TPMMuckraker

Tea Party Leader Launches PAC To Back Small-Government Candidates

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

A leading Tea Party activist is launching a political action committee to back candidates who run on a limited-government platform -- perhaps the most serious effort yet to to channel the Tea Partiers' grassroots energy toward electoral politics.

Eric Odom, a conservative online organizer who played a key role in sparking the original Tea Party movement this spring, is unveiling Liberty First PAC. The goal, said Odom in an interview with TPMmuckraker, is to raise $1 million to defeat incumbents who supported health-care reform -- which he called "very dangerous to the fabric of this country" -- and to elect a new crop of lawmakers committed to small-government principles in 2010.

Odom said that the PAC would soon get involved in a race that has already been mentioned as a likely focus of conservative grassroots energy -- by endorsing the conservative Marco Rubio over the more moderate Charlie Crist in the GOP primary for Florida governor. And Odom added that had the PAC existed, it would have gotten involved in the recent NY-23 primary, in support of conservative Doug Hoffman.

Odom pointed to MoveOn.org, which had early success targeting key electoral contests as a model for Liberty First. And he suggested that Tea Partiers had erred by focusing only on mobilizing grassroots pressure, and not getting actively involved in elections until now. "We think the Tea Party movement has lacked the initiative to get involved in the campaign side of politics," said Odom.

He doesn't seem to be the only one who's coming to that conclusion. Many of the Tea Partiers at the recent Capitol rally against health-care reform appeared to have their sights set on 2010. And a Tea Party activist has said he will challenge Rep. Pete Sessions, a GOP leader and no moderate, in a Republican primary next year. But Odom's new PAC seems to be the most organized effort yet get the Tea Partiers into the electoral politics game.

Odom said the PAC would not support incumbents of either party, and had harsh words for the GOPers currently in Washington. "Republicans had eight years to step up to the plate and push through a conservative agenda," he said. "Most of the Tea Party activists don't see a difference between most of the Republicans and the Democrats." He added that he hadn't been in touch with the RNC or any organized Republican group in connection to the new PAC.

In a message announcing the launch of Liberty First PAC, which was subsequently posted on the Tea Party Patriots site, Odom wrote:

Our mission is simple. We refuse to help any incumbents, and we pledge to work towards defeating any incumbent who voted to support Nancy Pelosi's dangerous healthcare bill.

Our goal is to:

a) Identify Patriot Candidates and help them run successful campaigns against power hungry politicians

b) Build a national educational media campaign to help the general electorate understand what our government is attempting to do to us.

Last February Odom played a central role in publicizing Rick Santelli's famous rant online, and in organizing the first "Tax Day Tea Party" on Tax Day this year -- another of which is planned for next April. He's not involved with the Tea Party Patriots -- the group that has provided much of the grassroots muscle for the Tea Party movement -- though he said he's friendly with TPP leaders.

Odom said his work on the Tax Day Tea Parties had given Liberty PAC a base of 40-50,000 supporters, from which it would seek to grow. In the 24 hours since it went live, the PAC's website has taken in $10,000, and has pledges of another $60,000, he said.

Join the Conversation!

21 comments

Recommend Recommend (3)

November 10, 2009 1:47 PM   

I may start an "I Love Our Flag" PAC.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 1:48 PM   

Swell...as if we didn't already have a bunch of radical ("C" Street, "the Family", "K" Street exec's) crazies, disguised as lawmakers, doing damage, in Congress...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 1:50 PM   

hmmmmmmmmmmm, is this PAC only going to consist of only angry, white gopers, or can anyboy become a member?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 1:50 PM   

they forgot their final bullet:

c) bring republican party identification down to 10%

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 4:35 PM    in reply to Water

Its true, this effort is likely to strengthen the Democratic party. By keeping all the GOP representatives extremists, it'll shy Americans away from voting for them.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 2:08 PM   

Way to go Mr. Odom. Get this anger out, I am sure you will feel better if you can save the World.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 2:10 PM   

Look mom, that is I with the cell phone helping to destroy this statue. I’m on top of it acting out for the cameras just like they do in Iran.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 2:42 PM   

Great, another group to push for the same ideas that got us into this mess. Oh well, why should consistent failure be a disqualifier? And rethinking things just wastes time that could be spent making new Nazi signs.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 11, 2009 9:15 AM    in reply to ericf

When will their parodies become their actual symbols?
How long until we recognize a Tea Party by the swastika on the front door?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 3:03 PM   

Republicans are becoming increasing like an American ideological version of the Canadian Parti Québécois-- a perpetually minority regional party, where the quest for purity undermines its desire to actually govern.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 11, 2009 9:28 AM    in reply to Clars

The Dead Moose Party is now forming. All Republicans thoroughly disgusted with moderation on the part of their candidates should join ASAP, so they can foment throughout 2010.

They don't like Wall Street OR DC, so where's a book-cooker or a K-Streeter gonna find a home these days?

The Republicans are going through some sort of deviated cell division, and the spawn of the change looks like a scattering of little political caricatures, the broken pieces of what was a very curious chimera in this last election.

And riding one of those caricatures (A Zombie Moose?) is Sarah Palin, with a hardy "Yep, you betcha!"

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 4:06 PM   

I love the loaded language..."Patriot" candidates opposed to those non-Patriot types.

And trying to 'educate' the general population? What in the hell are these people talking about?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 4:41 PM   

Would this group support Ron Paul? I found it odd how Republicans went against Ron Paul when he was the definition of small government. It seems that the GOP is for small government except when it comes to military, personal freedoms, phone tapping, Oil interests, Israel, or interrogation techniques. Then its all about Big government.

Hey at least they were small government when it came to Katrina disaster relief and international diplomacy!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 5:59 PM   

This is great news for Democrats! Not only will this group get a good amount of funding and bring prominence to even more fringe-right, ultra religious, ultra libertarian type politicians-but it will have NO effect in Liberal districts that are heavily Democrat and will help to bring disenchanted moderate Republicans to the Democrat's side and effectively destroy Republican's chances in all district's save the slave states and Utah.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 7:33 PM   

I predict the TEA party candidates will be well-funded by small business owners. $1,000 here, a $1,000 there. It adds up very quickly.


Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 11, 2009 8:43 AM    in reply to Silence

How long til' they are fighting in factions over all that money? When the first check hits the desk? When a cascade of political failures precipitates this sort of break-up, the shards that remain tend to covet every contribution as their own.

The party has split, now the tight wing splitters will divide, fighting over the imaginary spoils they believe they have taken from the middle.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 11, 2009 11:11 AM    in reply to JEP07

Who will fighting over what and where? Specific candidates will be awarded money, directly from the donors.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 10:01 PM   

They should call it WACK PAC.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 11, 2009 8:38 AM   

"health-care reform -- which he called "very dangerous to the fabric of this country"

... dangerous, in that it might help assuage some of the severe insecurity the monopolists need to continue selling us their bad investments, lousy insurance plans, overpriced gasoline and over-advertised drugs?

So, basically, this "danger" is security, and freedom from fear and suffering?

Now that's a danger any good monopolist can relate to. Fear and suffering are too profitable to assuage either of them.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 11, 2009 10:20 AM   

This will be another scam, they'll raise $1 Million and only $100,000 will go to candidates, the rest will go to administration and fund raising.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 11, 2009 10:24 AM   


Please contribute to my "Patriotic Americans" PAC, or my "The Sons of Liberty" PAC

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!