« previous | MUCK HOME | next »
House Committee to Meet Tomorrow to Vote on White House Subpoenas
At 10:15 tomorrow morning, the House Judiciary Committee will vote on whether to issue subpoenas to Alberto Gonzales' chief of staff Kyle Sampson, Karl Rove, former White House counsel Harriet Miers, deputy White House counsel William Kelley, and Rove's aide Scott Jennings, as well as White House and Justice Department documents, which have not been provided to date.
Today, current White House counsel Fred Fielding is expected to notify the congressional committees whether the White House will make Rove and others available. But House Democrats appear determined to hear from White House officials on their terms.
Advertisement

Comments (15)
Anonymous wrote on March 20, 2007 12:04 PM:"executive privilege" is an abstract myth.
Show me the part of the Constitution that details "executive privilege" exemptions and then I'll start listening to these claims.
For an Administration that claims to be "strict constructionist" on the Constitituion their words really ring hollow.
SPEAK wrote on March 20, 2007 12:09 PM:Congress better not take no for an answer. Sick of these people getting away with everything. Time to hold their feet to the fire. Under oath, while everyone is watching I want to hear what they have to say.
sdf wrote on March 20, 2007 12:16 PM:A couple of things that have struck me as odd over the past few years was the justice department's focused prosecution of enviro-vandals (terrorsists?) and secondarily their prosecution of medical marijuana.
Have there been USA's who have been leading the charge against these dangerous individuals?
I know it's just messed up priorities, but it's also a media weapon against environmentalism and democratic voting states. It'd be interesting to discover the strings behind the puppets.
Brooklynite wrote on March 20, 2007 12:17 PM:Agreed, anonymous poster.
Two pernicious legal theories have been abused over the past 50 years to hide government malfeasance from the public: "executive privilege", and the state secrets doctrine.
I've always been offended by the executive privilege argument though. If your advice to the president is so scurrilous you'd die of embarrassment if it were revealed to the public, maybe your advice isn't very good.
Stated another way, if your honest advice is too shameful to share with the people, it's too shameful to share with the President in secret.
I can't believe the media doesn't have the balls to challenge this doctrine. It is the most bullshit excuse for secrecy I've ever heard.
tekel wrote on March 20, 2007 12:17 PM:And while they're at it, how about they subpoena the emails from non-governmental accounts... Yahoo, AOL, Hotmail, gwb43.com... it seems like this is where the juicy stuff is likely to be, and the clearest evidence of obstruction of justice.
Rusty wrote on March 20, 2007 12:20 PM:anybody out there at Yahoo Mail, perhaps now is a good time to make a back-up of Karl Rove's email folder.
I will lose all hope if there is any compromise on this issue. There is absolutely no shield for Administration lackeys like Rove under "executive privilage" www.thinkprogress.org has a great article about the precidents related to this matter... in short, Rove is screwed. Even the NRO has an editorial saying the same thing. The people want testamony now and they want it under oath. We should let our representatives know it.
JEP (John Edward Patterson) wrote on March 20, 2007 12:52 PM:Brooklynite
"Two pernicious legal theories have been abused over the past 50 years to hide government malfeasance from the public: "executive privilege", and the state secrets doctrine."
Cheney used these dubious classifications to avoid revealing the truth about his "Energy Industry Task Force."
And as long as the Supreme Court is in his pocket, he'll prevail.
Remember "The Pelican Brief?"
It wasn't exactly fiction, everyone was so worried about the socail and moral agenda of these Bush SCOTUS appointees, they missed the real issue, which was protecting corporations from legal liability.
It is the one underlying thread to everything that has happened to the court since "Gore v. Bush." The social agenda was it's usual smokescreen, the real story is that these "Justices" are there to make sure no corporation is left behind.
Jgh88 wrote on March 20, 2007 1:11 PM:There is no way that the White House is going to allow Rove an Miers to testify. Although they should. The USA scandal is additional evidence that the US has sunk below many third world countries in term sof democracy. The US is run by the best government that the Corporations can buy.
Oke John wrote on April 27, 2007 5:25 AM:more info.
kriss@gmail.com wrote on April 29, 2007 5:06 PM:Generic Viagra. Buy Generic Viagra
bill@gmail.com wrote on April 30, 2007 9:10 PM:hello
gorge@gmail.com wrote on May 1, 2007 9:28 AM:hello
gorge@gmail.com wrote on May 1, 2007 9:29 AM:hello
PRINCE DON ALAMIEYESEIGHA wrote on May 1, 2007 9:58 PM:DON ALAMIEYESEIGHA.
Tony Williams wrote on October 3, 2007 7:38 PM:THE SON OF BAYESA STATE GOVERNOR,
NIGERIA.
DEAR SIR/ MADAM,
MY NAME IS DON ALAMIEYESEIGHA; I AM THE SON OF BAYESIAN STATE GOVERNOR.
I CAME IN CONTACT WITH YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS IN MY CAREFUL SEARCH FOR A REPUTABLE AND RELIABLE PERSON TO HELP ME TRANSFER SOME MONEY INTO YOUR COUNTRY AND THEREAFTER WE DISCUSS THE INVESTMENT TO DO WITH THE MONEY, THIS MONEY RESULTED IN THE COURSE OF MY FATHERS ARREST IN LONDON ON THE 10’TH OF SEPTEMBER 2005 WHICH HE WAS CHARGE TO COURT?
THERE ARE SOME MONEY LEFT IN HIS ACCOUNT HERE IN NIGERIA, WHICH I WILL LIKE TO TRANSFER INTO FOREIGN ACCOUNT FOR SECURITY PURPOSE, THE MAIN REASON OF THIS TRANSACTION IS THAT THE PRESIDENT HAS SET UP (EFCC) TO LOOK INTO GOVERNOR’S ACCOUNT.
I HAVE FOUND YOU WORTHY OF THIS TRANSACTION AFTER MY CAREFUL THOUGHT, MY FARTHER USED HIS POSITION TO ACCUMULATE US$35,000,000.OO (THIRTY FIVE MILLION UNITED STATES DOLLARS) WHICH HE DEPOSITED WITH A BANK WITH REFERENCE TO THE ECONOMIC CLIMATE IN NIGERIA COUPLE WITH THE DISTURBING OF (EFCC) SET UP BY OUR PRESIDENT OLUSEGUN OBASANJO TO LOOK INTO GOVERNMENT INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNT, INFARCT THE MONEY OR INVESTMENT IS NOT SECURED HERE IN NIGERIA.
I HEREBY REQUEST YOUR HELP AND ASSISTANCE TO HELP ME TRANSFER THIS US$35,000,000.00(THIRTY FIVE MILLION, UNITED STATES DOLLARS) INTO YOUR COUNTRY SO THAT WE WORK TOGETHER AND INVEST THE MONEY IN A LUCRATIVE BUSINESS IN YOUR COUNTRY.
WE SHALL ALSO DISCUSS IN DETAILS HOW WE WILL COMMIT OURSELVES IN THE INVESTMENT AND THE LIKELY SHARE OF THE PROCEEDS FROM THE INVESTMENT. I NEED YOUR ASSISTANCE TO TRANSFER THIS MONEY INTO YOUR COUNTRY SO THAT WE BEGIN THE BUSINESS IN EARNEST. MY FATHERS LAWYER; JUSTICE PRINCE ALEX WILL ALSO ASSIST US TO FACILITATE THE TRANSFER OF THIS US$35,000,000.00 INTO YOUR
BANK ACCOUNT.
I WILL LIKE YOU TO KEEP THIS INVESTMENT PROJECT CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL WE START IT IN EARNEST. I WILL GIVE YOU 20% GRATIFICATION AS SOON AS THIS US$35,000,000.00 ARE TRANSFERRED INTO YOUR BANK ACCOUNT.
I WILL ALSO REFUND YOU ALL THE MONEY YOU WILL SPEND IN THE COURSE OF TRANSFERRING THIS US$35,000,000.00 INTO YOUR BANK ACCOUNT. ON YOUR RECEIPT OF THIS MAIL; LET ME HEAR FROM YOU SO THAT WE KNOW THE NEXT LINE OF ACTION AS REGARDS THIS INVESTMENT PROJECT.
PLEASE I LOOK FORWARD TO HEAR FROM YOU ON YOUR RECEIPT OF THIS MAIL. REMEMBER TO GIVE ME YOUR PHONE AND FAX NUMBERS IN YOUR REPLY FOR EASY COMMUNICATIONS, CONTACT ME BY EMAIL ON YOUR RECEIPT OF THIS MAIL, SO THAT WE DISCUSS MORE ABOUT OUR INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP IN YOUR COUNTRY.
AS I WAIT TO HEAR FROM YOU.
REMAIN BLESSED, BEST REGARDS,
PRINCE DON ALAMIEYESEIGHA
TEL:234/803/953/7246
Good day
My name is Tony Williams I am 20 Years from Gahna why i worte this letter is because
i want to introdos business to you i have dynamode in my village in ghana so i'm looking
for buyer if you know you are intrest in this busines let me know immidately hope to hear
from you soon God bless
Tony Williams
williamsk_1000@myway.com