Gale Norton is being investigated by a federal grand jury for allegedly talking to Shell about a job, while she was Interior Secretary in 2006, reports National Journal. Both Norton and Shell are said to have received subpoenas.
The existence of the federal investigation was first reported last month by the Los Angeles Times. In a nutshell, the Feds have been looking at an episode in which Norton's Interior Department awarded three oil shale leases on federal land in Colorado -- potentially worth hundreds of billions -- to a subsidiary of Royal Dutch Shell. Two months later, Norton resigned, saying she had no job lined up. But later that year, she was hired by Shell as in-house counsel.
Federal employees are prohibited by law from discussing employment with a company while that company is involved in dealings with the government that could benefit it. They're also prohibited from "violating the public trust" by, for instance, giving contracts to friends or associates. The Feds are said to be looking into whether Norton broke either of those laws.
Norton's interior department also had ties to Jack Abramoff. The department's number 2, Steven Griles, pleaded guilty in 2007 to lying to investigators who were looking into whether Abramoff used a Norton aide -- who Griles was dating -- to improperly gain access to Norton and Griles.
Norton did not return National Journal's request for comment.

TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

lousgirl84
October 9, 2009 7:27 PM
I hope this is a precursor to jail time for this bitch. Slime ball bitch,
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
freivogel
October 10, 2009 6:24 PM
Is she the one that turned the Dept. of the Interior into kinda of a sex-and-drugs convenient store?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Noam Sane
October 11, 2009 2:23 AM
Heckuva job!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Mrs Panstreppon
October 11, 2009 10:40 AM
Both Norton and Shell are said to have received subpoenas.
Said by who?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CVille Dem
October 11, 2009 8:07 PM in reply to Mrs Panstreppon
Jody, that would be "Said by whom?"
Glad you are on this one!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
johnnydoughey
October 12, 2009 12:45 AM
Too bad important folks don't get prison time in relation to the monetary amount they fraudulently stole from their bosses (that USED to be us, guys), but those same important people and their friends are now making the laws... and the penalties (or lack thereof)...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Dogtail
October 14, 2009 7:23 PM
These people seem to forget they are PUBLIC lands supported by PUBLIC tax dollars but maybe we are all a bunch of dupes anyway since we just handed over billions to Wall Street and they are back to their same old shit. It's like enabling addicts. This is all our tax dollars do. Enable corporate greed addicts. In order to help an addict or alcoholic, you are supposed to set it up so they hit bottom, not bail their asses out over and over but we can't let the rich white people see the bottom. No, can't do this.
And why in hells name are Bush and Cheney and Rummy still walking around? We gonna get to them at some point? If you have enough money and connections in Amarika, you can make a killing and laugh about it afterwards. What a bunch of morons those taxpayers are. HA HA HA HA HA.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?