When it's a choice between strengthening the Patriot Act, or showing up for the Tea Party Patriots, what's a GOP lawmaker to do? We'll give you one guess...
Several Republican members of Congress yesterday blew off votes on the signature anti-terror legislation of the post 9/11 era to attend Michele Bachmann's Tea Party rally against health-care reform.
Reps. Steve King of Iowa, Trent Franks of Arizona, Randy Forbes of Virginia [SEE LATE UPDATE BELOW] , Jim Jordan of Ohio, and Louie Gohmert and Ted Poe of Texas all took time out yesterday for the "Super Bowl of Freedom," as Bachmann has called it. And all missed votes in the House Judiciary committee on Republican-sponsored amendments to the reauthorization of the Patriot Act -- measures that would have toughened the Act, but narrowly failed. Those votes took place, a committee staffer confirmed, between noon and two -- the very time when Republican lawmakers were rallying the Tea Party troops on the Capitol steps.
One measure, offered by Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, the ranking Republican on the committee, would have extended the "lone wolf" provisions of the Act, which would allow the FBI to surveil or search foreign nationals even if it can't be shown that the person is an agent of a foreign power. Many believe that had this been in effect before 9/11, the FBI might have caught Zacarias Moussaoui. And Republicans had said that extending the lone wolf provision this time around was crucial to protecting national security. Even some Democrats supported the measure, giving it a good chance of passage. But it failed by a single vote, 15-15. Reps. King and Gohmert were absent.
Another measure, offered by Rep. Dan Lundgren (R-CA), failed by a vote of 11 to 8. Reps. King, Gohmert, Jordan, and Poe were all missing.
And a third, brought by Rep. Tom Rooney (R-FL), which would have bolstered the ability of local law enforcement to use a device that records phone numbers from a particular phone, failed by 12 to 10, with King, Gohmert, Jordan, Poe, and Franks all absent. (A subsequent amendment that did essentially the same thing later passed, it's worth noting.)
Several other members of both parties missed some of these votes as well, but there's no evidence they were Tea Partying.
To be sure, the Rooney and Lundren amendments appear to have largely tinkered around the edges -- neither would have been far-reaching enough to produce broad GOP support for the final bill, which was strongly backed by civil libertarians and liberal Democrats. But the Smith measure was more far-reaching. And a Hill aide confirmed that all three Republican measures would have shifted the bill toward increasing the power of law enforcement to fight terror, and away from civil liberties -- an approach that Republicans have long argued is crucial to national security.
At the Bachmann event yesterday, King, of Iowa, sounded one of the more passionate calls to arms. "We own this hill. We're the American people," he told the Tea Partiers. "And you know what? We're not going to leave this hill until we kill this bill."
But a few hours later, the bill that King actually had a chance to help shape was voted out of committee by 16-10 -- with King, Gohmert, and Forbes, as well as three other Republicans, again absent for the final vote. Republicans on the panel blasted the legislation, saying it would hinder law enforcement and intelligence agencies in fighting terror. But had a few more of their own showed up to vote, instead of playing to the Tea Party crowd, perhaps they would have been able to fix some of what they didn't like about it.
None of the offices for King, Gohmert, Poe, Forbes, Franks or Jordan responded to requests for comment from TPMmuckraker.
Additional reporting by Rachel Slajda
Late Update, 11/10/09, 2pm: A spokeswoman for Rep. Forbes writes:
Congressman Forbes did not miss any of the Judiciary votes due to attendance at the tea party press conference. Rep Forbes was in attendance for the first three votes. He was absent for the final vote because he was on his way to attend an important shipyard commencement event being held in his district that evening

TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

ttarleton
November 6, 2009 1:26 PM
HAha! Dumbasses!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
benny 4 facts
November 8, 2009 2:36 PM in reply to ttarleton
Come on, Teabagees need to have priorities too. As a yellow dog Democratic my priority is 2010 and ridding ourselves of more of these people.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Johann
November 8, 2009 11:13 PM in reply to benny 4 facts
I understand tht at least five people at Bachman's rally needed medical services and were provided those services by the White House medical staff (Government health care in its purest form).
One of these people had a heart attack and it has been reported that he would have died without the provision of that government run health care.
So, why doesn't Rachel Maddow get him on her show to explain why he is a teabagger and is so against government run health care?
Would be very interesting.
.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
benny 4 facts
November 10, 2009 6:32 PM in reply to Johann
Ah, he was in the hospital.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Minne sconsin
November 6, 2009 1:32 PM
Showing up for committee meetings, votes on legislation - that's governing.
The modern GOP has no interest in the hard work of governing.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Shrubbit
November 6, 2009 1:54 PM in reply to Minne sconsin
They don't know and they don't care. Scum.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Dorn76
November 6, 2009 1:49 PM
The day HCR finally comes up for a vote we'll just tell these idiots some teabaggers and Fox News cameras are outside making a ruckus.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
moat
November 6, 2009 1:49 PM
If I may quote from TenaX: "That's gonna leave a mark."
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Riesz Fischer
November 6, 2009 2:00 PM in reply to moat
Where is TenaX anyway? Haven't seen her in forever!
BTW, I hate it when you go to log in and you can't find the page where you were trying to comment. And if you hit the back button it logs you out.
I really hate that.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Dorn76
November 6, 2009 2:04 PM in reply to Riesz Fischer
Tena left after some overzealous moderating.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Riesz Fischer
November 6, 2009 2:06 PM in reply to Dorn76
Oh. Thanks. She used to comment at Eschaton. Maybe I'll see her over there.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Walter Mitty
November 6, 2009 2:08 PM in reply to Riesz Fischer
She posts somewhat regularly over at Sargent's Plum Line bog.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Matt Jones
November 6, 2009 1:56 PM
Better headline: "GOP Reps Prefer Teabagging Over Governing"
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
erwin
November 6, 2009 1:59 PM
In a week of shootings, insider trading, and republican political shenanigans, this news is like an early Christmas present!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Smiley
November 6, 2009 2:03 PM
Please tell me this was not just a coincidence. Just once, I want to hear that the Democratic leadership flat-out out-clevered the Republicans with a little bit of old-fashioned shrewedness (rather than just a lucky fluke)! :>
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
kevbo
November 6, 2009 2:03 PM
Has the NFL cited Bachmann with trademark infringement yet? They are normally very protective of the term "Superbowl", which is why you hear many unlicensed advertisers refer to it as "the big game" and such.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jeffgee
November 6, 2009 3:35 PM in reply to kevbo
If she uses the word Olympic, she'll be sued.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
acf_ma
November 6, 2009 2:12 PM
The choice was between governing, particularly a bill Republicans love such as the Patriot Act, and attacking a keystone of the Obama agenda, health insurance reform. Was there any doubt which one this Republican party was going to make. Try and kill the Obama presidency, the option of choice of today's Republican party.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
fsudirectory
November 6, 2009 2:20 PM
This is the perfect example of good reporting that should be done on a regular basis to display the utter horseshit they constantly shout.
'Democrats didn't let us do this and it woulda saved us after this latest tragedy'
'You mean the amendment that relied upon your vote which you were absent on and instead were protesting the American peoples right to affordable health care'
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jeffgee
November 6, 2009 3:28 PM
Y'see, National security was only useful as tool to bludgeon the opposition and question their patriotism when the GOP was in power.
Now, once again, they believe they are standing for our freedoms by opposing any meaningful health care reform.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
slb
November 6, 2009 3:34 PM
But a Hill aide confirmed that all three Republican measures would have shifted the bill toward increasing the power of law enforcement to fight terror, and away from civil liberties
Well, well. It turns out the Tea-Baggers actually struck a blow for freedom after all.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
rubyxyz
November 6, 2009 3:41 PM
All these fucks are campaigning. Like Steve King needs to prop up his wingnut credentials. Hmm...maybe his district's so batshit crazy, he does. :scared:
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Campesino
November 6, 2009 3:59 PM
You're missing the big picture here, which is that Obama and the Democratic Congress are reauthoring the Patriot Act. Something you've been telling the world for seven years needs to be repealed.
Now that Dems are in power, it's just fine.
What a bunch of rubes
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Jorge
November 6, 2009 4:01 PM
To their credit, the Patriot Act sucks balls.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Ether1
November 6, 2009 4:07 PM
If others on the committee thought it such a good idea, why didn't they pass it anyway? Or, delay the vote.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lapdogs
November 6, 2009 4:23 PM
Say what? "If you don't read the bill, at least read our Constitution".
This from the whacko party that doesn't even know how the Constitution starts.
Sounds like the Bachmann/Boehner Whacko Party had better go back to school and take that Civics Class they slept through!!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
kash79
November 6, 2009 6:23 PM
Aren't many on the right hoping for another attack to see the back of Obama? Did Beckster preached them in one of his shows that another attack on the U.S. soil can only save America?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Silence
November 8, 2009 7:29 PM in reply to kash79
No.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Beagle
November 6, 2009 7:24 PM
When you step aside and think about it, it should come as no surprise to see these guys do anything to kill this bill. Their party's primary principle is based on the simple message "government can't do anything right". They are afraid that if this bill is enacted into law, it could very well work. They have to do whatever it takes to kill it, even if it means denying millions because the success of this bill is going to be the beginning of their party's end. Who would vote for republicans after the people see that the law the republicans try to kill is not the monster they were told it was?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Silence
November 7, 2009 8:54 PM in reply to Beagle
Isn't Medicare supposed to go broke in 2019? SS is heading for some very serious fiscal problems as well.
BTW, where are the jobs?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?