Since the Feds unsealed a criminal complaint against a former high level NASA scientist yesterday, charging him with attempted espionage, media interest has focused on the Israel angle: an FBI employee posed as a Mossad agent and gave Stewart Nozette money for classified satellite information.
Even the Justice Department's press release on the arrest played up the Mossad ploy, while noting that Israel is not accused of breaking any laws.
But a curious section in the criminal complaint suggests that there was a foreign country -- identified only as "Country A" -- to which Nozette may have passed information.
And there's circumstantial evidence suggesting one "Country A" candidate is India.
Nozette, who worked on Reagan's Star Wars program and was a top scientist at the Department of Energy and other government agencies, was a co-investigator on the Chandrayaan-1 lunar craft project on which NASA collaborated with the Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO). That's the craft that recently found evidence of water in the moon's soil.
One of the ways Nozette passed information to the "Mossad" agent in September was on a computer thumb drive. He also offered information on nukes and other weapons systems.
But before that, according to the complaint, Nozette in January traveled to Country A, taking two computer thumb drives along, but returning without them.
There's no crime alleged regarding the trip to Country A, but the Feds were clearly tracking Nozette at the time, because a TSA officer searched him as he was leaving the country, noting the drives, and a customs officer "thoroughly" searched him on the way back, observing that he no longer had the drives.
According to the complaint, Nozette also told a colleague sometime before the January trip that, if the government tried to "put him in jail" in an unrelated case involving his non-profit, Nozette would move to Israel or Country A and "tell them everything" he knew.
And right around the dates of Nozette's trip to Country A -- roughly January 6 to 28, according to the complaint -- there was a lot of activity going on with Chandrayaan-1, which was launched in October 2008.
This document from a planetary science conference notes that the first opportunity to try out a key spectrometer on the craft came on Jan. 8, over the Apollo 16 landing site. A paper co-signed by Nozette noted that the "first mapping season" of an imaging radar on the craft was set to begin in mid-January 2009. At the very end of the month, scientists gathered for the 100 day review of the project, though it appears to have overlapped only partially with Nozette's time abroad.
A. Bhaskara Narayana, scientific secretary of ISRO, told a New Delhi TV station that Nozette visited ISRO facilities at least twice. One of those trips was presumably in October 2008 when Nozette did a Q&A with the TV station.
The picture above, posted on a NASA site, clearly shows Nozette in India.
Is it possible that Nozette could have been giving information to the real Mossad on that January trip? Probably not, because Nozette made comments to the undercover FBI employee in September suggesting that the Mossad had never recruited him previously. That's despite the fact the Nozette for a decade worked for an Israeli government-owned aerospace company.
As for the complaint, it doesn't mention Nozette's role in the Indian project, despite a lengthy section on his career.
Nozette, of Chevy Chase, Maryland, appeared in court in Washington today but did not speak.
The Indian embassy in Washington did not immediately return a call seeking comment.

TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

Allsburg
October 20, 2009 5:42 PM
I'm not convinced - are you SURE that's India in the photo??
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tctundra
October 20, 2009 5:58 PM
There we go selling maps of the moon to India again.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CityGuy
October 20, 2009 6:15 PM
Okay so he was a triple spy!!! For Israel, India, but he was really playing the FBI. See, he was just pretending to be a spy so as to do a sting operation on the REAL spies! Yeah, that's it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
MNPundit
October 20, 2009 7:34 PM
The plot thickens. Interesting.... can we rescind our nuke deal with India over this? Sneaky Hindus!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Signalman
October 20, 2009 8:43 PM
I blame moose and squirrel.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
salaha
October 20, 2009 10:57 PM
What was the point of this article (and I am being very generous in using this particular noun to describe this piece) Mr. Elliott
Are you shilling for Israel?
Excuse my harsh words but, the story here is of yet another American willing to betray his country and spy for Israel. Do I need to remind you of Jason Pollard.
If anyone wants to read a factual, unbiased report of this incident, please review the following article
"Justice says scientist tried to share US secrets By DEVLIN BARRETT and PETE YOST (AP)"
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jGSMPiXOLJNwVNZd7FNRLBw-QiYQD9BF4AF81
Shame on you Mr. Elliott. I expected better of you and of TPM.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AJM
October 21, 2009 3:03 AM in reply to salaha
He's not shilling for either India or Israel -- the proper title of this article is that Nozette appears willing to sell to anybody.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
salaha
October 21, 2009 11:51 AM in reply to AJM
The title of Mr. Elliott's piece is "Could The Israeli Spy Case Really Be An Indian Spy Case?" With no proof, other than the fact Nozette went to India and a photograph of him appearing against the backdrop of the Taj Mahal, Mr. Elliott tosses out a spurious link to India. Why?
The court filings specifically stated Nozette thought he was dealing with the Israeli government, had worked for a company wholly owned by the Israeli government, and had told a co-worker if he was ever caught, he would be able to escape to Israel by obtaining an Israeli passport because both his parents were Jewish.
Mr. Elliott's piece reminded me of a tactic employed by some Republican during the 2008 election. They used an old photograph of President Obama dressed in African garb, to claim this as proof that Obama was a muslim. That was a blatant attempt at fear mongering and deflecting people's attention from the real issues at hand.
Mr. Elliott's piece was also deflecting from the issue which is, Nozette was caught in an FBI sting in which he was willing to betray his country and spy for Israel. Specifically Israel. And infact Nozette thought he had long been working for the Israelis in this capacity.
I stand by my original question. What was the point of this article Mr. Elliott. Are you shilling for Israel?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Bar Kafka
October 21, 2009 8:52 AM in reply to salaha
Pollard's first name is Jonathan, not "Jason." So, yes, we remember. But, hey, why dwell on the character of one shameless opportunist when we can make this all about the naturally nefarious interests of Jews?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
salaha
October 21, 2009 12:09 PM in reply to Bar Kafka
Thank you for the correction, the American who spied for Israel is Jonathan Pollard.
I don't understand why you would equate Jews solely with individuals who have spied for Israel? I have several very close friends who are American Jews. The idea they would betray their country to anybody would be an anathema to them.
A spy, is a spy. is a spy.
In the case of Nozette, his own words betray the fact he was willing to sell out his country to the Israelis. What has that got to do with Judaism?
I find it insulting to try and bring the Jewish faith into this discussion.
This article is about the betrayal of an American citizen, of attempting to sell state secrets to a foreign government, who in this instance the betrayer identified as the state of Israel.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
azpaull
October 21, 2009 5:30 PM in reply to salaha
I disagree, salaha. I think that this article is well-put-together and is highly relevant. Thanks, TPM.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Mrs Panstreppon
October 21, 2009 1:50 AM
Stewart Nozette was in trouble with the Feds long before he started selling classified information.
From his non-profit, Alliance for Competetive Technology, 2006 990:
Alliance for Competitive Technology, Inc. (EIN 33-
0401076), is a not-for-profit company established and
operated by Stewart D. Nozette (SSAN 335-40-7887. Dr.
Nozette and the company are the subjects of an ongoing
federal investigation, in connection with which a search
warrant was executed at the taxpayer's home, which also
serves as the company's office, resulting in the removal
of many boxes of company and personal financial records.
Those records were therefore not available to the the
company or its accountant for use in the preparation of
this return. When those records are returned by the
government, the company will be in a position to determine
if an amended return is required, and to file it if
warranted. This return represents the taxpayer's good
faith effort to prepare the most accurate return possible,
given the limitations imposed on it by the lack of
access to the records that were taken pursuant to the
search warrant.
According to the 2007 990, ACT spent $185k on legal expenses and had $75k in credit card debt.
It looks like Nozzette really needed money.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
salaha
October 21, 2009 2:18 AM in reply to Mrs Panstreppon
Dear Mrs Panstreppon,
I have always appreciated your input/blog at TPM.
FYI, the link I cited in my comment above,
Justice says scientist tried to share US secrets By DEVLIN BARRETT and PETE YOST (AP)"
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jGSMPiXOLJNwVNZd7FNRLBw-QiYQD9BF4AF81
contains the following information.
"...A law enforcement official familiar with the investigation said authorities became worried about possible espionage activity by Nozette after an investigation by NASA's inspector general in 2006 began looking at whether Nozette submitted false claims for expenses that were not actually incurred...Investigators found indications he might be working for a foreign government, and they launched a national security investigation that eventually led to the undercover FBI sting...IG investigation subpoenaed a bank account of Nozette's firm, Alliance For Competitive Technology Inc...From 1998 to 2008, the complaint against Nozette alleges, he was a technical adviser for a consultant company that was wholly owned by the Israeli government. Nozette was paid about $225,000 over that period, the court papers say..."
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
DancingBear
October 21, 2009 8:30 AM in reply to salaha
Not sure what your point is with this quote? It was acknowledged that the guy earlier worked for an Israeli company and thought he was spying for Israel. Why is it not important that he apparently actually did spy for another country? Are you shilling for India?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
salaha
October 21, 2009 1:09 PM in reply to DancingBear
The point of the quote was specifically directed to Mrs Panstreppon's comment. To add further detail to the company set up by Nozette. And to provide a time line of when and why the FBI got involved.
Mr. Elliott's article was vague in details. Rather than provide my interpretations of the events, I linked to:
Justice says scientist tried to share US secrets By DEVLIN BARRETT and PETE YOST (AP)"
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jGSMPiXOLJNwVNZd7FNRLBw-QiYQD9BF4AF81
for unbiased reporting of the facts.
Nozette thought he was/offered to provide classified documents to Israel. No other country was implicated in the court filings. You state '...he apparently actually did spy for another country...' Could you tell me where you are getting this detail from? given the fact the court documents do not include this claim.
Yes he travelled to India, but so too do hundred of thousands of other people each and every year. Are you suggesting that mere travel implies you are a foreign agent for the country you visit?
Why is it important to you to implicate other countries, when Nozette himself only thought he was dealing with Israel?
To paraphrase you question. are you shilling for Israel?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Mrs Panstreppon
October 21, 2009 9:46 AM in reply to salaha
salaha,
Thanks. That helps explain amounts of about $30k in the 2006 and 2005 990s classified as unreimbursed NASA expenses. In the 2005 990, Nozzette included a statement about how his records were incomplete and he wasn't sure how much money he had been paid but that he had professionals working on the issue.
Revenue in the ACT 990s is broken out between direct contributions and revenue from government programs. Most of the revenue of approximately $250k to $500k is on the government program line.
If the contributions came from the Israeli company for consulting services, both the company and Nozzette were in violation of the tax laws. In fact, the non-profit setup looks like a sham.
In the criminal complaint, there is a statement made by Nozzette to the supposed Mossad agent to the effect that he thought the company he was working for was a front for the Israeli government and that he was already working for the Israelis.
Looks like the Feds thought Nozzette was giving the Israeli company classified info and that triggered the initial investigation.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?