TPMMuckraker

Tea Party Group: Obama Is Both Goebbels And Mengele


Las Vegas tea party

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

So as you may have heard, the Tea Partiers are set to get back in the news next weekend with a big "March on Washington" to protest health-care reform, the bailout, climate-change legislation, and all those other intolerable encroachments on freedom that the Obama administration is planning.

The Tea Party Patriots -- which, along with the corporate-backed FreedomWorks, is the prime organizer of the march -- have worked hard to portray their movement as a reasonable, principled, non-violent opposition. Among the confirmed speakers for the rally are GOP lawmakers who are leaders of the conservative movement like Jim DeMint, Mike Pence, and Marsha Blackburn.

But sometimes the darker side of the Tea Party scene slips out.

On their website, the Tea Party Patriots list other Tea Party groups around the country, as a resource for activists -- one of which is a Connecticut-based group called the New Boston Tea Party. And on its own site, The New Boston Tea Party makes clear that it's helping to turn people out for the September 12 march.

But the New Boston Tea Party hardly offers the kind of reasoned, respectable opposition that the Tea Party Patriots attempt to embody. Currently, the site's lead item -- about the president's planned speech to school kids next week -- is entitled "Dr. Barack Goebbels Obama, Chief Reichmaster Tuesday September 8, 2009." Another recent post, based on the false "death panel" rumor, discusses Nazi doctor Josef Megele's human experiments on concentration camp inmates, before declaring: "WE NOW HAVE ANOTHER DR. MENGELE, AKA BARACK HUSSEING (sic) BARACK MENGELE."

It's worth noting that the Tea Party movement is intentionally decentralized. Anyone can start a group with the phrase Tea Party in the name, and put up a website. And there's no way that the Tea Party Patriots can monitor them all, or prevent them getting involved in the march. Even listing the New Boston Tea Party on the TPP site may be indicative of nothing more than sloppy vetting.

But in a sense, that's exactly the point. It's basically impossible for the "respectable" leadership of the Tea Party movement to ensure that their ranks don't include the kind of people who call Obama both Goebbels and Mengele in the space of a few days. And that's because, frankly, unhinged crazy people simply make up too great a proportion of the movement to be kept permanently at arm's length. If you're going to connect people to local like-minded groups around the country, some of them are going to be like this.
Indeed, we're pretty confident that, with a bit more digging, it wouldn't be hard to find a few more local groups that use similar rhetoric and that are welcomed under the Tea Party umbrella.

That's less an indictment of the Tea Party leaders than it is a sad commentary on the state of the "small-government" conservative movement.

Join the Conversation!

100 comments

Recommend Recommend (8)

September 4, 2009 1:43 PM   

These people are so pathetic! I am just waiting for Fox to make a reality show out of this crap!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 2:30 PM    in reply to GTFOOH

They already have. It's called Fox & Friends. Or Glenn Beck. Or Sean Hannity. Or Bill O'Reilly. Take your pick.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 3:23 PM    in reply to jeffgee

I would bet that 80% of this small group[ note the camera angles and tight shots and looped same faces] do not know who these monsters really were!.. ANY more than they know who really guards their Healthcare! Just names feed to them by the republican liars and propagandists...These people are being made victims once again by the wingnuts!

Look what congress did last week to PROTECT their donors over the elderly on medicare:

The House on Tuesday voted 242-181 to approve an operating rules package (H Res 5) that eliminates the Medicare trigger, which requires the president to submit a plan to contain Medicare costs if they reach a certain level, CQ Today reports. The trigger was approved as part of the 2003 Medicare law. Under the law, if 45% or more of the program's funding comes from general tax revenues for two consecutive years, the president must submit to Congress legislation that would slow spending over a seven-year period and make the program financially stable. The trigger went into effect for the first time last year

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 7:00 PM    in reply to Docb

Forget about them being made victims again. They never fucking learn. They have been victims all of their lives and apparently they like it.

Fuck them.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 5, 2009 6:04 AM    in reply to Docb

Agreed. But it's known that we can't reach simpletons without simple messages (I know, I know: but how else can we describe someone who actually believes this horsey do?).

It's got to be like:

  • Do you like your Medicare? Who brought that to you? Democrats.
  • Do you like your VA benefits and care? Who brought that to you? Democrats.
  • Do you like your Social Security disability coverage? Who brought that to you? Democrats.
  • Who said that "if we create Social Security, we invite socialism into our country!" Republicans.
  • Who said that if we offer Medicare, we turn the country into a socialist state and government will take control of everything? In 1961? Republicans. (Specifically: Ronald Reagan, accepting pay from the AMA to make a record that says so.)
  • Who opposed granting medical coverage for our soldiers, who put their very lives on the line to fight for your right to spout crazy talk, saying it invites a form of Marxism into our government and will be the ruin of our way of life? Republicans.

But this approach, of course, suggests that these people will listen to such answers anyway. And yet we keep the topic alive by discussing the "merits" of this one-sided conversation.

I'm torn, because we need to know this is happening out there, and where this stuff comes from. However, at the same time, we, like the Corporate Mass Media, keep the crazy in the headlines through all these headlines and all the vid clips. And all the attention keeps the corporate sponsors pushing the people who gobble up the crazy in front of cameras. And... round and round.

These nutbags are going to march on DC on Sept. 12? So should any and all who support reform.

The cameras wouldn't be able to open up their lenses wide enough to take in that crowd.

But where is the forming line?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 5, 2009 5:51 PM    in reply to Docb

I think you got this backwards. The elimination of what is called the 45 rule is good for Medicare recipients and bad for wealthy taxpayers.

The 45 Rule was introduced to over time make it impossible for Medicare covered seniors to find physicians who would accept them while building in a structural advantage for private insurers offering coverage under Medicare Advantage.

I'll double check tomorrow but think you are barking up the wrong tree here.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 6:59 PM    in reply to jeffgee

Oh my goodness. ROFLMAO

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 7, 2009 5:29 PM    in reply to jeffgee

And they already have their very own Dr. Mengele's. The CIA's Doctors who oversaw torture.

"Another recent post, based on the false "death panel" rumor, discusses Nazi doctor Josef Megele's human experiments on concentration camp inmates, before declaring: "WE NOW HAVE ANOTHER DR. MENGELE, AKA BARACK HUSSEING (sic) BARACK MENGELE."

It should read, WE HAVE HAD ANOTHER DR. MENGELE, THEY WERE THE DOCTORS OVER SEEING BUSH'S TORTURE PROGRAM.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 9:50 PM    in reply to GTFOOH

How many will die waiting for the trigger! Thousands...It does not kick in till 2013 and then it must adjududicated...

Trigger is the republican/democrat gimme to the HC corporations...Shameless the Congress just eliminated the trigger for medicare!!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 5, 2009 4:21 AM    in reply to GTFOOH

I'm telling ya... MSM has become Jerry Springer 24/7.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 5, 2009 6:46 AM    in reply to Dedalus2k

Here's my personal campaign at rebranding: I believe calling the MSM "mainstream" gives them credit and a legitimacy they no longer deserve (though they once did).

With the few exceptions like Bill Moyers, Rachel Maddow and, through occasional flashes, Stewart, Olberman and Bill Maher, there are no regular voices representing mainstream America on the TeeVee.

But the TeeVee still reaches more people at once than any other medium.

(Sorry Internet; hey, I'm a web developer by trade, so I'm on your side. But show me a single set of CTR data showing 500K or a million pair of eyes taking in a single blog or even a viral video in one sitting and I'll eat my questionable shorts.)

TeeVee is still a "mass medium." Maybe 500k people watch a Rachel or Olberman show. Maybe a million watch (sorry... gag reflex here) O'Reilly.

A ton of people watch the old broadcast networks and CNN, MSNBC and, yes, Faux News.

What unites them all (with the few exceptions cited above)? They are all owned by very conservative corporations (I know; a redundancy). And they serve up a stew of confusing cacophony that proposes, through their level of air time, that the 20-30% of the American population that is today's Republican party still represents a "mainstream" voice.

In a day when Democratic majorities were elected to both congress and the WH, CNN persists in having Republican guest speakers at a 4- or 5-to-1 ratio to Democrats (check ThinkProgress updated report). Hell, I hate to even say this, but Faux News is wa-a-y better than that according to the same ThinkProgress report!

Flat, supposedly "neutral" C-SPAN, funded by cable companies, almost half of which are owned by Rupert Murdoch, almost without fail, has Republican talking heads speaking up until 8 am on Washington Journal. You know, right up until people have to drive to work? Every day.

MSNBC comes in around a 3-2 ratio. Not even as "fair and balanced" as Faux News even.

That's the way they respond to their (conservative) corporate overlords. They continue to give legitimacy to a dwindling minority faction's voices by how much air time they give to them. And that is how stories like this crap fest sponsored by FreedomWorks, United Health and all the other medical/insurance industry interests stays alive and has momentum.

That ain't "mainstream" messaging.

I propose dumping the credibility granting MSM brand in favor of "Corporate Mass Media." That's the reality that separates this channel of information from all the spew on the TeeVee machine.

And CMM is as quick to text as MSM.

Just a thought.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 1:44 PM   

How far we've come. 8 years into Bush's presidency and openly criticizing him meant censure by the House and tearful apologies. Today, it's called Super Tough Guy Patriotism!!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 5, 2009 6:59 AM    in reply to Chris

No. In psychological diagnosis terms, it's called "projection."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 1:50 PM   

I'll keep repeating this for everyone, but these analogies are not on the fringe anymore. Follow your right wing twittersphere, and you'll see the Mengele stuff has been out there for months, even being repeated by elected officials. Only they used to say Zeke Emanuel was Obama's Dr. Mengele.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 1:53 PM    in reply to fbacon2

Absolutely! I'm with ya, read here.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 1:52 PM   

Does this movement, in its tone and content, appeal to anybody who wasn't already there in the 2008 campaign? These seem to be the same people who backed Palin (while holding their noses for McCain). Is this a hardening, shrinking core, or a growing movement? Aren't they alienating the broader electorate?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 2:35 PM    in reply to Terry Carroll

It's like the tigers in the Little Black Sambo story chasing each other around the tree until they turn into butter. The GOP is distilling itself into something much more vile and rancid than butter.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 7:01 PM    in reply to jeffgee

Wow, I remember that story.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 2:36 PM    in reply to Terry Carroll

No. These are the same people who were screaming socialist, terrorist and baby-killer.

Kos has a poll up that shows where Obama's poll erosion has come from -- Democrats and independents.

Democratic support for Obama has dropped by 17 points in 3 months; independent support, 10 points. That is all because of Obama's bipartisan, let the Republicans lead you around by the nose and, to use Josh, bitch slap you all across the country. From the stimulus to health care, GOP hissy fits have worked on members of Congress and Obama has not led with the passion and strength he needs to keep them in line.

So Democrats that worked their asses off to get him elected and get us to 60 are throwing up our hands asking what was the point?

The sad truth is that Bill Clinton had accomplished a lot more in his first 8 months than Barack Obama and he had a much more conservative Congress to work with.

We're still in Iraq (and no closer to coming home in reality)
We're getting further bogged down in Afghanistan
We have taken no action on Bush tax cuts (yes, most expire in two more years)
We have made little progress on energy conservation
We are stuck in the mud on health care

2009 is the easy year; 2010 is when it is going to be more difficult to pass stuff. Fail on health care and 2010 will be flat out ugly in terms of getting any real reform passed.

Then does anyone think 2011 gets better?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 1:53 PM   

Video of woman at anti-health care protest explains her sign, "Hitler had his ovens, Obama has hospice":

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_DTzjwLx39w

I'm guessing she's on medicare. Socialist.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 2:42 PM    in reply to Yoda Urbinato

That is damn scary. The woman stands there and with no sense of irony, repeats a string of fabricated talking points to equate medicare to the systematic genocide of the holocaust.

And then as an example of how the SEIU, Acorn and Move-on.org have been "physically attacking" anti-reform protesters she recounts how she was "accosted" by a young jewish woman who took offense to the comparison between the murder or millions of jews and health care reform. (Sorry for the play-by-play, it was just too crazy to keep bottled up in my head.)

I now understand why republicans didn't want mental health issues covered by health insurance. What would happen to their foot soldiers? Although I'm not sure if militant ignorance, extreme self-delusion and cognitive dissonance technically qualify.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 5:39 PM    in reply to Stiggs

Yup. Same reason for No Child Left Behind. Keep 'em spewing the data you poured into them, or you and your school will be shut down - no critical thinking or they might realize how we are exploiting them.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 6:44 PM    in reply to Powkat

In the interest of full disclosure, all of my knowledge about no child left behind has been acquired through casual exposure. That being said, I really don't get the thinking behind the program at all. I think that there are a lot of things that came out of the Bush years that are just down right ineffective and this may well be one of them. Poorly thought out, poorly executed with incredibly poor results.

That being said, it is worth thinking about what the hell they were trying to accomplish. Was there a competing progressive plan that it supplanted? (Think DHS.) It's possible that there were indoctrination plans in the works. That the law would somehow be paired with ideas like intelligent design and Texas style US history down the road (do those things really qualify as ideas?).

However, it could be as simple as Bush wanting to build his "compassionate conservative" cred by doing something "you know, for kids". Or maybe he was trying to shed his noninquisitive, anti-education reputation (the first thing I remember learning about Bush was a quote where he said "education isn't a priority for me", as a professional student that completely ruined any hope of him gaining my support). Or, getting back to my initial theory, he's just an idiot who was stumbling through the bulk of his presidency and didn't really have the intellectual capacity to develop "plans" or "goals" so his policies were a schizophrenic combination of which ever advisor's view point caught his attention at a given moment. Who knows (though that last one makes a lot of sense).

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 5, 2009 11:02 PM    in reply to Stiggs

It is an effort to stupify by distracting from actual learning to focusing on testing, testing, and more testing. It has the additional "benefit" of instilling obedience to authoritarians.

Ultimately, it is part of the effort to destroy the public school system.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 6, 2009 4:19 AM    in reply to Powkat

It just so happens that Neil Bush owned a huge standardized testing company when the bill was passed, but I'm not sure of his current stake in the company.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 5, 2009 10:57 PM    in reply to Stiggs

There are two forms of paranoia:

1. Clinical. This is easily spotted if one can think logically (clinical paranoia is a thought-stream of nonseqiturs).

2. Not knowing the facts, so filling in the blanks with conjecture, and jumping to the worst of conclusions.

The first is a negative megalomania: "Everyone in the world knows who I am -- and is agianst me."

The second is lack of education.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 2:50 PM    in reply to Yoda Urbinato

That was funny...although scary.

"We paid into medicare against our will...but now that we have it, that Adolf Obama is going to take it away and that ain't right!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 1:56 PM   

It's worth noting that the Tea Party movement is intentionally decentralized.

I wonder. Can anybody think of any movements that use a distributed power structure? One where there are small individual groups which operate fairly autonomously from the central command. Almost a "cell" like organizational plan. It's right there on the tip of my tongue.

I keep thinking Amway but that doesn't feel right. It's more political with perhaps a tinge of violence and religious zealotry. Oh well, it's probably not important.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 2:36 PM    in reply to Stiggs

Heavily encouraged by Roger Ailes's propaganda network.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

dal

user-pic

September 4, 2009 1:59 PM   

I'm uncomfortable raising the question, but it is an honest one, if anyone can enlighten us. Why aren't Jewish organizations flipping the eff out over this stuff? It seems to me that, of all the groups that can claim moral outrage at this teabagger rhetoric, the ADL (et al) could cut through it with a sharp "Oh, no, I'll tell you what fascism is..." line. I'm curious if any journalists have approached them for comment on any of this stuff...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 7, 2009 1:14 PM    in reply to dal

Actually, they have been. See, for example:

http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/political-media/anti-defamation-league-blasts-rush-limbaugh-for-hitler-crack/

http://www.njdc.org/blog/post/harris_on_obama-hitler_comparisons


Did anyone pay attention? Of course not. The right wing filth can do anything they want and the SCLM lets them - Murdoch and GE and Disney have too much to lose if they let their wingnut talking heads shed any credibility.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

dal

user-pic

September 8, 2009 12:38 PM    in reply to tomfodw

The internets are awesome! thanks!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 2:04 PM   

Oh please. Dissent is now unfashionable due to the election of Obama. Give me a break.
http://thereluctantconspiracytheorist.blogspot.com/2009/08/bush-as-hitler-remember-when.html

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

dal

user-pic

September 4, 2009 2:15 PM    in reply to The Reluctant Conspiracy Theorist

I'll grant those images / comparisons were frequently cheap and similarly unconvincing, but I don't actually recall seeing any until after 1) the "bush doctrine" of pre-emptive war and 2) leaks about US personnel torturing detainees... both of these gravely violate principles that were directly derived from the lessons of WW2. I'm just sayin... the Left, then, had at least some reasonable basis...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 2:22 PM    in reply to The Reluctant Conspiracy Theorist

This is the reason for the dumbing down of America. People like you, showing “evidence” that supports distortion without context is the crux of the misinformation, that feeds the racism, ignorance and delusion. This purported evidence that you are showing is of a single person who submitted a video to a advocacy organization and was never sanctioned and nod nod winked winked by the Democratic leadership. There is a BIG difference, and the fact that you don’t want to know it, speaks volumes to your ability to revel in your ignorance.
http://my.barackobama.com/page/event/detail/gpklj4

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 2:38 PM    in reply to AhTrini1

Wait'll Texas gets to dictate what textbooks are used nationwide. Then the real Idiocracy begins. A nation run by stupid obese people.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 5:05 PM    in reply to AhTrini1

Just so I get this right, please speak s-l-o-w-l-y and hopefully I will be able to understand your enlightenedness...it is OK for whatever fringe group it was to protest with hateful Bush signs, but NOT OK for another fringe group to protest with hateful Obama signs. Am I understanding you correctly? If not it must be because I was part of the "dumbing down of America" through the progressive school policies. I do not care if your Democratic party sponsored this rally, these pictures, or whatever. The president of the U.S. was being depicted as a Nazi then just as the president of the U.S. today is being depicted as a Nazi. Those are the facts. You see it differently because you feel it was right for the Evil Bush but not for Dear Leader Obama. Both were wrong, now put on your big girl/boy pants on and get over it. http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=612

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

dal

user-pic

September 4, 2009 5:46 PM    in reply to The Reluctant Conspiracy Theorist

Actually, you didn't read my comment... there is a substantive difference. The Bush Admin oversaw policies that broke the Geneva Conventions, developed from the lessons of WW2, specifically torture. Obama has not. He's, in fact, worked to end those policies, and his AG is now knee deep in figuring out how the US can keep on this side of an international war crimes tribunal. It is that serious - this is why "somebody's" gotta take the fall for it under US law, lest the US cede jurisdiction to the Hague for prosecution under international law.

Similarly, the wire tapping, blind patriotism, fear-mongering against "the other," and "you're with-us or against us"-ity could all be accurately likened to essential components of fascism.

I agree though - nazi comparisons are generally unpersuasive, polarizing, and cheap no matter where they come from, but there was an apt basis for the comparison under Bush 43.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 6, 2009 6:32 PM    in reply to dal

My reply was to AhTrini1 for the following reply: "This is the reason for the dumbing down of America. People like you, showing “evidence” that supports distortion without context is the crux of the misinformation, that feeds the racism, ignorance and delusion. This purported evidence that you are showing is of a single person who submitted a video to a advocacy organization and was never sanctioned and nod nod winked winked by the Democratic leadership. There is a BIG difference, and the fact that you don’t want to know it, speaks volumes to your ability to revel in your ignorance."

You, dal, had points I'm willing to consider. Sorry for the misunderstanding.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 5, 2009 6:10 PM    in reply to The Reluctant Conspiracy Theorist

Hmm.

Permanent Majority, Arbitrary Executive, Project for a New American Century, PATRIOT Act, American Exceptionalism, Homeland Security, "Watch what you say, watch what you do" voiced by the President's spokesman.

None of those were introduced into American discourse by DFHs with BDS. But man they translate easily into at least one Euorpean language.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 3:13 PM    in reply to The Reluctant Conspiracy Theorist

Kind of an interesting claim. From the perspective of people protesting, it's far less popular now than it was during the Bush era because there is less to be pissed about.

From the perspective of reporting, dissent is the new black. Tens of thousands of people went out and protested Bush's policy, both foreign and domestic and that got nary a mention. And when they did, it was often dismissive. A couple hundred or a couple dozen medicare recipients protest socialized medicine and now the media is all over it and acting like they somehow have a point.

I think dissent is a wonderful, powerful and incredibly important part of our society. I just think it's worthwhile for the protesters to be reacting to something that is real rather than being manipulated by corporate interests to fight windmills and fear the thing under their bed.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 5, 2009 11:09 PM    in reply to The Reluctant Conspiracy Theorist

No, dissent is not prohibited.

And that dissent includes critical evaluation of the views of those dissenting for whether they are true or false.

Your view, and those tyou defend, are patently false.

In addition, fruit-loop:

Bushit, et al., characterized criticism -- dissent -- as unpatriotic EXCEPT when it supported his subversions of the Constitution.


Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 2:04 PM   

I wonder if anyone is organizing a counter protest for the same time?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 2:12 PM    in reply to twoviragos

There is a counter protest march on September 12th, but we don't want anyone biting off anymore fingers....

http://my.barackobama.com/page/event/detail/gpklj4

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 2:18 PM    in reply to AhTrini1

Why not? One less finger Obama will get!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 7, 2009 9:27 PM    in reply to AhTrini1

The beauty of that incident was that the finger was bitten off of an anti-HC reform moron who attacked a pro-HC reform guy. The finger was re-attached; the man was on Medicare. Oh, the irony.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 5, 2009 3:44 PM    in reply to twoviragos

I heard of a pro-health care reform March scheduled in Washington, for the same time, from my sister in Asheville, NC. This has (apparently) been organized for some time, with busses for travel, etc.

I'll try to get some more info.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 2:09 PM   

May the heavens open and drop buckets of shit all over them for their unamerican activities!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 2:26 PM   

They LOVED fascism when Bush and Cheney were practicing it.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 2:29 PM   

Ever notice how many of them look like that horse-faced woman wearing the purple BandAids at the 2004 GOP convention?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 2:32 PM   

Hey, how about some coverage of the pro-reform voice for chrissakes. All anyone just about anywhere is reporting are these fringe crazies. There has been a big push for reform this past week in Seattle and no one is covering it. I've posted some pictures from a rally last night and wrote a little about it in a cafe post. How does one get the word out? Here is a link to the photos http://s844.photobucket.com/albums/ab9/digitatious/

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 2:52 PM    in reply to Bademus

Agreed! Seconded!

Great photobucket, thanks for sharing!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 4:34 PM    in reply to Bademus

If you wanted coverage, all one of your crazies had to do was bite off a finger.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 5, 2009 11:16 PM    in reply to The Reluctant Conspiracy Theorist

Or show up at politically VOLATILE political events armed?

The Founders/Framers would NEVER have allowed that: they recognized that it infringes the freedom of speech of those who hold different views than the gun-nut.

And that it is a threat to public safety.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 6, 2009 6:38 PM    in reply to JNagarya

Showing up with guns was a really bad idea. I do not sanction that.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 7, 2009 7:08 PM    in reply to The Reluctant Conspiracy Theorist

So whi are the crazies?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 2:40 PM   

September 12th in DC? The same weekend of the Black Family Reunion on the National Mall.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 2:51 PM   

Anybody else find it ironic that the real reason the original Tea Party happened was because the price of tea had been slashed low enough that smuggling was no longer profitable? Essentially, a few wealthy criminals convinced the common people to defend their "right" to profits.

In that light, the protesters defending the "rights" of the insurance industry makes a lot more sense - it really is in the same spirit as the original!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 2:52 PM   

Hey Gramma, Grandpa..you are idiots..advocating for Corporations (like the Private Health Care Corporations) to take over your lives, and "our" (we the people) government, IS fascism..you old fools..do you remember how to "look up" definitions in the Dictionary..? Or is your old brain not working that well anymore...?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 7:04 PM    in reply to Chabuka

If only it were just the grandma's and grandpa's it would be okay.

This is all about racism. It cannot be anything else. They hate it that a Black man (and brilliant one at that) is President.

I hate these racist muthafuckas

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 3:18 PM   

How very sad that everyone of the people in these crazy groups failed American and World History in school. How else to explain their inability to see the parallels between themselves and Goebbels and Hitler. A quick check of Nazi propaganda from the 1930s, 1940s reveals a very eerie similarity--between the Nazis, the Brown Shirts, and these nut jobs. Maybe if they had been better students in school...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 3:19 PM   

Does anyone else find the right's comfort and familiarity with the players and events of the third reich a little disconcerting? Granted, I am no scholar of the period but I have only a vague notion that Goebbels was a nazi and if you said Dr. Mengel to me I'd be likely to respond: "that's Mendel and actually he was priest, not a doctor".

It probably doesn't require mention (due to obviousness), but they do seem to have an unsettling fascination with all things nazi.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 5, 2009 6:27 PM    in reply to Stiggs

Anyone familiar with the slogan "Never Again" needs to be familiar with the names of Goebbels, Eichmann and Mengele. That only the Right maintains historical remembrance on this is truly frightening.

I remember vividly that in the fifth grade that my teacher put up two numbers on the blackboard. I was the only kid in class that was able to ID them as the pre-war and post-war population of European Jewry. For everyone else the 6.5 million difference drew a blank and this was 42 years closer to the end of WWII than we are today.

So I am not amused or bemused that only Reichnuts are familiar with the personalities, concepts, and language here. Instead I find it thoroughly disturbing.
ann

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 4:19 PM   

Here's what this gang has in common;

All are a mile wide and a half inch deep.

Most get their news exclusively from right wing sources.

Most are undereducated and politically unsophisticated.

Most couldn't last past the first 2 minutes in a debate.

Most were never picked to play in a choose up game.

For the first time in their lives they feel as though they belong to something.

Most haven't had an original thought in 30 years.

They finally find one another in the world, they come together, then its, Group love in; Group hate out.


Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 5:12 PM    in reply to JohnW1141

Here's what YOUR gang has in common;


Most get their news exclusively from LEFT wing sources.

Most are undereducated and politically NAIVE.

Most couldn't last past the first 2 minutes in a debate WITHOUT INSERTING RACE INTO IT.

Most were never picked to play SPIN THE BOTTLE.

For the first time in their lives they feel as though they belong to something.

Most haven't thought in 30 years.

They finally find one another in the world, they come together, then its, Group love in; Group hate out.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 5, 2009 11:24 PM    in reply to The Reluctant Conspiracy Theorist

There aren't any left-wing media sources of consequence.

But your oversimplification makes it clear why you believe anything right of center but left of Hitler is "Left".

Winston Churchill, an enemy of Hitler, was a Socialist. Get over it.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 7, 2009 10:22 AM    in reply to The Reluctant Conspiracy Theorist

The Reluctant,

but at least I'm original.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 5:13 PM   

I can assure you that the majority of people in the tea party movement arn't the extremists your choosing to focus on. The majority of us are tired of all politicians that have been lying to all of us in order to control a base of power. We are sick of the lies from Bush, Obama and all those elected officials who have stopped listening to the people they are there to serve. I would love to have a country where we could all have the same health plan as those we send to Washington have. However reality rears its ugly head. Our country is crippled with debt, Our government has chosen the path of political expediency over wisdom. Its now easier to promise us what ever it takes to pacify the masses than it is to fix the problems we have. If Health care for everyone is the goal shouldn't we first make our elected officials fix the deficient. While we reign in our own habits of living on credit and then once we have a solid stable financially sound base to build from then as we can afford it work on a solution for the country. To think that our country can support this Debt at this time is insanity. If we allow the monstrosity that this public health care bill has become to be added to Medicare and Social security as they now stand we would be doing nothing more than building this countries future in quicksand and we will topple and sink.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 8:03 PM    in reply to Artimus101

"We are sick of the lies from Bush, Obama and all those elected officials who have stopped listening to the people they are there to serve."

Funny how you managed to control all that outrage through 8 years of Bush lies ... just a coincidence, I guess.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 9:13 PM    in reply to cawleybo

"Funny how you managed to control all that outrage through 8 years of Bush lies ... just a coincidence, I guess." I totally agree with what Artimus1 wrote and you have posed an excellent point. I wonder myself where I was during those years, and during many years before that. I kick myself now that I realized I was one of those boomers just trying to get through the week. This last election woke me up because for me there wasn't any choice. Just different flavors of the same bad food.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 5, 2009 12:14 PM    in reply to The Reluctant Conspiracy Theorist

Lemme get this straight: Obama proposing what will inevitably turn out to be a minor regulatory fiddling with the insurance industry combined with the functional equivalent of a bailout (forcing people who can't afford insurance to buy it anyway a.k.a. "individual mandate") pisses you off enough to care, but raining death on thousands based on a blatant lie didn't?

I'm not a fan of Obama either. I'm not a fan of ANY government in fact, as I find the concept of "representative government" to be a myth, used as rhetorical cover for political elites & their friends to enrich themselves at the expense of the average person (who, realistically speaking, has no actual power whatsoever when they have to depend on the word of those far removed from their life). I would rather that, in the long run, the public ditch the idea of collective action by proxy & just do it ourselves, dissolving the State. But even with that, you cannot tell me that he's done more harm in 8 months than Bush did in 8 years. It's just impossible.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 5, 2009 10:26 PM    in reply to Fried Chicken Lover

"I would rather that, in the long run, the public ditch the idea of collective action by proxy & just do it ourselves, dissolving the State." I'm leaning that way myself, just don't know what that would look like in reality.

"But even with that, you cannot tell me that he's done more harm in 8 months than Bush did in 8 years. It's just impossible." It's not about doing more harm, just continuing the process. By the tone of your post, you must know that Obama is just a puppet as was Bush.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 5, 2009 11:28 PM    in reply to The Reluctant Conspiracy Theorist

Troll.

Tearing down Bush -- now that he's out of office -- while defending far-right lunatic fringe "teabaggers" who are from the same point on the political spectrum as Bush -- in effort to pretend you are objective about tearing down President Obama, doesn't cut it.

Go back to Freeperville -- and take your racism with you.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 6, 2009 7:07 PM    in reply to JNagarya

JNagarya: too bad you have such a narrow view and have to blame everything on racism. I'm glad I found TPM because I'm trying to understand other views, something you have decided are unnecessary because anyone with a different view than yours is a "far-right lunatic fringe teabagger" troll. Luckily I have read some posts that really give me something to think about. Other posters, like yourself, can't seem to have a discussion with out throwing out racism, because God knows, why else would anyone be against Obama?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 7, 2009 10:41 AM    in reply to The Reluctant Conspiracy Theorist

The Reluctant said:

".....I'm glad I found TPM because I'm trying to understand other views, something you have decided are unnecessary because anyone with a different view than yours is a "far-right lunatic fringe teabagger" troll. Luckily I have read some posts that really give me something to think about. .....

Your noble attempt to hear other views by coming here is laughable when one looks at your posts; no searching for truth among them.

So tell me, what posts have you read that 'really gave you something to think about' and tell me, well, what you arrived at by thinking about them.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 7, 2009 7:31 PM    in reply to The Reluctant Conspiracy Theorist

"JNagarya: too bad you have such a narrow view and have to blame everything on racism."

1. Your party-before-country extremist ideologues who pander to ignorance lost. We won. I won't be so "broad-minded" as to be persuaded that that isn't the reality.

2. This is how extremist propaganda works:

"you . . . blame everything on racism."

That word "everything": it asserts an impossible perfection which doesn't allow for exceptions. It doesn't allow for exceptions. It is an attempt to box a person in with irrationality. With the usual irrational extremism of "always" and "never".

I don't blame everything on racism; but I do blame some things on racism, and that includes all the unhinged far-right lunatic fringe nutballs who scream about "taking our country back" -- from those who WON the election -- and ludicrous nonsense such as "communist"/"socialist"/"fascist".

That sort of towering ignorance contributes nothing -- but it isn't intended to contribute: it is intended -- and this has been beyond admitted to boasted -- to destroy: because President Obama is black; not half black and half white; and certainly not white, even though the latter is as true and as easily said as "black".

With no regard whatsoever for the damage done the country. Shit, even when your asshole Bushit was in power the Constitution and rule of law was less than a technicality to you America-haters.

In that America-hating fringe view, no rules apply to anyone except all who aren't you. One one hand, there's whining about "being against the First Amendment" whenever your hateful lunacies are critiqued, refuted, and called what they are. But, on the other, let someone express a view you don't like, and the First Amendment ceases to exist.

"I'm glad I found TPM because I'm trying to understand other views, something you have decided are unnecessary because anyone with a different view than yours is a "far-right lunatic fringe teabagger" troll."

That's why your arrogant assertions are perfectly undoubted certitude. So perfect they need not be critically evaluated by the person who holds and asserts them. Because they are of the far-right lunatic fringe loon who is too damned ignorant to be able to be wrong.

Your arrogant certitude and condescending tone is that of the typical far-right lunatic fringe troll. Which is why I say you are that.

"Luckily I have read some posts that really give me something to think about."

Only as information to manipulate and attempt to get around.

"Other posters, like yourself, can't seem to have a discussion with out throwing out racism, because God knows, why else would anyone be against Obama?"

There isn't any legitmate reason to be against PRESIDENT Obama coming from those on the far-right. All of them are extremist HORSESHIT. He is not communist, socialist, fascist, or anything else of the kind; and neither are his policies. In fact, he's a centrist, and even right of center on some issues. The only excuses for the baseless hatred from the far-right lunatic fringe are two:

1. He isn't a right wing extremist who hates Constitution and rule of law.

2. He isn't sufficiently white.

Here's a secret for you: capitalist corporatists -- those you loons defend while they pick your pockets -- are actually FOR socialism. This is how it works:

They privatize their profits, and socialize their pollutions and losses.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 7, 2009 12:31 PM    in reply to Artimus101

Let me get this straight - you are tired of being fed lies by the politicians of both parties? Fair enough. I am too.

Yet you take in all of this Tea Bagger nonsense? This is all a media-driven (specifically Fox News) "astroturf" movement, that is being orchestrated by the Republican Party through its connections to the media. You do not seem to understand that you are STILL BEING LIED TO BY POLITICIANS! Why do you believe the likes of Beck, Hannity, O'Reilly any more than you would believe a politician?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 5:40 PM   

These Tea party people are delusional. Go to the Al Franken posted on the front page today and check out the T-shirt the woman in the middle of the picture is wearing. You would think that if she just looked down from on top of her neck she'd see that the logo isn't really a teapot, it's the red, white & blue Repub elephant on it's back, which is a true fact. Just look down lady!!!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 9:09 PM    in reply to kaylaspop

Although, now, looking again at this woman's tee, if she looks down she actually sees an elephant. It's only the rest of us that see the image as it is.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 6:22 PM   

These comments by the fringe right aren't all that surprising anymore. It doesn't help to point out the irony of their remarks or to ask them where they were when Bush was screwing over the country. Here are some of the fringe elements I photographed in Sacramento:

http://www.coffeesee.com/2009/09/02/151/

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 6:37 PM   

In case you aren't yet sick enough, donations to support this march are apparently tax-deductible. Brilliant.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 7:32 PM   

One has only to scan the faces of these people to see that the filter in this particular gene pool has not been changed in a long, long time.

Natural selection will weed these cretins out of the population over time. Not to worry.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 5, 2009 12:14 AM   

Must be the rent a mob Limbaugh is always talking about...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 5, 2009 11:29 AM   

For the record, what you are looking at when see the crowds gathering at a Tea Party event is a genuine grassroot upwelling of Americans who are not happy with the way things are going in this country. If this was not true, no amount of corporate sponsoring, or behind the scene maneuvering could have produced and maintained this kind of sustained political activism, and that is what is frightening the bejesus out of the political elites, both left and right.

There are a lot of independents gathering around the Tea Party banner as well for the same reason. Both the thoughtful and the crazies have a right to express themselves at a Tea Party event. Indeed, allowing for all to express themselves within a political movement is the very essence of a genuine, democratic, grassroot moverment.

All are welcome, because the fundamental message of the Tea Party movement is the enlightened recognition that partisian politics is the true divider of the people's interest in achieving the common good for all. Only the people can speak for the common good for all. Therefore, the political goal of the Tea Party movement is to give We the People a voice, allow it to speak and to be accurately heard above the voices of the political elites and the special interests within our political system.

Now, where is Obama's long-form birth certificate?

ex animmo
davidfarrar

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 5, 2009 6:42 PM    in reply to davidfarrar

Farrar you are so full of it and yourself.

Google 'flashmob'. 5 reasonably connected twenty somethings could get similar numbers to gather doing any goofy thing they chose at will. Rush and Glen just have millions of "friends" on tap.

Plus we have authenticated reports that media stringers told Congressmen their events would get no coverage without fireworks.

This movement is only slightly less organized than the Nurembourg Rallies.

Okay that is a stretch, but only because Rush and Glenn are too dim to even get a copy boy post in Herr G's message shop.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 5, 2009 12:23 PM   

I must continue to state that TPM's negative reporting on "Tea Partiers" is unjustified and damaging to your site's reputation.

Maybe too many of you were busy campaigning for or celebrating Obama's election to remember, but the whole tea party idea came back to life as a protest to the bailouts. It had huge support form all political walks of life, and many of the "teabaggers" (as the homophobes on TPM refer to us), were protesting Republican representatives.

I protested with everyone from Socialists, to Democrats, to Ron Paul nuts against the bailouts. It has _nothing_ to do with politics. It has to do with the fact that our country is in financial ruin (and no the fact that the stock market is up does not mean things are fixed).

And since when did associating the arguments of the stupidest members a group with the whole become standard journalistic practice at TPM? Do you remember how it felt when Republicans were associating Ayers with Obama? Well take a look in the mirror because that's what TPM is doing now. Congrats on helping keep American politics in the gutter.

Lastly, of course the tea parties are not centrally planned. Your site's not so subtle comparison of widespread independent political demonstration to terrorism is absolutely vile. The protests started as a grass roots reaction to the bailouts. Republicans are just glomming on to the movement as they are the party out of power. I won't be attending any Republican or anti-health care tea parties, but you can damn well but I'll continue to protest with all varieties of Americans over Bush and Obama's continued corrupt policies, particularly in finance.

Last question: who's going to muckrake TPM Muckraker?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 5, 2009 4:33 PM    in reply to matty

Yep, a grass-roots reaction that was aggressively promoted by Faux News. I'd also note that the bailouts weren't a subject of protest until *after* Obama was elected. Apparently, Shrub's $350b blank check to Goldman Sachs + co. was OK.

Oh, and there's a strong precedent for calling "tea party" participants terrorists. Or did you forget Nixon's use of the FBI to infiltrate and provoke virtually every anti-war group?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 6, 2009 2:05 AM    in reply to Matt Jones

The fact that Fox News promotes dissent under a Democratic majority doesn't change the fact that the tea parties began as grass roots protest.

The bailouts were very much the subject during this time in 2008 and Congress had some of the most heavy feedback ever during their passage. People on both sides of the aisle were not happy and the first vote even failed.

http://money.cnn.com/2008/09/29/news/economy/bailout/index.htm

It is highly unusual for a vote to be brought to the floor and fail. The reason it failed was massive and immediate feedback from constituents. No there weren't demonstrations, but that was due to the speed the legislation was passed, not from a lack of dissatisfaction. Surely you don't dispute that?

If you'll remember, it took the bankers bringing together the financially illiterate Obama and McCain campaigns to get that beastly legislation through.

And wow, comparing the tea party participants to terrorists like Bin Laden... No comment.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 5, 2009 11:34 PM    in reply to matty

Protesting based upon lies, against fantasies, is as far-right lunatic fringe as it gets.

And your claims to have protested with other than far-right lunatic fringers -- such as socialists -- while shrieking against "socialism" is transparent horseshit. Worse: transparent nonsense.

Are you paid to lie? Or do you do it for free?

Pack up your racism and go back to the America-hating Freeperville sewer.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 6, 2009 2:20 AM    in reply to JNagarya

Greetings JNagarya. Was this New York protest against the bailout lies and fantasies from the far-right lunatic fringe?

http://airamerica.com/blog/2008/sep/25/code-pink-bailout-protest-new-york

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFFCP9o_nyo (New York Bailout Protest 9/25/08)

I'm paid to write computer programs, and I do my best not to lie. I ask that you refrain from judging me just because I'm not jumping in with the anti-protest commentary with the rest of TPM's readership.

I don't shriek and I don't paint people as socialists, or "far-right lunatic fringers" even. People have widely differing views and it's unfair to lump them together.

I've marched with Socialists, Democrats, Republicans, and Ron Paulites to help stop the destruction of America's financial system and I'm sick of TPM smearing our work and calling us terrorists.

I don't know what I've said that you think is racist, but I agree that a sewer may be a better place for intelligent and pleasant discussion than TPM's message board...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 6, 2009 2:49 AM    in reply to matty

Did those protesters show up armed?

Did they accuse anyone of being "socialist" and "Marxist" and "Communist" and "Fascist"?

Were they unreasonable? Unhinged?

Did they spew venimous hate based upon and consisting of lies?

If not, then there's no legitimate comparison.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 6, 2009 12:52 PM    in reply to JNagarya

Greetings JNagarya. NYC has very strict gun laws so no one showed up armed of course. Keep in mind though that gun laws vary from state to state and city to city, and in many areas of the USA carrying weapons is legal. Here is a diagram that gives you an idea of which states allow open carry:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:USA_Carry_Map.jpg

No one accused anyone of socialism, though there were significant numbers of self-designated socialists marching with us:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/leesean/2888158639/

Comparisons of Bush to Hitler and similar figures were of course extensive, which makes me wonder: JNagarya, have you ever even _been_ to a protest?? People at protests are almost always unhinged because they're deeply upset about how their country is being run. They wrote letters, they called their Congressional reps, and when that didn't work all they could do was take to the streets.

The one thing that I would cede to you is that the protests are indeed more intense now. That is less a matter of politics though, and comes more from the fact of 16% unemployment, reduced wages, bankruptcies, credit card defaults, and more. Bush, Obama, and our Congress have burned their credibility.

There are always nuts at protests, and hence my frustration at TPM and other news sites "reporting" on this and spinning their own fantasies about why this is happening instead of examining the simple economic realities of our country.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 7, 2009 6:22 PM    in reply to matty

As concerns gun issues: I've been going toe-to-toe and eye-to-eye with gun nuts for over twenty years. Though not to my liking, it is a citzen's responsiblity to participate. And there obviously is a need for pushback when the issue is deadly.

"JNagarya, have you ever even _been_ to a protest??"

Have I ever been to a protest?

I became vocal against US involvement in Vietnam in high school during the same month it began being the nightly news. By the turn of the year 1965-66 my pacifism crystalized.

During most of 1968 I was full time active against that involvement. That included candlelight vigils, signing petitions, marches -- I was usually at the front with the clergy, as that is where I was most comfortable.

I knew Abbie Hoffman and Jerry Rubin -- they were assholes. (The bright red line of our disagreement, aside from their one-note tactic: they held the view that humans are political animals; mine was that humans are social animals.)

So I've seen the sorts of craziness than can happen, though when I was around there was very little of it because I was able to prevail on the few -- usually immature -- who tended to get a bit too enthusiastic.

In recent years, though, there has been more craziness.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 7:59 PM    in reply to JNagarya

JNagarya that's good to hear. Even though you consider me a "far-right wing", "rascist", "paid liar" on TPM, we'd probably get along just fine in person as I tend Democratic on most issues. Maybe I'll see you around once the Republicans are back in power. Best wishes. :)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 6, 2009 10:32 AM    in reply to matty

While it is mildly amusing when the TeaBag dissenters whine about bad press. Let me harken you back a few years!

Millions marched here and abroad opposing the Bush Administrations policies on illegal wars, torture, spying and extended long-playing tolerance of WAR PROFITEERING? Those dissenters barely got a column inch and were everywhere instantly dismissed (if even noticed) and never offered the closeup and the BIG-MEDIA Megaphone Moment.

The TeaBaggers whine, in theory about their voices not being heard (while disrupting public discussions) that they are not getting respectful coverage. I have to laugh!. And what do we see seniors on social security, who ignoring great VATS of IRONY, denounce expansion of medical coverage for their fellow Americans as SOCIALISM. And unlike the ANTI-WAR voices of just a few years back, we get to hear it again and again in the MSM Echo Chamber.

Calling a moderate like President Obama a socialist reflects at best poor education and at worst simple ignorance. The hysteria of these new converts to fiscal responsibility, who never noticed the BUSH ADMINISTRATION tax policies nor objected to the fiscal impact of the Bush Administrations two "OFF THE BOOKS WARS" and the endless cozying up to the ENERGY INDUSTRY. Well some of us did notice and we objected (seemingly unobserved [by the MSM at least]) when along with BIG PHARMA, the Energy Giants and VP Cheney made a killing during those dark years of the BUSH junta.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 6, 2009 1:07 PM    in reply to rwspisak

Vulgarity aside, you do make some interesting points. Why are protests of bailouts and health care covered so much more intensely than anti-war protests? Does the media consider anti-war protests non-events?

People did complain about Bush's fiscal policies--McCain in particular, oddly enough, and of course the usual small group of fiscally-sound Libertarian types. You are right though that the country as a whole was not critical to the degree they are with Obama. I believe the reason for this is that Bush got to utilize the final interest rate pump before our credit bubble burst. People are largely happy as long as their stocks are up and they have a job. Under the Bush administration that was the case for about 7 of his 8 years. And of course the housing bubble was a load of fun for a lot of people.

If Obama were really politically savvy, the first thing he should have done when he got in office is to tear down expectations. Use the correct unemployment percentage. Stop misleading people about the idea of a social security fund and recognize the program as the ongoing expense that it is. Force banks to eliminate their excess leverage or take them into receivership. Place all securities into an open market where their prices are viewable to all market participants.

Instead Obama kicked the can and borrowed more money from our kids, just like Bush. The only change is that Obama has almost run out of money to borrow and he won't be able to get the same results from that irresponsible strategy. It will be interesting to see if he has the sense to change course or if he will be a one-termer.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 5, 2009 12:31 PM   

He is also Lenin and Marx, hahahahahahahahahaha

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 5, 2009 5:28 PM   

The tactics of the Republican right of disrupting town hall meetings, wearing firearms to speeches of President Obama, stridently claiming that President Obama is a socialist and communist, and recently, even claiming that a planned Presidential lecture to school children encouraging them to stay in school will be propaganda are very reminiscent of what happened in Germany in the 1920s. The only difference is that the shouters are not (yet) actually physically attacking pro-health reform and pro-Obama people.
Here is a chilling reminder of those times in Germany (taken from Wikepedia):
“On 4 November 1921 the Nazi party held a large public meeting in the Munich Hofbräuhaus. After Hitler had spoken for some time the meeting erupted into a melee in which a small company of SA distinguished itself by thrashing the opposition. The Nazis called this event "Saalschlacht" (meeting hall battle) and it assumed legendary proportions in SA lore with the passage of time. Thereafter, the group was officially known as the Sturmabteilung.”
What is truly ironic is that the shouters even call President Obama a Nazi, being totally ignorant of the historical precedent for their own behavior.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 6, 2009 10:38 PM   

Nobama1, the Newest Virus
Of a Political Pandemic

During recent congressional townhall meetings, “healthscare” advocates have released a new virus which is spreading across the nation at a pandemic rate. The virus, labeled as “NoBama1”, is very contagious. It results in the disease Hypobamaparonoiditis”, for which there is no known cure as yet. The symptoms are hallucinations that cause victims to become overly suspicious and fearful. As a result they see their mission as scaring others into believing that their lives, freedom and wealth are being put in jeopardy by sinister motives of President Obama and his administration. Because the illness affects the way a person thinks, those infected no longer are able to distinguish between fact and fiction or between truth and lies. Symptoms are easily recognizable by disruptions, shouting and screaming and the repetition of “Rushed”, “Foxy”, and “insaHannity” messages that “Beckon” them in the radio and TV airwaves that pollute the atmosphere.

The Nobma1 virus was first detected in January 2009 in tea bags being sent to congressmen in protest over the medicine being prescribed by the government to help overcome the discomforts and pain of a once-healthy economy that had collapsed because of a systemic lack of oversight. Democrat congressmen mostly tossed the tea bags into wastebaskets while Republican congressmen who savored the tea-bag nectar were rapidly infected. The effect was traumatic; so much so that not once, but twice, the infected congressmen shouted in unison to oppose and vote against the administration’s prescriptions. By the beginning of spring, the virus had spread to Bluedog Democrats were tempted to sip the tea-bag nectar. These Democrats began displaying symptoms of “Hypobamaparanoiditis” during the debates over the second round of government prescriptions to restore the economy’s health.

The symptoms continued among Republicans and the Bluedogs as Congress debated national healthcare reform. But not until the August recess when Congressmen held townhall meetings did the Obama administration realize how contagious the Nobama1 virus is. With pandemic speed “healthscare” advocates coughed up their infectious, identical hyperbole from one meeting to the next unconcerned about the true facts.

Apparently there is no stopping the spread of the Nobama1 virus and the resulting disease. Its carriers see insidious motives in every attempt by President Obama to bring about his pledge of “change.” Even a televised speech to school children across the nation as schools reopen, encouraging them to pursue educational goals and not become dropouts, has become the target of Obama protesters with the same familiar use of scare tactics successfully used by the previous administration to stay in power for 2 terms.

As Congress returns this week to resume its work on Obama initiatives, Republicans seem pleased with their pandemic. The summer recess failed to ice the tea, and the tea pot filled with tea bags continues to boil. On Wednesday when President Obama speaks to a joint session of Congress we will know if his promise of bi-partisanship reform is doomed and in the subsequent weeks we will find out if Hypobamaparanoiditis can survive a full term of the Obama administration.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 7, 2009 1:07 PM   

I'm with Obama, and was with the anti-Iraq War movement from the beginning, but I also remember cringing at some of the behavior of demonstrators during the war. The coalition was heterogeneous to the point that for many it was simply an opportunity for people to get their fifteen minutes, or for celebs to get on camera. You had the celebrants who were just there to party. Then you had the well-meaning who diluted the message with items from their own agenda.

The present administration has adopted many of the programs and even methods of the previous one and I can't fault them in every case, because they can't afford to let some of the powers that Cheney/Bush seized to be removed from the presidential tool kit (note the return of the GWOT, for example). I hope that they will be as steadfast as their predecessors in ignoring the noise made by people who failed to defeat them in an election.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on