TPMmuckraker | Talking Points Memo | Intelligence or Policy Work? Feith Group's Legality Hinges on It

Intelligence or Policy Work? Feith Group's Legality Hinges on It

By Spencer Ackerman - February 9, 2007, 9:30AM

Douglas J. Feith's successor as undersecretary of defense for policy, Eric Edelman, has put together a 53-page rebuttal of the Pentagon Inspector General's report criticizing the Office of Special Plans (caution: PDF; hat tip to McClatchy ace reporter Jonathan Landay). Its key point: what the Office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Policy (OUSDP) did wasn't intelligence work at all, but rather policy work. It's an argument apparently generated to spare the OUSDP from the charge of illegality, which the IG doesn't in fact put on the office -- but, in his statement yesterday, Sen. John Rockefeller (D-WV), the chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, raised as a remaining possibility.

Now, there's a difference between the OSP and its precursor, the Policy Counter Terrorism Evaluation Group, but Edelman's rebuttal often conflates it, to refer in total to the OUSDP. And what's striking about Edelman's contention is that the substance of the OUSDP's work is not in fact in question. As his rebuttal states plainly, the office was designed to critique intelligence on the question of state sponsors of terrorism, and particularly Iraqi ties to al-Qaeda. A variation on this sentence appears several times in Edelman's report: "The result was a draft briefing on how these contacts might be viewed if one did not assume a priori that secular Baathists and Islamists would never cooperate." Indeed, in a June 4, 2003 Pentagon briefing, Feith described the PCTEG as something rather similar:

...it relied on reporting from the CIA and other parts of the intelligence community. Its job was to review this intelligence to help digest it for me and other policymakers, to help us develop Defense Department strategy for the war on terrorism. And as I said, it looked at these interrelationships among terrorist organizations and their state sponsors. It did not confine its review to Iraq or al Qaeda. I mean, it was looking at global terrorist networks and the full range of state sponsors and other sources of support for terrorist groups. Its main conclusion was that groups and states were willing to cooperate across philosophical, ideological lines.

From a legal standpoint, it may very well be that OUSDP's work didn't satisfy the statutory definition of intelligence activity -- which would help explain why the IG doesn't find the OSP to be illegal. But to say that the OUSDP's activities weren't intelligence-related is to draw on a legalism and shunt aside the question of propriety -- which is exactly what the IG's report criticizes. Edelman jibes the IG for presenting "no facts in the (IG's) Draft Report, or otherwise, supporting the assertion that this work was presented as 'intelligence assessments'."

That might come as a surprise to those who saw a briefing slide from Feith's office to then-deputy national security adviser Stephen Hadley that cited "Fundamental Problems With How (the Intelligence Community) Is Assessing Information."

Update: More on this here.

Comments (367)

EasyRider wrote on February 9, 2007 10:06 AM:

Yep,

More of the same "We not got our hand in the cookie jar!" crap from the criminals.

This is the crap that Reagan's people, Casey and North, used to create operations outside of the CIA and DoD control and Congressional Oversight.

More of the same, "I got no banana."

TheraP wrote on February 9, 2007 10:10 AM:

Frank Rich could do this better than I:

But, imagine a propaganda film, which at a later date tries to pretend it was "not a film" but rather, a 'critique' of another film (never shown!)

A critique presumes "something" in the public domain - open to review and critique by others. In the absence of that something, it is hard to claim one's work is "criticim."

Just another example of the slight of hand and abuse of the English language used to justify criminal behavior!

Uncle Sam wrote on February 9, 2007 10:20 AM:

I know we got Libby, lets hope we can only continue these trials with Douglas Feith, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Elliot Abrams, Dov Zakheim, David Wurmser, Donald Rumsfeld and many others, to expose the real crime of the century. These men intentionally mislead a paranoid White House that Iraq, not al Qaeda, was the main threat to the US. This group pushed our country to war, not to protect the American people from terrorism, but to be an active participant in a dream for a greater Israel. When this war in Iraq is done, over a million Iraqis will have perished, thousands of Americans will be dead with tens of thousands more wounded, lets pray that justice will be served to these traitors.

Anonymous wrote on February 9, 2007 10:22 AM:

Great work Spencer, don't let these little nitwits slip away on technicalities.

My favorite "findings" from the briefing slide include:

"Some indications of possible Iraqi coordination with al Queda specifically related to 9/11"

Hmm, I wonder how/why large portions of the American public believed Saddam Hussein was responsible for 9/11?

TheraP wrote on February 9, 2007 10:31 AM:

Let's not describe the White House as "paranoid." That presumes craziness. This is not a mental health problem here! These people did this deliberately!!! This is criminal - not craziness.

markg8 wrote on February 9, 2007 10:46 AM:

Bush may have been misled but I doubt it, and Cheney certainly wasn't. The WH wasn't looking for the truth, they were looking for justification for their policy. When the answers that came back didn't fit what they were looking for they had OSP get the raw intelligence from CIA, cherrypick the evidence and do their own analysis. That is doing intelligence work.

Dungheap wrote on February 9, 2007 10:51 AM:

Seems to me that the IG found that the OUSDP's work was, in fact, intelligence activity ("developed, produced and then disseminated alternative intelligence assessments"), but that because the Deputy Secretary of Defense directed the activity it was "authorized" and therefore not illegal.

Rockefeller's statement agrees to a point, specifically, that the OUSDP was engaged in intelligence activity and that the Deputy Secretary authorized it; however, Rockefellar takes the position that, simply becasue it was authorized doesn't make it legal.

biggerbox wrote on February 9, 2007 10:53 AM:

Call me old-fashioned, but I fail to see how analyzing intelligence information and 'digesting' it is NOT intelligence work. (It will be news to all those 'analysts' at the CIA, as well.)

As I understood the term, 'policy' work is deciding what to do in response to the intelligence, not imagining ways in which the intelligence might say something else if you ignore parts of it you don't like.

Steve Dwight wrote on February 9, 2007 11:09 AM:

This tortured logic reminds me of AG Gonzalez's testimony before the Senate Judiciary last week, when he explained that, although the Constitution prohibits denying habeus corpus, it doesn't specifically say it's a right. Therefore if you deny it, it's OK because something that isn't a right can be denied even if it's prohibited.....or something like that. The video is hilarious.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mdpCABIuVY&mode=related&search=

Kurt wrote on February 9, 2007 11:19 AM:

In the 20 years that I worked at NSA, DIA, AFIS and a host of other intelligence entities within the US government, my job was to:
develop, produce and disseminate intelligence assessments gathered from raw intelligence data.

Seems to me these folks were doing exactly the same type of work I was doing. If it was called intelligence activities for me, it should be called intelligence activities for them.

I hope Sen. Rockefeller keeps running with this ball--all the way through the goal posts.

Brooks wrote on February 9, 2007 11:36 AM:

"The result was a draft briefing on how these contacts might be viewed if one did not assume a priori that secular Baathists and Islamists would never cooperate."

It's been a while since my college days, but isn't that how Riemannian geometry got started? Assume that's what patently obvious to all us close-minded Euclidian thinkers maybe isn't true, after all, and see what you get.

Really, these guys are just outside-the-box visionaries. We should just shut up and let them have at it.

Brooks wrote on February 9, 2007 11:56 AM:

Of course, this may shed light on Cheney's heretofore undiscussed other top-secret agency, the Office for Even More Special Plans, which has been drawing up contingencies policies in the event that 'if's and 'but's really ARE candied nuts...

Repeat: this is not intelligence work.

Allsburg wrote on February 9, 2007 12:04 PM:

It's the newly created Office of Counter-Factual Intelligence: "We know for a fact that there were no ties between Iraq and al Qaeda, but IF there were, what would they be?"

Jasmine wrote on February 9, 2007 12:23 PM:

I have this niggling memory of reading that someone in this crowd, and I don't remember if it was the Cheney or Rumsfeld group, was poring over and trying to analyze raw intelligence data themselves. What I remember is the report of them continually calling up someone at the CIA, I assume it was, putting forth ridiculous interpretations and basically driving them nuts with their interference and amateur attempts to play sleuth. Does anyone remember the specifics of this and whether it's related to this discussion?

MFA wrote on February 9, 2007 12:33 PM:

So OSP was analyzing intellegence analysis.

Some form of intellegence meta-analysis, I guess.

Is that what makes it legal?

Sheesh.

Brooks wrote on February 9, 2007 1:38 PM:

But of course it isn't just the existence of the OSP which is so offensive, or the abject sophistry upon which its "legality" lies. It's also Cheney's public representation of its findings.

Nothing ever so vividly clued me into this man's genius for deception than the turn of phrase he adopted - repeatedly - during the run-up, specifically with regard to the Iragui/Al Quaeda link:

"We cannot confirm reports that so and so met with so and so."

This is almost always how he phrased it, his personal spin on "so when did you stop beating your wife."

And ever since noting it, I've been waiting for the other shoe to drop - that is to hear him have to say, years later (like right now) when the truth came out: "but I never said there was a link. I said we couldn't confirm the link, which turns out to have been quite accurate, since there was none."

Could we then all agree to draw him up by his apparently very large scrotum?

And did I just blow my chance or working for the democratic nominee?

davis¹³ wrote on February 9, 2007 2:37 PM:

These guys give weasels a bad name.

davis¹³ wrote on February 9, 2007 2:38 PM:

"And did I just blow my chance or working for the democratic nominee?"

lol. Yes.

DeWitt Grey wrote on February 9, 2007 5:05 PM:

The Undersec's critique is (unintentionally) funny. One key argument is that "intelligence assessments" and "intelligence analysis" can only be done by "intelligence agencies", and because the OSP was obviously not an "intelligence agency", it could not have done "intelligence assessments" or "intelligence analysis" (p. 38). Just think of the sighs of relief being heaved even now by those intrepid individuals who render legal advice without being licensed as lawyers, or who give medical treatment without being licensed as physicians. Never fear, folks, because you didn't have a license, the Undersecretary of Defense for Policy believes that ipso facto you weren't rendering legal advice or providing medical treatment.

Of course, this is what real intelligence professionals have been saying all along about the output of the Office of Special Plans.

The Undersec also says that, given that the OSP was busy spewing out its product at the direction of Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz, if they were violating procedures in giving those directions "the OIG should say so directly instead of finding fault with subordinate OSD offices and staff members who
did as the Secretary or Deputy Secretary instructed." Somehow I think Senators Rockefeller and Levin will concur with the view that Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz were very much at fault for this travesty.

Just imagine what Patrick Fitzgerald could do with a direct examination of the Undersec, using little more than the Undersec's own asinine "critique" . . .

Richard L. Adlof wrote on February 10, 2007 1:41 AM:

Uncle Sam,

What is up with the cut and paste repeat of the same lame post with the same slur against Israel in four different different story links?

Is there an issue that requires some couch time OR are your a right wingnut attempting to tick off the liberal and literate?

I grow bored of stumble across this post.

John Owens wrote on February 10, 2007 6:12 AM:

It seems to me that the IG's whole question carries an unwarranted underlying assumption: that it couldn't have been both intelligence and policy work, at the same time. (Let alone sometimes one, sometimes the other.) And thence, if the Office was doing policy work, it couldn't have been doing intelligence. I don't see any basis for this assumption. Rather than proving that the office was doing policy, shouldn't they "need" (even though the IG ought to be nonpartisan, and only seeking the truth) to show that they weren't doing intelligence?

Frank wrote on February 10, 2007 10:22 AM:

The Downing street memo said it all (fitting intelligence around policy). Feith's ideologically driven task of transmuting false intelligence to justification for a preemptive strike on a sovereign country, competes with Goebbels justifying Hitler's aggression. The resulting marraige of lies with aggressive intent has resulted in over 600,000 Iraqi deaths, over 3000 US military deaths, and the expenditure of hundreds of billions of dollars.

This country, now the scorn of the world, is a legacy that will take generations to overcome, unless, unless we convene a tribunal rivaling the Nuremberg trials. And now this clown teaches FOREIGN POLICY at Georgetown university? Where art thou accountabilty?

George E. Lowe wrote on February 10, 2007 12:26 PM:

Hi,Let us not forget that there are TWO key products of Wolfowitz-Feith's BOGUS/MANUFACTURED INTELLIGENCE PRODUCTS that served as the basis for President Bush's Preventive War of Choice vs. Iraq of 19 March, 2003. 1. Saddam Hussein's "links/contacts" with al-Qaida & the 9-11-01 attacks on the US. The Pentagon's IG has declared the actions of former Douglas J. Feith's Office of Special Plans, as "INAPPROPRIATE BUT LEGAL" over this BOGUS cause celebre for Bush's "March of Folly"--his Iraq War.
However, there is another more important cause celebre for Bush's "Expedition to Sicily", which is at the very heart of the "Scooter" Libby Trial: 2. The Bogus Weapons of Mass Destruction HOAX. Of those BOGUS WMDs, the Nuclear WMDs were the most feared by the American People & the most "concerned" by Bush-Rove's Fundamentalist Christian BASE.
Hiroshima/Nagasaki MEETS Armageddon & the Second Coming of the Christian Right's--GENERAL LORD JESUS CHRIST--the Victor at the Last Battle between GOOD & EVIL.[Rev. 16;16]
The Kabal that put Bush-Cheney in power[2000/2004] understands how truly NUCLEAR-WAR OBSESSED their Fundamentalist, Conservative Evangelicals --"Bible-believing, Born again, Spirit-filled Christians"-- base/supporters ARE by these End Times Signs.
The Bush-Rove White House cleverly played on these Nuclear War FEARS-& yes HOPES: Bush's "16 Words" re Niger Uranium Yellow Cake in his late January 2002's SOU/ NSC Rice's : Smoking "Mushroom Clouds"/Veep Cheney's claims re "Saddam's Reborn Nuclear weapons program"[Mid-March 2003]/Ambassador Wilson's CIA-sponsored trip to Niger[2002]/ The White House cover-up of Valerie PLAME-WILSON's OUTING as covert CIA Operative vs. Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.
The White House's message[2002-2007] has been very clear: BE VERY AFRAID OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS--IRAQ/IRAN/NORTH KOREA today & CHINA/RUSSIA tomorrow !
When will the Democrats investigate the CHENEY/RUMSFELD/WOLFOWITZ/FEITH/PERLE & CHALABI CABAL which created the BOGUS NUCLEAR WMD HOAX? Worried & curious in Stuart, George E. Lowe, Stuart, Florida

varney wrote on February 12, 2007 11:51 AM:

Isn't the slide that you refer to the slide that the IG said (in response to a question at Levin's hearing the other day) was intentionally NOT sent to the CIA, so that analysts there wldn't be "distracted"? Why would they not want to improve the CIA's intelligence by offering their criticism?

catarina@hotmail.com wrote on April 26, 2007 12:49 PM:

penis enlargement surgery chicago

witney@gmail.com wrote on April 30, 2007 2:20 PM:

hello

witney@gmail.com wrote on April 30, 2007 2:20 PM:

hello

clar@gmail.com wrote on May 1, 2007 3:02 AM:

hello

green@gmail.com wrote on May 6, 2007 2:24 AM:

hello

hillary@gmail.com wrote on May 7, 2007 4:09 AM:

hello

hillary@gmail.com wrote on May 7, 2007 4:10 AM:

hello

hillary@gmail.com wrote on May 7, 2007 4:10 AM:

hello

sett wrote on May 14, 2007 4:35 PM:

Lesbian sex

gilom wrote on May 23, 2007 1:51 PM:

n80 nokia saledownload polyphonic ringtonesfrost zonedownload sheet musicmotorollaericsson510 alcatel speedtouchfree ringtone sprint totallyoscar meyer jingleringtones for nokia 3390 gold

gilom wrote on May 23, 2007 1:52 PM:

n80 nokia saledownload polyphonic ringtonesfrost zonedownload sheet musicmotorollaericsson510 alcatel speedtouchfree ringtone sprint totallyoscar meyer jingleringtones for nokia 3390 gold

klipart wrote on May 24, 2007 8:06 AM:

ring tonealcatel mobile phonesjabra bt500sony psp usb driversamsung ringtonemotorola six sigma articlesnextel i860 ringtonewomens exercise clothingbordeaux line melodicgroom wedding attire

petro wrote on May 25, 2007 8:33 AM:

rooms videoadult indianpompano planned beachadult cupidcom friendcamping huntington beachcape breton chathandmade jewelryhomo byfuck fucked gettingtoys toyshop long

petro wrote on May 25, 2007 8:33 AM:

rooms videoadult indianpompano planned beachadult cupidcom friendcamping huntington beachcape breton chathandmade jewelryhomo byfuck fucked gettingtoys toyshop long

petro wrote on May 25, 2007 8:33 AM:

rooms videoadult indianpompano planned beachadult cupidcom friendcamping huntington beachcape breton chathandmade jewelryhomo byfuck fucked gettingtoys toyshop long

petro wrote on May 25, 2007 8:34 AM:

rooms videoadult indianpompano planned beachadult cupidcom friendcamping huntington beachcape breton chathandmade jewelryhomo byfuck fucked gettingtoys toyshop long

gafon wrote on May 25, 2007 8:15 PM:

newfoundland pissingper movie viewweb cam teenmovie adult lengthxxx lingerie bigtit small xxxsecret chat sexoral publicfree cat dollgallery teen

gafon wrote on May 25, 2007 8:15 PM:

newfoundland pissingper movie viewweb cam teenmovie adult lengthxxx lingerie bigtit small xxxsecret chat sexoral publicfree cat dollgallery teen

gafon wrote on May 25, 2007 8:15 PM:

newfoundland pissingper movie viewweb cam teenmovie adult lengthxxx lingerie bigtit small xxxsecret chat sexoral publicfree cat dollgallery teen

gafon wrote on May 25, 2007 8:16 PM:

newfoundland pissingper movie viewweb cam teenmovie adult lengthxxx lingerie bigtit small xxxsecret chat sexoral publicfree cat dollgallery teen

asam wrote on May 26, 2007 2:11 AM:

sale forpersonal in canadahitchhiker teen hardcorelesbian gaycomic sexplayboy big gallerypseudoephedrine fatesyoung pussy teenreality world andvideo seins big

asam wrote on May 26, 2007 2:11 AM:

sale forpersonal in canadahitchhiker teen hardcorelesbian gaycomic sexplayboy big gallerypseudoephedrine fatesyoung pussy teenreality world andvideo seins big

asam wrote on May 26, 2007 2:11 AM:

sale forpersonal in canadahitchhiker teen hardcorelesbian gaycomic sexplayboy big gallerypseudoephedrine fatesyoung pussy teenreality world andvideo seins big

asam wrote on May 26, 2007 2:12 AM:

sale forpersonal in canadahitchhiker teen hardcorelesbian gaycomic sexplayboy big gallerypseudoephedrine fatesyoung pussy teenreality world andvideo seins big

visimu wrote on May 26, 2007 8:26 AM:

movie of freemature christian bibletop adult onlinesex asianorlando accommodation70s adult tapefaux caspar stainedcorporal effects smithbeach sex longchat sex nasty

visimu wrote on May 26, 2007 8:26 AM:

movie of freemature christian bibletop adult onlinesex asianorlando accommodation70s adult tapefaux caspar stainedcorporal effects smithbeach sex longchat sex nasty

visimu wrote on May 26, 2007 8:26 AM:

movie of freemature christian bibletop adult onlinesex asianorlando accommodation70s adult tapefaux caspar stainedcorporal effects smithbeach sex longchat sex nasty

visimu wrote on May 26, 2007 8:26 AM:

movie of freemature christian bibletop adult onlinesex asianorlando accommodation70s adult tapefaux caspar stainedcorporal effects smithbeach sex longchat sex nasty

visimu wrote on May 26, 2007 8:27 AM:

movie of freemature christian bibletop adult onlinesex asianorlando accommodation70s adult tapefaux caspar stainedcorporal effects smithbeach sex longchat sex nasty

mp3 soft wrote on May 26, 2007 8:27 PM:

paul wrote on May 27, 2007 2:13 AM:

dior wrote on May 27, 2007 8:45 AM:

dior wrote on May 27, 2007 8:46 AM:

seremi wrote on May 27, 2007 2:43 PM:

seremi wrote on May 27, 2007 2:44 PM:

petro wrote on May 27, 2007 8:40 PM:

miolonis wrote on May 28, 2007 2:25 AM:

nozer wrote on May 28, 2007 7:00 AM:

free ringtonemaxis hotlink callerringtoneconverterfree mobilecingular free ringtoneringtone freefree nokiareal ringtone musicvirgin ringtone

nozer wrote on May 28, 2007 7:00 AM:

free ringtonemaxis hotlink callerringtoneconverterfree mobilecingular free ringtoneringtone freefree nokiareal ringtone musicvirgin ringtone

nozer wrote on May 28, 2007 7:01 AM:

free ringtonemaxis hotlink callerringtoneconverterfree mobilecingular free ringtoneringtone freefree nokiareal ringtone musicvirgin ringtone

nozer wrote on May 28, 2007 7:01 AM:

free ringtonemaxis hotlink callerringtoneconverterfree mobilecingular free ringtoneringtone freefree nokiareal ringtone musicvirgin ringtone

nozer wrote on May 28, 2007 7:01 AM:

free ringtonemaxis hotlink callerringtoneconverterfree mobilecingular free ringtoneringtone freefree nokiareal ringtone musicvirgin ringtone

bush wrote on May 28, 2007 4:48 PM:

ringtonenokia ringtonemadonnanextelcent 50download free ringtonecingular ringtone downloadringtone britneycricketmp3 download free

bush wrote on May 28, 2007 4:49 PM:

ringtonenokia ringtonemadonnanextelcent 50download free ringtonecingular ringtone downloadringtone britneycricketmp3 download free

bush wrote on May 28, 2007 4:49 PM:

ringtonenokia ringtonemadonnanextelcent 50download free ringtonecingular ringtone downloadringtone britneycricketmp3 download free

bush wrote on May 28, 2007 4:49 PM:

ringtonenokia ringtonemadonnanextelcent 50download free ringtonecingular ringtone downloadringtone britneycricketmp3 download free

noli wrote on May 28, 2007 8:27 PM:

ringtoneringtoneringtonesamsung free24cingular ringtone download50 ringtonealltelringtone music ringtoneringtone

noli wrote on May 28, 2007 8:27 PM:

ringtoneringtoneringtonesamsung free24cingular ringtone download50 ringtonealltelringtone music ringtoneringtone

noli wrote on May 28, 2007 8:27 PM:

ringtoneringtoneringtonesamsung free24cingular ringtone download50 ringtonealltelringtone music ringtoneringtone

noli wrote on May 28, 2007 8:27 PM:

ringtoneringtoneringtonesamsung free24cingular ringtone download50 ringtonealltelringtone music ringtoneringtone

noli wrote on May 28, 2007 8:27 PM:

ringtoneringtoneringtonesamsung free24cingular ringtone download50 ringtonealltelringtone music ringtoneringtone

Zoosir wrote on May 29, 2007 8:29 AM:

body tripodbig buttscomfree maturemale pornstarspornographic pornografiacom sex oralpornographic dvd fotospornoamateurscommouth toneuropathic zoofree hardcore neopets

Zoosir wrote on May 29, 2007 8:29 AM:

body tripodbig buttscomfree maturemale pornstarspornographic pornografiacom sex oralpornographic dvd fotospornoamateurscommouth toneuropathic zoofree hardcore neopets

Zoosir wrote on May 29, 2007 8:29 AM:

body tripodbig buttscomfree maturemale pornstarspornographic pornografiacom sex oralpornographic dvd fotospornoamateurscommouth toneuropathic zoofree hardcore neopets

Zoosir wrote on May 29, 2007 8:29 AM:

body tripodbig buttscomfree maturemale pornstarspornographic pornografiacom sex oralpornographic dvd fotospornoamateurscommouth toneuropathic zoofree hardcore neopets

Zoosir wrote on May 29, 2007 8:30 AM:

body tripodbig buttscomfree maturemale pornstarspornographic pornografiacom sex oralpornographic dvd fotospornoamateurscommouth toneuropathic zoofree hardcore neopets

dukar wrote on May 29, 2007 2:39 PM:

free datinglive seatingpicture pornsex nudistsc morales indvd salesongs downloadsbisexual wmvxxx cartoony gratis lenceria

dukar wrote on May 29, 2007 2:39 PM:

free datinglive seatingpicture pornsex nudistsc morales indvd salesongs downloadsbisexual wmvxxx cartoony gratis lenceria

dukar wrote on May 29, 2007 2:39 PM:

free datinglive seatingpicture pornsex nudistsc morales indvd salesongs downloadsbisexual wmvxxx cartoony gratis lenceria

dukar wrote on May 29, 2007 2:40 PM:

free datinglive seatingpicture pornsex nudistsc morales indvd salesongs downloadsbisexual wmvxxx cartoony gratis lenceria

ahmed wrote on May 29, 2007 8:43 PM:

bondage blonde chairfree discount pictureadult bookvideo cartoon gayablowjobwav femjoymotion adult cartoonvideos dorablowjob blowjobpersonals minnesotabondage pornadult free jtinfo

ahmed wrote on May 29, 2007 8:43 PM:

bondage blonde chairfree discount pictureadult bookvideo cartoon gayablowjobwav femjoymotion adult cartoonvideos dorablowjob blowjobpersonals minnesotabondage pornadult free jtinfo

ahmed wrote on May 29, 2007 8:43 PM:

bondage blonde chairfree discount pictureadult bookvideo cartoon gayablowjobwav femjoymotion adult cartoonvideos dorablowjob blowjobpersonals minnesotabondage pornadult free jtinfo

ahmed wrote on May 29, 2007 8:43 PM:

bondage blonde chairfree discount pictureadult bookvideo cartoon gayablowjobwav femjoymotion adult cartoonvideos dorablowjob blowjobpersonals minnesotabondage pornadult free jtinfo

max wrote on May 30, 2007 2:22 AM:

beauty dogfetish turtleneck sexyteen sexymasturbation posing andcity hell glamourhardcore free movielady jacket motorcyclefuck ofringtone e780ebony porn

max wrote on May 30, 2007 2:22 AM:

beauty dogfetish turtleneck sexyteen sexymasturbation posing andcity hell glamourhardcore free movielady jacket motorcyclefuck ofringtone e780ebony porn

max wrote on May 30, 2007 2:23 AM:

beauty dogfetish turtleneck sexyteen sexymasturbation posing andcity hell glamourhardcore free movielady jacket motorcyclefuck ofringtone e780ebony porn

max wrote on May 30, 2007 2:23 AM:

beauty dogfetish turtleneck sexyteen sexymasturbation posing andcity hell glamourhardcore free movielady jacket motorcyclefuck ofringtone e780ebony porn

uhasadin wrote on May 30, 2007 8:48 AM:

shania adult gangbangnudist wweaccompagnatrici soymonmouth behavioral healthbisexual freeamateur photo curveadult xxx kimbrutal gratisda mapa europade gratis

uhasadin wrote on May 30, 2007 8:48 AM:

shania adult gangbangnudist wweaccompagnatrici soymonmouth behavioral healthbisexual freeamateur photo curveadult xxx kimbrutal gratisda mapa europade gratis

uhasadin wrote on May 30, 2007 8:48 AM:

shania adult gangbangnudist wweaccompagnatrici soymonmouth behavioral healthbisexual freeamateur photo curveadult xxx kimbrutal gratisda mapa europade gratis

uhasadin wrote on May 30, 2007 8:49 AM:

shania adult gangbangnudist wweaccompagnatrici soymonmouth behavioral healthbisexual freeamateur photo curveadult xxx kimbrutal gratisda mapa europade gratis

adiba wrote on May 30, 2007 2:39 PM: