TPMMuckraker

Orly Taitz Responds To Judge's $20k Fine: Shove It!

Spread the word and support this article. Share it on Digg!


Orly Taitz

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Reached on her cell phone by TPMmuckraker and informed of the $20,000 fine imposed on her by a federal judge this morning, Birther attorney Orly Taitz responded, first, with laughter.

"So he didn't recuse himself?" Taitz asked, after letting out an extended, nervous-sounding chuckle.

Still defiant after months of legal wrangling and, by our count, three written denunciations by federal district court Judge Clay Land, Taitz said she had absolutely no plans to pay the $20,000 fine.

"Are you kidding? Of course not," she said, asked whether she planned to send a check. "This is a form of intimidation."

Instead, she plans to file yet another written response (though it's unclear whether the court will even accept one).

"I'll go to the circuit court of appeals. I'll take this as high as I have to go," Taitz said.

Asked about the judge's promise to refer the matter to the U.S. Attorney if she didn't pay within 30 days, Taitz said she'd have to take a look at the order.

Land wrote:

If counsel fails to pay the sanction due, the U.S. Attorney will be authorized to commence collection proceedings. [footnote:] The Court does not take this action lightly, and in fact, cannot recall having previously imposed monetary sanctions upon an attorney sua sponte.

Sua sponte is Latin for "of one's own accord" -- in other words, the court acting without prompt by any of the litigants.

Join the Conversation!

130 comments

Recommend Recommend (18)

October 13, 2009 11:38 AM   

I wonder how much longer her husband will bankroll her little hobby once this starts to cost real money?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 11:40 AM    in reply to Chilidog

Thankfully for Orly, credit is easy to obtain! :)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 4:36 PM    in reply to Chilidog

I would bet money that she and her husband are not bankrolling this - she's being funded secretly by some rightwingnut organization.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 11:45 AM   

Contempt of court is right. Contempt of democracy as well. That's all these rightwingers are about -- contempt.

Hope she "bravely" refuses to pay and gets cuffed and put in jail.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 5:19 PM    in reply to AnswerFrog

AnswerF:

The reason she doesn't want to pay is because of the GOP's bold and principled stand against...wait for it...a...bit...longer...
frivolous lawsuits.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 14, 2009 6:57 PM    in reply to AnswerFrog

Absolutely. I believe the attempts at collection would only be a first step. If she still refuses to pay up, the judge could rule that as a foundation for general contempt of court.

Check me if I'm wrong, but I seem to remember a certain Susan McDougal who served several years in jail for contempt of court for refusing to testify during the Clinton witch hunt. Orly could certainly end up in a small, sterile and quiet space until she decides to pay up.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 11:46 AM   

That's a lot of teeth cleaning, Orly.

I could just kiss Judge Land.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 14, 2009 2:13 AM    in reply to RetiredDem

She does realize that she "should" read Land's order. Even though as an afterthought.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 11:50 AM   

Hoo boy. Keep this up, Orly, and you're going to jail. "Bring your toothbrush," as the saying goes.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 5:22 PM    in reply to Lynn Dee

LynnDee:

I think she'll do really well in prison with those comely, come hither looks she's so good at. Every picture I've seen of her she's trying to look all flirty.

The other girls will LOVE that in prison.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 14, 2009 9:06 AM    in reply to KingElvis

Next headline: Orly does Playboy!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 11:51 AM   

gods, this is hilarious..... reading this helps my mental health---RW nuttiness flushing out the dreary weather and post-Nobel garbage....

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 11:52 AM   

Funny, I didn't know "Oily" was on Facebook.

http://www.facebook.com/people/Oily-Taint/100000129281296

LOL

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 11:53 AM   

This is not going to end well. Disbarrment for sure. Jail and/or a mental hospital are distinct possibilities. A still worse ending would not be surprising. And the worse the ending, the uglier the conspiracy theory it will spawn among the nutfringe.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 12:18 PM    in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve

Indeed. God help us from the righteous nutgasm that would ensue should this woman happen to meet an untimely demise for some reason.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 12:42 PM    in reply to Cool Blue Reason

Here's the question: is 20K the ceiling? (I vote 30).

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 5:56 PM    in reply to rumpole

If I read Judge Land's order correctly, $25K is the legal maximum he can call for.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 11:57 AM   

Attach her bank accounts

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 12:08 PM   

I don't think "right wing, wingnut, etc..." adequately describes Ms. Taitz. She's obsessive, obstinate, and delusional to an extent where you can only laugh.

I get mad at Republicans, but not at Taitz.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 12:13 PM   

"So he didn't recuse himself?" Taitz askedZ

I don't get the sense that Dr. Taitz really understands this whole thing known as the legal system.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 12:23 PM    in reply to CT Voter

She probably has at least a passing familiarity with the law -- but it, like everything else, seems to be distorted by her mental illness. She actually believes in what she is doing, and so she actually believes that she will prevail somehow.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 14, 2009 2:32 AM    in reply to CT Voter

She certainly doesn't "get" separation of powers; therefore in her view the judiciary is in the "chain of command" under the president.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 12:14 PM   

Memo To: OT
From: The Reality Based World
-------------------------
OT, this is not intimidation. It is punishment.
And when Sean, Bill and Karl ask you; "Why you are being intimidated"?, please refer them to the Georgia and California state bar associations.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Nim

user-pic

October 13, 2009 12:23 PM   

The end of the order:

"The Court further directs the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this Order to the State Bar of California, 180 Howard Street, San Francisco, CA 94105, for whatever use it deems appropriate."

Hope it was worth it, counselor.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 12:36 PM    in reply to Nim

nice catch

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 3:03 PM    in reply to Nim

I don't live far from there. I'd be willing to print up the order and hand delivering it. It wouldn't be any trouble at all.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 12:37 PM   

Don't you just love the "You have no idea who you're dealing with!" look in her eyes in the photo above? Clearly her cavalry is just over the hill...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 2:06 PM    in reply to Hussein Stemper

Borderline personality disorder.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 14, 2009 2:36 AM    in reply to SOS ICEBERG

I think she's simply undereducated and clueless. She probably believes she's actually onto something big.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 14, 2009 11:49 AM    in reply to JNagarya

Actually, as Sir Charles at COGITAMUS points out "Amazingly enough she appears to have passed the California bar (one of, if not the toughest in the country) and become accredited as a dentist. So she clearly has some base line level of intelligence that is pretty high. The fact that English is her second language makes this even more impressive.

And yet -- she is clearly insane -- delusional and narcissistic. She registers a zero on the emotional intelligence scale, which is a vastly underrated part of being a litigator."


Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 11:20 PM    in reply to Prup (aka Jim Benton)

She's either insane -- which I doubt -- or a far-right extremist with the usual naivete about not only reality being inflexible, but also about how our gov't/legal system is to function.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 12:41 PM   

What an ugly sleeze ball.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 12:41 PM   

Orly, honey, they need you back in Moldova. They have a crackpot shortage. We have a surplus.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 12:45 PM    in reply to artwrite

Boy ain't that the truth?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 1:27 PM    in reply to GTFOOH

And why does she always look like a bobble doll, who's head spring has been over bobbled?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 12:51 PM   

I really don't understand why you (or anyone other than a psychiatric journal) is covering an insane person.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 1:21 PM    in reply to Rich in NJ

It's like watching a train wreck.

Unlike a homeless crazy, shouting on the corner, she is able to function in society, so I have no pity for her.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 8:21 PM    in reply to Rich in NJ

Because the birthers site her as their reason to live. If the leader of their movement is now publicly denounced as a crackpot, by a rightwing judge, possibly members of the birthers will have a productive moment of self-examination (nothing x-rated).

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 14, 2009 2:42 AM    in reply to Prefabfan

Yeah. That'll happen. Sure thing. Without doubt.

Limbaugh and Beck, Hannity and O'Reilly, et al., will lead the meditation.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 14, 2009 5:22 PM    in reply to Rich in NJ

She's getting coverage because she is dangerous. She is dangerous because she has the ability to attract crackpots who believe her delusions and they would have no problem going out and doing her bidding..which is to get rid of the President.

She's like the other rightwingnutz from the religious right..who preach about abortion and say very subtle things which the dittoheads take to heart and go out and kill doctors.

Very dangerous woman..and people who follow her are mindless robots just looking for something to do to get their 15 minutes.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 12:52 PM   

He's referring her conduct to the California State Bar. They could end this nonsense in a hurry.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 1:18 PM    in reply to cleduc

but is it a disbarrable offense?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 2:14 PM    in reply to Chilidog

Lawyers are officers of the court. So I am guessing the answer is "Hell yes".

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 2:58 PM    in reply to Bruce Webb

It is doubtful that this would be deemed an offense that merits disbarment. However, it very likely would merit a suspension.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 3:29 PM    in reply to taikan

I'm curious to know if she ever notified the Bar that disbarred lawyer Charles Lincoln III was working for her as per the CalBar rules. I am more than willing to bet that she has not notified all her clients about this.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 14, 2009 2:44 AM    in reply to Chilidog

Why would she selectively OBEY rules about which she has no concern or respect?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 12:55 PM   

I wonder if they'll send Orly to women's prison or men's prison.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 4:17 PM    in reply to Cal Gal

I don’t think she’ll stop until they haul her away in a straight jacket. Probably to one of Obama’s secret FEMA concentration camps! LOL!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 1:13 PM   

This is not going to end well for her. Further filings at the District Court which do not offer contrary authority for the sanctions will be met with further sanctions.

The Circuit Court of Appeals is going to affirm the District Court Order probably little comment, and if she files more crazy, conclusary rantings in the Circuit Court they might add to the sanctions.

The Supreme Court will quickly deny without comment her Petition for Writ of Certiorari as they do 99% of the time.

And no court is going to delay or stay enforcement of the $20k order so the US attorney's office will likely seize property of her's in a matter of months.

Finally, and ultimately, her license to practice law is going to be suspended by the California Disciplinary Authority.

This would all be entertaining if we weren't watching a person slowly and all too publicly go mad.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 1:24 PM    in reply to Ward Report

This reminds me of the BYU professor, Steve Jones who slipped down the rabbit hole of "truther Physics."

In a way it is sad, but it is also fairly instructional.

Kind of like that TV show about hoarders.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 3:18 PM    in reply to Chilidog

I have to agree vis~a~vis Hoarders. Perhaps that will be her future coming out the other end of all this. Notoriety, disbarred, and a participant in a new reality show; Birthers, Deathers and Tenthers showdown. Too bad World's Biggest Losers is taken.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 14, 2009 8:21 AM    in reply to Chilidog

The two don't compare -Tates is attempting to disprove the Likely, namely the extreme possibility that Obama was born in the US, with obvious forgeries and improbable stories. Jones is attempting to disprove the Unlikely, namely the unlikelyhood that the top part of any structure in nature would collapse through its bottom part at freefall speed, unless the bottom part had been compromised first. Jone's theories may seem unlikely, but remenber -the likelyhood of his theories being true hinge only upon the ability of men to conspire and then brazenly commit evil deeds -and when has that ever been unlikely? 

Nature has laws that cannot be broken, Man does not. The more people-centric we get in our everyday life, the more we will blur the two worlds and start believing in physical impossibilities. 

Many of us who understand and use physics in our workaday life know that the manner in which those buildings fell on that day was a physical impossibility. When confronted by a choice between a physically impossible occurance and the evil tenencies of man, I'll figure the latter the most likely any day.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 14, 2009 9:01 AM    in reply to will o dwisp

oh, no. A thruther, Run everyone.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 11:32 PM    in reply to Chilidog

The "truthers" are as bad as the "birthers" -- going through all the conspirabunk gymnastics, backflips, contortions, and other such futrile exercises for the sake of sociopathically morbid entertainmnet when the simple reality is staring them in the glazed-over eyes:

1. Even before bullying and stealing their way into office, the Bushit criminal enterprise was bent on invading Iraq. All they needed was an excuse.

2. The Bushit criminal enterprise received ADVANCE WARNING of the attacks. Instead of dealing with it, Bushit went on vacation.

3. The attacks were, at worst, ALLOWED to happen. Ergo, there was no need for any "inside job".

Clue: the very same conspirabunk was made up by the far-right about the OK City bombing -- in order to achieve two goals:

1. To smear gov't, which they always hate; and,

2. To distract attention from themselves -- they were aligned with and all for McVeig's views and actions -- by casting yet another aspersion onto gov't.

When that didn't work, the conspirabunk was resurrected and repackaged for 9/11. And suckers on the Left, along with those on the Right, have swallowed what was all along anti-gov't conspirabunk confabulated by the far-RIGHT.

I'll make it real simple for you:

1. Bush-Cheney got WARNING of the attacks.

2. The attacks were ALLOWED to happen.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 1:32 PM    in reply to JNagarya

"The attacks were ALLOWED to happen."

I agree that is most likely.

The additional felling of the buildings themselves though was physically impossible given the energy the hijackers had under their immediate control -logically therefore additional energy was provided and controlled by another group, perhaps not even known to the hijackers.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 1:06 PM    in reply to will o dwisp

Are you an expert in architectural design and physics?

I thought not.

Why don't you leave the far-right lunatic fringe anti-cum-m,int horseshit behind: stick to what you KNOW, within YOUR narrow expertise, and stop pretending to know mor than you do.

Here's a clue: welded joints of beams. In order to WELD to beams together, the WELDING METAL must be DELIBERATELY susceptible of MELTING. That MELTING POINT is LESS THAN the tempterature of the inferno which resulted from the attacks.

Wake up: you have swallowed, and are regurgitating far-right lunatic fringe America-hating anti-gum'mint garbage, REPACKAGED from the last time it was used: the OK City bombing. It didn't work then because it was a lie then. It REMAINS a lie.

Further, idjit:

If the attacks were ALLOWED to happen, then there wouldn't be ANY NEED for ANY "inside job" actions, including the "felling of the buildings".

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 4, 2009 3:41 PM    in reply to JNagarya

JNagarya said -"Here's a clue: welded joints of beams. In order to WELD to beams together, the WELDING METAL must be DELIBERATELY susceptible of MELTING. That MELTING POINT is LESS THAN the tempterature of the inferno which resulted from the attacks."

Wow -talk about uninformed -thats all I can say -yikes.

I guess we don't need to further speculate about haughty Mr. JNagarya's knowledge of structural steel construction or just about any other form of the simplest metalwork -he has  confused "welding" with "soldering" -most people learn the difference between these two around the age of twelve.
Soldering (and brazing for that matter) is used to join metals using a material with a much lower melting point and therefore has a joint that will melt at a lower temperature. 
Welding is a fusion process and uses a filler/electrode material (rod or wire) that melts at very similar if not the same temperature as the "mother" material being welded -hence the extremely high temp "arc" in "arc welding" and the "molten pool" comprised of the molten mother metal and the electrode/filler rod. Decent welding produces joints that are often stronger than the pieces fused and there is no difference in melting point.

If thats all you've got, you better start rethinking your position. Your lack of knowledge on the subject makes your questioning MY qualifications and calling ME an "idiot" visibly pathetic to any who bother to read these posts.

Oh and anyone who has read my posts over the past years on TPM will notify you that I am a Liberal -tried and true.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 5, 2009 9:06 PM    in reply to will o dwisp

"Very similiar if not the same as the 'mother' material."

In other words: welding is done at a lower temperature than is the forging of steel beams in furnaces.

Try again, loon.

Meanwhile, the point was already made which renders all the "inside job" conspirabunk moot:

1. The Bushit criminal enterprise bullied and stole itts way into office, one of their few paramount priorities being the invasion of Iraq. They only had to find a pretext for doing that.

2. The Bushit criminal enterprise had ADVANCE warnings of the attacks -- but IGNORED them. That the attacks were therefore, in effect, ALLOWED to happen, thus being convenient pretext for 1., above, there wouldn't be any NEED for any of the "inside job" nonsense.

3. The "inside job" conspirabunk was most recently, before 9/11, confabulated by the far-RIGHT America-hating anti-gov't lunatic fringe and then thrown at the OK City bombing. The whole intent being, as should be obvious, to depict the gov't (which is actually We the peole) as the "enemy".

It didn't work then, so it was recylced and thrown at the 9/11 attacks.

You're either far-RIGHT, or a leftist dupe of the far-RIGHT in swallowing the "inside job" hogwash, then parroting it.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 6, 2009 2:50 AM    in reply to JNagarya

"In other words: welding is done at a lower temperature than is the forging of steel beams in furnaces."

Ridiculous and wrong.

Welding is a fusion process -an arc welder typically generates temperatures between 9,000 and 11,000 degrees F -steel melts at about 2,600 degrees F -the steel becomes liquid locally -the parts are melted together along with some filler, often the same material as the parts being welded -the resulting joint has the same melting point as the parts themselves.

A weld joint between two beams will not melt at a lower temperature than the beams themselves do.

Go ahead -ignore facts.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 8:33 AM    in reply to will o dwisp

Neither ridiculous nor wrong.

But your belaboring the nonsense you suckers swallow as excuse to hate gov't -- which is We the people -- and be paranoid.

Pay attention:

If the 9/11 attacks -- which were warned against in advance -- were ALLOWED to happen, then there was NO NEED for any "inside job" nonsense.

Is that too obvious, too simple and non-conspiratorial, for you to grasp?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 2:59 PM    in reply to JNagarya

As I predicted you are now more interested in arguing assumptions than facts. 

As soon as your misunderstanding of the real world facts you chose to use in your argument is made shamefully obvious -easily researchable and understandable facts I might add -things a twelve year old should know -you smokescreen that point to avoid admitting you are wrong by switching over to other points that are purely speculative and assumptive but also conviently neither provable or disprovable in this venue. The cowardly way out. No let-up in snottiness either.

I challenge you -go back and re-read your know-it-all posts.

At least from now on perhaps you will think twice before making snotty assertions about things you know absolutely nothing about -you never know when you are going to get your ass handed to you again.

Thanks for the entertainment.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 11, 2009 1:43 AM    in reply to will o dwisp

You agreed with my SPECULATION -- ASSUMPTION if you prefer -- that the attacks were ALLOWED to happen.

That being the agreement, the "inside job" conspirabunk is irrelevant horseshit.

But those who have an axe to grind, beyond facts, won't let the gov't-hater's nonsense go. So it's essential that you persist with the bullshit that it was an "inside job" even though it wasn't.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 3:36 PM    in reply to Ward Report

Go mad? She's been insane for a long time now...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

mcc

user-pic

October 13, 2009 3:41 PM    in reply to Ward Report

Is this a kind of order which even can be appealed?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 14, 2009 11:46 AM    in reply to mcc

Yes, it's an appealable order. Orly is throwing gas on the fire with her continued public comments. It will be interesting to see if the Judge takes the bait.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 1:14 PM   

I thought the usual Orly picture was bad, but this one is worse. The vague hint of a "come hither" look makes me feel like I need a shower. Or two. Ugh.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 1:17 PM    in reply to Matt Jones

She wants you to give her a "deposit-ion."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 3:06 PM    in reply to Matt Jones

To the contrary, even though Taitz is bat-shit crazy, there's something about her look that makes me want to ravage her all over her office desk!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 3:24 PM    in reply to ManOmega

I just threw up in my mouth a little bit.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 5:07 PM    in reply to ManOmega

There's definitely something to be said about sex with crazy women.

And that's "Don't."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 1:15 PM   

I like this part from the footnote on page 42.

The Court wishes to explore the possibility of directing the
financial penalty to the National Infantry Foundation at Ft. Benning,
Georgia, which has as part of its mission the recognition of our brave
soldiers who do their duty regardless of the personal sacrifice required
and their own personal political beliefs."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 1:42 PM    in reply to Chilidog

Bad idea, in general, to let courts direct financial penalties to charities they like. Just put it in the General Fund where it belongs.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 1:42 PM   

Ms Taitz is clearly Cookoo for Cocoa Puffs.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 1:53 PM   

In the meantime, how's that Army captain doing? It must be fun serving under her command. And I bet her superior officers just love her.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 3:56 PM    in reply to tamiasmin

She'll be really lucky if there isn't a less than honorable discharge waiting for her at the end of her tour. The kind of crap she pulled--insubordination to civil authority and attempting to evade service by bullshit legalisms--pushes all the buttons for a superior officer.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 4:20 PM    in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve

Doesn't the fact that she's an MD mitigate some of the heat? After all, there aren't a lot of docs flocking to Iraq or Afghanistan these days.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 2:21 PM   

Shameless self promotion on the backs of American servicemen and women. Orly is a man. As a cross dresser he is as good with his hair and make up as he is an attorney.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 2:40 PM   

Orly's pose is very Dr. Frankenfurter.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 2:45 PM   

Regardless of whether or not she refuses to pay, who can start disbarment proceedings? She has no business being an officer of the court.

Regards.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 2:49 PM   

I have a question for the legal experts here.

Orly was admited pro hac vice to argue the Rhodes case before Judge Land. That case is over. The sanctions as a result of that case are a totally different matter, as the Judge pointed out. If she appeals the sanction, can she still represent herself pro hac vice?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 3:01 PM    in reply to Chilidog

She does not need to appear pro hac vice in defending herself, but instead is entitled to appear pro se.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 3:31 PM    in reply to taikan

Another legal term to file away.

Thanks. :)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 3:14 PM    in reply to Chilidog

I've been wondering how a person who didn't graduate from an ABA accredited school has been able to appear in States that require that for admission, nor without any local counsel serving as co-counsel that may have muzzled her. The judge's decision today was the first to explain how Taitz has been able to appear as she has. I wonder if the courts in the future will just summarily deny her Motion to be Admitted pro hac vice (which is essentially, just court approval for an attorney who is not generally authorized to practice in a jurisdiction to serve as counsel in a particular case for a particular party so long as that attorney is "supervised" by local counsel familiar with the local rules and customs.) That's why Cousin Vinny had to meet with the trial judge in the beginning and said he was "Gallo."

Sorry for the pop reference, but that's how I actually first became familiar with the concept of admission pro hac vice.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 4:23 PM    in reply to modernesquire

"I didn't say Gallo! I said Callo! Jerry Gallo's dead!"

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 2:54 PM   

It's also clear from the order that this is a fight the judge welcomes. He set a 'sanctions trap' that she simply could not resist. He gave her chances to walk back -- as any good judge would do -- but she couldn't help herself which is what the judge expected.

You can tell the Judge -- A G W Bush appointee -- is genuinely offended by her use of the courts, which is refreshing. In my own experience Judges tend to be far to indulgent of abuse of process.

Did any of the other judges threaten her with Rule 11 sanctions? Filing a law suit in a second court after having been summarily thrown out of previous court make a prima facie case for Rule 11 sanctions.

A motion for sanction should be a standard response on the part of the Government when responding to these suits.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 3:19 PM   

""So he didn't recuse himself?" Taitz asked, after letting out an extended, nervous-sounding chuckle."

The scary part here is this: She actually thought that he would recuse himself.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 4:08 PM   

And the fun continues! Catch Crazy Orly on the Joy Behar Show on HLN tonite. Check your local listings for times and channel. Better than Dancing with the Stars!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 4:25 PM   

She could always do porn to pay for the fine.

I mean, I've seen worse.

And you just know somebody like Jim Powers would pony up 20 large -- he'd stand to make far more just from having her on top billing.

I'm just having trouble imagining of what title Jim might choose...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 6:36 PM    in reply to bughunter

Re: "I mean, I've seen worse"

I'm going to have to call your bluff on this one.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 4:31 PM   

You can tell a lot about this woman by the poses she adopts for her photos. Clearly very much in love with herself, in addition to being a nut.

I'd enjoy seeing her take on Cindy Sheehan in a Celebrity Death Match (not that either of them are such) - I'd be pulling for a mutual knockout.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 5:24 PM    in reply to billp

Yeah, what's WITH that? Between the cardboard eyelashes and the come hither sultry looks, how could she NOT be taken seriously?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 6:37 PM   

*Singing and doing the cabbage patch*

"Orly got dat a$$ tapped, Oily got dat a$$ tapped..."

I resent (no, I really really really resent) some born-in-the-former-Soviet-Union Jewish Israeli hag trying to dictate who and what MY President is or should be.

This is no situation where an election was 'barely' won (unlike Bush II); BHO beat McCain by 10 MILLION votes and he is the choice of the MAJORITY of those that voted, so Stanky Taints needs to take her funny-looking a$$ back where she came from.

It is, however, funny and telling that white rightwing nut-suckers (xenophobic and anti-immigrant as hell in a general sense) line up to listen, agree and take marching orders from some Uncle Festus looking trick that was not even born in this country. ...especially since white America was jingoistic as hell towards the former Soviet Union back in the day, and in full support of America's dirty, shady and murderous Cold War tactics committed in my neck of the woods, Asia and the continent of Africa.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 8:22 PM    in reply to BluegreenEyedMixedChick

What does her being Jewish have to do with it?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 11:51 PM    in reply to Prefabfan

"What does her being Jewish have to do with it?" - Prefabfan, Oct 13, 2009 @8:22PM

In one sense, not a thang (though, unfortunately and Goddess work with me, I'm 22 and started to distrust Jews due to unfortunate experiences).

Buuuuut I described Orly in other terms including "Jewish." Check it... "some born-in-the-former-Soviet-Union Jewish Israeli hag."

Why no sniveling asking about my stating Orly was not born in America, Israeli, or hatched in the former Soviet Union?

Sensitive?

Sincerly,

BluegreenEyedMixedChick

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 5:28 AM    in reply to BluegreenEyedMixedChick

There is no "sniveling" response about you stating that Orly Taitz is an Moldovan, Israeli immigrant because those areas of her background are relevant to the discussion.

Your inclusion of "Jewish" implies that there is some foreign, un-American element to one being Jewish, in a sense referring to the stereotype of the scheming Jew and The Protocols of Zion.

Sensitive? I think not. Try offensive.

I don't think you'd like to be stereotyped, especially based on your "unconventional" writing style, for example.

So I'll ask you nicely to please cool it with the ethnic stereotypes and to please stick to the discussion at hand, which is crucifying the Queen of the Birthers.

Speaking of Orly Taitz... If in the end, she doesn't pay the $20,000 fine and Taitz is found in contempt of court, can she be deported?

I'm under the impression that Contempt of Court is a misdemeanor (not sure on the federal level), and conviction of certain misdemeanor's can result in deportation. Would this apply to the Birther Queen?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 6:37 PM   

That fragrance you're smelling? The aroma of sweet, sweet schadenfreude. :)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 13, 2009 11:18 PM   

I just read the judge's opinion and order. It's 43 freaking pages.

I don't think I've ever seen a judge so pissed that he spent 43 pages just to eviscerate a lawyer.

Here's hoping that Taitz does appeal, because the Circuit Court of Appeals is likely to impose additional sanctions for a frivolous appeal.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 14, 2009 12:36 AM   

Guess you guys have ALL lost the voice the founding fathers gave you in the Constitution. A citizen does have the right and standing to ask for validation of the Chief Executive's Natural Born Status. Maybe you guys are simply drinking too much Koolaid and have never been provided with the opportunity to even look at the Constitution? Are all here slaves to the man in the Oval Office? Did you, like the freaks in Hollywood take a fealty oath to the man sitting in the Oval Office? It is illegal for a sitting president to accept the bribe the Nobel prize committee is offering and it is illegal for a sitting president to become leader of the UN. So, maybe you guys haven't read the Constitution?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 14, 2009 3:13 AM    in reply to Rosebud

"Rosebud

"Guess you guys have ALL lost the voice the founding fathers gave you in the Constitution. A citizen does have the right and standing to ask for validation of the Chief Executive's Natural Born Status."

Ever learn ANYTHING of the BASICS of law? For your edification:

Constitutional provisions are IMPLEMENTED by means of STATUTES.

The relevant statutes implementing the provisions to which you refer are in "Elections Law".

What that law does -- and has done virtually FOREVER -- is REQUIRE that a person declaring candidacy for an elective office with an age requirement PROVE they are ELIGIBLE for the office in all ways required. That includes:

1. Providing PROOF of PLACe and DATE of birth UP FRONT.

That means, asshole, there IS NO ISSUE. Barak Obama PROVED himself ELIGIBLE to run for and hold the office of SENATOR. Where was the far-right lunatic fringe challenge THEN?

That further means, asshole, there IS NO ISSUE. Senator Barak Obama PROVEE himself ELIGIBLE to run for an hold the office of President.

In sum, what all that means is this:

THERE IS NO ISSUE.

And no amount of kool-aid drinking by you assholes will force reality to bend to your law-illiteracy, stupidity, ignorance, and total lack of IQ.

"Maybe you guys . . . have never been provided with the opportunity to even look at the Constitution?"

You've LOOKED at it!? Some of us have actually READ it. Beyond that, SOME of us have an ACTUAL education in ACTUAL law -- one doesn't get that from FOX's Fraud-on-America, or any of the other far-right lunatic fringe radio and TeeVee ENTERTAINERS who shove the most ludicrous of available nonsense down your credulous -- that's GULLIBLE, asshole -- faces.

"Are all here slaves to the man in the Oval Office?"

How in hell is that sensible, let alone relevant, law-illiterate?

"Did you, like the freaks in Hollywood take a fealty oath to the man sitting in the Oval Office?"

No such "oath" EXISTS, therefore no such "oath" can be sworn.

"It is illegal for a sitting president to accept the bribe the Nobel prize committee is offering"

"Bribe"!? What is the Nobel Committee "bribing" President Obama to do?

And if it's ILLEGAL for a sitting president to receive the Nobel Peace Prize, then you'd better enforce equality of the law by exhuming and indicting and prosecuting Presidents TReddy Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson also.

"and it is illegal for a sitting president to become leader of the UN."

I'll bite:

1. Where in the Constitution does it declare it ILLEGAL for a US President to become "leader of the UN"?

2. WHEN did President Ogbama become "leader of the UN," and how did THAT happen?

"So, maybe you guys haven't read the Constitution?"

Some of US have. You HAVEN'T; instead, you're relying on the far-right lunatic fringe America-hating propagandists to TELL you what's in it, even though THEY TOO are making it up.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 14, 2009 1:06 AM   

"A citizen does have the right and standing to ask for validation of the Chief Executive's Natural Born Status." - Rosebud, Oct 14, 2009 @ 12:36AM

Then why did you clucknuts not "ask for" or demand this "validation" of Reagan, Bush I, Clinton, Bush II etc.??? ...yeah, I thought so. *rolleyes*

"Maybe you guys are simply drinking too much Koolaid and have never been provided with the opportunity to even look at the Constitution?" - Rosebud, Oct 14, 2009 @ 12:36AM

Ain't nothin' like the wingdingaling punch (laced with nut juice) you and your ilk sip on the regular.

"It is illegal for a sitting president to accept the bribe the Nobel prize committee is offering...

...it is illegal for a sitting president to become leader of the UN." - Rosebud, Oct 14, 2009 @ 12:36AM

"Bribe?" "Leader of the UN?" Oh, Rosebud. Why is it you and your type often look at an apple and swear up 'n down it's a pumpkin?

What you've stated is BS and it'd be wonderful if people could charge (and collect on) lying nutsucks, as I'd hit you up for more than 20k then donate it to this charity I volunteer for.

Anyway I'm often tickled by the way you guys throw a tantrum and have the nerve to talk about others having not read or looked at something -- when it is obvious you've never read the Constitution or understand plain English.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 14, 2009 2:49 AM   

Her initials are OT--that's seriously hilarious.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 14, 2009 3:17 AM    in reply to Nancy Irving

Oh-tay!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 14, 2009 7:26 AM   

There is no mental health examination required prior to obtaining a license to practice law. Nor is a minimum level of mental health required to maintain one's law license. Here we see the results.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 11:41 PM    in reply to stevelaudig

It's a first amendment issue:

Insanity is a form of freedom of belief.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 14, 2009 8:42 AM   

Wow thats jsut too funny. The Kangaroo Judge and his Kangaroo court! LOL

Russ
www.true-privacy.net.tc

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

rip

user-pic

October 14, 2009 11:12 AM   

As nuts as Orly is - the true crazy can be found in the freeper threads about her. Many of the loons there are convinced that each set-back for Ms. Taitz opens the door to requiring further "discovery" of Obama related documents in order for Orly to defend herself, and that the courts are playing into her hands. When the more sane freepers point out the absurdity of this logic and impune Orly's legal acumen, they are accused of being ACORN funded trolls.

Good times, good times.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 14, 2009 12:43 PM   

This is one crazy nutcase. Well at least Sarah Palin has found a viable running mate for 2012. As far as Oily goes "Jail the bitch."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 14, 2009 12:56 PM   

LOL so damn hard. "nutsacks" 'nutsack def.. a portable conveyance device that allows for immediate and rapid portable transportation of one or many wingnuts'(1).

(1) wingnut (see politically induced mental insanity)(see also oxygen deprivation pregnant women)

LOL so hard at poor old Rosebud.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

rip

user-pic

October 14, 2009 2:08 PM   

Rosebud and his/her like have it hard. Apparently the entire jusdicial system up to and including SCOTUS continually ignore the flagrant disregard shown for the constitution by Obama and the Democrats. It seems the conspiracy onion surrounding this has many layers, including but not limited to: ACORN, The Daley Machine, Goldman Sachs, The Tri-Lateral Commision, the Bilderbergers, Hillary Clinton's stash of FBI files,and of course the mainstream media.

There is some debate as to wether Orly Taitz is employed/duped by this conspiracy to make the birthers look bad, or if she is the lone brave patriot who is pulling on the thread that will unravel the whole thing, resulting in the deportation of Obama and the arrest of the entire Democratic leadership for treason.

So many enemies, so little time. What is a wingnut to do?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 14, 2009 4:11 PM   

"Barack Obama PROVED himself ELIGIBLE to run for and hold the office of SENATOR. Where was the far-right lunatic fringe challenge THEN?" - Jnagarya, Oct 14, 2009 @3:13AM

Where were they?

Oh, at that time in 2004, those dumb b!tches were too busy putting on a minstrel show and backing that CLOWN, Alan Keyes', Illinois senate run against Barack Obama.

Keyes is currently a plaintiff in one of Oily Tatertotz' nutsack lawsuits and, obviously, still mad over getting his sell-out a$$ spanked like he stole something (I think Obama got, like, 70% of the vote).

Signed,

BluegreenEyedMixedChick

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 14, 2009 5:27 PM   

Barack Obama qualifies as POTUS. He was born in Hawaii and was over 35. THAT qualifies him for POTUS. Besides..not too long ago...Congress, including the morons who questioned his birth, voted with the rest of Congress to stipulate that Obama was born in Hawaii.

That's it.

If anyone has a problem with Obama as President, they can vote for someone else 2012...THAT's the way we do things in this country.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 14, 2009 5:31 PM   

Orly Taitz needs to go back to Russia. If she doesn't have enough money to go back...let's say she's short $5.00.....I'll give her $25.00 and she can take 4 of her friends with her.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 3:09 PM   

The court cannot impose a sanction of any kind without first giving notice of the grounds for the sanction and also conducting a hearing. Without these elements, there is no due process.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 11:21 PM    in reply to Rgnad Kzin

That's supposed to be:

Regnad Kcin

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 7:05 PM   

If anybody is to be fined, it should be Judge land and all of the other judges who've "DISMISSED (blown off) all of the "ineligibility" cases filed against this evil muslim communist parasite, USURPER, barack hussein obama, for obstructing justice and total disregaurd for the U.S. Constitution!! Not one of these judges EXCEPT UNITED STATES MARINE JUDGE CARTER has any kind of standing, including judge Land! Judge carter and Dr. Orly Taiz both "stand tall" amoung the weaklings of the left!

Dr. Orly Taiz and Judge Carter are "Patriotic Heroes" and I do mean Heroes!
God Bless Dr. Orly taitz and Judge Carter!

There are always ...
Too many Democratic congressmen,
Too many Republican congressmen,
And never enough U.S. Congressmen.
~Author Unknown ~

FREEDOM IS NOT FREE!
GOD BLESS AMERICA!
GOD BLESS ISRAEL!
Bob Pinkstaff
Gunnery Sergeant
United States Marine Corps Retired
AMERICAN CITIZEN BY BIRTH, UNITED STATES MARINE BY CHOICE!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 18, 2009 8:54 PM   

Terri, thanks for information that many of us have wanted to know. It seems that it 's time to repeat your post of September 1, 2009 and my reply of September 2, 2009. This is a reminder to all of those flakey so called leaders in Washington DC, that we American Patriots will not stand by while they play politician at our expense, trying to cram this bullshit communism down our throats!

TO ALL SERVICE MEMBERS ... HONOR YOUR OATH!!!
My Reply Posted by GySgt Bob Pinkstaff USMC Retired on September 2, 2009 at 5:21pm

TO ALL SERVICE MEMBERS---HONOR YOUR OATH!!!

Posted by Terri Applen on September 1, 2009 at 10:20pm
Send Message View Terri Applen's blog
Honor Your Oath!

An Open Letter to the Service members and all of those who Pledged Allegiance to these United States of America!

Written by an American Service member.

“Duty, then is the sublimest word in our language. Do your duty in all things. You cannot do more, you should never wish to do less.” - General Robert E. Lee

Every oath administered at every enlistment, commissioning, and promotion across all branches of military service begins with the individual swearing or affirming to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America against all enemies foreign and domestic and ... [to] bear true faith and allegiance to the same.” Should our country and government fall under attack from foreign armies, there is no question that we will defend this country and our Constitution to our last. But what should be the proper course of action for the service members of these united States when our Constitution is threatened from within, by those who themselves have taken a nearly identical solemn oath to support and defend (or preserve, protect, and defend in the case of the President) the very document they usurp? The answer to this quotidian question, it would seem, is not self-evident when one considers the near silence of our military personnel.

When elected officials, regardless of political affiliation, whether Representative, Senator, or President, repeatedly defy the Constitution by legislating on and regulating all aspects of American life, commerce, privacy, and health in direct defiance of the limited scope to which the Constitution binds them (see Article I, Section 8), what recourse is available to the service members bound by their oath? What options remain when repeated written and oral petitions for redress of grievances addressed to these officials are answered only by repeated injury? How many petitions of this nature must be ignored before American service members and civilians alike finally muster the courage to ask such questions?

Some may say that the service member’s duty is to maintain the status quo and remain silent, declaring that it would be unwise or unprofessional for military men and women to opine on political matters. However, these matters are not of a partisan nature. The nature of addressing unconstitutional advances, rather, is that of a service member fulfilling his sworn duty and at stake is the nature of the relationship between the federal government and the people and States.

It is also perhaps not surprising that our service members largely have remained silent considering the dearth of education pertaining to the Constitution military personnel and Americans at large receive. Is this willfully negligent or is it another effort to abstain from appearing partisan? Is this negligence to teach the Constitution sufficient to relieve the service member of his sworn duty to support and defend our governing document? Certainly not! Ignorance in this case is a terrible shame but is no excuse. The ethical responsibility is on the individual service member to fully understand his sworn oath and it falls equally on his leadership to ensure comprehension of and adherence to the oath.

If the service member duty to support and defend the Constitution persists, again what recourse is available? Seeking to engage fellow service members in discussions about Constitutional authority for current legislation has the potential of yielding sarcasm, indifference, or being labeled a domestic terrorist threat. The time has sadly arrived where service members who have sworn to support and defend the Constitution are marginalized for voicing their concerns that our governing document is being metaphorically shredded.

So again, what remains for the service member who sincerely holds himself accountable to his oath when he finds his fellow service members and elected officials to be guilty of neglecting their own? Should he remove himself from military service? Should he abandon his sworn duty because so many others find the implications of supporting that oath an uncomfortable or unacceptable option? Common sense and an obligation to honor tell us that to do so would be absurd. Rather, it is the duty of the individual service member to continually and emphatically advocate the long-forgotten notion that the federal government abide by the law of the land. To that end, let this letter serve as a call to all those who have raised their right hand, often invoking divine assistance, to reexamine their willingness to abide by their oath and to accept its full weight and responsibility. This inevitably will yield only two options: deciding to dutifully act in full accord with the oath, thereby truly supporting and defending the Constitution, or deciding to depart military service. Any other option would be a dereliction of duty.

THIS IS MY REPLY TO THE ABOVE ...

TO ALL SERVICE MEMBERS---HONOR YOUR OATH!!!
As a young man of 18 years and upon graduation from high school, I enlisted in the United States Marine Corps on 3 June 1952 and was "sworn in", that is, with my right hand raised, administered the "U.S. Armed Forces Oath Of Enlistment" in Kansas City, Missouri. The Korean War was in progress, which began in 1950, just 5 years after the end of WWII (Pacific Theater). The patriotic spirit of all American citizens was still on the high level of that of WWII, the love for God, the USA and freedom ... in that order!

Even though I've been retired from the United States Marine Corps for 25 years and will soon be 77 years old, I am and always will be, until the day I die, accountable, bound and true to the "U.S. Armed Forces Oath Of Enlistment" that I solemnly took over 57 years ago and upon each reenlistment. As God is my witness, I will continue to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America against all enemies foreign and domestic and ... [to] bear true faith and allegiance to the same.”

The time is rapidly approaching for the U.S. Military, U.S. Military Veterans, Police Dept's, Fire Dept's etc to "DRAW A LINE IN THE SAND"! To decide if they will honor the "sworn oath" they were administered "to support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America against all enemies foreign and DOMESTIC and ... [to] bear true faith and allegiance to the same.” ....... Are you prepared to “support and defend the UNALTERED Constitution of the United States of America against all DOMESTIC enemies?!?" Which side of that "LINE IN THE SAND" will you be on?!?!

For myself the answer is simple, it's a no brainer ...!

The United States Marine Corps Motto is "Semper Fidelis", meaning "Always Faithful"!

That means "Always Faithful" to "God, Country & the United States Marine Corps"!

The last I heard, the country we live in, is the United States of America, the greatest CHRISTAIN AND JUDAISM country in the world and is governed by the U.S. Constitution!

In spite of the EVIL Muslim communist, USURPER, barack hussein obama, his EVIL wife Michelle obama, the so called U.S. Congress and SCOTUS .....
We will TAKE BACK America, Christianity, Judaism, the U.S. Constitution, Capitalism and the freedom and way of life that many millions of us have fought and died for!

As the old WWII song goes, made very popular during WWII ... "We did it before and we can do it again, we can do it again, we can do it again!" and by the GRACE of GOD ALMIGHTY, our LORD AND SAVIOR JESUS CHRIST, "we will do it again"!

As a Retired United States Marine, I refuse to live under any form of 'communism and or socialism' form of government! Be aware, I will fight to the death to ensure that the freedoms and way of life that so many of us have fought and died for are maintained! This not a threat, this is my First and Foremost promise to Jesus Christ my Lord and Savior and, those great American heroes who gave their all so that we could enjoy the good life, the freedoms and way of life that we had before this EVIL USURPER, barack hussein obama, came on the scene! Secondly,this is not a threat, this is my promise to this EVIL muslim communist, USURPER, barack hussein obama and all of his EVIL associates and henchmen!

THIS IS MY STATEMENT, I APPROVE OF THIS STATEMENT AND I'M STICKIN TO IT, SO HELP ME GOD!!

There are always ...
Too many Democratic congressmen,
Too many Republican congressmen,
And never enough U.S. Congressmen.
~Author Unknown ~

A United States Veteran is someone who,
At one point in his or her life,
Wrote a blank check made payable to,
"The People of the United States of America",
For an amount "...Up to and including my life."
~Author Unknown ~

FREEDOM IS NOT FREE!
GOD BLESS AMERICA!
GOD BLESS ISRAEL!
Bob Pinkstaff
Gunnery Sergeant
United States Marine Corps Retired
AMERICAN CITIZEN BY BIRTH, UNITED STATES MARINE BY CHOICE!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 22, 2009 12:08 AM   

THE WASHINGTON D.C. TURNCOATS!!

Posted on Patriotic Resistance 10/21/2009: http://www.resistnet.com/profiles/blogs/this-needs-to-go-viral-no-to
THIS NEEDS TO GO VIRAL! No To Copenhagen, TWEET CONGRESS ABOUT LORD MONCKTON AND US LOSS OF SOVEREIGNTY!

This is my reply to the above post:
http://www.resistnet.com/profiles/blogs/this-needs-to-go-viral-no-to
I'm gonna repeat this again and again and again if necessary ...!!!
BE ADVISED ... Congress, that's the jack asses and the fat elephants, are not on our side, the SCOTUS is not on our side, the state and fed judges are not on our side! We don't have any representation in Washington DC that gives a shit about Christianity, America and the U.S. Constitution! These elected AH's are "TURN COATS" and are lining up for position and favor in the NWO! Your just spinning your wheels, wishing they were on our side! Wake up, this is not the land of OZ and we're not travelling on the yellow brick road!

If Judge Carter turns into a "wimp" and dismisses the Dr. Orly Taitz Esq suit against this evil musslim communist, parasite, USURPER, barack hussein obama, then our 12 months of peaceful attempts to rid America of this USURPER, barack hussein obama will NEVER work! The only solution will be unpeaceful!

BE ADVISED ... For those of you who haven't began to prepare for an unpeaceful solution, you'd better start and start now ... Wake up to reality! It'll be a long cold winter!

There are always ...
Too many Democratic congressmen,
Too many Republican congressmen,
And never enough U.S. Congressmen.
~Author Unknown ~

FREEDOM IS NOT FREE!
GOD BLESS AMERICA!
GOD BLESS ISRAEL!
Bob Pinkstaff
Gunnery Sergeant
United States Marine Corps Retired
AMERICAN CITIZEN BY BIRTH, UNITED STATES MARINE BY CHOICE!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 24, 2009 12:14 AM   

The EVIL barack hussein obama's secret girl friend Vera Baker & 5 year old child!

Dr, Orly Taitz Esq link. Under "Category" Click on "Latest News (82)" http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/

If you have any info on barack hussein obama's secret girl friend Vera Baker and her 5year old daughter please contact Dr. Orly Taitz Esq ASAP by clicking on the above link.

Important: does Vera Baker have a child around 5 years old?
Posted on | October 23, 2009 |

Vera Baker Obama’s Secret Girlfriend – Bradley Effect?
The Post Chronicle ^ | Oct 13, 2008 |

Posted on Wednesday, October 15, 2008 6:57:21 AM by IrishMike
Is the lovable charismatic Barack Obama hiding the fact that he has a girlfriend? Or is he the victim of the ‘Bradley Effect?’ Rumors are swarming that Obama has committed adultery on Michelle Obama with a woman by the name Vera Baker.

Vera baker is a staffer who worked for Barack Obama during his run for the United States Senate in 2004. Rumor has it that Michelle Obama was complaining about the supposed close friendship between Barack Obama and Vera Baker and before the public knew it, she was transferred to work at the Caribbean on the island of Martinique.

The story goes as following: Vera Baker was Obama’s “Finance Director” for his 2004 Senate campaign and made a good buck doing so. Although those who followed the campaign, Claire Serdiuk was known as the finance director on all the postings but strangely Vera Baker was paid too for the same position but not listed. According to reports, Michelle Obama became very angry about something and all of a sudden Vera Baker was relocated to New York. It is said that Michelle was EXTRA angry about something, but it was not specified as to what in the media. And then, not very long after relocating to New York, Vera Baker found herself on the island of Martinique.

The Daily Mail who released the name of the woman has since then said the claim is unsubstantiated but there is a quite a bit of story to go along with what we don’t know. Could this mean that a major American newspaper company will be covering this story right before election? Rumor of Obama’s adultery will most likely have an adverse effect on the election and could come up as the big ‘October Surprise‘.
(Excerpt) Read more at postchronicle.com …The article on speculation of Obama affair has been scrubbed but here is a comment on it

Important! I (Dr. Orly Taitz Esq) needs a copy of the Birth Certificate and the Death Certificate for this child.

There are always ...
Too many Democratic congressmen,
Too many Republican congressmen,
And never enough U.S. Congressmen.
~Author Unknown ~

FREEDOM IS NOT FREE!
GOD BLESS AMERICA!
GOD BLESS ISRAEL!
Bob Pinkstaff
Gunnery Sergeant
United States Marine Corps Retired
AMERICAN CITIZEN BY BIRTH, UNITED STATES MARINE BY CHOICE!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 6:02 PM   

RECKLESS 2008 & 2009 U.S. CONGRESS MUST BE REPLACED!

I contend that as long as long as "any - one" of the elected U.S. Congress, appointed judges, officials etc of this reckless 2009 congress remains in office, the United States of America will always be at risk of communist takeover! You can't tell the good guys from the bad guys, they talk out of both sides of their mouth!

TO QUALIFY MY POINT ... Because of the reckless 2008 U.S. Congress, both jackasses and fat elephants, allowed this evil Muslim communist parasite, USURPER, barack hussein obama, to not only be nominated, they allowed him to be elected! THERE WAS NO "VETTING PROCESS" ON THIS ASS HOLE USURPER, barack hussein obama, BY THE COMMUNIST DEMOCRATS, WHO KNEW HE WAS INELIGIBLE AND THE REPUBLICANS JUST WENT ALONG FOR THE RIDE WITH MCCAIN WHILE CRUCIFYING SARAH PALIN!

I don't know any of those who have expressed their desire to run for congress or those who are considering running for office in the 2010 U.S. Congressional election. These individuals might be good upstanding citizens and good choices under normal conditions. But ... These are not normal conditions!

BE ADVISED ... A few minnows swimming in a large pool of sharks will only eliminate the food chain! We must first eliminate the sharks, ya know, drain the swamp first to get rid of the alligators! Communism is alive and well in our own U.S. Congress Y'all need to watch the old black & white movie with Jimmy Stewart, "Mr. Smith Goes To Washington"!

The election process of the "Continental Congress of 2010" with fully vetted candidates is the only answer to a possible return to the Republic of the United States of America!

THIS IS MY STATEMENT, I APPROVE OF THIS STATEMENT AND I'M STICKIN TO IT, SO HELP ME GOD!!

There are always ...
Too many Democratic congressmen,
Too many Republican congressmen,
And never enough U.S. Congressmen.
~Author Unknown ~

FREEDOM IS NOT FREE!
GOD BLESS AMERICA!
GOD BLESS ISRAEL!
Bob Pinkstaff
Gunnery Sergeant
United States Marine Corps Retired
AMERICAN CITIZEN BY BIRTH, UNITED STATES MARINE BY CHOICE!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 26, 2009 11:26 PM   

WE'VE DONE ALOT OF TALKIIN ... WE'RE NOT GONNA TALK A COMMUNIST TO DEATH ... WHEN DOES THE TALKIN END?!?!

First things first...
As I said, ya gotta drain the swamp first to get rid of all of the alligators", young and old alike. Be advised, the alligators are the communists. To drain this "230 plus year old swamp" won't be an easy, there'll be casualties, just as there were when our founding fathers fought and died to give us this great nation. Many of our good patriotic American citizens are too complacent, taking our freedom and way of life for granted, thinking all can be solved peacefully at the ballot box at the next election. Not true this time, communism and their fight for world wide power is always a "gloves off and no holds barred" fight! It's unproductive wishful thinking to think differently!

In the past and up until now, the ballot box was, I say was, the normal, acceptable and peaceful solution to unseat any elected state or federal official. Not so this time, we have an evil muslim communist parasite, USURPER, barack hussein obama, who sits in the oval office as prez and commander in chief of our military! This evil communist USURPER, barack hussein obama, was approved first, by the democratic party as an eligible prez candidate. The republicans had no rebuttal to candidate bho. McCain blew the election, and at the same time, McCain, the democrats and republicans crucified Sarah palin. Then, to add insult to injury, this evil muslim communist parasite, USURPER, barack hussein obama, was approved as prez by both the existing 2009 house and senate with no objections from the SCOTUS! The U.S. Constitution no longer works!!!

Replacing the "corrupt, existing U.S. Congress" via the ballot box, even if possible, will take many many years. We, as a God Fearing Christian/Judaism nation, don't have the luxury of many many years to to accomplish this task, time is on the side of the enemy! Like it or not, the enemy is the evil muslim communist parasite, USURPER, barack hussein obama, his evil wife michelle obama and all U.S. federal and state elected/appointed leaders and judges. They are positioning themselves for favor as the future leaders of the communist NWO! Those who think otherwise, are not willing to face the fact that we Americans may soon be at war in our own country, some just flat refuse to believe it, they say and think, "not in America"!

Dr. Orly Taitz Esq and Judge Carter are the only human beings on face of this earth who can stop the upcoming physical part (shoot out at OK corral) of the second Revolutionary War! If Judge Carter "WIMPS OUT" by dismissing this ineligibility case against the USURPER, barack hussein obama, the peaceful part of this revolution will soon end.

We must stop the "communists invasion" of the United States of America. That means locking up the evil muslim communist parasite, USURPER, barack hussein obama and his entire family first. The next step is to declare the entire elected U.S. Congress, all appointed officials/judges and all government transactions that have transpired since the swearing in of this evil USURPER, barack hussein obama, null and void! "I'd rather be dead than red"!

The delegate vote has taken place and closed. The newly elected congressman and senators of the new Continental Congress of 2010 will govern the Republic of the United States of America! How does "Doc Gillenwater for the House or Senate of the Republic of the Continental Congress 2010" sound!

I REPEAT ...
BE ADVISED, I will fight to the death to help ensure that the freedoms and way of life that so many of us have fought and died for are maintained! This not a threat, this is my first and foremost promise to Jesus Christ my Lord and Savior and, those great American heroes who gave their all so that we could enjoy the good life, the freedoms and way of life that we had before this EVIL USURPER, barack hussein obama, came on the scene! Secondly,this is not a threat, this is my promise to this EVIL muslim COMMUNIST, USURPER, ILLEGAL INVADER, barack hussein obama, his EVIL WIFE Michelle obama and all of his, barack hussein obama's EVIL HENCHMEN AND FOLLOWERS!!

THIS IS MY STATEMENT, I APPROVE OF THIS STATEMENT AND I'M STICKIN TO IT, SO HELP ME GOD!!

There are always ...
Too many Democratic congressmen,
Too many Republican congressmen,
And never enough U.S. Congressmen.
~Author Unknown ~

FREEDOM IS NOT FREE!
GOD BLESS AMERICA!
GOD BLESS ISRAEL!
Bob Pinkstaff
Gunnery Sergeant
United States Marine Corps Retired
AMERICAN CITIZEN BY BIRTH, UNITED STATES MARINE BY CHOICE!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 30, 2009 10:13 PM   

JUDGE CARTER, WINS AMERICAS' "WIMP OF THE CENTURY" AWARD FOR COWARDICE IN THE LINE OF DUTY!!

We thought judge carter was the one and only God fearing, honest judge left in the United States who believed in, and would honor his sworn oath, to defend the the U.S. Constitution!

NOT SO, NOT SO, NOT SO, NOT SO!
HE HAS DISHONORED TWO OATHS! THE FIRST SWORN OATH WHEN HE ENTERED THE MARINE CORPS, THE SECOND WHEN SWORN IN AS A JUDGE. JUDGE CARTER NOW JOINS THE RANKS OF DISHONORABLE MARINES IN DC ... ROBERTS, MURTHA AND NOW CARTER! THE SAME GOES FOR ALL OTHER ELECTED MARINES IN THE STATE AND FEDERAL CONGRESS/GOVERNMENT!

These elected congressmen and women/judges/appointed officials both state and federal have sold the United States of America out to the communists, without batting an eye, through that evil muslim communist parasite, USURPER, barack hussein obama and his communist regime!

Orly Taitz Lawsuit Thrown Out By California Judge
Oct 29, 2009 ... Judge Carter wrote in his decision that the plantiffs were asking the Court "to
Effectively ... Orly Taitz Responds To Judge's $20k Fine: Shove It! ... Reply
Favorite Flag as abusive Posted 07:28 PM on 10/30/2009 ...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/29/orly-taitz-lawsuit-thrown_n_338870.html - 214k -

There are always ...
Too many Democratic congressmen,
Too many Republican congressmen,
And never enough U.S. Congressmen.
~Author Unknown ~

FREEDOM IS NOT FREE!
GOD BLESS AMERICA!
GOD BLESS ISRAEL!
Bob Pinkstaff
Gunnery Sergeant
United States Marine Corps Retired
AMERICAN CITIZEN BY BIRTH, UNITED STATES MARINE BY CHOICE!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 31, 2009 5:16 PM   

Gunny, I am at your back (1693946).

This moment, this issue of Mr. Obama refusing to to provide legitimate proof that he is eligible to hold the Office of President of the United States of America is the historic equivalent of the challenge to this Nation of the American Revolution,and Civil War. Both were resolved through Semper Fi.

We will take the objective!

Stephens

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 8:36 AM    in reply to Dr. Gerald Stephens

Loon --

In order to run for election to public offce, one must, as a matter of LAW, prove IN ADVANCE that one is a citizen, and old enough to hold the office for which running.

Is that too basic for your to grasp?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 12:27 PM   

JUDGE CARTER WINS AMERICAS’ “WIMP OF THE CENTURY” AWARD FOR COWARDICE IN THE LINE OF DUTY!!

The cowardly "WIMP" judge carter is not taking comments of any kind. In fact, judge carter and his web site are in hiding behind the skirts of of the cowardly congress and his partner in crime, the evil muslim communist parasite, USURPER, barack hussein obama, his evil wife michelle obama!

WONDER WOMAN, DR. ORLY TAITZ ESQ, DESERVES THE PULITZER PEACE PRIZE AWARD!

This fine lady, Dr Orly Taiz, is a “HERO” in the truest sense of the word! Like the true Patriot Freedom Fighter she is, Dr Orly Taiz has gone “above and beyond the call of duty” leading this battle against the evil Muslim communist, USURPER, barack hussein obama, from the beginning, surrender has never been an option for Hero Dr, Orly Taitz Esq!

I will proudly stand with and support Dr. Orly taitz Esq in her battle to save and protect the American way of life, the U.S. Constitution (as written) and, the freedoms and way of life that many millions of us have fought and died for.

We patriotic American citizens thought judge carter was the one and only God Fearing, honest judge left in the United States who believed in, and would honor his two sworn oaths, to defend the the U.S. Constitution both as a United States Marine and judge!

NOT SO, NOT SO, NOT SO, NOT SO, JUDGE CARTER “WIMPS OUT”, COWARDICE IN THE LINE OF DUTY!
Judge Carter has dishonored two (2) sworn oaths, the first sworn oath when he entered the Marine Corps, the second sworn oath when he was sworn in as a judge. Judge Carter now joins the ranks of “dishonorable Marines” Roberts, Warner, Murtha in Washington D.C who have blatantly dishonored their two (2) sworn oaths by refusing to honor and defend the U.S. Constitution. This also applies to all other elected/appointed Marines, Army, Navy, Air Force, Coast Guard and civilian personnel in the state and federal government.

Judge Carter and the above named also win Americas’ coveted award, “WIMP OF THE CENTURY” for cowardice in the line of duty!

The current elected congressmen and women/judges/appointed officials both state and federal have trashed the U.S. Constitution and surrendered the United States of America to the communist NWO without batting an eye, through the evil Muslim communist parasite, USURPER, barack hussein obama, his evil wife Michelle obama and his communist regime known as the NWO!

There are always …
Too many Democratic congressmen,
Too many Republican congressmen,
And never enough U.S. Congressmen.
~Author Unknown ~

FREEDOM IS NOT FREE!
GOD BLESS AMERICA!
GOD BLESS ISRAEL!
Bob Pinkstaff
Gunnery Sergeant
United States Marine Corps Retired
AMERICAN CITIZEN BY BIRTH, UNITED STATES MARINE BY CHOICE!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 6, 2009 3:53 PM   

WONDER WOMAN, PATRIOT & HERO DR. ORLY TAITZ ESQ, FILES DECLARATION WITH PLEADINGS!

PATRIOTS,
Let's all stand with and support Dr. Orly Taitz Esq, both financially and morally, in her relentless drive to rid the white house of the evil muslim communist parasite, USURPER, barack hussein obama, his evil wife michelle obama, the Washington D.C clan who call themselves U.S senators, congressmen/women and judges!

Dr. Orly Taitz is our last best hope for a "peaceful resolution, I repeat, a peaceful resolution" to this issue, the return to the rule of law under the unaltered U.S. Constitution and the Republic of the United States of America! Please scroll down to read her "declaration". God Bless Dr. Orly Taitz Esq!

There are always ...
Too many Democratic congressmen,
Too many Republican congressmen,
And never enough U.S. Congressmen.
~Author Unknown ~

FREEDOM IS NOT FREE!
GOD BLESS AMERICA!
GOD BLESS ISRAEL!
Bob Pinkstaff
Gunnery Sergeant
United States Marine Corps Retired
AMERICAN CITIZEN BY BIRTH, UNITED STATES MARINE BY CHOICE!

This declaration is being filed with upcoming pleadings
Posted on | November 5, 2009 | 5 Comments



UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA



Captain Pamela Barnett, et al.,

Plaintiffs, §

§

v. § Civil Action:

§

Barack Hussein Obama, § SACV09-00082-DOC-AN

Michelle L.R. Obama, §

Hillary Rodham Clinton, Secretary of State, §

Robert M. Gates, Secretary of Defense, § Motion for

Joseph R. Biden, Vice-President and § Reconsideration

President of the Senate, §

Defendants. §



Declaration of Orly Taitz

1.My name is Orly Taitz. I am over 18 years old, am of sound mind and free of any mental disease or psychological impairment of any kind or condition.
2.I am a citizen of the United States of America and a resident of the state of California.
3.I am an attorney and an officer of the court licensed in all courts of the state of California, Supreme Court of the United States, Federal District Court in the central District of the State of California and have practiced pro hac vice in the states of Texas, Pennsylvania and Georgia.
4.This declaration is made in response to the October 29th order in above captioned case.
5.During the October 5 hearing in the above mentioned case Judge David O. Carter stated that I encouraged my supporters to call him.
6.I declare under penalty of perjury that this is not true.
7.During the hearing I tried to protest this defamatory allegation against me and asked to speak. However, Judge Carter refused to let me speak and respond to this allegation.
8.In the same order on page 29, Judge Carter has stated that he received letters with affidavits, claiming that I asked potential witnesses to perjure themselves.
9.I declare that this is absolutely and categorically not true, and it constitutes an outrageous defamatory and slanderous accusation. Those letters were ex parte communications, highly prejudicial against me and my clients and I had no opportunity to respond and deny those accusations.
10.I believe that the court referred to the letters from Larry Sinclair and Lucas Smith. Both parties were contacted and asked to be witnesses during the motion hearing on September 8, 2009.
11. I have asked Larry Sinclair to authenticate an affidavit he submitted to the Chicago police regarding the homicide of Mr. Donald Young. In fact, the statements to which Mr. Sinclair would testify are already a matter of public record.

1.In the affidavit submitted to the Chicago Police and in his book, recently published, Mr. Sinclair stated that Mr. Donald Young contacted him repeatedly and told Mr. Sinclair that he had a lengthy homosexual relationship with Mr. Obama.
2.The affidavit further said that Mr. Young was found dead, shot in the back of his head at the onset of the Democratic primaries for 2008 presidential election.
3.Any allegation that I asked Mr. Sinclair to perjure himself is not only completely defamatory, but lacks any sense or reason, as Mr. Sinclair’s affidavit regarding Mr. Young’s homicide can be found filed with the Chicago police department and in his book, that can be purchased on the Internet.
12. I asked Mr. Lucas Smith to authenticate Kenyan birth certificate for Mr. Barack Hussein Obama, which he previously tried to sell to the highest bidder on E-bay. Again, any allegations that I asked Mr. Smith to perjure himself is absolutely not true, defamatory and ludicrous, as he made this information available to the public long before he ever met me.

13. As of now I am the only attorney with the courage, integrity and strength of character to not only bring forward information of Mr. Barack Obama not being eligible for the office of the presidency, but I am also to submit to court information from two licensed investigators, showing that Mr. Obama has used 39 different social security numbers according to national databases, including social security numbers of deceased individuals.

14.I am bringing forward evidence showing that Mr. Barack Hussein Obama, sitting president, is guilty of multiple felonies, for which he might need to spend the rest of his life in prison.

15. I believe, that I am being targeted in an effort to silence me, which involves targeting my law license in an attempt to try to prevent me from proceeding with legal actions on the above issues.

I solemnly swear under penalty of perjury that all the facts stated and circumstances described above are true and correct statements.

Respectfully submitted,

NOVEMBER 5, 2009

/s/ ORLY TAITZ, ESQ.



By:__________________________________

Dr. Orly Taitz, Attorney-at-Law

29839 Santa Margarita Parkway

Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688

Tel: (949) 683-5411; Fax (949) 766-7036

California State Bar No.: 223433

E-Mail: dr_taitz@yahoo.com

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 8, 2009 3:31 PM   

This is my response to those ignorant, uniformed, naive people who have taken offense to Alexander freeman's post ...

Alexander Freeborn Check out the discussion 'What we must do and Why Part 1'
Be sure to read this. It may save your life, or the life of a fellow American Citizen.
Discussion posted by Alexander Freeborn:

Our Father who is in Heaven, I ask in the name of Jesus Christ that everyone reads this slowly and fully understands, and that we as a pe...

Discussion link:
What we must do and Why Part 1

Semper FI Alexander and God bless!!
GySgt Bob Pinkstaff
USMC Retired

**************************************************************************

MY COUNTRY AND OUR WAY OF LIFE THAT SO MANY OF US HAVE FOUGHT AND DIED FOR, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, IS IN DEEP, DEEP TROUBLE!

MY AMERICAN FLAG IS FLYING UPSIDE DOWN TODAY AND HAS BEEN FLYING UPSIDE DOWN SINCE THE ELECTION OF THIS EVIL Muslim COMMUNIST PARASITE, USURPER, barack hussein obama! BENEATH MY AMERICAN FLAG THAT IS FLYING UPSIDE