Did American University professor James Thurber ever sign on to act as an independent ethics adviser for astroturf lobbyist Jack Bonner, in the wake of the scandal over those forged letters to lawmakers on climate change? The two principals can't seem to agree.
Thurber has now backed out of the gig, after an ad he ran in Roll Call praising Bonner raised questions about how independent he could truly be. But how firm was the arrangement in the first place?
Bonner told Congress late last month that he had "retained an independent ethics adviser who is well- regarded as maintaining the highest standards and independence," and that Thurber "has agreed to serve in this capacity."
But in a statement released through American University, Thurber said: "There was no contractual arrangement for me to be involved with Bonner and Associates pro bono or otherwise." He added that he had merely "mentioned to Mr. Bonner his need for ethics training for his staff."
A Bonner spokesman stood by Bonner's testimony, telling TPMmuckraker: "Professor Thurber told us that he would provide ethics training without fee, and he has now told us that he has decided he will not do that."
And on Thursday, Roll Call reported:
Thurber offered to provide pro-bono ethics advice to Bonner's staff, which he hasn't yet conducted. With the fallout from this week's ad, Thurber said he now won't provide that advice, and will recommend another ethics adviser to Bonner's firm. "I think its best not to do it."
It's a crime to lie to Congress. The Select Committee on Energy and Global Warming has said it is reviewing -- for possible referral to the Justice Department -- apparently false statements made by Steve Miller, the CEO of the coal-industry group on whose behalf Bonner 's firm forged the letters, during Miller's testimony on the episode.
Asked whether the committee might similarly review Bonner's claim to have retained Thurber, a spokesman for the panel declined to comment.

TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

Winston Smith
November 9, 2009 2:10 PM
Ethics advisor for a neocon neolib astroturf firm. Gimme a fucking break. Can I get my whore a chastity advisor?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
vbwr1
November 9, 2009 2:25 PM in reply to Winston Smith
LOL. . .
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Matt Jones
November 9, 2009 2:51 PM in reply to Winston Smith
Yes, you can. Call Carrie Prejean. Or, if she's not available, try Bristol Palin. :)
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
commie atheist
November 9, 2009 4:14 PM in reply to Matt Jones
Now, now. While Carrie did have her fake boobs paid for by the pageant people, we have no evidence that any money changed hands between any of the Palins and their erstwhile son-in-law-that-never-was. No need to disparage Ms. Palin's morals.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Johann
November 11, 2009 6:27 AM in reply to commie atheist
"No need to disparage Ms. Palin's morals."
What morals?
Bristol Palin is a prime example of the fact that while abstinence works for the prevention of pregnancy, abstinence programs fail miserably simply because human beings are designed, by God, to want to have sex.
Condoms, IUD's, birth control pills, and the morning after pill all work much better that abstinence programs at preventing unwanted pregnancies.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
LFC
November 9, 2009 3:09 PM
I remember when Kenneth Starr's hand-picked ethics advisor walked out on him, saying that he had abandoned his independent prosecutor role to become an advocate for impeachment.
For the record, Kenny didn't listen to his ethics advisor. I don't expect Bonner would listen all that hard to his hand-picked fig leaf, er, ethics advisor either.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
EH
November 9, 2009 3:10 PM
Screw it, they both lied. Keelhaul, 'em.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
rmiller
November 10, 2009 2:27 AM
This was a deal that went sour. While I wasn't a witness to the discussions, I'd bet that Bonner (being Bonner) wanted to control the message, and some of that message involved the words "pro bono" distributed to the media when in fact, pro bono wasn't really a part of it at all. Academician Thurber was then faced with a nasty conundrum: REALLY do this work pro bono and have everyone on the planet asking what the hell he was thinking about OR not really doing this work pro bono but still letting Bonner SAY pro bono. Someone at some point probably approached Thurber and explained the obvious: that Bonner was a very smart and aggressive guy and that this was not the best situation for an academician like Thurber (or really, anyone else)to be in. Besides, if Bonner so much as bought Thurber a CHEAP S.U.V. as compensation, it would be found out by the nasty left-wing press. So. . .too much grief, not enough upside.
Fuggedaboutit.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
PushMe-PullYou
November 10, 2009 1:26 PM in reply to rmiller
If it were me, I wouldn't trust Bonner about anything.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?