« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

Majority Leader-To-Be Is Anti-Surge

As Josh announced this morning, we've been making our calls to congressional leaders about whether they support the president's idea of increasing the troop level in Iraq by "15,000 to 30,000 more troops for a mission of possibly six to eight months" as outlined in The Washington Post.

A number of leaders have come out already with statements, and we'll be providing a tally of those, along with what we were able to find today, a little later. For now, though, we've gotten a statement from the future House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD), who had not yet taken a public position on the president's "surge" plan. He's clearly against:

I do not believe that it would be helpful to increase troop levels by 15,000 -- or even 30,000. Incoming House Armed Services Chairman Skelton has said this, the former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Colin Powell agrees, and even the President's own Joint Chiefs do not think it will help. We must remain focused on a political solution and make clear to the Iraqi leadership that they have to take responsibility for the security and governance of their country. I would hope that the President will address the nation as soon as possible, outline the major changes in policy that Americans have demanded, and quickly get to work with Congress to make a major course correction in Iraq. A small increase in troop strength should not be a part of that.

Comments (10)

ft wrote on December 20, 2006 4:27 PM:

Good for Hoyer. He puts to rest some of the concerns that he would softer on Bush's Iraq policy than would have Jack Murtha.

ft wrote on December 20, 2006 4:28 PM:

Good for Hoyer. He puts to rest some of the concerns that he would be softer on Bush's Iraq policy than would have Jack Murtha.

MoDem wrote on December 20, 2006 5:59 PM:

I sent Josh the note that an NPR story has the in-coming chair of the Armed Services Committee, Ike Skelton, also anti-surge.

Paul Bell wrote on December 20, 2006 7:58 PM:

Could we please stop parrotting the administration line by calling it a "surge." The term is ridiculous and simply another example of the Orwellian language that is taking over the political discourse in this country. Call it what it is, an increase or an escallation in the number of troops. A surge...pleeeeese stop.

bamage wrote on December 21, 2006 10:30 AM:

Sen. John Cornyn (Asshole-TX) is emphatically PRO-surge, according to a D.C. staffer.

Lewis wrote on December 21, 2006 10:04 PM:

So much for bipartisanship and support of Baker-Hamilton.

Lewis wrote on December 21, 2006 10:16 PM:

So much for bipartisanship and support of Baker-Hamilton.

Lewis wrote on December 21, 2006 10:18 PM:

So much for bipartisanship and support of Baker-Hamilton.

apply for a credit card wrote on April 24, 2007 8:04 AM:

Best available credit card offers in easy to understand manner. You can search, compare and apply for a credit card online - and in some cases even get a credit decision within 60 seconds!

epenisa wrote on January 11, 2008 1:16 AM:

Hello
Nice work from your side... have a nice time with yoru blog :)
Bye

Post a comment

Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address