« previous | MUCK HOME | next »
Justice to ACLU: I Thought You Were My Friend
It was only one battle among many between the government and civil liberties advocates. But in this round, at least, the ACLU won the day and even made the Justice Department look a little silly.
Yesterday, the Justice Department abruptly gave up its battle for a classified document, which they'd sought to confiscate from the ACLU through the unusual means of a criminal subpoena (which is usually used to obtain evidence, not confiscate all traces of it). Why'd they give up? Well, it appears they were going to lose anyway... and lose badly.
In arguments before federal Judge Jed Rakoff December 11th, the transcript of which was just unsealed yesterday, the ACLU and Justice Department lawyers went back and forth about the subpoena. After DoJ lawyer Jennifer Rodgers explained that she'd sought to confiscate the document from the ACLU because it was "contraband," and had been told by an ACLU lawyer "that the ACLU, being the ACLU, wouldn't want to voluntarily give the documents back in cooperation with the government and would need some sort of process and I said what sort of process? How about a subpoena? He said that's fine, fax me a subpoena, which I did." Rodgers was then surprised when the ACLU fought the subpoena.
To this, Rakoff responded bemusedly:
... it's not easy to believe that the ACLU, despite its history, would be cooperative. Well, hope springs eternal .... there seems to be a huge difference between investigating a wrongful leak of a classified document and demanding back all copies of it, and I'm old enough to remember a case called the Pentagon papers, but, more generally I wonder what the authority is for using a grand jury subpoena for that purpose.
The Justice Department didn't have a good answer. And soon, the Pentagon declassified the document, allowing the DoJ to back away from the fight.
Update: You can read the document here.
Comments (3)
D.P. Kilian wrote on December 19, 2006 11:44 AM:To mix metaphors, Ms. Rodgers fell in over her head and her colleagues let her twist in the wind before cutting her down. Presumably, Ms. Rodgers was participating in the investigation of a low-level leak of classified information and found that one of the documents had been e-mailed to the ACLU. She called and asked for it back. She took their demand that the government compel them to give it back as cooperation, she says, and issued a blanket subpoena. She claimed surprise that the ACLU then asked for the legal authority under which the government proposed to enforce its subpoena. It had none. But by then the dispute was public and in federal court. After having assured itself that Ms. Rodgers had learned from her mistake, the government backed down and de-classified a document that appears to be not worthy of classification, and backed away from her subpoena. Presumably, it hopes that the ACLU cannot require the judge to issue his decision on the merits; its legally spurious argument would have gone down in flames and created a precedent that would have Mr. Cheney running a scythe through the US Atty's office in New York. Interesting diversion from Iraq and domestic spying, but let's get back to business.
MarchDancer wrote on December 19, 2006 3:22 PM:Our civil servants, paid with our tax dollars, at work doing their very best! Each time I read about one of these idiotic errors in judgement I wish for a new blog to be developed, the topic of which would be exactly as displayed in this article: Government Servants Working For Us
master cards wrote on April 24, 2007 7:31 AM:MasterCard Worldwide is a membership organization owned by the 25,000+ financial institutions that issue its card. MasterCard is also the company's brand of credit cards. It was originally created by United California Bank, Wells Fargo, Crocker National Bank, and the Bank of California as a competitor to the BankAmericard issued by Bank of America. BankAmericard is now the VISA credit card, issued by Visa International.