TPMMuckraker

Will Ensign Escape Criminal Probe?

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

Sen. John Ensign (R-NV)

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Is the Justice Department leaning towards laying off Sen. John Ensign (R-NV)?

That's the direction in which Politico's reporting seems to point. According to the new site, DOJ officials "signal that the case is a low-priority matter for them." It adds that "no one close to Ensign or the Hamptons has been contacted by any federal investigators." And it notes that the Senate Ethics committee, which usually stands down when Justice is involved, has been forging ahead with its probe of the philandering Nevada senator.

Ensign reportedly directed his staff to maintain contact with Doug Hampton -- the former aide whose wife Ensign had an affair with -- after the senator had set Hampton up as a lobbyist. In at least one case, Ensign took action on behalf of Hampton's clients after Hampton had lobbied his office. Those revelations led to calls for a DOJ-led criminal investigation.

Not surpirsingly, watchdog groups aren't happy about the idea that DOJ would let Ensign off the hook so easily. "If they're not going to prosecute Ensign for this, with the abundance of evidence there is that he violated the law, then they might as well just throw the law out, because when will they have a clearer case?" Melanie Sloan of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington told Politico. "It basically tells members of Congress 'Don't worry about this, you won't be prosecuted, violate the lobbying ban at will.'"

Politico also reports that Attorney General Eric Holder went to some lengths to avoid appearing in person with Ensign during a recent event in Las Vegas -- which frankly seems appropriate, given that DOJ may be mulling a probe.

Join the Conversation!

13 comments

Recommend Recommend (4)

November 19, 2009 12:15 PM   

Bears repeating:

"If they're not going to prosecute Ensign for this, with the abundance of evidence there is that he violated the law, then they might as well just throw the law out, because when will they have a clearer case?"

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 19, 2009 12:30 PM   

Is there anything new here? How many Republican felons and war criminals have already been given free passes by the Obama DOJ? Whatever good Obama does, his most enduring legacy will be cementing in place the culture of impunity that is rotting Washington to its core.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 19, 2009 12:31 PM   

I just heard an interview with Don Siegelman by Peter Collins, and Siegelman says the DOJ is still loaded with Bush appointees who engaged in political prosecutions and still get to make decisions. That would help explain the many bizarre decisions the DOJ on inherited cases as well as prosecutorial decisions like this.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 19, 2009 2:14 PM    in reply to ericf

Face it. After 10 months, the current DOJ is Obama's DOJ. It was his decision to keep all those Bush appointees in their places of responsibility in his DOJ - including "Obama's" voter fraud US Attorneys who were appointed by Bush and retained by Obama.

Once again pointing out that there just isn't that much difference between Democratic and Republican politicians.

They all consider themselves to be above the laws they pass and expect the rest of us to obey.
.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 19, 2009 12:55 PM   

So, let's see..a US Senator, with PUBLIC PROOF that's he's guilty of CRIMES IN THE US and the Senate ethics panel (much less a US Court) can't be bothered??? Another criminal in the US walks with no charges....

Nice to know...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 19, 2009 12:57 PM   

Some things remain the same. Inside The Beltway is an ethics, law free zone for it's elected and selected denizens. Too bad Obama continues to countenance such disregard for the law and ethics to the continued detriment of the Republic.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 19, 2009 1:15 PM   

DOJ and The Rule of Law....what's missing here? Oh...I guess it'a little guts and backbone to do the right thing and restore faith in the DOJ! Maybe it's Ensign'sseat is viewed as vulernable so let the voters take care of the slime!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 19, 2009 1:43 PM   

The worst the Congressional Ethics Committees will EVER do is admonish. So why should any agency do anything so tasteless as actually prosecute. Meanwhile in South Carolina, the governor's flying to South America at state expense to schtoop his mistress apparently has been determined by an ethics panel there to be fine with them.

Any wonder the public gets more and more cynical about politics and politicians. You got whole administrations involved in pretty serious allegations of war crimes and they're walking around as if nothing happened. Why should Ensign be worried.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 19, 2009 1:51 PM   

Got to wonder what the GOP has on A.G. Holder...or is it the GOP "worms" that are embedded in the DOJ gumming up the works..? Or the GOP Senators who have secret "holds" on President Obamas new DOJ appointenments...?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 19, 2009 2:47 PM   

Prosecuting Ensign would only divert needed resources from the Siegleman persecution.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 19, 2009 3:56 PM   

So, we're supposed to get all lathered, and start dumping on Holder based upon a Politico.com report? Please.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 20, 2009 7:48 AM   

Politico = Republico. Why are they given credence?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 24, 2009 11:19 PM   

Hey maybe the FBI will get involved and send someone away to "prison". Read this post by a recent former inmate at the same prison "camp" that corporate financial scammer Joe Nacchio is doing his time.

http://fprison.wordpress.com

It's a non-stop party on the taxpayer dollar and narco-traffickers are included in the party. The corruption is far deeper than you think.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on