Just when we thought the American Private Police Force saga might be over, a putative APPF "investor" has come forward -- anonymously.
KULR in Montana reports on a "California man" who claims, under condition that his name not be used, that he is one of several private individuals who gave APPF money for the Hardin jail project.
There's no mention by the investor of that "major security firm" parent company APPF long claimed to have.
Apparently operating under the assumption that APPF is made up of more than just 'Captain' Michael Hilton, the man told KULR that several private individuals (yes, that's plural) who gave APPF money are now looking into opening the Hardin jail without Hilton.
And they are trying to verify "the source of prisoners Hilton claims to have." Which also strikes us as an odd claim, given that Hilton himself claimed last month -- to KULR, no less -- that the deal was primarily about a security training center: "We don't really want to get into the prison business."
Meanwhile, APPF is spreading a little oppo research on the man Hilton falsely claimed would be the director of operations at the Hardin jail. Michael Cohen, of Ohio-based International Security Associates, served over a year in prison after a 2004 felony conviction for stealing from his then-employer, the Secret Service, the AP reports.
Which raises the question: if you're going to all the trouble of fabricating a director of operations and sending his resume to town leaders, why pick the guy who just got out of prison for theft?

TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

KeithL
October 8, 2009 12:05 PM
They were probably cellmates.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Johann
October 8, 2009 2:54 PM in reply to KeithL
Of course, we should trust those investors who gave their hard earned money to a fraud like Hilton.
They have demonstrated how competent they are to do anything.
.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Cool Blue Reason
October 8, 2009 12:12 PM
Okay, this is the part that makes the least sense to me, and I don't think it has ever been fully addressed: How the hell does a private corporation "get" prisoners???
I mean, what the hell? The state has a monopoly on incarceration, as far as I know. Taking away people's freedom is not something that can be fully privatized within constitutional limits (I mean, prison operations can be run by subcontractors, but they don't "get" the prisoners). And it makes no difference whether you're talking about citizens or undocumented immigrants -- they get at least *some* due process of law and are not subject to arbitrary kidnapping and imprisonment by a for-profit enterprise.
If we're talking about federal, state, or local governments transferring prisoners to the site and paying for that service, then it makes sense -- but it also means APPF isn't offering Hardin anything "special" in that regard.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
EH
October 8, 2009 12:23 PM in reply to Cool Blue Reason
They're probably just referring to the acquisition of state/fed/whatever contracts to house existing convicts. I don't think they're talking about creating them in the first place.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Hedonistic Pleasureseeker
October 8, 2009 12:25 PM
I can't stop looking for that parent company. Worth checking into:
Managment and Training Corporation, Utah
Office in Youth Corps building at:
2830 North Ramshorn Dr
Mt. Laurel MT 59044
406-628-7850
They are the largest contractor for the Department of Labor. Specialty: Training and employment, but they got into the prison business in the 1980's. It LOOKS as though the MTC (has?) had a contract to run the Southwest Detention Center (Riverside County CA), which I THINK was on the list of early private detention centerss(sorry I don't have my notes with me right now). Having a really hard time figuring out when the Southwest Detention Center was established, but it was one of the original illegal immigration facilities.
How I found them: That would make this comment too long, BUT! Suffice it to say I looked up the original owners of privatepoliceforce.com (now defunct, but the registration showed some Oct 1 2009 activity, don't know if it's meaningful), saw the county they were from (Riverside) and through some windy road ended up with MTC.
Why MTC is an interesting candidate: One of their top executives, Lane McCotter., Lt. Col (Ret), Military Police, ran Leavenworth and a few state prison systems, and was appointed by Ashcroft to design a prison system in Iraq (aka Abu Graib). His involvement might be controversial enough to make the TRA keep mum about the parent company.
MTC doesn't have any Homeland Security contracts directly, (that I can tell, at least) but indirectly though partnerships with other entities.
I'll check this particular rabbit hole later this evening. I'll let you know if it's empty.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Hedonistic Pleasureseeker
October 8, 2009 1:19 PM in reply to The Hedonistic Pleasureseeker
Oh, forgot the Serbia connection:
McCotter's bosses while serving on the Iraq prison project (ICITAP) were the Chief of Staff (Michael Turner) and the Deputy Director (Carr Trevellian V) of the Kosovo Police Service School during the UN peacekeeping mission. Trevellian also served in a coordinating capacity on behalf of the Macedonian National Police. Interesting, given the whole Serbian crest flap.
FWIW McCotter was cleared of any wrongdoing during the Abu Graib torture scandal
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
NitPicker1
October 8, 2009 1:31 PM in reply to The Hedonistic Pleasureseeker
You are ascribing to Michael Hilton's assertions about his company a degree of veracity that is in no way supported by any evidence.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
NitPicker1
October 8, 2009 1:44 PM in reply to NitPicker1
I mean to say, there is no parent company. My suspicion is that Hilton hinted (or fraudulently demonstrated) that he was a front for some national-security outfit, the CIA or whatever, and hence it was a matter of patriotic duty for Peterson et alia to keep their mouths shut about just who they were convinced was backing this sham operation up.
Otherwise, I'm just plain mystified about why the TRA board would have any reason not to say who they think the "parent company" is. (Well, maybe profound embarrassment if they just let it go at that without asking why a legitimate operator would be working through this guy in the first place.)
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Hedonistic Pleasureseeker
October 8, 2009 2:26 PM in reply to NitPicker1
There is a parent company. You will see.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Douglas Simon
October 8, 2009 3:06 PM in reply to The Hedonistic Pleasureseeker
As long as he can get someone to believe his con he'll continue pocketing money.
Guys like this can be very convincing. Just google Robert Hendy-Freegard http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Hendy-Freegard
or Michael Garveigh
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article6632578.ece
You see a pattern?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Douglas Simon
October 8, 2009 3:29 PM in reply to Douglas Simon
...oh wait theres more.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/lawandorder/4339320/Conman-who-pretended-to-be-MI5-agent-tricked-victims-out-of-300000.html
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ben33
November 10, 2009 8:14 AM in reply to Douglas Simon
What you will not hear in a follow up story is that Michael Garveigh has been exonerated of all charges. Garveigh was set up by the other man involved. The media has a way of dramatizing these situations and almost convicting people before all the facts are displayed. It also seems that follow up stories never arrive with the true facts.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
NitPicker1
October 8, 2009 1:21 PM
From that Gazette article:
Hmmmm.... this joint is never going to operate as a jail.
But a convention center, hmmmm. Maybe operate a boutique theme hotel - "Jailhouse Rock". Looks like Hardin's students have a ready-made theme for the prom.
Are those kids attending the banquet going to spend the night in the pokey too?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
pqowieur
October 8, 2009 7:06 PM
Sep.16 "After Tuesday's meeting, Peterson said he had talked to APF representatives and has seen documentation of the parent company's work."
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5ifOx0LPKy5B_0KAyPHyNTEqdQz6QD9AOHIIO1
So is he saying that documentation included the name of the parent company?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
pqowieur
October 8, 2009 7:13 PM
Sep.20, betting on mystery company, BG, Becky Shay
> Shay says, in effect, APF will be the Hardin PD
> City Council to meet [Sep24].
"That hearing... ...is to gauge public opinion on the city breaking from the county for law enforcement services. The city and county have been at odds for years about the law enforcement presence provided by the Sheriff's Office."
> Hilton says if Hardin creates PD then APF will "provide" chief of police, police cars, "training center" officers "to support the city", and "Hilton said that during a trip to Hardin... ...he was shocked to see people selling and using drugs, so he wants to have two narcotics agents in Hardin".
http://www.billingsgazette.com/news/state-and-regional/montana/article_babd814e-a591-11de-8891-001cc4c002e0.html
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
pqowieur
October 8, 2009 7:44 PM
BG, Kimmerick, Oct.6
> Peterson and Bond Brokers indicate if APPF gives financial info, then deal proceeds.
"Peterson... ...spoke with Michael Harling, the vice president of Municipal Capital Markets Group in Texas, who brokered the sale of bonds to finance the jail. He said Harling has asked Hilton... ...to produce a detailed income statement and a statement of financial activities. If Hilton does not produce that information, Peterson said, he will consider discussions with APF at an end. If we get that, we'll continue discussions," he said."
http://www.billingsgazette.com/news/state-and-regional/montana/article_906384fa-b303-11de-9381-001cc4c002e0.html
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Kropotkin
October 8, 2009 8:10 PM
October 8, 2009 7:55 PM
We broke the story on Hilton as a fraud on the 10th, four weeks ago.
We broke the story on his criminal record and regular losses as a defendant in fraud, breach of contract and eviction proceedings, and bogus bankruptcy filings on the 25th, two weeks ago tomorrow.
The media has followed in our path.
We have seen nothing to date to convince us that he was anything but a one-man sting operation, with a few extras in the cast as needed. Becky Shay passed her screen test by failing her intelligence test.
I wonder if he had someone call posing as an "investor?" He had the lawyer whom he gulled in Santa Ana meet with dullards from Hardin and introduced him as a "Major," in the "APF." He had a "Sgt. Martin" with him as well, in Orange county as well as Hardin. He tosses out "commissions" like cheap beads at Mardi Gras, including creating himself as a "Captain."
So was this mysterious "investor" "Hilton's" two-bit thespian doing "Daddy Warbucks," playing his role to the wretched and hopeless officials in Hardin, or just some prankster adding fuel to the fire?
For-profit prison get their prisoners from states and municipalities, and from Federal agencies. They have been frequently convicted of corruption, as it is a pervasively corrupt enterprise. Dozens of executives, legislators, lobbyists and other elected and appointed officials languish in jails and prisons.
Selling these prisons as "economic development" to desperate cities with naive or corrupt officials' cooperation is where the real fraud is at. "Hilton" is but a sideshow.
More material than anyplace in the world on this sordid industry can be found at: www.privateci.org
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
pqowieur
October 8, 2009 8:27 PM in reply to Kropotkin
Regarding "Sgt.Martin"...
Oct.6, BG
> Man answers call to David Gilberts phone #, as "Sgt.Martin". [Hiltons refered to his lawyer as Mr. Martin also?]
"Convery... ...said afterward that she remembers meeting Hilton [in California], one other person who may have been associated with APF but seems to have specialized in wind power, and a man named David Gilberts, whose business card identified him as APF's communications director. A call to the California number on Gilberts' business card was answered by a man who identified himself only as Sgt. Martin, who said he was with APF. At first he said no one named David Gilberts worked there, but, when told about Gilberts' purported position with the company, Sgt. Martin said, "He's not here," and then referred all further questions to Shay."
http://www.billingsgazette.com/news/state-and-regional/montana/article_3819f80a-b23c-11de-9b80-001cc4c03286.html
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Johann
October 9, 2009 9:17 AM in reply to Kropotkin
"I wonder if he had someone call posing as an "investor?""
Why would he need anyone else? He could have made that call himself - posing as an investor.
.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
pqowieur
October 8, 2009 8:37 PM
Sep.24, BG -Becky Shay
> They are trying to say Hilton is/was not the owner? Becky Shay said he was.
"As part of the offer, APF owner Michael Hilton said he'd help launch the police force by helping with hiring and providing the first vehicles."
http://www.billingsgazette.com/news/state-and-regional/montana/article_9215c76a-a98d-11de-8127-001cc4c03286.html
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?