We've known since last week that the story surrounding a deal that handed an empty jail in Hardin, MT, to shadowy private security company American Private Police Force just wasn't adding up. Today, it became still more clear that APPF has a lot of explaining to do.
Let's review the developments:
The contract signed by APPF and Hardin makes clear that controlling the prison was the least of it -- the contractor was also given the right to run the town's law enforcement operations.
Spooked attorney Maziar Mafi, who previously voiced confidence in the project and was once falsely described by APPF as its president, severs ties with the company and the jail deal.
APPF rolls out new name and scrubs Web site of a few absurd claims (including boast of kidnapping services); other absurd claims remain.
California defense contractor Allied Defense Systems threatens legal action, claiming that APPF has plagiarized wholesale from Allied's Web site.
Hardin official tells TPMmuckraker APPF has lined up a "highly qualified" ex-military director of ops for jail project -- but he's in Afghanistan right now.

TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

Lestatdelc
October 5, 2009 6:59 PM
This read like some bizarre G. Gordon Libby op, mashed up with the classic Nigerian Prince money transfer email, scam
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
HeyThereItsEric
October 5, 2009 7:03 PM
More plagiarism, still live as of 10/05/09, 5:50 Central time:
Page on kidnapping. I've highlighted difference in the text in bold.
International Counterintelligence Services, Inc. page on kidnapping and ransom services:
I won't quote all the rest - every sentence in the APPF page appears word-for-word on the International Counterintelligence Services, Inc. page. (Exceptions: "ICS" becomes "APPF"; "this kind of situation is a positive one." becomes "this terrible kind of situation is ultimately a positive result")
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SfcMayhem
October 5, 2009 7:47 PM in reply to HeyThereItsEric
They have plagiarized, and stolen copywritten photos from many different companies' websites. I have forwarded information to many companies regarding this, and their website will be changing many times like it did yesterday. Until Michael Hilton gets arrested for this con, and possible federal charges. Wouldn't it be sweet if he is the prisons first inmate? I know I would get kick out of that!!!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
HeyThereItsEric
October 5, 2009 8:18 PM in reply to SfcMayhem
The extent of the plagiarism is bewildering... These guys are like Scooby Doo villains. What baffles why they thought a hilariously incompetent website was better than no website.
My question: Is APPF the only one of whatever it is? Or simply the only one that's getting exposed?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
slb
October 6, 2009 2:42 AM in reply to HeyThereItsEric
Bewildering indeed; they evidently even plagiarized the errors. (In the excerpt, "worse case" should be "worst case." Actually, "...who you can trust" should also be "...whom you can trust," but I'm lenient on that one -- I'd rather see "who" used as an object than to see "whom" stuck where it doesn't belong. Not that the problems with that copy begin and end with those...)
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JNagarya
October 6, 2009 1:41 PM in reply to slb
In this instance I unreservedly agree that they deserve to have the full force of the AmerEnglish Grammar Police come down on them.
It isn't bad enough that they plagiarize -- STEAL -- while claiming to be "law enforcement"; but they must also be illiterate in their native language!?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
midnight rambler
October 6, 2009 4:00 AM in reply to HeyThereItsEric
They're actually not the only ones; I did a search to see if they were ripping someone else off and found that it seems to be epidemic in the PI business. APPF:
http://www.usaprivateinvestigators.com/Home.html
http://wixinvestigations.com/
http://www.mcminvestigation.com/
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Ickyma
October 5, 2009 7:12 PM
This is really amazing stuff.
I'm sure the Libertarians are creaming themselves over such a prospect... but it gives me the heebeegeebies...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Lestatdelc
October 5, 2009 7:12 PM
This could end in the zenith of ironic comedy. Michael Hilton along with other co-conspirators, is indicted and convicted of fraud and various other illegal activities in this scam, and ends up in prison... and it is.. (wait for it) the unused jail in Harden where his incarceration and prison term is served.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
HeyThereItsEric
October 5, 2009 7:20 PM
APPF plagiarism, still live as of 10/05/09, 6:10 Central:
APPF page on Fugitive Recovery
Identical text, character for character (Exception: single-spaces instead of double spaces after periods; corrected phrase "For instances" to "For instance") at Global Fugitive Recovery, 2nd paragraph under "INTERNATIONAL"
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
HeyThereItsEric
October 5, 2009 7:38 PM
APPF plagarism, still live as of 10/05, yada yada yada. Differences in bold
APPF page on Special Forces Training:
Matcal International Security Services, International Training - section entitled "Law Enforcement Operations":
What's strange is that some of the source pages for the plagiarism seem to also be replete with haphazard grammar (e.g. "For instances" "extensive tactical firearms instructors"), some of which APPF actually improved. Makes one wonder if the whole industry isn't fishy, and APPF simply got too visible.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SfcMayhem
October 5, 2009 7:50 PM in reply to HeyThereItsEric
Most people do not utilize proper grammar and punctuation. Since computers have become so dominant in society, people have gotten lazy and rely upon spell check, and other tools. Oh, and I do realize that was a run on sentence!!!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
pqowieur
October 5, 2009 7:43 PM
I'm beginning to believe less that its a Hilton "scam" ($ or god knows what). I'm starting to believe that its going to take Gitmo like people. Yes I know Becky Shay said 'they would not be taking Gitmo detainies' but given APPF/TRA track record on incredibly covert and misleading behavior, who knows. Maybe they will "laundry" Gitmo people or other terror suspects and have them wind up in Hardin. At this point I kind of hope this is the case. I'm just totally freaked out about the possibility that its a Hilton "scam" (God knows what those intentions are/would be).
I wish it was just a simple private security firm operating the jail, but it obviously is apparently much more than that.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SfcMayhem
October 5, 2009 8:27 PM in reply to pqowieur
It is a scam... nothing less, nothing more.
I have verified with many govt sources the following:
APF/APPF was formed in march of this year. Thus has never completed a contract. Somewhere Hilton was reported as referring to a retired army colonel by the name of Richard Culver. Well unless a 114 year old retired army colonel is in Afghanistan training someone, he is also eluding the record of being the oldest person alive! Col. Richard Culver retired from the Army in 1947.
Not one shred of evidence they have EVER held a contract ANYWHERE.
Not one person in the industry has ever heard of them before they were in the news back in September 10th. I have worked in the industry, and have known people in the industry since 2003.
State Dept. has never had an application for export/sale of restricted items abroad. This would be necessary for them to have sold weapons to Afghanistan. Also as the company founder is convicted felon, they could not get one no matter how hard the try.
Michael Hilton cannot get a job doing security work in any state with his background.
I also witnessed his DUI arrest on march 14th 2003, as I just got home on leave right after my 21st b-day and was out celebrating with friends. Some friends went out to smoke, and as we were out there a HBPD cruiser rolled a silver sedan, and a man fitting his description was the driver. We watched till they cuffed him.
the number of aliases he has alone is enough grounds to dismiss him from any real kind of job, let alone one doing this kind of work.
Conclusion, he is a criminal, and not a good one at that. This is a piss poor scam he is running. No conspiracy or grand scheme, other than his own, because if you were planning something bigger, would you use this guy given his background? I know i sure as hell wouldn't even hire him to clean my toilets.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SkepticRising
October 6, 2009 1:00 AM in reply to SfcMayhem
I agree with your conclusion that it's a scam, but what is the payoff? A scam implies that they get a big payoff from someone without having to actually perform. But no one involved in this seems to have any money. Are they trying to get control of the detention facility to work some scam on someone else? Are they trying to get established so they can actually get government contracts? What's the payoff?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
brillobreaks
October 6, 2009 5:41 AM in reply to SkepticRising
It's what's called the "big store" con. A con artist sets up a fake business and hires some unwitting but legitimate people to make the business seem real. He then uses this real seeming business to attract investors, customers, get contracts, get people to buy his services, etc. Meanwhile, he makes off with their money, leaves the business and unwitting dupes holding the bag.
In this case, Hardin, the Two Rivers Authority, and it's jail are likely the 'big store'- innocent people sucked into this not to take their money directly, but to give APF some sense of legitimacy so he can scam people with money.
The AP reported on this a week ago when this Hilton guy's record first came to light. He's done this same exact scam before, selling art and real estate. If TPM were interested in actual reporting, rather than conspiracy theory crap, they'd probably report on this and not the ridiculous luxury SUVs with magnet decals bullshit.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Lestatdelc
October 6, 2009 1:54 PM in reply to SkepticRising
The $2.3 million contract they were about to sign to run the prison for one. $2.3 million is a nice little bit of loot.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
psyopswatcher
October 6, 2009 7:29 PM in reply to SkepticRising
The contract (section 12.04) states that inmate telephone revenues belongs to the Operator. My money's on telemarketing (selling security systems?) with prisoners-in-training running the scams.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
elle a
October 6, 2009 7:24 AM in reply to SfcMayhem
scam yes, but who is funding it? is it possible that hardin officials did not do a background check on this guy?
at what point does the fbi get involved??
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
HeyThereItsEric
October 5, 2009 7:50 PM
More plagarism, still live as of.. oy.
Finally plagiarizing from Xe (neé Blackwater). Differences in bold
APPF page on Police Officer and Security Training
Xe page on International Training
I was at least expecting Xe to have a professional sounding website, but they seem to insist that Department of Defense security initiatives are a type of government agency.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Hedonistic Pleasureseeker
October 5, 2009 8:04 PM
Oh hey, their new colors look like UN blue. How apropos:
http://books.google.com/books?id=wwb3rCcnvpUC&pg=PA26&lpg=PA26&dq=%22civilian+police+international%22+kosovo&source=bl&ots=-b0Fdfv96i&sig=sHhBVsNeYrG3xVg7-XM3kgj31_o&hl=en&ei=YGLKSrb3L5LGlAeY_5iSAw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=7#v=onepage&q=%22civilian%20police%20international%22%20kosovo&f=false
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
HeyThereItsEric
October 5, 2009 8:12 PM
Completing the "International Operations" trifecta (quintfecta?) in the lower left corner of the Services page is Convoy Security (Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan etc). Then I promise I'm done hijacking the comment thread. As usual, differences in bold
2nd half of Blurb at Books•A•Million for book "Combat Leader's Field Guide (Paperback)" (original source may be book's publisher?)
2nd half of APPF page text:
1st half of Blurb at Books•A•Million for book "Combat Leader's Field Guide (Paperback)"
(cough) scam (cough)
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
slb
October 6, 2009 2:50 AM in reply to HeyThereItsEric
Good leg work, man.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
TJ1
October 5, 2009 8:22 PM
This is great! The City fathers of Hardin locked up (so to speak) APPF for their law enforcement needs. Now if they can just get Judge Roy Bean under contract for the judiciary, they are all set for justice!
Only in America!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
twirling fartknocker
October 5, 2009 8:59 PM
reminds me of those two jokers who were selling, like, 30-year old guns to the US or Afghani forces in Afghanistan a couple years back
half-assed operations that we throw money at like there's no tomorrow. once they get a little cash flow, they can start to hire ex-CIA folks and so forth and then apply for the big bucks
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
HeyThereItsEric
October 5, 2009 9:09 PM
What is it with some members of this industry and their horrible, horrible websites? What kind of scam needs the appearance of an ongoing business concern, without the business actually being any good?
Money laundering is an entertaining possibility. It'd be clever to pay for an international "investigation" that is never done, whose results are protected by informal privacy norms (I presume; perhaps the results are even legally protected). Of course, this being the interweb, I have zero evidence for this.
Another fun possibility is that all the international stuff is simply a way of providing a glossy cover to what is, essentially, the seedy (an lucrative) business of spying on people's spouses and kin. Even though International Counterintelligence Services, Inc, offers such things as addressing kidnapping and ransom situations, their case studies focus on issues of spousal behavior, custody, and the investigation of one's children for illicit activity (27 of 34 cases), with special emphasis on infidelity (19 of 34 cases) - with no international kidnapping cases to be found anywhere.
A third possibility, not so fun: weapons trafficking. A website that passes a cursory examination might provide cover to a haphazard / underpaid / crooked seller of military equipment. Can't say there's much evidence for that speculation, though.
Anyway... Examples of bad websites I've run across trying to find the sources of plagiarized text:
Scrolling text and animated GIFs from an organization around since 2006 (Central Division of Protection).
Strangely constructed sentences ("Safe, realistic, and challenging are the hallmarks of our training performance record.") from Xe (neé Blackwater)
Blinking eyes, rotating cameras, a scale actively balancing Truth and Justice poorly-anti-aliased spinning quasi-logos are all available in the Homer-Simpsonesque delight known as SafeTek Security Industries, Inc. (in their defense, the sight claims to have been last updated in 2001 - but someone must still be paying for the domain).
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Mooser
October 5, 2009 10:17 PM
First of all, don't they have contract for 2 million a year? And they run the police force and the jail, so I'm sure they will find ways to augment their income. And then the guy who wrote that the best way to resolve this is with a big ol' Montana shootout.
The South has risen, and is taking over!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Technowitch
October 5, 2009 10:25 PM
It is also a violation of both federal and Montana state law to impersonate police officers -- which seems to have been the case when these goons rolled into Harding in SUVs emblazoned with decals claiming to be the Harding town police.
There's a reason why private security firm employees, while possibly wearing official-looking uniforms, take care to be identified as "Security" or "Guard" or both. Not Police.
Look for another company name change in the very near future, once they start getting slightly better legal advice from their attorneys. Assuming they have any.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
unknowncitizen
October 5, 2009 10:34 PM
It seems the focus is all on how totally full of shit the APPF description of themselves is, and how this should lead to some serious legal action against the company.
The Montana town that fell for this seems to be spared the complete ridicule they are due. They build a jail they don't even need or have the money to operate? They enter into a contract with a company that makes the Male Enhancement products industry look like a pillar of honesty. They are so hyped up with the idea of black SUVs, cool guns and kick ass commandos that they invite a complete sham to unfold upon themselves with no evidence that their elected officials possesses the least inkling of an idea of how to competently run a municipality.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
brillobreaks
October 6, 2009 6:16 AM in reply to unknowncitizen
Why are people commenting on this stuff when they're clearly ignorant of what's going on? The town built the jail expecting the state to house prisoners there. Whether it was through some sort of misunderstanding or some backroom political mess, that never happened and the TRA (which is not the city gov't, but a private corporation) was left holding $27 million in bonds and an empty prison.
Once again, not the city government.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Johann
October 6, 2009 9:57 AM in reply to brillobreaks
Are you really trying to imply that the Two Rivers Authority could disolve, forfeiting on the $27 Million in bonds, and that would not reflect on the town of Hardin?
It IS the city government that is ultimately responsible for the payments on those bonds.
.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
witty1
October 5, 2009 10:43 PM
This is happening because Cheney actually believes he was Jack Bauer in real life.
If they aren't just security guards isn't this a private military? A private military which is now beginning to see government subsidies?
Wherethefuck is the Justice Department?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
TJ1
October 5, 2009 10:56 PM
The folks who run that city must be just a bunch of hick country rubes; totally beguiled by the Glenn Beck demagoguery . You tend to see this when the level headed ones in town just throw up their hands at the inanity of City government and check out; the nuts take over. It's a story being played out in a lot of small towns across America, but they don't all achieve this level of keystone cops - scooby doo amusement.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
witty1
October 6, 2009 12:33 AM in reply to TJ1
Which reminds me of a bumper sticker i just saw.
"Tell shaggy to pass the baggy so scooby can roll a doobie".
Think they're growing pot in those empty jail cells?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
slb
October 6, 2009 3:03 AM in reply to TJ1
About the town: I just went back to an earlier article to confirm my recollection. Just last Thursday, TPMMuckraker was quoting the web site of Hardin's Two Rivers Authority as saying, "APF is not running our town or our police force." And now we find out that the contract does indeed give them the option to run the town's police force, or "its law enforcement operations," which seems to me to amount to the same thing.
Somebody didn't learn that it's always the cover-up that gets you into hot water...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
brillobreaks
October 6, 2009 6:04 AM in reply to slb
The TRA is not the City of Hardin, it's a private corporation formed to encourage economic development in the area. They cannot, and did not, give these guys control of the police.
The town in fact, doesn't even have a police force. It's policing is provided by the Big Horn county sheriff's department. The town of Hardin has been trying to form their own police force for nearly a decade, because the sheriff's department simply cannot cover the whole county. It's 5,000 square miles, nearly the size of Connecticut, much of it unpaved, patrolled by a few deputies.
The town wants it's own people assigned full-time and specifically to the town. The county sheriff can't and/or won't do so. The town and the county have been trying to get this issue worked out for years, long before the prison was even built, much less before all this other crap happened.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
NitPicker1
October 6, 2009 11:23 AM in reply to brillobreaks
The TRA is not the City of Hardin?
Well someone had better inform the TRA of that fact.
Their rather minimal website prominently displays the City of Hardin seal, the "contact us" page features a large photo of the City of Hardin Administrative Offices building, and the front page of the website, in addition to proudly informing viewers of the fact that it was "formed by the City of Hardin in 2004" describes itself as "a quasi-governmental arm of the city."
The City of Hardin is in no way off the hook here. They allow the TRA to flash that city seal, is it really such a stretch from that to letting the AP(P)F flash those police badges?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
brillobreaks
October 6, 2009 11:33 AM in reply to NitPicker1
A development authority is a private corporation formed by a city to protect themselves from certain financial risks, just like a person would form a corporation to do the same thing. It's technically separate, legally separate, but there are ties.
Just like if I form a corporation for my small business, I'm still running it, but it protects me personally.
These guys are in default on $27 million dollars in loans, not the city. The city does not owe the money, it does not own the prison. The TRA does. At least for now, eventually the banks will take it back and probably try to sell it.
Either way though, the TRA is not in charge of the city, they can't make decisions on things like the police force (which does not exist), whether they or Hilton put such language in the contract or not.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
brillobreaks
October 6, 2009 6:32 AM in reply to TJ1
All but one of the members of the TRA board are from out of state. They're not 'country bumpkins', hicks, rubes, or whatever. Most are well educated members of the local business community, ie. nutjob Republicans.
The actual locals are a mixture of Native Americans and regular old Montanans (libertarian leanings, but fairly equally split between the left and right). This county is one of the most deeply blue counties in the state, even more so than any of the 'urban' areas.
How about folks stop with the country bumpkin crap, the locals know this is all a scam. The only ones who seem to not get it are the people in charge, and frankly, I think a lot of them know the same thing. They just won't admit it yet. They're sitting there holding $27 million in defaulted upon bonds, they've got banks breathing down their necks, and they're pretty desperate.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Johann
October 6, 2009 10:16 AM in reply to brillobreaks
"All but one of the members of the TRA board are from out of state."
Really? The quasi-governmental "Authority" for the town of Hardin has only one (1) Montana resident as a member?
Who ARE the members, where DO they live, and what are their other affiliations?
.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
brillobreaks
October 6, 2009 11:19 AM in reply to Johann
I just mean that they're not from here originally, as a means of contrasting what part of the community they were, and to counter the 'country bumpkin' idea. They're transplants, well educated, out of state, Republican business owners in the town.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Moe
October 6, 2009 4:08 AM
This is a classic sting by Hardin on APPF.
Finally they will have some prisoners for their jail when all the APF guys get thrown behind bars.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ClosetLuddite
October 6, 2009 8:38 AM in reply to Moe
Wow! You could be on to something! That would be the _priceless_. Sting of the century!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
fitley
October 6, 2009 4:16 AM
By the end of this week, it will all be over. Hilton probably won't be arrested but I'm sure he'll be dreaming up a new alias. It's interesting to see new business models emerging though isn't it? I wouldn't be surprised to find out that Dick Cheney was funding this whole thing.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
TJ1
October 6, 2009 10:04 AM
If they're not country bumpkins, then they must be the kind of City Fathers who want the services, but they just don't want to raise the taxes to pay for them! You know, the ones who feel entitled to this stuff and are offended if anyone says that they have to pay a tax to get it!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Johann
October 6, 2009 10:30 AM in reply to TJ1
"You know, the ones who feel entitled to this stuff and are offended if anyone says that they have to pay a tax to get it!"
Sounds like they would make great US Senators and Representatives.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Cal Gal
October 6, 2009 1:55 PM
They need to make a movie about it and use the $$$ it would gross to pay off the bonds.
This could make a really, really good slapstick comedy.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Sparkle Plenty
October 6, 2009 4:19 PM
Has everyone missed the most blatant plagiarizing by APPF?
Their crest is 100% ripped off from the Romanov dynasty - ya know, that monarchy that ended in 1917 with the deaths of Czar Nicholas, Czarina Alexandra and all their children.
Won't that be grand when folks realize they have just put the crest of a repressive RUSSIAN government over Hardin, Montana?
Can you say 'laughingstock?'
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?