TPMMuckraker

Don't Even Point! Cheney's Extreme View Of Presidential Privilege

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

Former Vice President Dick Cheney

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

It's not news that Dick Cheney takes an expansive view of executive privilege. But one passage from the just released Plame interview documents makes clear just how far he took it.

When asked if he ever advised Libby that the president had decided to declassify the NIE, the vice president declined to answer in view of his concerns about sharing potentially privileged conversations between himself and the President. it was clarified for the Vice President that he was not being asked to comment on the substance of his conversations with the President, but rather, only whether he'd ever told Libby that he'd had such a discussion with the President. In response, Vice President Cheney repeated his assertion that he must refrain from commenting to the investigators about any private and/or privileged conversations he may have had with the President.

In other words, not only could Cheney not talk about any conversations with the president -- even to federal law enforcement. He couldn't even talk about any conversations with an aide about conversations with the president.

Join the Conversation!

14 comments

Recommend Recommend (6)

October 30, 2009 7:51 PM   

Dick is dithering with the truth.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 30, 2009 8:09 PM    in reply to ivy22

I don't think he is dithering so much as he has totally accepted life in an alternate reality. All of the lies would trip him up eventually, if he did not live in a world where up is down and he is always right.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 31, 2009 10:29 PM    in reply to ivy22

The ONE thing we KNOW.... Dick Chaney is DISTURBED!!! Well ... more like ... INSANE!! See below how disturbed he is ... twice in just 3 sentences from this article.
---Cheney said The New York Times piece was disturbing. Cheney said he was most disturbed because it was now being made to look as though the vice president had personally sent Wilson on the trip. The vice president said that all he had done was to make a legitimate inquiry of a CIA briefer in February 2002 about Niger and Iraq.--

I as a voting US citizen am DISTURBED too!! DISTURED that the RNC/Repub/Conservatives/Supporters continue to present (hoist upon) the American peoples DISTURBED individuals for elective office ... Bush/Cheny, McCain/Palin ... not to mention the cast of characters in the propaganda arm (Fox "News")!

OH, sorry about the misspelling of ChAney ... I am reminded of Lon Chaney and the characters he played in the old "Horror" movies ... you know ... the ones where he terrorized, murdered, became blood sucking animals, never died and never went away! Happy Halloween booooooooo!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 31, 2009 12:01 AM   

What a jackass.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 31, 2009 6:12 AM   

Cheney reflects the so-called unitary executuve Constitutional theory pushed by the Cheney-ites. I considered the "doctrine" absurd, BUT Bush and Cheney have salted the judiciary with judges that actually believe this. One of them is Judge Brett Kavanuagh of the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit who is considered a major "star" in the judicial firmament. They are all over the judiciary which is one of the reasons the Republicans are stalling Obama judicial nominations--i.e., preserve right wing najorities on the Courts of Appeal so that they can rule against Obama programs. At its heart is the severe restriction of the Article I power of Congress. Do not ignore the rumblings about a legal challenge to health care reform as beyond Congressional power. The Roberts Supreme Court is rapidly restoring the "doctrines" that allowed it to declare child labor laws unconstitutional and much of the early New Deal. There are a few cases before the Supreme Court this term which will indicate if this extreme view has penetrated the Supreme Court--I fear it may be approaching majority status if it has not already. If this scares you, it should.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 31, 2009 10:13 AM   

Like the 5-4 SCOTUS decision making W president, executive privilege only applied to Bush's administration and was not to be repeated. That's GOP exceptionalism.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 31, 2009 11:41 AM   

It makes for great intellectual debate to focus on the arguments devised by the neocons to justify their acts. However, Cheney and his cabal represent the continuation of a treasonous band operating across business and government lines, with the purpose of dominating this nation and, through it, the world. They have their roots historically in the nobility and the old class system: "noblesse oblige", if you will. Then the rise of the robber barons and the growing role of federal government provided the opportunity to combine economic and political power. Eisenhower perceived the threat late in his presidency and chose to warn our nation of the threat from the "military and industrial complex" as the theme of his last major address. Both Eisenhower and Kennedy faced a CIA that sought to manipulate foreign policy by acting independently of executive knowledge and oversight. This deadly struggle continues, and the recent setbacks experienced by the neocons may be only due to the unprecedented incompetence of the Bush II administration. Not only was the judiciary further seeded with the agents of autocracy, rather the entire executive branch is riddled with staffers who pledge allegiance not to their nation as a whole, but rather to a group and an ideology smaller than and more parochial than "with liberty and justice for all". Cheney, his comrades and their mindless minions are very ruthless and very dangerous. However much the neocons' constitutional arguments serve to justify their official acts, either in their own minds or to the public they seek to manipulate, the important point is that they seek power for privilege and they do not quibble about what means are employed to achieve these ends.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 31, 2009 11:47 AM   

I wonder, why didn't we hear about this before... Dick Cheney, wow his parents name him so appropriately!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 31, 2009 12:06 PM   

To sum it up, Cheney won't talk about anything because it's 'privileged' or had developed the "CRAFT Disease", even back then, for many of his other non-answers.
Well, we got rid of one and now we have another 'tricky Dick'!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 1, 2009 1:23 PM   

One more brief question, Mr. Cheney:

"Do the orders still stand?"

http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2008/12/18/clock-stoppers/

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 1, 2009 4:30 PM   

Hey, guess what? Cheney won! He got the wars he wanted; got the companies in place to reap billions as war profiteers; he ruined his enemies [even those who were serving the country like Plame and Wilson]; he came out of his bunker after 8 years and the loyal ass-holes listen to him as though he is a genius; he ordered torture; he lied over and over again -- and he got away with it all. His daughter [a disgusting spawn if ever there was one] is being floated as a possible presidential candidate.

Short Answer: He ruined the country and got away with it, and his knuckle-dragging followers believe him when he blames it on Obama.

I do blame Obama (and Fitzpatrick) for letting him get away with it. This guy should suffer.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 12:36 PM    in reply to CVille Dem

Amen! Hwe and his daughter and Beck and Limbaugh and the rest of the Reich should suffer. Oh! And that Puppet-sident, W.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 1, 2009 10:13 PM   

BTW doesnt talking to someone ELSE break privilege? What an asshat.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 12:32 PM    in reply to yug doog

BINGO!!!

What this really tells you is that Cheney's respect for Congress is far beneath the respect he has for an Exectutive aid. He feels an aid has more entitlement to the information then a US Congressman. Does the Congress have any idea what the definition of contempt is?!?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on