Remember the rash of right-wing protesters who showed up to Obama events in August and September armed -- sometimes to the teeth?
In the middle of September, the gun-toter du jour was Josh Hendrickson, who came to an Obama health care speech in Minneapolis with a Glock and a Kel Tec 380 in his back pocket. But Hendrickson was a little different from the other gun-toters: he showed up at the event just after getting out of jail for a pepper-spraying incident.
And based on court records we've obtained, that episode appears to have been an unfortunate flareup of Mall Cop Rage. It resulted in a fifth degree assault misdemeanor conviction.
In short: Hendrickson, serving as a security guard at a Cub Foods in a Minneapolis suburb, wasn't happy with where a female customer parked her car while returning a movie, according to police. So when she returned and got into her car, he slammed the door on her. Their argument escalated.
At which point he pepper-sprayed her -- a "quick hit" as he described it -- through the window. For good measure, Hendrickson followed that up with another quick hit of spray on the woman's driver's side headlight, according to police.
Hendrickson was given an $1,000 fine and 89 days to serve in the Hennepin County Workhouse, starting in June 2009.
Here's the key passage from the court records, which can be read in full here:
Hardeman indicated she was at the Cub Foods Store ... to return a movie at the Red Box machine. She parked her vehicle by the fire lane, and when she got out of the vehicle, a man described as white, approximately 40-45, 6 feet tall with a medium build, wearing a uniform-type green shirt, started to yell at her about not parking in the fire lane. Hardeman indicated that she just needed to return the movie and would be right back outside. As there were people in line, she gave the money that she needed for the return to the people there and asked them to return the movie for her. She then went back out to her vehicle, and as she walked back out, the male started to argue with her again as she was walking toward her vehicle. She got in the car, and the male was still right next to her yelling. As she was about to close the door, the male slammed the door on her and the confrontation continued. She rolled down her window, and told the male that slamming the door was not going to help with anything. The male sprayed her with some type of aerosol chemical in the face through the open window. After spraying her, the male then walked up to the headlight located on the driver's side in the front, sprayed the light, and then began walking towards the Cub Foods main entrance. Hardeman indicated that she felt a burning sensation in her eye, and that her right eye was irritated. She then drove home to wash her eye, and called the police. ...Officer Moua also spoke with the suspect, Joshua Hendrickson, who indicated that he had made a report through his work ... In that report, Hendrickson admits to giving Hardeman a "quick tap" of his pepper spray, but states that it was in response to a belief that she was going to open her car door and hit him with it."

TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

lousgirl84
October 6, 2009 6:20 PM
What a creep. As long as the guy is carrying his guns, he is a big guy. I guess it's the little penis syndrome.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jack boot
October 6, 2009 7:08 PM in reply to lousgirl84
Ah yes, the "little penis syndrome". I hear this cogent analysis frequently, usually on the Randi Rhodes show. Does anyone recall the Neo-Freudian "penis envy complex", usually attributed to women because they didn't have one? Can we finally dispense with this? There is no valid research that suggests that male aggression can be traced to feelings of penile inadequacy. Penis size, like skin color, should not be the pivot of one's argument regarding anything related to behavior. Do you feel comfortable with discussions of "big tit syndrome" or "frigid wife syndrome" or.... I thought not. Let's put "little penis syndrome" on the trash heap of discredited psychological tropes, where it belongs.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
kgb999
October 6, 2009 10:55 PM in reply to jack boot
And don't forget it's close cousin, shortman complex. Hit a bit close to home, eh?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jack boot
October 7, 2009 2:41 AM in reply to kgb999
Close to home? Well not really, if you mean me personally. But I do live in a world where disparaging comments about personal attributes like gender, skin pigmentation, sexual orientation and yes, penis size, should be pretty much off limits as rhetorical strategies. We don't say "black skin syndrome", we condemn gender related arguments like "she must be on the rag," and It's been a truly long time since I've heard any cliche mongering about short men. Perhaps you don't monitor your own speech for bon mots that might be hurtful or marginalizing to your audience, but I do. And does even suggesting this really require a dick-measuring contest to confirm ones, shall we say, bona fides?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Random
October 7, 2009 7:25 AM in reply to jack boot
I do love political correctness.
It's so fun. Though fun is probably offensive to anyone with clinical depression. And correctness probably to those who have OCD or other people obsessed with correction. Hell that's probably offensive to people who rather not think about things like that. and Hell, well that offensive to people who don't like bad words
I think I should stop now...thinking about how I may be hurting other people's feelings is hurting me...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
johno
October 7, 2009 11:47 AM in reply to Random
blech. you're just offensive to people who aren't dumb...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Minnesota Raindog
October 12, 2009 11:59 AM in reply to jack boot
I'd say jack boot measures up to about 2 inches or so. I bet he owns a cigarette boat too.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Powkat
October 7, 2009 12:26 PM in reply to jack boot
Would you prefer that when the guy in the ridiculously huge pick-up jacked with jacked up suspension tailgates and/or cut me off in traffic that I just wave my pinkie? Because I do.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
LFC
October 7, 2009 2:59 PM in reply to Powkat
Don't forget the "truck nuts".
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mikenathan
October 7, 2009 2:09 PM in reply to jack boot
There are many cases when society's high level of concern for minorities has resulted in a lack of concern for the feelings of traditionally privileged classes such as white males. For example, our school system is so concerned with helping girls be successful that little boys are being left behind, not going to college, etc and no one cares. However, just because it is appropriate to refrain from using racial epithets doesn't mean we need to pretend that women are and men aren't different. Sometimes women are on the rag and sometimes men are trying to prove something with their behavior. Why pretend otherwise? Why sanitize our discourse? I am perfectly comfortable with "big tit syndrome" and the like. This adds color to the debate, just as any good analogy. Even if it were desirable, you are never going to convince people to stop making fun of each other. Small penises are funny no matter what you say or do. So, my advice is to stop hijacking blog threads to wax about your personal rhetorical preferences, and focus on substance when you take the time to post comments.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Powkat
October 7, 2009 3:33 PM in reply to mikenathan
Du quell planet et tu?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jaypet
October 8, 2009 4:28 AM in reply to jack boot
hitting a lil close to home? i dont see why one would take offense to referring to this guy as having a little dick, mini nub. pinky penis...it simply refers to someone as being overly petty in a mysognistic way...if the lady was a man the mall cop would have never had sprayed and yet...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
brianm0122
October 7, 2009 11:58 AM in reply to lousgirl84
It's not "little penis syndrome", it's "I'm 40 and working as a security guard at Cub Foods" syndrome.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
fitley
October 7, 2009 1:11 PM in reply to lousgirl84
Look at his picture. Got his camouflage on so he's invisible and blends into the background. Goofy tinted sunglasses. Baseball hat, he's an athlete you know. Guns, pepper spray for the ladies, tin badge that says "Super Duper Undercover Hero". Groovy goatee. Where's the costume party, short stuff? Who's Bad? You're Bad. Super Bad.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Chris
October 7, 2009 1:33 PM in reply to lousgirl84
Disturbing no doubt, but let's take a peak into the modern Republican mindset...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Nonyabiznus
October 7, 2009 4:12 PM in reply to Chris
That's about as ridiculous as using your comment to say: "Here's proof Liberals are poorly educated. They can't even spell simple words like 'peek'."
There are idiots and jerks within all political affiliations. And some of them have CCW Permits. But there are idiots and jerks in positions of power now that are a lot more dangerous than this Hendrickson guy or most any permit holder........
Heck, (former) Senator Kennedy had more personal kills than 99+% of all CCW permitees, and his was most definitely reckless homicide, but wealth = entitlement, so he got away with it. Did you admire him? Was he more 'righteous' than some anger management failure who pepper sprayed a woman in an argument (illegally) and wore weapons to a political event (legally), but never killed or threatened to kill anybody?
{Hope you don't mind my avatar}
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
consrfunny
October 8, 2009 2:36 PM in reply to Nonyabiznus
Bwaahhhaaaa.
I love this argument. I also love how these clowns pick out Kennedy. I always wonder why they never use Laura Bush in such examples. According to your genius level post she's got more kills than 99% of those idiots carrying concealed weapons. YIKES.
BTW, how do you know this idiot that felt the need to pepper spray a woman sitting in her car doesn't have any "kills" under his belt? If he's so pathetic that he felt the impulse to spray a defenseless woman then who knows what other impulses to hurt he has acted on.
Bwaaahhhhaaaaaa. I sure do love reading moronic justifications from the gun crowd. Always good for a laugh.
My personal favorite from the moron brigade are the defenders of that idiot woman from Pennsylvania who felt the need to carry her gun with her to her kid's soccer game and wear it on her belt. Nothing like going strapped to a youth soccer game and scaring everyone that is standing around watching 8 year olds play soccer.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Confound Them All
October 6, 2009 6:27 PM
And to think it all started off when as a little boy he'd pull the wings off flies.
A bad seed. But hey, doesn't everybody in this freedom-lovin' land of ours have the right to carry two handguns when he goes to see the President? Especially after just getting out of the slammer?
Just misunderstood I'm sure. Probably needs the love of a good woman and a few dinners of macaroni 'n cheese washed down by a quart of Diet Coke.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
paulw
October 6, 2009 7:08 PM
Yep, that's someone with the calmness, deliberation and negotiation skills you want carrying a loaded weapon.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
plaidsportcoat
October 6, 2009 10:46 PM in reply to paulw
If he just got a violent offense, why allow him to peacock his gunnies?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AhTrini1
October 6, 2009 7:55 PM
Liar, liar, pants on fire; he thought he wouldn't have gotten questioned, much less convicted of anything, but sometimes, not often for some, there is justice.
"In that report, Hendrickson admits to giving Hardeman a "quick tap" of his pepper spray, but states that it was in response to a belief that she was going to open her car door and hit him with it.""
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jeffgee
October 7, 2009 11:43 AM in reply to AhTrini1
The catch-all excuse for police brutality: "I felt that my life was threatened"
And this guy's not even a real cop.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Dave Bowman
October 6, 2009 9:23 PM
This guy is a real-life Rod Farva.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
igotmyreasons
October 6, 2009 11:32 PM
Uh... anyone see Observe & Report?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
GTFOOH
October 7, 2009 11:09 AM
Before we all jump to conclusions, I think we need to know what the movie was the victim was returning!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JEP07
October 7, 2009 11:10 AM
Tweaker?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JEP07
October 7, 2009 11:14 AM in reply to JEP07
evidence to that effect; "the male 'started to argue' with her again as she was walking toward her vehicle. She got in the car, and the male was still 'right next to her yelling'.
Tweakers, especially those with attributed some sort of minimalist authority (like a rent-a-cop) can't abide their trivial authority being ignored or trivialized.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bill57
October 7, 2009 1:02 PM in reply to JEP07
RESPECT MAH AU-TORA-TEE!!!!!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
johnnydoughey
October 7, 2009 11:15 AM
... so he was sentenced and part of his agreement was to not carry pepper spray?
Lethal weapons, however, are now a must in this eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth, law abiding nation.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
johnmccsf
October 7, 2009 11:16 AM
Made the mistake of ordering Observe and Report from Comcast On Demand
Couldn't finish the damned thing
Tried twice b4 I flushed 5 bucks
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
dukesutton
October 7, 2009 11:16 AM
I have no tolerance for this idiot... what did he think would happen when he hit a woman with pepper spray?
That being said, how lazy is this woman? She parks in a fire lane and then asks other people to pay her fine for her. Was she on the way to perform emergency surgery? Negotiate a settlement in the Middle East?
Maybe she could have parked and taken the time to wait in line like everyone else in that store.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
westsider8
October 7, 2009 11:23 AM in reply to dukesutton
Exactly, this woman doesn't come off much better than the mall cop. She's the classic "oh, those rules don't apply to me". Fire lane--yep, I can park there. Movie--yep, I can keep it as long as I want. Line--nope, I'm not waiting there. At least she actually paid the fine. She's lucky it wasn't me. I probably would have keyed her car while she was inside.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
pmukh
October 7, 2009 11:34 AM in reply to westsider8
If pepper spray is worth 90 days in jail, not sure if you want to go around damaging property in that jurisdiction...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Milton Wiltmellow
October 7, 2009 11:37 AM in reply to westsider8
Good thing her shirt wasn't untucked.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jeffgee
October 7, 2009 11:41 AM in reply to westsider8
Does that justify being pepper sprayed? I thought pepper spray was meant to disable an attacker, not "show that bitch who's boss" of the parking lot after she dissed him.
Maybe the fire lane should have had a warning sign- violators will be pepper sprayed by the parking lot cop.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
kenga
October 7, 2009 12:11 PM in reply to jeffgee
No.
Guy is very lucky that she wasn't injured when he slammed the car door.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
midnight rambler
October 7, 2009 3:20 PM in reply to jeffgee
No, it just shows what happens when you put two assholes together.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
hunter
October 7, 2009 12:14 PM in reply to westsider8
I probably would have keyed her car while she was inside.
Why stop there? Why not just kill her when she comes back?
Seriously, get a grip dude. It's parking in a fire lane for a minute.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Kuyleh
October 7, 2009 1:39 PM in reply to hunter
The woman deserved to get her ass chewed. She didn't deserve to get assaulted, not, but she should have been ticketed. I don't care who you are, the laws apply to you.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
westsider8
October 7, 2009 1:44 PM in reply to hunter
Yes, you're right, there's such a fine line between petty vandalism and murder. By your hyperbolic logic, why stop at parking in a fire lane for a minute when you can blow up the firehouse?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Heron
October 7, 2009 12:23 PM in reply to dukesutton
I think having a large 40+ male yelling at her might have something to do with her ditching the line prematurely. While parking in the fire lane is pretty low, her action after that point seem more driven by anxiety than laziness to me.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jenzinoh
October 7, 2009 1:21 PM in reply to Heron
To be honest, if there is a fire, your little car is going to get rammed by the big ole tanker truck anyway... and then you will get sued for the damages to the truck. It's like parking next to a hydrant... they smash your windows and feed a hose through or use their vehicle to move yours...
In any case, the mall cop is lucky that someone didn't use their 2nd Amendment rights in response to a guy assaulting a woman in a parking lot...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tchamp77
October 7, 2009 11:31 AM
Wow, 90 days in jail for that???? Bet he learned his lesson after about 90 minutes in the slammer. If anything, 90 days probably made him even more bitter.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jeffgee
October 7, 2009 11:36 AM
What was the point of pepperspraying the headlight? Did he think it would blind the car?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
White Collar
October 7, 2009 12:21 PM in reply to jeffgee
Petty attempt to get back at the woman by damaging her headlight so she would be out $200+ for a new headlight assembly?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Nowukkers
October 7, 2009 12:25 PM in reply to jeffgee
My thought too. Anyone? An act of frustration at being an unqualified brownshirt? (I know - it was a green shirt - same diff.) My wife is a domestic violence attorney, and the frequency with which she sees this sort of ass-clown - with an unhealthy gun-lust - as the adverse, is very disconcerting. Essentially, they are cowards who love to remind people of the "power" they wield. I hate people who abuse traffic rules too, but a bit of proportion wouldn't have gone amiss here.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
christovir
October 7, 2009 12:54 PM in reply to jeffgee
In my experience, violence is often an expression of frustrated incompetence. Spraying the car headlight is a good example of that: petty, driven by spite, and totally ineffectual.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
runfastandwin
October 7, 2009 12:03 PM
Well it does not justify the pepper spray but she was in the wrong. If it's a no parking zone, it's a no parking zone. I am glad to see there are others here that agree.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
kenga
October 7, 2009 12:13 PM in reply to runfastandwin
I noticed that the quoted section did not state that she was IN a fire lane - "near the fire lane" is what is quoted.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Suznaz
October 7, 2009 12:06 PM
While any "I was just..." excuse for parking illegally is incredibly annoying, rentacops should have a police and a tow company on speed dial rather than assaulting the inconsiderate. Think he should consider anger management as well as not being allowed anywhere near the President.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
An Outhouse
October 7, 2009 12:36 PM in reply to Suznaz
My thoughts exactly. If I got paid peanuts to police a store, I wouldn't waste my time confronting illegal parking, but I would carry a camera to document the crime. ( and then maybe offer the images to the guilty party for a small fee).
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CT Voter
October 7, 2009 2:31 PM in reply to An Outhouse
Just tow the jerks who park in a fire lane (if that's where she was). People do that shit because there aren't any consequences. If you towed on car a week, voila! Problem solved. No one would park there, even for "just a minute".
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JEP07
October 7, 2009 12:18 PM
"he should consider anger management"
Or change his drug habits. See my earlier comment...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
eric the red
October 7, 2009 12:22 PM
I checked out Mr. Hendrickson's court records online. He has quite a record, actually. Interference with a police officer, domestic assault, hit and run, at least three disorderly conduct convictions, and a DUI. He has done a fair amount of time in jail. If you want to look, here is the link: http://pa.courts.state.mn.us/default.aspx
Click criminal records then enter this guy's name, Joshua David Hendrickson. His DOB is 11/09/1976. Don't confuse him with the other Joshua Hendrickson that pops up.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Nowukkers
October 7, 2009 12:27 PM in reply to eric the red
Aha! I thought I detected domestic violence.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Nonyabiznus
October 7, 2009 4:25 PM in reply to eric the red
How's he kept a CCW Permit? Those crimes should nullify your right to have one, although the Domestic Assault wasn't a spousal situation. I can't imagine the police AND Secret Service interviewed him and didn't do a records check.
Maybe they submitted a report to the Sheriff's office or CCW licensing authority in MN and his permit will be yanked.
If not, they should.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
counter coulter
October 7, 2009 12:32 PM
Interference with a police officer, domestic assault, hit and run, at least three disorderly conduct convictions, and a DUI.
Well that would explain the "40 and a Cub Foods Cop" aspect.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jack boot
October 7, 2009 1:02 PM
That should not explain the "40 and a Cub Foods Cop" aspect. Was he not vetted, and if so, why not? And if he was vetted, doesn't Cub Foods understand their liability in hiring obviously risky security personnel? This woman could have easily gone after this man's employer, and perhaps she should have.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
counter coulter
October 7, 2009 1:51 PM in reply to jack boot
I think you're confused about his job. You're talking about a very low paying job (~$13/hr) that the grocery store hires directly, not some sort of corporate security company. I doubt that Cub even spent the money to do a full background check on the guy. It's very likely that there are hundreds more like this guy working "security" jobs elsewhere.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
thunderbay63
October 7, 2009 1:10 PM
Exactly what I was thinking. How does someone with a record like that hold a job as a security guard?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SOS ICEBERG
October 7, 2009 1:17 PM
Fuck these assholes. Any one of these disrespectful psychos who show up in the presence of the president armed should be taken down immediately by Secret Service and arrested.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Nonyabiznus
October 7, 2009 4:30 PM in reply to SOS ICEBERG
Get a grip.......... He wasn't in the President's "presence"..... he was across the street from the building Obama was in.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SOS ICEBERG
October 7, 2009 5:17 PM in reply to Nonyabiznus
Believe me, I've got a grip. It's not specifically a matter of where this particular jackass was. He was participating in this sick pattern of acts and gestures, and they are an inexcusable affront to the stature of the US presidency and an act of overt disrespect to this particular president. His literal presence is not a matter to consider outside the totality of circumstances...he's a twisted MF with a mile-long record who's parroting sick, disrespectful behavior that could easily escalate into a violent encounter. If someone so much as wore a T shirt that said "Bush sucks" into GWB's presence he'd probably end up in Gitmo.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
sisterkevin
October 7, 2009 1:23 PM
Now that we're all past the "penis" psychology let's just put ourselves there,pulling into a parking lot "by the fire lane", trying to return a video. Slow down and reflect for a moment: how crazy is this guy? Yea, that's right, dangerously crazy. And then imagine if the she was a he and both parties were "packing". Shucks, we got us a good old fashion gun fight!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Schmed
October 7, 2009 2:05 PM
DOB = 09NOV76. He's a 32 years old rentacop: still sad but not quite as pathetic as 40 years old rentacop.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
fitley
October 7, 2009 4:23 PM
First thing he reaches for when "dealing with the ladies", is his pepper spray. Ha fucking Ha. Dork really has issues. I wonder what kind of scenario he imagined when he was packing not just one but two pistols at the super dangerous heath care rally. Those rallies are 10 times more dangerous than terrifying parking violation situations. How does he manage the stress?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Matt Jones
October 7, 2009 4:26 PM
He tried to pepper-spray the HEADLIGHTS? WTF, has he been watching Disney's "Cars" and taking it as literal gospel? Fucking idiot teabagger.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?