TPMMuckraker

Flouting Lobbying Ban, Ensign Helped Hampton Clients: Report


Sen. John Ensign (R-NV)

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

We knew there was another shoe waiting to drop in the story of Nevada GOP senator John Ensign's affair with a top aide's wife.

And now it's dropped. A lengthy investigation by the New York Times reveals that Ensign was far more involved than previously known in trying to get a job for Doug Hampton -- his mistress's husband -- after the affair had been discovered. And that Ensign then used his influence in government to try to do favors for Doug Hampton's new employers -- apparently in violation of lobbying rules.

As Hampton summed up the basic problem to the Times: "The only way the clients could get what John was essentially promising them -- which was access -- was if I still had a way to work with his office," Mr. Hampton said. "And John knew that."

Among the revelations:

• After Hampton left Ensign's office, Ensign put his chief of staff, John Lopez, in charge of dealing with Hampton, even though Lopez had raised concerns that Hampton's contact with the office could violate a ban on lobbying a former boss's office. Hampton said, according to the Times, that both he and Ensign were aware of the rule, "but chose to ignore it."

• Ensign then took at least two actions on behalf of Allegiant Air, the Nevada-based airline that he had helped get Hampton a lobbying contract with. When Allegiant was being probed for allegedly overcharging for its online tickets, Ensign -- responding to a request from Hampton -- called the transportation secretary to argue on Allegiant's behalf. Later, Ensign arranged for Hampton and Allegiant to meet the new transportation secretary, Ray Lahood, in order to resolve a dispute with a foreign competitor.

• Ensign also acted on behalf of another Hampton client, NV Energy, after Hampton had contacted his office about the company. The senator urged Interior Department officials to complete an environmental review for a coal-burning plant that NV Energy was hoping to build.

• In order to convince his former aide Mike Slanker to give Hampton a job, Ensign falsely told Slanker that Hampton wanted to return from Washington DC to Las Vegas because Cindy Hampton was ill. Ensign said nothing about the affair. As a result, Slanker re-started his political consutling firm, November Inc., in order to give Hampton, as the Times put it, a "well-known base in Nevada political circles to start a small government affairs practice."

• Ensign greed to help Hampton line up three or four clients for that practice, in order to match the $144,000 a year salary Hampton had earned while working for Ensign.

• According to Hampton, at that famous February 2008 C Street confrontation, Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) told Ensign that if he didn't end the affair, Coburn would "go to Mitch" -- meaning GOP Senate leader Mitch McConnell.

• Just four months ago, as Doug Hampton was stepping up his demands, Ensign allowed his friend Coburn to serve as an intermediary with Doug and Cynthia Hampton in discussing a plan for Ensign to pay the Hamptons a multi-million dollar settlement.

• Ensign told Hampton that he first realized he wanted to sleep with Hampton's wife Cindy
after taking her to a black-tie Christmas party at the White House in 2006.

You should really read the whole thing...

Join the Conversation!

10 comments

Recommend Recommend (8)

October 1, 2009 6:40 PM   

I'm sure it's ok, as Ensign surely passed all this to The Family for authorization. PTL and pass the gravy.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 1, 2009 6:46 PM   

Wow! That is some shiny big wedding band he is sporting! I guess that proves he is a true family values kind of guy.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 1, 2009 7:22 PM   

Here is a perfect example of Republicans living under a constant state of hypocrisy.

http://progressnotcongress.org/?p=3047

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 1, 2009 8:05 PM   

Gosh, I've known people who take to the Hamptons for a vacation. In this case, it looks like the Hamptons took him.
He should really divide the amount of money he gave or sent thier way by the number of times he played two-backed-beast with Mrs. Hampton. Needs to get a handle on the cost.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 1, 2009 9:36 PM   

Actually, this could be a twofer. It doesn't look kosher for Coburn either.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 2, 2009 4:17 AM   

What did the Hamptons buy with this money? Did the Hamptons have health insurance paid for by this hush money?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 2, 2009 6:53 AM   

Shouldn't Ensign be gone from the Senate? Shouldn't Coburn be gone for complicity? This goes waaaay beyond a hypocritical sexual escapade. Besides breaking Senate ethics rules, he is breaking laws and the public trust. The only way this could go away is if it all happened in Las Vegas. Or is he expanding the slogan to "What happens in Nevada, stays in Nevada"?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 2, 2009 5:50 PM   

I'd like to know more about Hampton's military contracting business and how he got started. What was he selling to the government? Sex toys?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 3, 2009 8:37 PM   

Coburn is in this scandal up to his smarmy neck. Wait until he has to face some careful questioning about what exactly he was trying to accomplish in this affair and precisely what means he proposed using to hush this up. It seems that Hampton has lost some of his earlier naivete, to put it very kindly, about the right wing's objectivity and rectitude. He is now taking his story to entities that know how to expose the scurrilous treatment he was given for the illegal self-interested cupidity that it actually was. Obstruction of justice anyone?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 4, 2009 3:20 AM   

Well, just another case of a policy dispute. We surely don't want to criminalize it. We need to look forward, not back. We just need to make sure it never happens again.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!