TPMMuckraker

Party Foul! Tea Partiers Eat Their Own In Bitter Internal Feud

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

The Tea Party movement is being ripped apart by bitter internal rancor, highlighted by a lawsuit against a former leader, vituperative name-calling, and charges of financial mismanagement and corruption.

As we told you this morning, board members for the Tea Party Patriots (TPP) this week filed suit against Amy Kremer, a former TPP leader who fell out with the group over her involvement with a rival Tea Party faction, the Tea Party Express. And on Tuesday, a judge granted a preliminary injunction, ordering Kremer to return control of the TPP websites to the board, and to stop representing herself as a TPP spokeswoman.

But that's just the tip of the iceberg in terms of the Tea Partiers' internecine strife. Emails obtained by TPMmuckraker detail how a rogue faction of Tea Party Patriots is lashing out at the board for going ahead with the suit against Kremer, and challenging the board's financial management, triggering a state of acrimony that appears serious enough to threaten the upstart movement's ability to continue to mount an effective grassroots challenge to the Obama agenda -- just days after the House passed the health-care-reform bill that the Tea Partiers view as socialism.

In an email to fellow TPPers sent Wednesday, Gerald Merits called the lawsuit "the single most insane act of self destruction I have witnessed since this country elected Obama," and asked "how much donor money is being spent of (sic) suing Amy?"

For the rest of the day, the email list was consumed with charges and counter charges. In response to Merits, Josh Parker, a supporter of the board, wrote: "Amy created a situation where TPP couldn't do anything BUT sue her, then she goes on with her poor me crap. She brings this on herself and all the rest of us."

At the root of the dispute is the acrimony between TPP and the Tea Party Express, a newer group formed by a team of GOP consultants. Many TPPers sees TPE as inauthentic, calling it the "Astoturf Express," and deriding it as a "Republican front organization." But others -- including Merits -- have flirted with TPE, apparently out of frustration with the TPP's sprawling structure and unwieldy decision-making process. On Wednesday, David McKalip, the Florida neurosurgeon and one-time Tea Party Patriot activist, who found himself in hot water after we published an email he sent showing President Obama as a witch doctor -- addressed a Tea Party Express rally in Orlando.

In Wednesday's email exchange, several other TPPers sided with Merits in raising concerns about the lawsuit. And one, Jack Staver, raised a separate charge against the board, suggesting that board members were being insufficiently transparent about the organization's finances.

Wrote Staver:

How much money does TPP have? How much did we make in DC? Where are the financial statements? Do board members get paid and if so who? Who signs the checks? Where does our money go?

Merits echoed that theme. "Why are the financial records not public knowledge?" he asked. "Show me the money!"

Eventually a Tea Party Patriots loyalist couldn't take it anymore. "Why are you intentionally trying to destroy this movement??" he demanded.

Charges of lax book-keeping -- and worse -- appear to be breaking out across the Tea Party movement. In a separate email written Wednesday and obtained by TPMmuckraker, Matt Perdue, the president of a San Antonio Tea Party group, ripped into the group's treasurer, her husband, and their supporters for conducting a "mass redirection campaign," apparently to line their own pockets using Tea Party donations.

"Where has all this money gone?" asks Perdue. "If there is nothing wrong going on, why has there not been one single piece of paper produced to back up why people got checks, some for $3,000, $7,400+, $4,000, $10,400+??? Where is the documentation? Why isn't the cash deposited like it should be? Why did it take more than two weeks to deposit cash from the meetings?"

Meanwhile, other Tea Party factions are trying to distance themselves from the dispute between Kremer and TPP -- and position themselves to benefit. Darla Dawald, the leader of the Patriotic Resistance, a far-right grassroots group, wrote in a message on the TPP email list that her organization has "not supported any lawsuit or fighting ... but I felt obligated to inform our base what is happening so that you could make an educated decision about your support of the Group called the Tea Party Patriots." Dawald has been a key participant in the bus tour organized by the Tea Party Express -- an effort shunned by TPP.

And Eric Odom, the founder of the Tax Day Tea Party events, wrote in his own message that the acrimony "presents a dangerous situation for the movement as a whole," and urged TPPers to return to "defeating the socialist thugs who seek to destroy our country, not fellow patriots who seek to stop them." We reported that Odom this week launched a political action committee designed to channel Tea Party activism toward an electoral goal.

As Wednesday wore on, the TPP internal email list degenerated into name-calling, sarcasm, and personal attacks. "Jack, you REALLY look clueless right now," Parker wrote to Staver at one point. Parker also ripped Merits for "your usual pissing and moaning without knowing nothing." And Staver deemed Parker "not worthy of a response."

Some TPPers expressed concern that the acrimony could damage the movement if exposed. "Daily Kos and other left wing interest groups are going to love running with this story," wrote one.

Merits appeared to share that concern. "This will go public if we let it drag on long enough and if you don't think this will have a chilling effect on all Tea Party movements raising funds you are living in a world of fairy dust and gingerbread houses," he wrote. "Read my previous emails. If this goes on long enough, we all go down - NOT just TPP and TPE - ALL OF US."

Join the Conversation!

60 comments

Recommend Recommend (10)

November 12, 2009 5:41 PM   

Many TPPers sees TPE as inauthentic, calling it the "Astoturf Express," and deriding it as a "Republican front organization."

Well, we certainly can't have THAT.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 5:50 PM   

This is what happens when you form a group entirely of people unfamiliar with the concept of civil discourse. Members who were familiar with factual research could also help them out with their financial issues; unfortunately, these folks get their "facts" from tabloid-like resources and think they've got the real deal. It's just not pretty.

Dare someone mention to them their previous stands on frivolous lawsuits?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 6:52 PM   

oh the lulz.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 7:00 PM   

"Where has all this money gone?" asks Perdue. "If there is nothing wrong going on, why has there not been one single piece of paper produced to back up why people got checks, some for $3,000, $7,400+, $4,000, $10,400+??? Where is the documentation?"

Don't worry. I'm sure they'll find a way to blame the govt & 'socialists' for their own errors and corruption.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 11:58 AM    in reply to Scott in PacNW

If it was ACORN members having this heated internal discussion, some Congressional Republican would call for an investigation...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 12:15 PM    in reply to JEP07

Where is the documentation?"

...as a former campaign manager who had to count every scrap for the FEC, I would like to see that documentation, too. Just what sort of oversight do these 'baggers have to deal with?

Surely someone in authority should make certain the TPP finances are on the up and up, don't you think? They should at least be subject to election laws, and non-profit regulation.

Not that we would ever want them to be discouraged from organizing, it's just that the rules apply to everyone in a fair and balanced democracy, don't they?

JMHO, but it seems to me that any legislative hoops ACORN has to jump through should be held up for these 'baggers, too.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 7:19 PM   

When you mix crazy with crazy, you still get crazy.

It is funny to see them falling victim to their own devices and personal motivations. Honestly it took longer then I thought it would.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 7:52 PM   

I swear, the Tea Party movement looks more and more like a spoof of Life of Brian.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 1:12 AM    in reply to Matt Jones

I can picture it

"I mean what have the Romans ever done for US"

"Well they did built the aqueducts"

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 10:10 AM    in reply to M. Digby IV

You are all individuals!

We are all individuals!

I'm not.

Shut up.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 7:56 PM   

With regards to the tea baggers calling each other names: it is certainly what they specialize in.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 8:01 PM   

This sort of backbiting is pretty much why we ditched the Articles of Confederation in favor of the Constitution (despite protests from the 1700s equivalent of these folks that we were collectively throwing away the precious liberty won by the Revoultion). As sincere as these folks may be, their lack of focus and shared vision beyond being anti-Obama makes it hard for them to do anything on their own - see anti globalization, anti-war and anti-Bushies of the last 2 decades.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

slb

user-pic

November 13, 2009 1:29 AM    in reply to calbearinillinois

(despite protests from the 1700s equivalent of these folks that we were collectively throwing away the precious liberty won by the Revoultion)

One of whom was Patrick Henry.

And you are spot on in that analogy.

I was going to say that when you put together a bunch of people who are basically anarchists at heart, it's not too surprising that what you get is ... anarchy.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 12:26 PM    in reply to slb

So, the crowd yelling about the evils of socialism, are in fact socialist? This is a great theory.

Jesus, you're the exact same type of person as the tea-baggers.
They call given money to bankers socialism.
You call quasi-fascist anarchists.

Always good to see that incoherence is a bipartisan affair.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 1:34 PM    in reply to beau23

huh?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 1:49 PM    in reply to Dorn76

I think we got a socioanarchist here...

Socialism = anarchy?

There is but one form of anarchy that might be acceptable, and that is enlightened anarchy.

The mob we here-in speak of is living proof we have not, as a nation or a planet, reached that state of being.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 3:18 PM    in reply to JEP07

I didn't say socialism = anarchism, though it is a type of socialism (socialism > anarchism?).

My point I thought was fairly simple.

The tea-baggers misuse the word socialist, using it as a lazy minded slur for anything they don't like.

slb, here uses anarchist in the same way.

In fact, at least the tea-baggers are using a slur from the right (...correct) side of the spectrum, when they call things socialist. Implying that anarchism is some how a conservative philosophy, is just ludicrous. You don't have to like them, obviously, but I tend to expect a tiny bit more intellectual consistency from my brothers on the left.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 18, 2009 12:57 AM    in reply to beau23

Government haters -- as all orthodox Reagan adorers are -- are anarchists at heart.

You, sir, are the one who doesn't get it.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 2:54 PM    in reply to slb

I think the more apt comparison would be to the latter days of the CSA, where decisive military action depended on a strong central government. Unfortunately, the leaders discovered that founding a union on the principle of "states rights" made that pretty hard...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 8:09 PM   

I don't know who these people are, but they are not organizing the big events.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

dal

user-pic

November 12, 2009 9:05 PM    in reply to Silence

Those other groups, collectively, appear to have stolen this group's identity. AFP, FreedomWorks, Our Country Desrves Better PAC, et al, used these tools to claim "legitimacy" for their AstroBagging. But now, apparently, they're not quite as useful.

Y;know, that's really gotta hurt... getting effed so hard like that... by an elephant.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 10:04 AM    in reply to dal

Political organizers come and go. The allegiance to Freedom and prosperity remains the same.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 12:00 PM    in reply to Silence

"Freedom and prosperity"

not necessarily in that order, though, huh?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 12:55 PM    in reply to Silence

"The allegiance to Freedom and prosperity for a few remains the same."

Fixed that for you. That's really what you meant to say, isn't it?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 8:40 PM   

Tea Partiers Eat Their Own In Bitter Internal Feud

I'd be happy to provide some ketchup and mustard if it makes them go down better.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 10:04 PM   

Hmm....

"insane acts", "self destruction", "Astoturf Express", "Republican front organization." financial opacity, "name-calling, sarcasm, and personal attacks", "cluelessness"...

You know, for once they're right.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 1:39 PM    in reply to Dave Adams

You forgot:

"...living in a world of fairy dust and gingerbread houses."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

RAM

user-pic

November 12, 2009 10:13 PM   

If you’ve ever served on a civic group board or been elected to local office (or covered said local government for the local newspaper) you know there’s a troublemaker in every organization. It’s a social ecological niche that is filled in every organization with at least one and sometimes two people who really seem to enjoy causing trouble for everyone else. The tea party movement, as near as I can tell, is comprised of ONLY these civic troublemakers, a sort of distillation of pure bad attitudness. Looks like it’s finally reaching critical mass, which it was bound to do. This could get pretty entertaining before it’s over.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 10:39 AM    in reply to RAM

It reminds me of the hate groups that the Southern Poverty Law Center keeps tabs on. They often disintegrate amid battles over who's going to be the secretary-treasurer, who gets to award badges, how the money has been accounted for, who's stolen the mailing list, and so on. Since the group does, indeed, consist of troublemakers who are almost pathalogical, they end up behaving like a group of 10-year-olds who try to form a club.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 11:31 AM    in reply to RAM

Exactly. If an entire organization is comprised of malcontents and contrarians, it's really only a matter of time before they start to accuse those within. Equal parts irony and poetic justice.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 2:04 PM    in reply to ched

Lord of the Flies?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 14, 2009 5:37 PM    in reply to JEP07

More like Animal Farm.

"Some pigs are more equal than others."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 10:22 PM   

These people gripe about fiscal irresponsibility in government and yet they can't manage their own small-business books? ROFL!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 10:32 PM   

Wasn't the Nazi party started by a bunch of anti-government losers who failed in every previous endeavor? I'm not calling them Nazis. I'm calling them losers and failures who aspire to take down the U.S. government and run it themselves.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 11:20 PM   

I have two 7 month old puppies in the backyard who spend their days pooping, eating, yapping at each other, chewing anything they can get their mouths on and anxiously waiting for me to bring them treats. And I've just decided to rename them Tippip and Teepee.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 8:09 AM    in reply to Chuck6421

Photo?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 12:23 AM   

This is what happens when a whole "movement" is made up of total paranoids! The financial records -- should they be disclosed -- will not satisfy them any more than Obama's birth certificate did.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 1:56 AM   

Crazy people and cannibalism and ironic justice. This is wonderful.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 6:05 AM   

OK, so let me get this straight.

The Tea Party Patriots is the original group of Tea Party protesters against all things Obama. The Tea Party Express is the Republican Party-sponsored group attempting to capitalize on this anti-Obama sentiment.

From what I can tell, it looks like the Republican Party is successfully absorbing all the Tea Partiers who are willing to be Team Partiers, but the TPP people not teaming up with the Party are left with just tea, and maybe some TP, but no party.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 12:46 PM    in reply to Mark Welch

Is this what is looks like when lemmings collide?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 6:50 AM   

They would have been more unified if they had just called themselves the KKK instead of the TPP or TPE or whatever.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 8:22 AM   

It might be wise to try to slow down the implosion until a bit closer to 2010 election time. But regardless of when these Republican Party factions finally divide, when factions take to fighting, their original articles of unity get so blurred that there's nothing left but messy party-wide divorce.

And The Dead Moose Party rises from those ashes?

Palin's book-sale tour might just produce enough delusion in the rabid minority that wupports her, to propel her into the Presidential race.

One good thing about Paiin, whether she wins or loses in -politics matters no more, as long as she can sell her books.

Had she been a sincere politician, ambitious for more than just money, she might have assuaged her rogue image and read some serious books.

Instead she's doubling down on her roguishness, and proving unequivocally that book sales, not good government, are what matter now.

She knows she gets her support from a very small minority, and isn't likely to lead any party anywhere but over Lemming Heights, so one might assume she would either give it up or change her message. But now that she's making big dough signing books others write, the office of the President is just another tool in her money-grubbing reality-show.

She should wisely and incrementally stand down after the book sales drop off, and let the Republicans look for someone their whole party can support. Knowing what she surely does about her poll numbers within her own party, she should have the sense to do what's right and try to unify what is left of the Republican branders.

But, I would guess that's not her real schtick, until she has another big book hit, or gets that wingnut talk show with the big payday, she's not giving up that golden-egg-laying goose.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 8:26 AM    in reply to JEP07

I realize that might seem off-topic but really, it goes to the core of how these "grassroots" groups are being taken in by these self promoting snake-oil sellers, Palin being the current seller-du-jour.

Factions represent failure, especially to the Republicans. These factions of a faction are just more proof the division goes too deep and too wide for the Republicans to repair.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 9:46 AM   

BRIAN: Are you the Judean People's Front?
REG: Fuck off!
BRIAN: What?
REG: Judean People's Front. We're the People's Front of Judea! Judean People's Front. Cawk.
FRANCIS: Wankers.
BRIAN: Can I... join your group?
REG: No. Piss off.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 9:53 AM    in reply to rdb66

fucker! you beat me to it!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 10:01 AM   

Beat me to it, too.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 10:47 AM   

These people sure are quick to resort to government intervention to deal with their problems.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 11:04 AM   

Back in September we here in my fair city of Mansfield, Ohio experienced a falling out of sorts within the "TeaBagger" community over a "Bobble Head Jesus". That's right a "Bobble Head Jesus". It seems that a TeaBaggerite brought in a Bobble Head Jesus to amaze the masses. One could ask the BHJ a question and then by touching it's precious little head await the powers of GOD(spring) to respond with the Holy answer. Questions like "Was Obama born in Kenya"? or "Dear Bobble Head Jesus to you hate Health care reform and all the Commies that support it"? Other members thought this was nothing more than "Black Magic". Now we here in Mansfield have the "Anti Bobble Head Jesus TeaBaggers" faction and the "Pro Bobble Head Jesus TeaBaggers" faction. You just can't make this shit up.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 11:39 AM   

Anti-v Pro Bobbleheads?
Two more factions?
We're up to about 20.
Palin's "divide and conquer" scheme for manning the helm of some future GOP/Wingnut chimera should be titled "fracture and profit".

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 12:15 PM   

"When you mix crazy with crazy, you still get crazy."
-- Ohyeahthatsright NOVEMBER 12, 2009 7:19 PM

Yes, but is it "crazy + crazy," which is "crazy x 2" -- or is it "crazy squared"?
Looks like it might even be "crazy to the power of crazy."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 12:50 PM   

Wouldn't these acolytes of Ayn Rand and her objectivist philosophy just accept that whomever has the money, they had the vision, temerity and will to just take it....and use it for whatever selfish reasons they may have?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 2:59 PM    in reply to Max Thrax

There's your mistake - just because they think Rand is the second coming doesn't mean they've actually *read* anything she wrote. FFS, most of them completely miss the powerfully atheist (some would even say anti-religious) tone of much of the work.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 16, 2009 7:15 PM    in reply to Matt Jones

I've read that crap, and it's pretty tough plowing.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 1:45 PM   

When you consider that the last election was well more than a billion-dollar affair, is it any wonder some of those carnival barkers from that circus might look for ways to stretch-out the season of lies?

Each "faction" has a separate finance committee, more than any one factor it is where the lines between these groups are drawn. They want the public to see them as united, but try and pry their money secrets out of the treasurer's hands and you get stonewalled every time.

Book-cookers, one and all.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 1:57 PM   

"TPP's sprawling structure and unwieldy decision-making process..."

I.E., the legitimate, though thoroughly misguided grassroots.

Do the TPPers even suspect the TPEers are the ones who brainwashed and bamboozled them in the Bush years?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 4:01 PM    in reply to JEP07

It probably has something to do with their Authoritarian tendencies. They can't work with each other to develop something, they have to all appeal to authority. That's why so many are deflecting to the Authoritarian astroturfed group.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 6:52 PM   

This is, of course, good news for Republicans.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 14, 2009 2:29 AM   

Who would have thought that a group of ignorant people loosely formed by unified racism and fear along with a total inability to understand economics, world history, American History or basic political science would devolve into back biting and anarchy.

/sarcasm

My real question is this. Since these people are masters of the inappropriate and irrational and always extremely offensive sign, when rival tea partiers begin tea bagging each other what will the signs look like? They have already used up Hitler, Che, Stalin, Castro and the Holocaust on President Obama.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 16, 2009 7:09 PM   

Hee hee hee.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!