Professonal Bigots
Professonal Racist
Those who make a living from Hate
The color or race does not matter, the money is good

I would like to know who wrote the TPM that told the news and sports readers to repeat the exact words about Rush Limbaugh's statement about race, without verificaton?

This is the same as the sign in the cafe that says,
" No Colored ".

"They're MO is very insidious."

Should be "Their MO," shouldn't it?

I disagree that the representatives he named as being duped by Gaubatz. I don't have high expectations for the GOP now. On the contrary, they're quite low. But I do suspect that they know exactly what they're doing in this case. There is no other way to construe it!

"Some perfectly well-meaning members -- Myrick, Shadegg, Broun, and Franks, who I've met and are good people -- have been really duped by this Gaubatz character."

Myrick et al., are either stupid or sleazy opportunists. My bet is on the latter.

Suhail Kahn is a Republican so he will be very cautious about what he says about the right wing. Surely he knows about the racist crap espoused by the likes of David Yerushalmi and Paul David Gaubatz.

The SANE website is now paid subscription access only and for good reason. Gaubatz and Yerushalmi doesn't want the masses to find out what their real agenda is now that they have a shot at attracting a mainstream audience.

But there is enough evidence left on the internet to get an understanding about how corrupt the beliefs held by Yerushalmi and Gaubatz are.

From an essay written by David Yerushalmi and Col. Tom Snodgrass published on the Intellectual Conservative website in August 2007:

If Bush embarks on a bombing campaign of Iran that is based on the restrictive "gradualism" to send his own version of the Vietnam-era diplomatic message, patriotic (AKA “right-wing”) Americans will be happy after the initial attacks, but when Iran then escalates its attacks against the US in retaliation, the appeasers (AKA “left-wing”) Americans will say: "You see, bombing never works; it only encourages Jihad and makes matters worse."

And in a sense, they will be correct, unless, that is, we bomb to completely destroy Iran's capability to make Jihadi war against us. Restricted and gradual "tit-for-tat" bombing will have the same result that it had in Vietnam: Iran will understand our self-imposed limited war approach and ratchet up the ante knowing our domestic limitations. And, almost as if in concert, the anti-war appeasement movement will immediately scream: "This bombing is inhumane! Disproportionate!" Never mind the inhumanity in what Ahmadinejad promises for the US and Israel and in what Ahmadinejad has already accomplished, killing hundreds of GIs with IFPs/IEDs in Iraq while successfully fueling the violence of the Shia militias, further confounding the efforts for an Iraqi political resolution.

And it is this call of “inhumanity,” or put affirmatively, the demand for universal “human rights,” that effectively ends war for the West. The Islam of the Jihadists of course recognizes no such “humanity” except as it serves Allah’s will as expressed in his perfect (perfectly murderous) law known as Shari’a. But if those of us in the West, especially the US, cannot recognize that OUR humanity is more important than our enemies’, on what basis can we war? How can we ever justify the violence inherent in war?

...If we bomb Iran, and indeed we should, we had better embark on this venture with the intent of making the rubble bounce. As the old military adage goes, “More rumble, less trouble.”

From a comment by Yerushalmi in the comments section to the essay:

...We have also carefully spelled out what it is we would do to defend ourselves against the Jihad now being waged in the name and under the long-standing (1000 years) authority of Shari'a:

"…we need not target all or even any substantial number of the world’s Muslims. Instead, we target their leadership, their command-and-control centers, and their infrastructure. Will many of them be killed in the war? Of course, and it is intended to be so. Otherwise we can never expect to be victorious. Muslims will certainly never abandon historical and traditional Shari’a easily. But given sustained and determined separate-quarantine-search-and-destroy operations, Muslims will have the choice: either reform your own societies or forever be rebuilding them while burying your dead." From: http://www.saneworks.us/War-Manifesto-The-War-Against-Islam-article-343-1.htm...."

From a September 10, 2007 post on the Ethnic Ashkenazim blog:

...David Yerushalmi informs us:

"There is a reason the founding fathers did not give women or black slaves the right to vote."

The article "On Race: A Tentative Discussion, Part II"
(http://www.saneworks.us/On-Race-A-Tentative-Discussion-Part-II-article-64-25.htm) contains many similar gems.

Another SANE article states:

Is there something unique about the Black American (or, at least the Black New Yorker) that leads him to murder so disproportionately and to most often kill and victimize his own? Do we see patterns of Black culture that arise out of Africa and the wanton murder of blacks by blacks there? Why have the colonized blacks of the African continent, after having acquired their freedom and independence, so willingly slaughtered their own and live in despicable disease and squalor despite a land of enormous riches while Indians of the Indian sub-continent have successfully moved from British rule to democracy and relative civility even in a country that still maintains social inequalities as a fact of their culture?

According to Richard Silverstein at the Tikun Olam blog, David Yerushalim issues this proclamation on the SANE website:

WHEREAS Islam requires all Muslims to actively and passively support the replacement of America’s constitutional republic with a political system based upon Shari’a.

Whereas, adherence to Islam as a Muslim is prima facie evidence of an act in support of the overthrow of the US Government through the abrogation, destruction, or violation of the US Constitution and the imposition of Shari’a on the American People.

HEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED THAT: It shall be a felony punishable by 20 years in prison to knowingly act in furtherance of, or to support the, adherence to Shari’a.

The Congress of the United States of America shall declare the US at war with the Muslim Nation.

Do Myrick, Shadegg, Broun, and Franks really want to be associated with the hate-mongering and racism promoted by David Gaubatz and David Yerushalmi?

Perhaps Rep. Myrick can convince Gaubatz and Yerushalmi to open up the SANE archives so we can gain a better understanding of SANE's philosophy?

For that matter, let's get the Gaubatzes on record as having unequivocal support for the organization that funded their little project.

Link to SANE's 11/08 press release on CAIR racketeering lawuit here.

The defendants were served with the complaint and summons to appear while attending the CAIR 14th Annual Dinner Sunday night in Arlington, Virginia. Congressman Ellison (D-Minn) was a guest speaker at this affair.

... "The evidence has long suggested that CAIR is a criminal organization set up by the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas to further its aims of stealth Jihad in the U.S.," Mr. Yerushalmi said referring to the fact that CAIR has been named by the federal government as an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation terror financing trial.

"But our investigation and this complaint make clear that CAIR's criminal activities know no bounds," Yerushalmi continued.

...The four plaintiffs contacted their attorney David Yerushalmi only after they had spoken to Dave Gaubatz, a private researcher who had been investigating CAIR for its connections to the Muslim Brotherhood and its ties to global jihad. Had Gaubatz not informed the plaintiffs of the fraud, they would still be under the impression that Days was a competent attorney representing their legal interests in various lawsuits and administrative proceedings.

I wonder what how much money Yerushalmi guaranteed the plaintiffs for filing the suit.

Now we are investigating people based on religious beliefs? If these idiots read about Islam, they would find some truly inspiring information.