A good government group is calling on the State Department to investigate the role of former ambassador Peter Galbraith in drafting Iraq's constitution in 2005 while he held a lucrative stake in a Kurdish oil field.
The letter from Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington to the State Dept. Inspector General asks whether State approved Galbraith's activities, and cites a recent New York Times exposé that built off work of the Norwegian newspaper Dagens Naeringsliv.
The Times reported that Galbraith, advising the Kurds during the 2005 constitutional talks, helped secure "clauses that he maintains will give the Kurds virtually complete control over all new oil finds on their territory."
In 2004, Galbraith, ambassador to Croatia during the Clinton Administration and longtime friend of the Kurds, secured what the Times calls an "enormous stake" in a Kurdish oil field. He also worked for Norwegian oil company DNO in 2004 and 2005, including on an oil deal with the Kurds. Galbraith stands to make millions off his stake, the Times reported.
Galbraith, for his part, has denied wrongdoing and told the AP Saturday that "I had no affiliation, no association, received no assistance from the U.S. government at the time these activities took place." He says he took part in "appropriate business activities" that have benefited "the people of Kurdistan."
But the Times reported that Galbraith's role could be detrimental to U.S. policy in Iraq:
As the scope of Mr. Galbraith's financial interests in Kurdistan become clear, they have the potential to inflame some of Iraqis' deepest fears, including conspiracy theories that the true reason for the American invasion of their country was to take its oil. It may not help that outside Kurdistan, Mr. Galbraith's influential view that Iraq should be broken up along ethnic lines is considered offensive to many Iraqis' nationalism. Mr. Biden and Mr. Kerry, who have been influenced by Mr. Galbraith's thinking but do not advocate such a partitioning of the country, were not aware of Mr. Galbraith's oil dealings in Iraq, aides to both politicians say.Some officials say that his financial ties could raise serious questions about the integrity of the constitutional negotiations themselves. "The idea that an oil company was participating in the drafting of the Iraqi Constitution leaves me speechless," said Feisal Amin al-Istrabadi, a principal drafter of the law that governed Iraq after the United States ceded control to an Iraqi government on June 28, 2004.

TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

wyt
November 19, 2009 7:13 PM
Here's a beautiful quote from Peter, speaking in Brattleboro, Vermont last week: "Now, it’s true that people in Baghdad may disagree with that, people in Washington may disagree with that, but there’s no conflict there. The advice I was giving and the economic interest were exactly, exactly congruent."
See! No conflict! His advice and his business interests were perfectly aligned!
Source
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
dweb823
November 19, 2009 7:42 PM
No.....
You have just received another simple answer to a simple question.
In today's government, nobody gets prosecuted for anything, regardless of what is involved..
using govt. funds to travel to see your mistress, misusing campaign funds, violating the Geneva Convention, paying off aides to hush up a matrimonial disaster......nothing. so what raises this to a higher level than all the stuff which is already being ignored.
Send it to a Congressional Ethics committee. They know how to handle this stuff.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mepmep09
November 19, 2009 8:04 PM in reply to dweb823
Since they wouldn't be investigating one of their own on this one, a Congressional committee just might be the best way to go. A State Department investigation might be a conflict of interest, given the post-election inconvenience and heartburn Galbraith caused Afghanistan President Karzai and his gooood buddies in our State Dept. and White House.
And echoing another one of your points, how did this particular bit of sleazy behavior suddenly start getting all this intensive press attention, out of all the usually ignored sleazy stuff that has been going on since the advent of our Great Adventures in IraqIstan? Payback perhaps, or just an effort to destroy Galbraith's credibility - with (apparently) an assist from his own shoddy behavior - and make him an example to other would-be whistle-blowers?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
November 19, 2009 8:16 PM in reply to mepmep09
THAT'S A GREAT PICTURE MEPMEP
MADE ME LAUGH
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mepmep09
November 20, 2009 2:12 AM in reply to lousgirl84
Thanks; it actually isn't my own work,* and I cannot even now remember where I saw it. McMaverick as Popeye still cracks me up.
[*In hindsight, it's probably a breach of generally understood rules of "netiquette" on my part to use it in this manner; I'll probably go into my profile one of these days and swap it with a different image.]
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
wyt
November 19, 2009 11:03 PM in reply to mepmep09
His boss who wanted to cover up the Karzai "election" was Norwegian. After Peter defied him, this broke in a Norwegian paper. Norway's a small place.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mepmep09
November 20, 2009 2:04 AM in reply to wyt
Ah, thank you for that information; I didn't actually know this first broke in Norwegian media. Definitely payback, it would appear; just not Made-in-the-USA payback.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
johnnydoughey
November 20, 2009 12:50 AM
No news here...
Of course the two mobs are in close contact and use scoundrels... that's what mobs DO!
In a perfect world there would be intelligent folks who would not continue to vote in these mobs. But alas... this is not even a sane world, let alone perfect one... IMHO
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Johann
November 20, 2009 10:31 AM in reply to johnnydoughey
So, what do you do when all the candidates are members of the same "mob"?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
asknotwhynot
November 20, 2009 5:44 AM
Galbraith wrote a book advocating the break up of Iraq.
He is a stooge of Richard Holbrooke, who is widely known in Afghanistan to have advocated breaking up that country, too.
Why? So it's easier to get to the massive oil and gas deposits in and around the Caspian Sea.
Holbrooke got kicked out of Afghanistan after a) shouting at Karzai for refusing to call a runoff within hours of the first round results and, b) telling Abdullah he wanted to "turn Afghanistan into Yugoslavia" and "turn Pashtunistan into a Pashtun graveyard."
Now we know why Holbrooke and his filthy little assistant Galbraith were working so hard for a run-off.
They wanted to stick their grubby little fists in the till in Afghanistan, just as they did in Iraq.
Galbraith got kicked out of Afghanistan for misusing US resources in favour of an Afghanistan collapse precipitated by a sack of Kabul by Abdullah's boys.
The U.N. and Karzai kicked them out of the country before that disgusting plan could come to fruition, thank god.
These people are repulsive. Working on behalf of the investment houses and energy companies.
There is no more shocking or direct example of how US soldiers are now expected to die on behalf of corrupt US policy.
They die so that the ruling American elite can line its pockets with their blood.
No wonder everyone despises the Americans, considers them greedy, duplicitous and corrupt.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
kfreed
November 20, 2009 5:46 AM
So I'm guessing all the other politicians/government appointees benefitting from their roles in our "endeavors" to secure Iraqi oil will also be investigated? Every single one of them should be prosecuted, including Galbraith. Bush and Cheney, by the way, should head up the list.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
kfreed
November 20, 2009 6:01 AM
I should also add...
I remember a pre-surge news clip of Bush demanding that the newly installed Iragi government get on the ball and make the necessary decisions required to determine how best to distribute oil revenue amongst the various factions. I remember turning to my husband and asking sarcastically if "we" were among the so-called factions. Turns out... "WE" are.
Yet, its somewhat old news that's been fairly ignored by the MSM and I never saw that little "oops" clip again.
Old news: http://www.chris-floyd.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=989&Itemid=135
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?