TPMMuckraker

Moderator: Klein, Kirchick 'Went At Each Other From The Get-Go'

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

Jaime Kirchick and Joe Klein

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

A raging expletive-filled shouting match between Time's Joe Klein and The New Republic's Jamie Kirchick, written up by the Washington Post, has been gripping the blogosphere.

And now we've gotten a few more choice details from the man who moderated Tuesday's panel discussion on ""The Pro-Israel Lobby and the Media," at which the war of words took place.

Ron Kampeas, a reporter with the Jewish Telegraphic Agency, told TPMmuckraker that the two pundits -- who had already clashed online over foreign policy-- "went at each other from the get-go."

Kampeas called Kirchick -- an uncompromising advocate of neo-conservative foreign policy positions, who's still in his twenties -- "a bit of a bomb-thrower," but added that "they were both ill-tempered."

During a hallway confrontation after the panel was over, according to Kampeas, Klein called Kirchick a "dishonest prick."

Kampeas said that during the discussion, Kirchick repeatedly accused Klein, of having called neocons traitors. In response, said Kampeas, Klein asked the audience: "Can you believe the shit that he's saying?" Klein later told the Post he's never used the word traitor in regard to neocons. "I've said, at times they put the interests of Israel above the interests of the U.S., " he said.

For his part, Klein, 62, kept making an issue of Kirchick's age, said Kampeas. "I'm glad that you're a college graduate, but maybe you should learn how to report," Klein said at one point. Klein sounded that same theme later to the Post, saying of Kirchick: "He's 25 years old, and he's one of those people who has opinions but no facts or experience."

At one point during the discussion, said Kampeas, Kirchick argued that an atmosphere of political correctness, which discouraged concerns about radical Muslims, had helped to allow the Fort Hood shootings. When Klein objected, Kirchick responded that Klein himself and his ideological allies shared blame for creating the climate that led to the shootings -- drawing boos even from the conservative members of the audience.

A final note: It sounds like there's video of the rancorous discussion. We're working to obtain it, and will post if we do.

Late Update: Kirchick tells TPMmuckraker that he never raised his voice, and that he asked Klein afterwards "Why are you using this sort of language?" It was this that prompted Klein to call him a "dishonest prick."

Klein kept referring to Kirchick's age, but "he was the one acting like a child," said Kirchick.

Kirchick compared Klein's focus on Kirchick's age to Klein's remark this summer that the work of neoconservative columnist Charles Krauthammer, who is confined to a wheelchair, "would have a lot more nuance if he were able to see the situations he's writing about," -- a comment Klein later apologized for.

"Why cant we debate the substantive issues? Why is it you always have to impugn people's motives and qualifications?" Kirchick asked, addressing Klein directly.

Klein declined to comment.

Join the Conversation!

37 comments

Recommend Recommend (8)

November 12, 2009 1:38 PM   

Neocons are traitors. They are traitors to all the good people in the world.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 2:51 PM    in reply to benny 4 facts

Also not a huge Klein fan, but Mini-me sucks donkey dick.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 5:23 PM    in reply to gonzo

roflmao!!!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 1:06 PM    in reply to gonzo

I cannot speak to that but I think he sucks something.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 16, 2009 1:06 AM    in reply to gonzo

Where do these child-adult Neocon(artists) get their oversized can't-be-wrong egoes? Inheritance?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 3:34 PM    in reply to benny 4 facts

Klein later told the Post he's never used the word traitor in regard to neocons. "I've said, at times they put the interests of Israel above the interests of the U.S., " he said.

That's the definition of a traitor, methinks - putting the interests of another country above those of your own. Joke Line should have the courage of his convictions.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 16, 2009 1:04 AM    in reply to commie atheist

Agreed:

"Kirchick compared Klein's focus on Kirchick's age to Klein's remark this summer that the work of neoconservative columnist Charles Krauthammer, who is confined to a wheelchair, "would have a lot more nuance if he were able to see the situations he's writing about," -- a comment Klein later apologized for."

Why did he apologize for saying that Krauthammer doesn't know what he's talking about, so talks out of his ass? None of which has anything to do with the fact that he's in a wheelchair. Or with the fact that he's both a psychiatrist and a crackpot, nut, and hate-mongering lunatic.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 2:28 PM   

Joe Klien getting into a personal beef with someone? Goodness me. Truly an unheard of occurance.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 2:39 PM   

I'm not the biggest fan of Joke Line but he's right about Kirchick except for one thing.

Kirchick is not a dishonest prick, he's a puerile dishonest prick.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 2:39 PM   

"Why cant we debate the substantive issues? Why is it you always have to impugn people's motives and qualifications?" Kirchick asked, addressing Klein directly.

We don't always have to. Only when someone's motives are criminal and their qualifications are non-existent.

Next question?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 12:30 PM    in reply to RickMassimo

Bravo! You've said it well.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 2:39 PM   

Ah...A new generation meets the same old Washington story of young turks and old fuddieduddies but with the traditional 'All About Eve' hissiness slathered with the new grease of firebrand dishonesty.
Phasers on heavy stun!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 2:40 PM   

It's a bit ironic for a defender of Israel to suggest that Muslims benefit from an "atmosphere of political correctness" in this country.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 3:10 PM   

OMG, reporters from two dying, inconsequential paper rags got in a fight.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 3:15 PM   

That has been in the Republican and neocon playbook since the time of Karl Rove.

Pick out the weakest position of your candidate or the weakest position you have and ascribe that position to your opponent.

It is called projection and it assumes that your opponents are exactly like you. It also worked in the past, but people are getting wise to it now.
.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 3:18 PM   

Let's face it. You have an opinionated, egotistical, inexperienced young brat going up against an experienced, curmudgeony old fart.

And this is what you get.

C

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 3:37 PM    in reply to cmaukonen

A pox on both their heads and a plague on both their houses.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 3:39 PM   

I've read The New Republic since high school. I cancelled my subscription last year after it turned into another mouth piece for the Israeli Lobby.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 8:11 PM    in reply to Brooklyn Democrat

Hmmm.  Might Likud Lobby be closer to what you had in mind?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 6:30 PM   

I ran into a lot of people "old enough to have experience and facts" working on the Obama campaign as a 23-24 year old. All of the people who used that "naivety" argument were condescending and made an embarrassment of themselves in front of a more mature grown adult, who happened to be just out of college. With that being said, there have been a lot of pro-Israel Americans who often think in the best interest of Israel rather than the U.S. At the very least these people have convinced themselves that what is good for Israel is ALWAYS good for the United States. Common Sense would dictate that idea is inherently false.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 6:38 PM    in reply to Common Sense Caucus

Yes, honey, young people are great, and some old folks like JK are immature. That said, Kirchick is a chickenhawk and a pompous ass.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 16, 2009 1:12 AM    in reply to Common Sense Caucus

"Common sense is much too common." -- Ralph Waldo Emerson.

"Common sense is none too common." -- Ralph Waldo Emerson.

For the naive:

Appeals to "common sense" are a self-serving appeal to an abstract, implied majority which puportedly supports the view of the individual making the appeal.

It is a form of the "appeal to authority" fallacy.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 7:16 PM   

Klein has, for a long time, fallen back on his "experience" as a sort of trump card when arguing with folks, be they younger than he, bloggers, or folks that, by his lights, didn't come up "the hard way." This is the argument of someone who is not feeling particularly comfortable about his position in the reporting world. Further, it reminds me of the admonition: "Do not fall into the error of the artisan who boasts of twenty years in his craft while in fact he has had only one year of experience--twenty times."

On the other hand, I've read some of Kirchick's stuff; he really is a prick, and not a particularly good writer, to boot. Whether he is dishonest or not, I couldn't say, but I would recommend that he read Marty Beckerman's post: http://www.salon.com/mwt/feature/2009/11/10/recovering_republican/index.html

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 16, 2009 1:19 AM    in reply to dougom

When one gets into the heat of "argument," and is bent on "winning," one can slip into intellectual dishonesty.

Of course, if a Neocon(artist), and or "conservative," and or Republican, who constantly feels s/hes been given the short end of the stick (a nonsensical image), thus feels one is always the victim (even if one convinces oneself that such fakery is legitimate), then one will engage in dishonesty as a matter of course. Then one's "argument" is as a whole, itself, a falsehood, a lie, and one might "honestly" advance and build upon it.

The problem is, of course, that pseudo-intellectuals such as Kirchick, because they lack experience, and are wet behind the ears, fall for egotistical certitude and bluster as being instead intellectuality. They don't know the inportance of truth, so all that matters is saying whatever will "win" the argument. The standard "Might makes right" -- and to hell with truth.

A chip off the old paradigm of William F. Buckley phoniness.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 7:28 PM   

I want to see the video before commenting.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 8:58 PM   

Kirchick makes Klein look great.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 2:42 AM   

yawn.... who cares?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 6:29 AM   

What's interesting is the culture war aspect of Kirchick's statements. How do you answer the charge that creating an atmosphere of political correctness resulted in the Fort Hood shootings? Do you say, "No, it didn't?" One can hardly do anything BUT attack the person making such an odious and immoral statement. It's true that snide comments about his youth are stupid, but Klein is no genius, that much is sure. He was on safer ground when calling him a dishonest prick. And it's not Kirchick's youth that causes him to make such a statement, it's his ideology, which is corrupt, fascistic, racist, and anti-human, and has been promoted by douchebags of all ages, like Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Lou Dobbs, etc., etc., etc.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 16, 2009 1:22 AM    in reply to L0ngT0m

And it's his youth which causes him to uncritically swallow and regurgitate that supremacist ideology.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Joe

user-pic

November 13, 2009 7:05 AM   

Once upon a time there was a man named Henry Wallace who edited a certain magazine, gosh, can't remember what that magazine was but it actually stood up to a certain demogauge, oh what was that guy's name, gee can't remember offhand, he was alleging everyone was a Communist. Wallace was the only real editor who actually stood up to that bully. Gee that magazine really encouraged liberals. Don't know what happened to it. What a shame...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 9:13 AM   

"Kirchick responded that Klein himself and his ideological allies shared blame for creating the climate that led to the shootings"

Or it could be "political correctness" like this:

http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2009/01/07/investor-relations/

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 10:59 AM    in reply to furey

Ah, yes. Israel uses the foreign aid given to it by the US government to buy bombs from US companies to be used for peaceful purposes.

Isn't peace wonderful?
.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 16, 2009 12:48 AM    in reply to Johann

Why don't we have a real conversation about Israel? Like how it is an apartheid state involved in ethnic cleansing. Why don't we ask why it is that every politician in the U.S. feels it necessary to suck up to Israel regardless of their stated policies and practices? why don't we discuss why there is a growing international campaign of Boycott, Divestiture and Sanction that is doing very well, particularly in Europe. Why don't we discuss what happened in Gaza?
Joe Klein; is he supposed to be our new hero?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 9:24 AM   

How is this story gripping the blogisphere? I haven't seen it everywhere and no one is really hanging on this story? What am I missing here except two people totally disagreeing on a subject

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 10:57 AM   

Why isn't that little neo-conservative prick in the Army. When he steps in harms way to slow the world-wide Muslim conspiracy I will take it seriously. Until then he can shut up.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 12:35 PM    in reply to Mooser

Kirchickenhawk.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 16, 2009 1:25 AM    in reply to PushMe-PullYou

Pseudo-populist anti-elitist elitist.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on