TPMMuckraker

GOP Congressman Leading Fight Against Rangel Has His Own Ethics Woes

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

Rep. John Carter (R-TX)

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

In a rich irony, the Republican congressman leading the fight to have Rep. Charlie Rangel (D-N.Y.) ousted as chair of the House's top tax-writing body turns out to have ethics problems of his own.

Rep. John Carter (R-TX) had nearly $300,000 in unreported profits from oil stock sales in 2006 and 2007, Roll Call reported yesterday.

It was Carter who earlier this month introduced the failed resolution to have Rangel removed from his chairmanship of the House Ways and Means committee. Carter told Fox News that Rangel had been getting "special treatment from the IRS," and that his problems were "embarrassing to the Congress."

But in 2006, Carter made $199,000 in profits through the sale of Exxon stock. He made another $97,000 the following year. And in neither case did he list the profit on his financial disclosure form. In mid 2008, Carter did amend the 2007 form to include "capital gains", but he say how much he earned through the stock sale.

Carter did, however, pay taxes on those profits, according to his tax forms for those years. So the misstep appears to have been of a reporting nature, rather than a tax-paying nature. That contrasts favorably with Rangel, who is being investigated by the House Ethics committee for a range of financial irregularities, including failing to report
rental income on a vacation home in the Dominican Republic, which led to him paying nearly $10,000 in back taxes last year.

And of course, whatever Carter's situation, Rangel's case needs to be considered on its own terms.

Still, the GOP should probably find another standard-bearer for its anti-Rangel campaign.

Join the Conversation!

10 comments

Recommend Recommend (3)

October 23, 2009 1:01 PM   

Rangel should Temporarily step down as Chairman of Ways/Means, Democratic moral high-ground going into 2010 is paramount. If Rangel can be cridibly cleared of major wrongdoing than he could clearly step back in.

However, I suspect that he is guitly of enough wrongdoing that he would not make it back on the commitee. He doesn't really have re-election worries in his district but his Chairmanship of such a high profile commitee isn't really good for the party given the allegations.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 23, 2009 1:38 PM   

That's rich...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 23, 2009 1:42 PM   

Unfortunately, this is much ado about nothing if Carter paid the taxes on the money. Most folks will say "Hey, he paid. What's the big deal?"

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 26, 2009 10:29 AM    in reply to soupson52

Exactly. Much ado about nothing. Carter paid taxes. All he did was not write in exactly how much gains he had. He even wrote that they were sold. Call Ethics and they'll say it's a common error because there's not box on the form to write in your actual amount. What Rangel has done is much worse, and decades long.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 23, 2009 1:47 PM   

Investigate that SOB Carter. Only thing that I despise worse than Republican politicians are Texas Republican politicians; that is because I was born in Texas and consider them to be a personal insult.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 23, 2009 2:13 PM    in reply to Captain Dan

we live in Carter's district. we had a very moderate Dem running against him in a county clearly trending purple - but couldn't get the DCCC's attention - thx Chris, Rahm, really, you shouldn't have

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 8:19 PM    in reply to Captain Dan

Seconded.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 24, 2009 12:58 AM   

He had $300,000 in unreported profits. That fact just blows by. Here's a person that needs to pay more taxes not less. Being an unethical prick may just be skirting the ethics rules & nothing will likely happen to him, but, he's still an unethical prick. Oh, & he could stand a trip to the Ortodontist. Bastards probably got government paid for coverage too.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 24, 2009 3:05 AM   

hey, its like saying hitler was worse then stalin. get rid of both of them, and lots of others too.read up on what pelosi did to american samoa because she and her husband own lots of stock in the biggest employer there she exempted them from minimum wage rules. they're all crooks, rangel may be the biggest. funny, thats how he got elected when he beat adam clayton powell. term limits are the answer.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 26, 2009 4:20 AM    in reply to jjdjjd

Typical troll bullshit.

The minimum wages in American Samoa were higher than those in Kansas until this year. The Kansas minimum wage of $2.65/hour was kept that low thanks to the large Republican majority in the state legislature. Republicans also kept the federal and Samoan minimum wages low.

Democrats raised the federal minimum wage three years ago, but there is a lower wage for the islands. The bill's sponsors included 214 Democrats and only eight Republicans.

Republicans including some key players who were on the take from Jack Ruby, conspired to keep the Samoan wages low. The biggest employer in Samoa was Starkist Tuna, owned by Del Monte foods. It was sold to a Korean company last year. All of Del Monte's substantial campaign contributions went to Republicans.

Don Young, (R-AK), who was heavily involved with Ruby, was mentioned in a federal indictment last week and has spent millions on attorneys preparing to fight the ethics and corruption charges against him. Alaskan Republicans were aware of his violations, yet chose him in a contested primary and he won his seat in the general election by 16,000 votes.

Pelosi and her husband don't own any Del Monte stock and she never worked on the bill.

jjdjjd is a nitwit and/or a liar.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!