Works for me. The more she is out there as a leading light on attacking the President, the better. Her ass in jail is a win-win scenario in my book.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 22, 2009 3:36 AM    in reply to LarsThorwald

Sounds plausible--looking to act so crazy, and screw up her actions in this case so badly, that she gets sanctioned, fined, maybe even jailed, all to try to milk the martyr angle.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 22, 2009 8:53 PM    in reply to LarsThorwald

Ah, yes. The "routine" motion for reconsideration.

Also known as "motion to accomplish nothing whatsoever other than to immortally piss of the judge."

Which would be why it's anything but "routine."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 3:03 PM   

Putting Oily Taint in jail would be giving her exactly what she craves — martyr status. It's far better to keep her on the outside embarrassing herself on a daily basis. Just fine her every time she steps over the legal line.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 3:15 PM    in reply to bluestatedon

I am fine with her in jail, but I also agree that there are merits in just fining the crap out of her at every turn. This way she pleads for money from the fright-wing loons, and leaches their wallets dry and thus denying funds to other winger campaigns.

Think of it as a wing-nut funding flypaper strategy.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 3:29 PM    in reply to Lestatdelc

Yeah, what he said -- WTF?!?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 3:31 PM    in reply to Schmed

That should go here....

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 3:55 PM    in reply to Lestatdelc

Maybe we should also fine the journalists who are reporting on her without including context ("She's crazy. Here's her latest insane rant."

Failure to include context is pure journalistic malpractice or FOX reporting by now.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 3:12 PM   

Orly Taitz: the gift that keeps on giving. I hope she makes a "comeback" in 2012. She's real mavericky. I like that.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 3:13 PM   

When you think about it she's not really that far out there for a "spokesperson" of the right. You've got cheating husbands (Sanford, Duvall), drug addicts (Rush) and perverts (Beck - remember the one that brags about make out sessions with his sister?).

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 3:16 PM   

"Beck - remember the one that brags about make out sessions with his sister?"

Whaaaaaat the...?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 3:57 PM    in reply to Lestatdelc

Here is a link to that story - I had to look it up. Read it all the way through.
http://www.newshounds.us/2009/05/04/glenn_becks_incest_fantasy.php

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 3:17 PM   

I can say that if I were trotting around the various forgeries that Taitz seems to accumulate like wallpaper, I'd be institutionalized if not incarcerated. So remind me again why Orly is guesting on talk shows...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 3:22 PM    in reply to 714Day

If Glenn Beck and Nancy Grace can get their own shows, what's so hard to understand about Orly being a guest?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 3:48 PM    in reply to 714Day

**Pure comic relief, dude.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 5:40 PM    in reply to greylox

but seriously... i think they have her on because the freak show generates ratings. Calm, reasoned discussion is left for PBS and NPR.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 22, 2009 3:43 AM    in reply to 714Day

At least if she's institutionalized, she'll be able to wallpaper her room with the forged birth certificates...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 3:38 PM   

Ms. Taitz should be able to recognize a forged letter..after all she has produced several.... Birth Certificate forgeries.... (however she seems incapable of identifying authentic documents..like the certified Birth Certificate (Certified by the State of Hawaii) of President Obama, that's posted at various web sites, all over the internet)..perhaps that is because she was not born in this country, and does not understand the process of authentic documentation (my understanding of Communist Russia was that documentation did you little good, if the KGB grabbed you) just goes to prove that not all ignorant racists are born in America

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 3:49 PM   

Good God. If she asks for discovery to prove she had a good faith basis for her factual allegations, she'll get sanctioned again. It's tantemount to an admission that she had no good faith basis for her factual allegations at the time she made them but was hoping to dig something like that up in discovery.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 4:16 PM    in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve

Does anyone know where The Taint got her dental license? If this is the way she practices law, I think that some rusty pliers and a bottle of scotch would be a reasonable alternative to going to her for a bad tooth.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 4:31 PM    in reply to Schmed

Orly Taitz: Marathon Woman
bzzzzzz- "is it safe?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 4:07 PM   

How long before "Oily Taintz" has her own FoxNews show??

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 4:29 PM   

The more I see and hear this woman, the more I'm convinced that she herself is a forgery.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 5:08 PM    in reply to we r all husseins

Yeah, I was wondering if she was real too.
Maybe her head exploded in some past episode and they stitched her back together with some fake parts.

She is programmed to keep repeating her talking points no matter what question she is asked in an interview. And she constantly interrupts everyone. Kind of like Cheney's daughter.
I wonder if she is being paid for her antics by some outside group.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 4:38 PM   

There is a shortage of palin-sent garbage and the media hates to look for news.
This is cheap bleached and prepackaged lunacy. What more do they need.
Sounds edible to most people who eat the fringe.
you know she has lines of people waiting to shake her hand or ger whatever to try and get some of that good insanity rubbed on themselves.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 4:45 PM   

"Nothing I disagree with is real!"

Most people learn that that is not an effective strategy by, what, four years old?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 5:33 PM   

She reminds me of Laura Schlesinger, only nuttier. She's a true circus side show, trying to become a headliner. And the more attention she gets, the nuttier she gets. Until comparatively recently, I had believed that by giving these fruitcakes enough rope, they'd hang themselves. But given the practically speaking-in-tongues reaction of their devoted fanbases, and the airtime which they have been granted, I'm not so sure now. I just don't get what draws people to these charlatans. I guess she's just the messenger du jour, stupid enough to parrot loudly their irrational conspiracy-theory nonsense. And there'll be another following her when she falls.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 5:44 PM    in reply to Nowukkers

whatever happened to Laura anyway? Does she still have a show? She kind of disappeared off the radar.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 5:52 PM    in reply to rynato

It is....alive! Although, who knows if anyone is listening. I got the feeling that the El Rushbo ate her lunch years ago.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 5:49 PM    in reply to Nowukkers

Dr. Laura Schlesinger is a "doctor" in much the same way The Taint is a lawyer: not what one would presume.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 6:03 PM   

No one has offered to marry Orly yet? You guys are mean! The lady may be looking for a loving shoulder to cry on, and what does Josef do? He hires a different lawyer!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 6:17 PM    in reply to baba2nde

She is already married, to some computer entrepreneur or something.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 7:05 PM   

Holy moly. I actually started to read her re-filing for an emergency stay after the court already dismissed with prejudice the original filing with this court. And she went there.

In the actual filing she explicitly states that the court either didn't read the original complaint or (and get this) is being controlled by, and in conspiracy with the executive branch. Get a load of this language:

"The fact that Court's 14 page order does not address any actual statements in Plaintiff's complaint by page or paragraph number, or any page citation to her TRO, suggest to a reasonable and objective mind that the Court either did not read these documents or was summarily instructed by that same illegitimate "chain of command" alleged above no to address at least three key questions asserted in Plaintiff's complaint..."

and then it goes even deeper in accusing the Court of conspiracy by saying:

"The Court's failure to address these three key issues again, standing alone, is suggestive that the executive branch is exercising control over the Court's decision making process, and is sufficient ground, by itself, to justify this Court's grant of an EMERGENCY STAY OF DEPLOYMENT for at least TEN DAYS..."

So she is saying, in the actual Court filing, that the Court either is incompetent or is in conspiracy with the administration.

Wow. Just plain wow.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 22, 2009 2:56 AM    in reply to Lestatdelc

This sounds more like a goofy You Tube comment than a court filing. I agree - wow.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 22, 2009 3:48 AM    in reply to Lestatdelc

She may be trying to appeal to the court's sense of humor.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 22, 2009 12:02 AM   

Oily tush-lawyer at large. You fakum-I'll breakum! Open 24/7. Call now & get a 10% discount.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 22, 2009 12:24 AM   

Palin - Bachmann 2012, with Taitz for Attorney General (or Director of Immigration and Naturalization?)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 22, 2009 2:54 AM   

So much for the validity of the CA bar exam that she somehow managed to pass. This is the kind of quality professional you get with an internet degree.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 22, 2009 3:20 PM   

That "DDS" thing must be pretty rare in legal filings. That's Doctor of Dental Surgery, no?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 22, 2009 5:26 PM   

I wonder if Oily Taints will get disbarred? She doesn't really seem like a lawyer. She seems like a loony.

Unless, of course, Barack Obama really is secretly a Kenyan Muslim communist, in which case Oily is a brave, dedicated servant of justice and the law.

But she seems like a loony.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 25, 2009 10:54 AM   

My daily chime ins:

1. Motion for Reconsideration: Taitz is showing her ignorance, again.

First, this is a significant, non-routine motion.

The rule in fed court is that the client must sign off (approve) on all significant filings. Even if it was routine (it's not) a competent lawyer always obtains client approval before filing most pleadings.

Motion is not routine - Evidence shows that reconsideration motions are rarely filed. This is because the standards for filing are strict and such motions are rarely granted (won), therefore most attorneys don't bother even considering whether to file such.

Standard or what you have to prove:

A. You have found new evidence, unavailable on the earlier motion and the new evidence is so significant that it might change the judge's mind. Or,

B. There was a significant change in law AFTER the judge ruled on the first motion. And like evidence, the change in law is so significant you have a shot at the judge reversing his ruling.

C. A motion to reconsider is asking the judge to reverse himself. As you might suspect, judges are not inclined to agree with counsel that a ruling just made 10 days ago (see below) was erroneous.

D. There's a short deadline after a judge's ruling within which a party must file a motion to reconsider, typically about 10 days. So all of the above would have to have happened within that 10 days.

I doubt Taitz meets any of these standards (significant change in law; significant new evidence). She appears to only be echoing the arguments made in the earlier motion and complains that the judge's order indicates he was a dumb ass in his first ruling. These are invalid or forbidden bases for a motion to reconsider. (One does not tell a judge that he or she was a dumb ass in his or her ruling.)

These motions are not routine, they are rarely filed or granted. So lawyers don't bother. If they were routine you would see them routinely filed, but they are not.

2. Disbarment: Taitz can be subject to California State Bar discipline if Rhodes files a complaint or if Taitz gets sanctioned by the court. (When "fined" more than appx. $1000 by a judge, the California Bar is notified so it can decide to take action against the attorney.)

I suspect Taitz can also be subject to disciplined for her saying on national TV that the fed Judge in a Los Angeles case is biased in her favor (she said that in an interview last week or so.) It's a violation of State law and Bar rules for an attorney to talk smack about a judge. I suspect the L. A. judge will sanction her for going on national TV and mischaracterizing his rulings, the status of the case and saying he is biased toward her because, among other things, was a Marine (implying HE is a true American, while the other judges are not).

By law judges must be fair, neutral and avoid even a hint of bias toward one side or the other. Taitz basically said on national TV that the Judge Carter (the L. A. judge) is not neutral.

3. D.D.S - Yes, that is kooky and rare that Taitz signs some of her pleadings with a "D.D.S." in the title or puts the designation on her name in the pleading caption. That she does this is another bit of evidence confirming she is a fool and mental slob.

4. Rule 11 Discovery - There is no such thing. The court is not going to let Taitz use a Rule 11 OSC (Order to Show Cause) to back door the case, meaning litigate the main case to show there was merit to it, and on proving such allegations, escape Rule 11 sanctions.

Besides, the issue is res judicata. Several judges have ruled that there is no merit to the birther plaintiffs' claims. On whether to fine the lawyer, so to speak, the judge is required to rely on the earlier findings by that court and/or the other judges' rulings.

So Taitz is mistaken (or once again showing she is a dumb ass) if she thinks that she is entitled to some sort of "relitigation of the issues or case" (or what she calls Rule 11 discovery) to defend against an OSC why sanctions should not be imposed against her.

Taitz is in a world of hurt with that OSC. What it means is the judge is inclined to impose sanctions and is giving Taitz an opportunity to convince him why he should not. That's a difficult task for Taitz, best done in a professional manner, not by going on national TV and acting like a fool or badmouthing the judicial system or confirming she is nuttier than squirrel sheet.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on