TPMMuckraker

Report: FBI Probing Controversial Arizona Sheriff For "Investigating" Political Foes

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

Sheriff Joe Arpaio

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Sheriff Joe Arpaio, the hard-line anti-immigration Arizona sheriff, is being probed by the FBI for allegedly using his authority to retaliate against political adversaries, sources tell a local TV station. One of the key cases cited by Phoenix-based KPHO is one we told you about recently, in which a husband-and-wife team of big-name Washington GOP lawyers was briefly recruited to try to build a case against a local official who had clashed with Arpaio.

In response to the KPHO report, Arpaio bizarrely lashed out at ... David Iglesias, the former U.S. attorney who had dared offer an expert opinion to the station.

Arpaio -- the Maricopa County sheriff who has used press-friendly stunts like forcing prisoners to wear pink underwear to build a national reputation -- recently had his authority to conduct immigration raids scaled back by the Justice Department.

But the reported FBI probe could turn into a far bigger headache. KPHO reports that it has examined more than two dozen complaints against the sheriff from business owners, government workers, mayors and law-enforcement officials, who allege that after they spoke out against Arpaio, they found themselves the subject of investigations by his office -- none of which have resulted in convictions, and many of which never even led to charges being filed.

KPHO cites numerous such cases, many of which have made local headlines in the past. But one prominent one is that of Don Stapley, the county supervisor who, after pushing for audits of Arpaio's office, found himself arrested by sheriff's deputies in September. The sheriff's office has alleged violations of campaign-finance laws, but no prosecutor has taken the case. And last week, county officials short-circuited an effort to turn it over to Washington GOP power couple Joseph diGenova and Victoria Toensing.

In an interview with TPMmuckraker, Stapley's lawyer, Paul Charlton, compared Arpaio's modus operandi , as laid out by KPHO, to that of an eastern European dictator who deals with dissent by having outspoken citizens shot, so as to warn others not to speak up. "If it were one or two events, you could say this was an aberration," Charlton said. "But when it's repeated over time ... this was an attempt to intimidate them."

Charlton knows something about missteps in the administration of justice. He was one of the U.S. attorneys who was improperly fired by the Bush administration, after irritating DOJ officials by arguing against the death penalty in one case.

And remarkably, another of those fired U.S. attorneys also now finds himself tangled up in the case -- as a target of Arpaio's retaliatory tactics. As an independent expert who could assess KPHO's research on Arpaio, the news station had turned to David Iglesias, who famously was dismissed as the top federal prosecutor in New Mexico by declining to bring politically motivated prosecutions sought by the state's GOP.

Iglesias, who has never met Arpaio, told KPHO that if he were handling the case, he would "seek an indictment."

Saying he had never seen anything like it in his long career in law enforcement, Iglesias called Arpaio's actions "absolutely unacceptable," adding, "we don't do this kind of thing in America ... without some kind of consequences."

In response, Arpaio went after Iglesias, releasing a statement through his office that tried to tie the former Navy JAG to the right's latest bete noir:

Iglesias was criticized for looking the other way in an investigation involving ACORN, an organization that embraces illegal immigration and is currently under intense scrutiny and investigation by the US government for fraudulent schemes.

The statement also clumsily attacked Charlton as an "impartial (sic) and bias (sic) observer of the facts."

Other cases cited by KPHO of Arpaio using the sheriff's office to go after critics include those of:

• Phil Gordon, the mayor of Phoenix, who last year asked DOJ to investigate complaints of racial profiling against the Arpaio's office, then received demands from the sheriff's deputies for copies of all of Gordon's e-mail, phone logs and appointment calendars. Gordon told KPHO the effort "definitely was" retaliatory.

• And Daniel Pochoda, a local ACLU lawyer who was arrested by Arpaio's deputies for trespassing at a 2007 anti-Arpaio demonstration, and found not guilty last year.

• Terry Goddard, the Arizona attorney general, who had criticized Arpaio's use of resources to arrest otherwise law-abiding illegal immigrants, rather than focusing on those with outstanding warrants. In 2007, Arpaio's office began a probe into a payment made by the state treasurer's office to Goddard's office -- but no charges have yet been filed.

Arpaio, a Republican, has expressed interest in a run for governor next year, where he could face Goddard, a Democrat.

Join the Conversation!

25 comments

Recommend Recommend (7)

November 2, 2009 1:59 PM   

It's time for this guy to be brought down!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 2:06 PM    in reply to GTFOOH

Indeed

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 2:07 PM   

Acorn = Hitler!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 2:07 PM   

I bet ol' Sheriff Joe will really enjoy the pink underwear in his own jail.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 2:18 PM   

I love the smell of schadenfreude in the morning. Hopefully he shares a cell with an MS-13 member.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 2:36 PM    in reply to mistersnrub

Oh yes. Sheriff Joe would have to hope for one of those segregated prisons--you know, where they only imprison people who have shown their original birth certificates to Orly Taitz and Gary Kreep. Otherwise, I predict he'll become a human pin cushion. Schadenfreude is the perfect word for such a situation.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 2:23 PM   

I wonder if he's ever received complaints by fired/disciplined employees for refusing to carry out his orders? If his whole organization is into this, then his removal might only serve to raise an accolyte into the master position.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 2:38 PM   

It's lacy pink underwear for you!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 4:23 PM    in reply to Avvocato

Like he doesn't already have a couple pair.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 2:39 PM   

What happens to you if you FOIA all of Arpaio's e-mail, phone logs, memos, and appointment calendars?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 2:42 PM   

This guy is a well known racist. The quicker he suffers punishment for his tactics the better. It would be quite the turn of events if he went into his own slave labor prison.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 3:12 PM   

Now Fascist Sheriff Joe will be screaming about the "Federal oppression" and "tyranny" of the Obama administration for daring to challenge his absolute authority.

I'd like to see Arpaio spend a year in his 115°F tent prison city wearing pink underwear.

Proof that liberals aren't violent: he was heckled in NYC at the Colbert Report but nobody has tried to shoot Sheriff Joe.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 3:24 PM   

The Phoenix New Times has an ongoing series documenting Arpaio's abuses. Well worth the read:

http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/specialReports/view/1476917

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 3:29 PM    in reply to aabbmm

How long before their offices are raided by Joe's deputies?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 3:32 PM   

The complete New Times Arpaio archive:

http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/arpaio/

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 3:54 PM   

Gosh, Arizona just sounds like such a cool place to live. I'm torn, Arizona or Idaho? Hmmmm

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 4:25 PM    in reply to twirling fartknocker

Now, now, let's not paint all of Arizona with one broad brush. Northern AZ and the Flagstaff environs actually are pretty cool. The city of Phoenix, on the other hand, I have found to have very few redeeming qualities.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 4:00 PM   

Holy shit!! YAY!

My uncle is actually among the people this asshole has had the feds raid as retribution for asking the wrong question.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 4:21 PM   

Arpaio is a thug, and will be OH SO PRETTY in his pink undies.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 4:24 PM   

LOL, is anyone actually surprised by this?? In all honesty, I cant believe someone didnt take this IDIOT out a LONG time ago!

Jiff
www.complete-privacy.at.tc

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 4:34 PM   

Arpaio is playing 1984 but may be paying under 1983.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 4:41 PM   

Hallelujah! It couldn't happen to a bigger a$$hole.
Okay, except for Cheney.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 3, 2009 10:38 AM    in reply to Prof Wagstaff

Cheney/Arpaio '12!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 5:19 PM   

you guys have only hit the tip of the iceberg with the intimidation issue. MCSO has filed no less than 5 lawsuits in the last year or so against the County Supervisors. Some of the Supervisors haver reported SO officers sitting outside their homes (the two in question live in areas of Phoenix partolled by Phoenix PD). You could also check out the story about Guadalupe, a small mostly hispanic populated county island next to Tempe, where the mayor got in a fight with Arpaio about his random 'immigration raids' in the area, and good ol Sheriff Joe threatened to pull all officers from the area. (See also, Mesa, City of- the police chief of Mesa expressed his disapproval of MCSO 'immigration raids' and the next thing you know, Sheriff Joe is raiding City buildings). The list goes on and on and on . . .

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 3, 2009 7:35 AM   

I hope Arpaio runs in a state wide-race. He needs to be known by more people. Not to overstate the point, but anyone in political office, left, right, center, whatever, who employs power in that fashion is a menace to everybody and a lethal threat to democracy itself.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on