I suspect that if this was a reasonable legal tactic Dow Chemical would've pursued it long ago. Moreover, such a lawsuit would no doubt have the unintended consequence of raising the profile of this disgusting organization.

If they do decide to forge ahead I hope the CoC will consider retaining the services of Orly Taitz. She is still licensed to practice law and her services would be fit hand-in-glove.

I’m waiting for Limbaugh, Beck, O’Reily, and the rest to complain the Chamber has no sense of humor, just like they complain when they’re called out for their racist, homophobic, sexist rants...Still waiting...Anyone? Anyone?

The eyes on that guy in the picture is creepy. Both seem to be drifting apart the longer you look.

I predict this will be every bit the brilliant legal and public relations success that Fox's lawsuit against Al Franken was.

You know, the where Fox launched a bombastic complaint and great fanfare then dropped three days after the preliminary injunction ruling where the judge describedthe lawsuit as "wholly without merit factually and legally."

Gotta hand it to the Yes Men. First they fool everybody by playing Chamber fools, and the prat was so good that they do it again with the same ruse and sue themselves, gaining further notoriety.

What, it's not as funny when you dupe the dupes into giving you a forum for further grandstanding? I can't wait to see all the motions and declarations they get to file that will get national attention and point the spotlight on all the absurd CoC actions and beliefs.

CoC should try to settle now, by paying the Yes Men as much as they can.

Yes Man Mike B attended the screening of their film in New Orleans a couple weeks ago during the New Orleans Film Festival. He answered questions from the audience after the movie and one person asked about law suits and if they were concerned about being sued. His response was that he welcomed it as it will help keep the issues of which they're trying to bring to national attention in the media spotlight longer. He noted a law suit in the UK where McDonalds was suing someone and it brought about a lot of negative publicity towards McDonalds. I assume both Yes Men welcome this legal challenge as it may help to publicize just the issues that they were trying to bring to national attention to in the first place.

They (the Chamber) do realize that satire is protected speech? I doubt if they have a case, except one to make themselves look like crybabies.

Why can't/don't "we the people" sue the Chamber of Commerce..for "alienation of affection"...luring our own government away from us, (away from "the people") with bribes, candy and promises of high paying jobs, (in case the politicians get caught and then fired)..(AKA "campaign donations")
Oh yeah I forgot..U.S.A.G. Eric Holder..one of the original Chamber of Commerce's "Yes Men"

This proves that the Chamber of Commerce is nothing but a front organization for the trial lawyers!

The Yes Men probably have plenty of attorneys lined up already, waiting for their shot at a national reputation.