Comments (372)

Anonymous wrote on March 23, 2007 5:42 PM:

Karl Rove had his own little experience with voter fraud.

In 2005, it was revealed that, although he claimed his 1.3 million "Homestead" was in the District of Columbia where he lives with his wife and son, he cast his vote from a two bedroom cottage in Ingram, TX.

By claiming his "homestead" as DC, he was receiving a tax write off from the DC Government. A write off only DC voters can receive.

Ingram, TX locals questioned the fact that Karl was one of the local townsfolk, and one eventually filed a voter fraud complaint with the local sheriff.

Karl was acquitted by the sheriff - but only becaue Karl could not produce a copy of the Homestead form he signed in DC. How convenient.

Read the whole sordid story, courtesy of crew here:

http://www.citizensforethics.org/press/newsrelease.php?view=85

And while your're at it, spend some time wondering why Karl is overpriced selling real estate to his former political business partners:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/5/2/10177/11404

pinson wrote on March 23, 2007 5:43 PM:

Very nice. This is a seminal piece because it clearly draws the big picture of a national strategy to get their people in place in key swing states for the 2008 elections. It's all coming into focus now. The electoral map is looking scary bad for the GOP in the next elections. Karl knows they're going to lose big if they don't act, hence the urgency to make this happen. Too bad it's a) blowing up in their faces, and b) undermining the integrity of the justice department.

Dan wrote on March 23, 2007 5:43 PM:

Voter fraud is now a partisan issue?

nice midwestern girl wrote on March 23, 2007 5:49 PM:

FDL called it right:

http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/21/the-math-2/

jonas wrote on March 23, 2007 6:04 PM:

Dan: "voter fraud" in a Rovian context is very much a partisan issue precisely because it has zilch to do with actual fraud and everything to do with using the power of the Justice Department and the US Attorney's office to discourage poor and minority citizens (who tend to vote Democratic) from exercising their constitutional rights.

Virt wrote on March 23, 2007 6:11 PM:

The Bush administration was born as a result of the original sin of their stopping minorities from exercising their right to vote in the Florida 2000 election. They did this with the collaboration of the highest court in the land. In addition to being a crime against the Constitution, it was the greatest act of mass racism to occur in the last 50 years.

Given this history, there should be no surprise that they have now perverted the entire federal justice system.

Anonymous wrote on March 23, 2007 6:12 PM:

And to bring it all full circle, Heather Wilson of New Mexico is currently engaging in the same "homestead deduction" fraud that Rove tried. Go to

https://www.taxpayerservicecenter.com/RP_Search.jsp?search_type=Assessment

and plug in Square 0866, lot 0054.

Funny: the Constitution requires Congressmembers to reside in the states they represent (at least as of Election Day), yet Wilson has claimed this tax break -- on the basis of being a resident of DC -- going back well before November 2006.

DCIST wrote on March 23, 2007 6:14 PM:

Anon:

Sounds like Wilson owes the taxpayers of DC some money.

Drop a dime to the the DC government's tax fraud line and help the unrepresented citizens at least get their fair share due them:

Email: TaxFraudHotline@dc.gov
Phone: (800) 380-3495
Mail: Government of the District of Columbia
Office of Tax and Revenue
Attn: Tax Fraud Hotline
941 North Capitol Street, NE, Suite 840
Washington, DC 20002

Anonymous wrote on March 23, 2007 6:14 PM:

The voter fraud thing is a weak hand for Rove and the GOP. They can suppress a few votes at the margin and in ultra close races, Florida 2000 for instance, it can be telling. Overall however it's a tiny piece of the puzzle. The biggest piece is to be poplular and now the GOP is becomming as popular as, in Cheney's case, Jeff Dahmner.

This isn't to discount this whole thing but just to put it in perspective.

The deepest foundation of modern conservatism is white American exceptualism. It will require overturning the Constitution as we know it for the white Christians to maintain their status. That is what the Bush presidency is all about. It's the first salvo. Electoral political operations liked Roves are just a rearguard action. They certainly know that they cannot win the election game going forward to mid century.

rapier wrote on March 23, 2007 6:15 PM:

The voter fraud thing is a weak hand for Rove and the GOP. They can suppress a few votes at the margin and in ultra close races, Florida 2000 for instance, it can be telling. Overall however it's a tiny piece of the puzzle. The biggest piece is to be poplular and now the GOP is becomming as popular as, in Cheney's case, Jeff Dahmner.

This isn't to discount this whole thing but just to put it in perspective.

The deepest foundation of modern conservatism is white American exceptualism. It will require overturning the Constitution as we know it for the white Christians to maintain their status. That is what the Bush presidency is all about. It's the first salvo. Electoral political operations liked Roves are just a rearguard action. They certainly know that they cannot win the election game going forward to mid century.

jrcjr wrote on March 23, 2007 6:18 PM:

Jonas & Dan--
we've seen this supposed concern over "voter fraud" clearly in action here in Georgia. the republican legislature has been pushing hard for a Voter ID to combat potential fraud. sounds like a good idea on its face, only there is no record of this kind of fraud ever (ever!) occurring in this state. On the other hand, there has been very clear evidence of people being wrongly turned away from the polls. Even our mayor's mother was denied an absentee ballot.

sean wrote on March 23, 2007 6:19 PM:

It's amazing how McClatchy manages to be ahead of the curve on so many of these (e.g. Warren Strobel's reporting on Iraq).

GWN wrote on March 23, 2007 6:34 PM:

Don't underestimate the power of several hundred votes.... a few thousand can be huge

WAPO an d NYT wrote on March 23, 2007 6:53 PM:

Dear McClatchey,

Back off man. You're making us look stoopid. Thanks!

foggylady wrote on March 23, 2007 7:02 PM:

Man o Man...between TPM staff, bloggers, readers/contributors, McClachty, etc. the pieces are falling together.
No wonder Bushies wanted to control the Internet.
And another piece, thanks to one of the TPM readers who I cannot remember: a plan to pass laws that explicitly deny any court redress.
http://www.committeeforjustice.org/contents/reading/092804.pdf

Bush et al are planing to not only to pack the USA, but to also the courts, make legal redress impossible.
Here you can find a database showing which judges are nominated by which President.
Bush has nominated over 300, if I did the search correctly.

..

zoober wrote on March 23, 2007 7:07 PM:

This entire debacle has made me grow concerned over the 85 US Attorneys who WEREN'T fired.

What is it that those 85 are willing to do, that they were not fired?

What is it that have they done, that they were not fired?

I feel that I am being unfair to them. But I can't help it.

From the badlands of New Mexico wrote on March 23, 2007 7:08 PM:

Did Frank Luntz come up with the term of art "voter fraud" to replace the ostensible voter suppression?

Estate tax = Death tax?

I sure am glad Republicans hate politics by focus group so much.

bushworstpresidentever wrote on March 23, 2007 7:09 PM:

To Republicans, bogus "voter fraud" is just another means of vote suppression, particularly of minorities. And it is not something Rove invented. Go far enough back to the 1950's and you will recall that now deceased Justice Rehnquist made his bones as a Rethuglican by engaging in voter suppression efforts against minorities in Phoenix in that time period.

Michael Kinsley wrote on March 23, 2007 7:10 PM:

Nothing to see here. Move along.

malcontent wrote on March 23, 2007 7:13 PM:

We ought to string Karl Rove up.

jeffgee wrote on March 23, 2007 7:22 PM:

Maybe those "numbers" Rove was talking about before the 2006 thumpin' were due to his overestimation of his ability to steal another election by using loyal Bushies in the US attorney's offices. Rove knows the republicans can't win in a fair fight, so he finds every way he can to rig elections.
Bush is willing to go to the mat with Congress to protect Rove. That's some canine loyalty.

Ad Absurdum wrote on March 23, 2007 7:29 PM:

Michael Kinsley prefers getting his "news" from columnists such as David Brooks rather than from news articles from McClatchy.

Anonymous wrote on March 23, 2007 7:30 PM:

Shields' and Cragan's study (http://www.epluribusmedia.org/columns/2007/20070212_political_profiling.html)
showed that the biggest imbalance in voter fraud cases (4 Democrats to 1 Republican) was at the local level which does not reach the national news.

TPM should try to get their raw data and go over the cases one by one. There's a lot of stuff that no one knows about except locals. And there's an apparent pattern -- not quite a conspiracy, but the use of the law for a coordinated voter-suppression action, organized partly throught the Federalist Society and partly by the Attorney General through the "loyal Bushies" that have been appointed.

terry hallinan wrote on March 23, 2007 7:36 PM:

Nothing to see here. Move along.

Posted by: Michael Kinsley

Oh really?

Interesting comments by Josh about The Mike Kinsley.

Kinsley once addressed the complaints that he was no liberal and said he really was.

Kinsley is a very intelligent and perceptive fellow and an absolutely superb and witty writer but he is a conservative. His unwillingness to take authority to task is the proof.

I imagine most here heard the stories of Rehnquist once being a most aggressive poll watcher challenging minority voters in his younger years. The charge was never really answered. Without serious investigation, I have no knowledge whatever whether it is true.

But are we not right back to where Rehnquist once supposedly was according to allegations?

A new day is dawning. The change is as impossible to stop as time itself.

Best, Terry

On the Clock wrote on March 23, 2007 7:39 PM:

Segregation then. Segregation now. Segregation forever!

Karly, you're doing a heckuva job.

comadrejo wrote on March 23, 2007 7:42 PM:

I just know living in Seattle, there is a wing of the Washington State Republican Party that still stand by its motto, "we wuz robbed" of the 2004 Gubnatorial election. If one looks at the rantings of "soundpolitics.com" or the Evergreen Freedom Foundation, where they constantly hammer that the Gubnatorial election was stolen from Republican Dino Rossi. The firing of McKay was aimed as much to West of the Cascade Curtain moderate Republicans, like Norm Maleng, Sam Reed etc as it was for the RNC to get ready for the national elections in 2008.

The whole voter fraud myth, is just a way to suppress votes, as the votes were suppress in Florida in 2000.

Books Alive wrote on March 23, 2007 7:43 PM:

Virt:

You rightly mention the Rehnquist court's decision and its selection of Bush for president. In 2001, John Dean wrote about his role in how Nixon came to appoint William Rehnquist to the Supreme Court. It is chilling to realize the end result of Nixon's search for "strict constructionist" nominees. Dean's book on the SC - http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0743226070/findlaw-20 - and his "Worse than Watergate" are timely, truthful and terrifying.

MG wrote on March 23, 2007 7:44 PM:

"We ought to string Karl Rove up."

A bit harsh, malcontent.

We should dose him with some of Dick Cheney's heart and BP medications and give him chemical ED. No lead in the pencil, as it were.

-mg

skeptik wrote on March 23, 2007 7:48 PM:

the crime of voting while black.

Books Alive wrote on March 23, 2007 7:51 PM:

Terry H:

We read what John Dean has to say about Rehnquist harassing Hispanic voters in Arizona in Dean's book I linked to above. Rehnquist took part in activities that weren't illegal at the time, but par for the course.

John Emerson wrote on March 23, 2007 7:51 PM:

The Shields and Cragan raw data are here.

Lilybelle wrote on March 23, 2007 7:52 PM:

The charges against Rehnquist were aired, though far from sufficiently, at the confirmation hearings when Reagan nominated him for Chief Justice. He was a straight-up racist. I remember the testimony of Blacks and Latinos who recounted Rehnquist had accosted and then thrust a book. He would then declare they hadn't read well enough to vote. That's how Rehnquist made his name within the Republican Party.

Lilybelle wrote on March 23, 2007 7:53 PM:

The charges against Rehnquist were aired, though far from sufficiently, at the confirmation hearings when Reagan nominated him for Chief Justice. He was a straight-up racist. I remember the testimony of Blacks and Latinos who recounted how Rehnquist had accosted and then thrust a book at them. He would then declare they hadn't read well enough to vote. That's how Rehnquist made his name within the Republican Party.

awg wrote on March 23, 2007 7:55 PM:

This all goes to the larger point of the corruption and incompetence that is systemic in the administration right now. Democracy is fragile and one of the pillars is the non-political nature of sitting US prosecutors. As one of the Republican prosecutors appointed by Bush (then later fired) said Republican AG Ashcroft told him when he was hired to be a US prosecutor, that politics should not enter into deliberation of prosecution at the department of Justice. Of course it does at certain times but not on this apparent scale. For all of his possible policy faults, Ashcroft was sound on this ethical value here. Sadly others in the WH do not play by the same rules.

Make it all purely political and we have a Banana Republic with wild swings of retribution and constitutional/political/economic ruin. You want that when a Democrat gets in the WH and acts likes this? A Democratic WH taking out revenge on every professional in agencies across the country?
This is not an issue of the GOP or Dems. It's the constitutional structure of this nation that matters. Period. Tamper with the judicial system the way they apparently have done here (and in the past) and in more and more cases and you have a mess for all involved.

In fact, this is not partisan nor is it trivial. These are REPUBLICAN USAs being fired by a WH that is "Republican" in name, money and talk, but wildly NON-Conservative in policy and action or demeanor. The "waste of time" issue is a bogus argument that will only end up turning off 70% of the public. When the argument turns to "waste of time and money" (NRO, FOX, etc., are trying this out today after Snow pitched it earlier yesterday), it usually means in "DC political speak" that the paper trail is closing in fast. It's a desperate attempt that is being used by some now. It will work for about 25-35% of the public. If you go to the conservative blogs/sites this will be advocated and reinforced by some but not by all.

The issue is this: are GOP supporters and conservatives in America going to let the larger GOP party and American Conservative philosophy continue to take the fall by siding with this Bush Administration on this and other mounting questions of corruption/mismanagement or will they side with the long-term interests of the GOP?
The smart ones in the GOP have chosen the long term of the GOP (Scarborough, Army, Sullivan, Phillips, Sununu, Conrad, Hagel(who has the most conservative voting record of any Senator in the Senate), Simpson, Scowcroft, etc.,) and Republican and/or Conservative agenda. All the while, the FOX fans too often just take their talking points from this particular crumbling White House and people like Hannity. That is a political and philosophical mistake to make. These mounting issues of corruption and mismanagement and deception are potentially devastating for the WH and could take many with them down if those supporters choose to just keep standing up for this radical and incompetent WH.

John Emerson wrote on March 23, 2007 7:55 PM:

Shields and Cragan:

http://www.epluribusmedia.org/columns/2007/Table%203%20Only%20Local%20Investigated.pdf

danielle wrote on March 23, 2007 7:59 PM:

Target Dems for bogus voter fraud cases, suppress Dem votes...How else were they supposed to get a "permanent Republican majority?"

They've always said they were trying to achieve one party dominance.

T. Scheisskopf wrote on March 23, 2007 7:59 PM:

Something tells me RealID figures into this. But where?

Foggylad wrote on March 23, 2007 8:11 PM:

Ooops...
forgot to add the Federal Judge Database link...

here:
http://www.fjc.gov/

Cal Damage wrote on March 23, 2007 8:13 PM:

Nixon had '72 in the bag, yet his paranoia drove him and his to break into the DNC HQ to find out what they were up to and how they were going to steal the presidential election.
And that was the little thread that was yanked on and caused the whole Nixon lie-machine to unravel.
After all the horrors that Junior, Rove, and Shooter have visited on America and its Constitution, that it might be their paranoia about a couple hundred voters in Colorado that undoes them would be SOOOOOOOO satisfying....

Jeff wrote on March 23, 2007 8:45 PM:

As I mentioned in another thread, the termination of attorneys is not an issue unless there is the framework of a bigger picture.

Now, mass replacement of 9 atorneys of 11 'swing' states, thats a HUGELY bigger picture, especially given the context of the apparently bogus nature of the performance claims.

If ANYONE can find a shred of evidence that any of the appointed USAs were vetted based on voting related issues - specifically access to polling and ID issues, this has gone from smoke to a smoldering blaze, as you now have (for now anecdotal) evidence of an actual conspiracy in furtherance of a cause....

m kerner wrote on March 23, 2007 8:57 PM:

For Rove it is always about winning the next election. If you look ito each of these priority replacements it is either about protecting a current republican or setting themselves up to disrupt the next election cycle with "new" investigations. Is their any doubt that the new Ark USAtty would announce a renewed investigation into Clinton just after the Dem primary? Who would be better prepared for that task than the Rove aide in charge of opposition research? Why change staff in IL?- Obama.

Richard L. Adlof wrote on March 23, 2007 9:09 PM:

Of course, this is about the 2008 election. I find it reassuring that it only took two plus weeks after I and others posted these and other similar thoughts and observations.

johnnydrama wrote on March 23, 2007 9:13 PM:

Just to be clear.

For Rove and his ilk, voter fraud means the following:

Black people voting in their own districts

That's what they mean by voter fraud.

The fact that Rove mentioned 11 important election states, and in 9 of those states, they've replaced the USA adds adds to this whole story about 1000%

1Watt wrote on March 23, 2007 9:43 PM:

There's a need for a special prosecutor to tie this together with Diebold, Choice Point. RICO=RNC

If it weren't for BlackBox Voting and BradBlog 2006 may have been much different.

tinfoil hat not needed.

Mrs Panstreppon wrote on March 23, 2007 9:48 PM:

@ March 23, 2007 05:42 PM

I can add to questions about Karl Rove's finances which I posted about at the TPM Cafe.

In November 2002, the Roves bought property in Rosemary Beach for $165,000 from the Rosemary Beach Land Company. Rosemary Beach is in Walton County, Florida.

According to the records of the Walton County Clerk of the Court, Karl and Darby Rove took a mortgage on the property for $100,000 with a $1,000,000 line of credit on 11/23/2002.

The mortgagor was The Bank of Birmingham, Alabama.

The Roves satisfied the mortgage on 2/3/2003.

Why did the Roves bother to take out a mortgage for three months? I'm curious, too, if the Roves ever drew down on the $1 million line of credit.

I would not be surprised in the least if the Bank of Birmingham wrote off the mortgage or someone else paid it. Nor would I be surprised if Rove borrowed money under the line of credit that he never intends to repay himself.

Bankers can be just as crooked as the next person and Karl Rove has a lot of long time connections in Alabama where he conducted some really nasty campaigns.

johnnydrama wrote on March 23, 2007 9:48 PM:

If anybody's bored, it'd be great to see what states Rove mentioned as 2008 targets, who were the US Attorney's before they were replaced, and who were they after.

I'll probably look into it if nobody beats me.

Mad Dog Rackham wrote on March 23, 2007 9:56 PM:

"Segregation then. Segregation now. Segregation forever!"

Indeed.

What is it about people named George?

The Oracle wrote on March 23, 2007 10:10 PM:

Exactly what did Karl Rove and Alberto Gonzales know, and when did they know it, concerning Mark Foley, a fellow neo-con Republican, who had a sexual predilection for young House pages?

(Note: in early 2006, Karl Rove "talked" Mark Foley (R-FL) into running for another term in office, even as the House Republican leadership was covering for Mark Foley's sexual predatory practices, as they'd been doing for years)

And did Alberto Gonzales, after Foleygate broke with a fury into pre-election news last October, use his position as Attorney General to get as many Republican-appointed federal prosecutors as possible to bring bogus voter fraud cases against Democrats in an attempt to replace negative news coverage of Foleygate with negative news coverage of alleged Democratic improprieties?

Is this why the Gonzales-controlled Justice Department is stonewalling (obstructing justice?) in not releasing all the emails related to the firing of eight U.S. Attorneys last December, two months after Foleygate severely hurt Republican chances in the November elections?

And how does Alberto Gonzales resolve the contradiction between his statement the other day that he wants to keep his job so he can go on protecting the kids, when the FACT is, he and Karl Rove, being chief White House political strategists, MUST have known about Mark Foley's sexual predator practices long before the late September 2006 revelations about his activities?

So many questions, and so few answers...so far.

George E. Lowe wrote on March 23, 2007 10:11 PM:

Hi, My kudos to "RAPIER"[March 23, 2007/06:15pm for raising the key issue behind Karl Rove's plans for a permanent GOP "Christian Fascist/Corporate Fascist Majority" as a precursor to a "Fascist Christian Theocracy" imposed on apathetic Americans in the next decade. Rapier is on all fours with his brilliant insight: "The deepest foundation of modern conservatism is white American exceptionalism." Rapier is also dead RIGHT in his observation that: "It will require overturning the Constitution as we know it for the white Christians to maintain their status."
Fortunately we have the Internet & the Blogosphere to challenge THEM & beat them at their own game & create our competing MEMES to the "Frank Luntz"-types who say "VOTER FRAUD" when they really mean "VOTER SUPRESSION" of "the colored ones."
Recall what the Orwellian Nazi's did to cover-up their real agenda--the elimination of World Jewry:
1. "Final Solution"--Eliminate or kill by mass murder all Jews
2. "Action"---Large-scale round up

3. "Deportation"--Resettle, removal, extermination

4. "Nach Osten"--To the death camps

5. "Rooting Out"--Extermination

6. "Operations Unit"--Killing unit

7. "Bath Installation"--Gas chamber

8. "Special Treatment"--Killing

The Bush Administration has used this "regulated language" or "Sprachregelung" to MASK/HIDE what they have been doing to our secular Democratic-Constitutional Republic of Law, from 2001-2007. And Rove & Company are planning to steal another Presidental Election in 2008, with their campaign vs. so-called "VOTER FRAUD"/rigged electronic voting machines & other Nixonian "dirty tricks" like "swiftboating"--if we of the "Vital Center" let THEM get away with it AGAIN.
Sinclair Lewis warned us in the 1930s: "When Fascism comes to America it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." Yes, my fellow members of the Vital Center--IT CAN HAPPEN HERE: A FASCIST CHRISTIAN AMERICA--because it is. Just turn on FOX & see "the pods growing." Very worried in Stuart, FL. George E. Lowe

noshrubs wrote on March 23, 2007 10:15 PM:

Interesting to see Minnesota on Rove's list. The U.S. attorney (Heffelfinger) in Minnesota mysteriously left his job within the past year. He was well respected, doing a great job. It was so odd. People here in MN in the legal community couldn't quite figure it out. And he was replaced by a 30-something Bushie...it all makes sense now. I've heard that the House Judiciary Committee is interested in what happened here...

goodshowtom wrote on March 23, 2007 10:37 PM:

Yep... Rove may be a hero to his party, but a traitor to the country.

Last time I checked, it was the United States of America, not the United States of The New Right, or Reich as it were.

Silly me, always referring to that dusty old Constitution, at least what's left of it.

chompiz wrote on March 23, 2007 10:41 PM:

Los Angeles Times, Thursday, March 22, 2007
California Section "B", first header read like this:
" Bush loyalist was added to purge list late"
"The administration wanted to retain Kevin Ryan as US Attorney in SF but then fired him to defuse a fuss about his poor job evaluation"

PDX wrote on March 23, 2007 11:57 PM:

Read what Joshua Marshall has to say about this, and then read yesterdays article in Salon by Sidney Blumentha. We are at a true crossroads right now in this country, and most people don’t even know why. These articles answer that question.

When Rove is cornered is when he is the most dangerous. Right now Karl Rove should be considered a very dangerous man.

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/

http://www.salon.com/opinion/blumenthal/2007/03/22/attorneys/

Matt wrote on March 24, 2007 12:40 AM:

It is almost the same Supreme Count who stopped the ballot count in Florida, who will now decide if the American people should be allowed to know what our Administration is doing, and why it is doing it.

Does anyone have a line on whether the Chief Justice will reveal himself as Judus? Or, is John Roberts a "loyal bushie"?

Phoenix wrote on March 24, 2007 2:08 AM:

We are starting to see how the common thread runs through some districts where there doesn't appear to have been any obvious reason to target the sitting US Attorney -- Nevada, Michigan.

Its also worth noting that they installed the lawyers from the Civil Rights Division in SDFla and WDMo as "interim" US Attys. The one in Florida (Acosta) was later confirmed by the Senate, but in Missouri they appear to have used the Patriot Act provision right about the time it was enacted, in March 2006, to end-run the Senate. (From the website of the US Atty for WDMo: "Bradley J. Schlozman was appointed to serve as the United States Attorney for the Western District of Missouri under an Attorney General Appointment on March 23, 2006.")

Phoenix wrote on March 24, 2007 2:12 AM:

And, by the way, I'd been wondering how long it would take before people started asking questions about Debra Yang (CDCa). I see we're there now.

JoeM wrote on March 24, 2007 2:56 AM:

The nearly yearlong investigation into voter fraud in 2004 has yielded no evidence of a broad conspiracy to try to steal an election, U.S. Attorney Steve Biskupic said Monday.

He predicted that perhaps "a couple of dozen" isolated cases of suspected fraud might be charged, and he said sloppy recordkeeping by election officials was a key impediment to proving such cases.

Nothing in the cases that his office has examined has shown a plot to try to tip an election, Biskupic said during a meeting with Journal Sentinel editors and reporters.

Critics had raised such fears of partisan voter fraud schemes in the election aftermath. But Biskupic said, "I wouldn't say that at all."

He said, "We don't see a massive conspiracy to alter the election in Milwaukee, one way or another."

Biskupic, a Republican whom President Bush appointed in 2002, and Milwaukee County District Attorney E. Michael McCann, a Democrat, announced a joint effort to investigate allegations of illegal voting in January.

That followed Journal Sentinel stories on widespread problems in Milwaukee, including flawed voter counts, votes cast from invalid addresses, outdated poll lists and discrepancies between the number of ballots cast and voters listed at dozens of polling places.

The newspaper found similar problems elsewhere in the state.

Four of the 18 people accused of felonies in the investigation have been convicted, officials said Monday.

Here is the breakdown of cases:

-- Federal prosecutors have charged 14 people: 10 felons with voting illegally and four people with double voting.

Four of the felons accused of illegal voting were convicted, one was acquitted and five cases are pending, Assistant U.S. Attorney Rick Frohling said.

None of the four people charged with double voting has been convicted. Charges against one person were dismissed because of mental incompetence, one person was acquitted, one trial resulted in a hung jury, and one person who agreed initially to plead guilty now wants a trial, Frohling said.

Two of those charged with double voting were driven to several polling places in the same van, but the driver hasn't been identified, and no evidence of an organized conspiracy has been uncovered, Frohling said.

-- McCann's office has charged four people with felonies in Milwaukee County Circuit Court. Two people affiliated with the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now were charged with filing false voter registrations, and two felons were accused of illegal voting. None of those cases has been resolved.

Biskupic said he had hoped to complete his portion of the investigation this year to avoid dealing with such matters in 2006 another election year.

He said, however, that the investigation will likely spill over into next year, which will feature elections for governor, Congress and most of the state Legislature.

Biskupic declined to estimate when his part of the inquiry might be done.

Assistant District Attorney David Feiss said the district attorney's office also likely won't complete its inquiry this year.

Feiss, too, wouldn't say how much longer the investigation would last.

Biskupic said recordkeeping problems have been rampant.

He said that jurors interviewed after acquittals told prosecutors the record problems created doubt as to whether fraud had occurred.

"I don't know how you are going to prove a case when there is no paper trail," Biskupic said.

In addition, he said, it was "extremely difficult" to prove that felons ineligible to vote did so intentionally.

State law bars felons who haven't completed probation or parole from voting.

Defendants have argued that they didn't know they were barred from voting as felons, Biskupic said.

"Once people hear that argument can get them off in front of a jury, you tend to hear it more," he said.

Partisan split

The 2004 vote problems took on added significance because of the close outcome of the presidential election in Wisconsin. Democrat John Kerry beat Bush by 11,000 votes, one of the closest margins in the country.

Republicans have argued that fraud appears to be rampant in Milwaukee and that stricter controls must be enacted.

Democrats have said that the main problem is clerical shortcomings, not fraud.

That only 18 voter fraud cases have been charged doesn't mean it's not a major problem in Wisconsin, state Republican Party Chairman Rick Graber said.

"For anyone to sit back and say our election system doesn't have problems, that is just blatantly false," Graber said. "The questions raised in 2004 still haven't been answered."

He criticized Democratic Gov. Jim Doyle for vetoing legislation that would have required photo identification at the polls.

Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett, a Democrat, said the results of the investigation confirm his view of a year ago, that there were only isolated instances of fraud.

"Initially, there were people painting this picture of some sort of conspiracy where there were bands (of scammers) getting together to try to defraud the system, and that obviously has not happened," Barrett said.

Barrett said he supports prosecution of lawbreakers and is critical of state officials, who said they're unlikely to complete a statewide voter list in time for April elections.

Biskupic said he worried that cases of voter fraud could spawn a partisan battle, in which the losing side perceives that the winner had some unfair advantage and becomes "more inclined to do something" illegal to even the score in the next election.

Copyright 2005, Journal Sentinel Inc. All rights reserved. (Note: This notice does not apply to those news items already copyrighted and received through wire services or other media.)

vicissitude wrote on March 24, 2007 6:10 AM:

"Never forget that everything Hitler did in Germany was legal"

MLK 63

buckheaddad wrote on March 24, 2007 6:31 AM:

When information like Mr. Rove's little TAX switch-back deal become public knowledge, WHY IS THIS NOT PUBLICLY NOTED BY THE PRESS?

vox clamantis in red state wrote on March 24, 2007 7:57 AM:

Wow! So much insight. So many blogs. TPM has hit the big time. Great job TPM!
Heads must roll.

vox clamantis in red state wrote on March 24, 2007 7:58 AM:

Wow! So much insight. So many blogs. TPM has hit the big time. Great job TPM!
Heads must roll.

tom@hotmail.com wrote on April 26, 2007 2:57 PM:

penis details page 12

dennis@gmail.com wrote on April 30, 2007 12:34 AM:

Generic Viagra. Buy Generic Viagra

willy@gmail.com wrote on April 30, 2007 3:06 PM:

hello

brtney@gmail.com wrote on May 1, 2007 3:45 AM:

hello

Jonglly wrote on May 2, 2007 1:13 PM:

Before buying generic viagra read this.
I've got new info about generic viagra and share with you.

tonny@gmail.com wrote on May 6, 2007 3:26 PM:

hello

tonny@gmail.com wrote on May 6, 2007 3:27 PM:

hello

acyclovir wrote on May 13, 2007 4:41 PM:

Good work!

Jonglly wrote on May 21, 2007 3:51 PM:

Before buying generic viagra read this.
I've got new info about generic viagra and share with you.

ymonhfa zgqplmf wrote on August 6, 2007 2:47 PM:

xczfph oxslfkzv braztk qyvoecgbx zwnq tngxav dkuyinhq

cheap viagra wrote on September 18, 2007 12:09 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

online viagra wrote on September 18, 2007 9:48 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

viagra cheap wrote on September 18, 2007 1:39 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

order levitra wrote on September 19, 2007 3:09 PM:

cheap@levitra.com

buy viagra wrote on September 19, 2007 4:55 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

generic viagra wrote on September 20, 2007 6:00 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

cheap viagra wrote on September 20, 2007 7:45 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

discount viagra wrote on September 20, 2007 9:29 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy cheap viagra wrote on September 20, 2007 3:05 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy viagra generic wrote on September 20, 2007 4:27 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

Eagles wrote on September 21, 2007 10:44 PM:

sale@mp3.com

viagra generic wrote on September 22, 2007 5:47 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

order levitra wrote on September 23, 2007 12:48 AM:

cheap@levitra.com

buy viagra wrote on September 23, 2007 8:15 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

cheap viagra wrote on September 23, 2007 11:21 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

discount viagra wrote on September 23, 2007 1:03 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy generic viagra wrote on September 23, 2007 3:03 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy levitra wrote on September 25, 2007 2:57 PM:

cheap@levitra.com

cheap levitra wrote on September 25, 2007 5:04 PM:

cheap@levitra.com

generic levitra wrote on September 25, 2007 7:33 PM:

cheap@levitra.com

order levitra wrote on September 25, 2007 9:43 PM:

cheap@levitra.com

buy viagra wrote on September 25, 2007 10:58 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

generic viagra wrote on September 26, 2007 12:27 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

cheap viagra wrote on September 26, 2007 2:10 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

discount viagra wrote on September 26, 2007 4:09 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy generic viagra wrote on September 26, 2007 5:44 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

purchase viagra wrote on September 26, 2007 7:21 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy cheap viagra wrote on September 26, 2007 9:01 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy viagra generic wrote on September 26, 2007 10:36 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

online viagra wrote on September 26, 2007 12:17 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

prescription viagra wrote on September 26, 2007 1:49 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

viagra cheap wrote on September 26, 2007 3:18 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

viagra generic wrote on September 26, 2007 4:57 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy levitra wrote on September 27, 2007 8:28 AM:

cheap@levitra.com

cheap levitra wrote on September 27, 2007 9:52 AM:

cheap@levitra.com

generic levitra wrote on September 27, 2007 11:28 AM:

cheap@levitra.com

order levitra wrote on September 27, 2007 1:19 PM:

cheap@levitra.com

buy viagra wrote on September 27, 2007 2:48 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

generic viagra wrote on September 27, 2007 4:18 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

cheap viagra wrote on September 27, 2007 5:45 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

discount viagra wrote on September 27, 2007 7:17 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy generic viagra wrote on September 27, 2007 8:44 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy cheap viagra wrote on September 27, 2007 11:48 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy viagra generic wrote on September 28, 2007 1:32 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

online viagra wrote on September 28, 2007 3:35 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

prescription viagra wrote on September 28, 2007 5:23 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

viagra cheap wrote on September 28, 2007 7:07 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

viagra discount wrote on September 28, 2007 8:49 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy levitra wrote on September 28, 2007 11:50 PM:

cheap@levitra.com

cheap levitra wrote on September 29, 2007 1:36 AM:

cheap@levitra.com

generic levitra wrote on September 29, 2007 3:32 AM:

cheap@levitra.com

order levitra wrote on September 29, 2007 5:24 AM:

cheap@levitra.com

buy viagra wrote on September 29, 2007 10:02 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

generic viagra wrote on September 29, 2007 11:36 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

cheap viagra wrote on September 29, 2007 1:05 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

discount viagra wrote on September 29, 2007 2:38 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

purchase viagra wrote on September 29, 2007 4:02 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

viagra pharmacy wrote on September 29, 2007 5:35 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy cheap viagra wrote on October 2, 2007 2:07 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy viagra generic wrote on October 2, 2007 4:01 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

online viagra wrote on October 2, 2007 5:40 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

prescription viagra wrote on October 2, 2007 7:27 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

viagra discount wrote on October 2, 2007 9:09 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

viagra generic wrote on October 2, 2007 10:45 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

cheap levitra wrote on October 4, 2007 4:58 AM:

cheap@levitra.com

generic levitra wrote on October 4, 2007 6:34 AM:

cheap@levitra.com

order levitra wrote on October 4, 2007 8:13 AM:

cheap@levitra.com

buy viagra wrote on October 5, 2007 4:23 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

generic viagra wrote on October 5, 2007 7:08 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy generic viagra wrote on October 5, 2007 2:33 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

purchase viagra wrote on October 5, 2007 4:13 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

viagra pharmacy wrote on October 5, 2007 6:07 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy cheap viagra wrote on October 5, 2007 7:56 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy viagra generic wrote on October 5, 2007 9:59 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

viagra discount wrote on October 6, 2007 3:16 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

viagra generic wrote on October 6, 2007 4:46 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy levitra wrote on October 7, 2007 1:32 AM:

cheap@levitra.com

cheap levitra wrote on October 7, 2007 3:29 AM:

cheap@levitra.com

generic levitra wrote on October 7, 2007 5:17 AM:

cheap@levitra.com

order levitra wrote on October 7, 2007 6:51 AM:

cheap@levitra.com

buy viagra wrote on October 7, 2007 8:25 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

generic viagra wrote on October 7, 2007 9:50 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

cheap viagra wrote on October 7, 2007 11:32 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

discount viagra wrote on October 7, 2007 12:59 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy generic viagra wrote on October 7, 2007 2:27 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

purchase viagra wrote on October 7, 2007 4:16 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy cheap viagra wrote on October 7, 2007 6:23 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy viagra generic wrote on October 7, 2007 8:50 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

cheap viagra uk wrote on October 7, 2007 10:29 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

online viagra wrote on October 8, 2007 12:26 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

viagra cheap wrote on October 8, 2007 3:15 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

viagra discount wrote on October 8, 2007 5:18 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy levitra wrote on October 9, 2007 5:08 AM:

cheap@levitra.com

cheap levitra wrote on October 9, 2007 6:53 AM:

cheap@levitra.com

generic levitra wrote on October 9, 2007 8:42 AM:

cheap@levitra.com

order levitra wrote on October 9, 2007 10:22 AM:

cheap@levitra.com

buy viagra wrote on October 9, 2007 12:15 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

generic viagra wrote on October 9, 2007 2:51 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

cheap viagra wrote on October 9, 2007 6:46 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

discount viagra wrote on October 9, 2007 11:23 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy generic viagra wrote on October 10, 2007 1:48 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

purchase viagra wrote on October 10, 2007 5:13 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy cheap viagra wrote on October 10, 2007 7:29 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy viagra generic wrote on October 10, 2007 10:37 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

online viagra wrote on October 10, 2007 1:46 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

prescription viagra wrote on October 10, 2007 3:43 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

madrus mpeg cum animl wrote on October 10, 2007 4:31 PM:

Good job. I loved youre site, keep it up.

viagra cheap wrote on October 10, 2007 6:00 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

viagra generic wrote on October 10, 2007 8:53 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy levitra wrote on October 11, 2007 5:41 PM:

cheap@levitra.com

cheap levitra wrote on October 11, 2007 8:00 PM:

cheap@levitra.com

gonne collant wrote on October 11, 2007 9:19 PM:

Good job. I loved youre site, keep it up.

generic levitra wrote on October 11, 2007 10:03 PM:

cheap@levitra.com

order levitra wrote on October 11, 2007 11:33 PM:

cheap@levitra.com

buy viagra wrote on October 12, 2007 12:59 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

generic viagra wrote on October 12, 2007 2:26 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

cheap viagra wrote on October 12, 2007 4:16 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

discount viagra wrote on October 12, 2007 5:39 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy generic viagra wrote on October 12, 2007 7:04 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

purchase viagra wrote on October 12, 2007 8:44 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy cheap viagra wrote on October 12, 2007 10:16 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy viagra generic wrote on October 12, 2007 11:38 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

online viagra wrote on October 12, 2007 1:20 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

prescription viagra wrote on October 12, 2007 3:12 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

viagra cheap wrote on October 12, 2007 5:28 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

viagra discount wrote on October 12, 2007 8:13 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

cheap levitra wrote on October 13, 2007 3:04 PM:

cheap@levitra.com

generic levitra wrote on October 13, 2007 5:00 PM:

cheap@levitra.com

order levitra wrote on October 13, 2007 6:51 PM:

cheap@levitra.com

buy viagra wrote on October 13, 2007 9:12 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

generic viagra wrote on October 13, 2007 11:50 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

cheap viagra wrote on October 14, 2007 1:39 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

discount viagra wrote on October 14, 2007 3:27 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy generic viagra wrote on October 14, 2007 5:26 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

purchase viagra wrote on October 14, 2007 7:13 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy cheap viagra wrote on October 14, 2007 9:19 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

online viagra wrote on October 14, 2007 1:10 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

prescription viagra wrote on October 14, 2007 2:42 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

viagra cheap wrote on October 14, 2007 4:24 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

viagra generic wrote on October 14, 2007 6:12 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy levitra wrote on October 15, 2007 8:52 AM:

cheap@levitra.com

cheap levitra wrote on October 15, 2007 10:23 AM:

cheap@levitra.com

generic levitra wrote on October 15, 2007 12:01 PM:

cheap@levitra.com

levitra online wrote on October 15, 2007 1:41 PM:

cheap@levitra.com

buy viagra wrote on October 15, 2007 3:22 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

generic viagra wrote on October 15, 2007 5:26 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

cheap viagra wrote on October 15, 2007 7:39 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

discount viagra wrote on October 15, 2007 10:08 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy generic viagra wrote on October 16, 2007 1:01 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

purchase viagra wrote on October 16, 2007 3:45 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy cheap viagra wrote on October 16, 2007 5:48 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

order online viagra wrote on October 16, 2007 7:11 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

online viagra wrote on October 16, 2007 9:54 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

online generic viagra wrote on October 16, 2007 11:25 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

viagra cheap wrote on October 16, 2007 12:46 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy levitra wrote on October 17, 2007 2:13 AM:

cheap@levitra.com

cheap levitra wrote on October 17, 2007 3:46 AM:

cheap@levitra.com

generic levitra wrote on October 17, 2007 5:08 AM:

cheap@levitra.com

order levitra wrote on October 17, 2007 6:42 AM:

cheap@levitra.com

generic viagra wrote on October 17, 2007 9:52 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

cheap viagra wrote on October 17, 2007 11:18 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

discount viagra wrote on October 17, 2007 12:53 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy generic viagra wrote on October 17, 2007 2:19 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy cheap viagra wrote on October 17, 2007 5:47 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy viagra generic wrote on October 17, 2007 7:27 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

generic viagra uk wrote on October 17, 2007 8:58 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

pharmacy viagra wrote on October 17, 2007 10:28 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

viagra cheap wrote on October 17, 2007 11:55 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

viagra generic wrote on October 18, 2007 1:37 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy levitra wrote on October 18, 2007 4:10 PM:

cheap@levitra.com

cheap levitra wrote on October 18, 2007 6:11 PM:

cheap@levitra.com

generic levitra wrote on October 18, 2007 8:00 PM:

cheap@levitra.com

order levitra wrote on October 18, 2007 9:20 PM:

cheap@levitra.com

buy viagra wrote on October 18, 2007 10:56 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

generic viagra wrote on October 19, 2007 12:39 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

cheap viagra wrote on October 19, 2007 2:35 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

discount viagra wrote on October 19, 2007 4:50 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy generic viagra wrote on October 19, 2007 7:09 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

viagra price wrote on October 19, 2007 9:15 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy cheap viagra wrote on October 19, 2007 10:44 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy viagra generic wrote on October 19, 2007 12:25 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

online viagra wrote on October 19, 2007 2:07 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

prescription viagra wrote on October 19, 2007 3:40 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

viagra cheap wrote on October 19, 2007 5:35 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

viagra generic wrote on October 19, 2007 7:58 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

cheap levitra wrote on October 20, 2007 11:46 AM:

cheap@levitra.com

generic levitra wrote on October 20, 2007 1:07 PM:

cheap@levitra.com

order levitra wrote on October 20, 2007 2:30 PM:

cheap@levitra.com

buy viagra wrote on October 21, 2007 4:31 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

generic viagra wrote on October 21, 2007 6:24 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

cheap viagra wrote on October 21, 2007 8:10 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

discount viagra wrote on October 21, 2007 9:33 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy generic viagra wrote on October 21, 2007 11:05 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

purchase viagra wrote on October 21, 2007 12:42 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy cheap viagra wrote on October 21, 2007 1:58 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy viagra generic wrote on October 21, 2007 3:28 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

online viagra wrote on October 21, 2007 5:06 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

prescription viagra wrote on October 21, 2007 6:55 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

viagra cheap wrote on October 21, 2007 8:28 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

viagra generic wrote on October 21, 2007 9:52 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy levitra cheap levitra generic levitra levitra online order levitra wrote on October 22, 2007 12:45 PM:

cheap@levitra.com

buy levitra wrote on October 22, 2007 2:26 PM:

cheap@levitra.com

cheap levitra wrote on October 22, 2007 3:57 PM:

cheap@levitra.com

generic levitra wrote on October 22, 2007 5:30 PM:

cheap@levitra.com

order levitra wrote on October 22, 2007 7:03 PM:

cheap@levitra.com

buy viagra wrote on October 22, 2007 8:39 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

generic viagra wrote on October 22, 2007 10:08 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

cheap viagra wrote on October 22, 2007 11:44 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

discount viagra wrote on October 23, 2007 1:30 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy generic viagra wrote on October 23, 2007 3:30 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

purchase viagra wrote on October 23, 2007 5:39 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy cheap viagra wrote on October 23, 2007 8:12 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy viagra generic wrote on October 23, 2007 10:20 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

online viagra wrote on October 23, 2007 11:55 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

prescription viagra wrote on October 23, 2007 1:33 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

viagra cheap wrote on October 23, 2007 3:01 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

viagra generic wrote on October 23, 2007 4:34 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy levitra wrote on October 24, 2007 8:06 AM:

cheap@levitra.com

cheap levitra wrote on October 24, 2007 9:36 AM:

cheap@levitra.com

generic levitra wrote on October 24, 2007 11:10 AM:

cheap@levitra.com

order levitra wrote on October 24, 2007 12:54 PM:

cheap@levitra.com

buy viagra wrote on October 24, 2007 2:26 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

generic viagra wrote on October 24, 2007 4:00 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

cheap viagra wrote on October 24, 2007 5:26 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

discount viagra wrote on October 24, 2007 6:57 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy generic viagra wrote on October 24, 2007 8:47 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

purchase viagra wrote on October 24, 2007 10:12 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy cheap viagra wrote on October 24, 2007 11:32 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy viagra generic wrote on October 25, 2007 1:03 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

online viagra wrote on October 25, 2007 2:35 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

prescription viagra wrote on October 25, 2007 4:19 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

viagra cheap wrote on October 25, 2007 6:12 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

viagra generic wrote on October 25, 2007 8:09 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy levitra wrote on October 25, 2007 10:58 PM:

cheap@levitra.com

cheap levitra wrote on October 26, 2007 12:33 AM:

cheap@levitra.com

generic levitra wrote on October 26, 2007 3:28 AM:

cheap@levitra.com

order levitra wrote on October 26, 2007 5:30 AM:

cheap@levitra.com

buy viagra wrote on October 26, 2007 5:47 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

generic viagra wrote on October 26, 2007 7:37 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

cheap viagra wrote on October 26, 2007 9:03 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

discount viagra wrote on October 26, 2007 10:29 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

purchase viagra wrote on October 26, 2007 11:54 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

viagra price wrote on October 27, 2007 1:26 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy cheap viagra wrote on October 27, 2007 3:11 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy viagra generic wrote on October 27, 2007 5:03 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

viagra prescription wrote on October 27, 2007 8:58 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

viagra buy wrote on October 27, 2007 10:39 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

viagra generic wrote on October 27, 2007 12:19 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy levitra wrote on October 28, 2007 2:40 AM:

cheap@levitra.com

cheap levitra wrote on October 28, 2007 4:07 AM:

cheap@levitra.com

generic levitra wrote on October 28, 2007 5:26 AM:

cheap@levitra.com

order levitra wrote on October 28, 2007 6:55 AM:

cheap@levitra.com

buy viagra wrote on October 28, 2007 3:43 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

generic viagra wrote on October 28, 2007 5:03 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

cheap viagra wrote on October 28, 2007 6:24 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

discount viagra wrote on October 28, 2007 8:16 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

purchase viagra wrote on October 28, 2007 9:50 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

viagra price wrote on October 28, 2007 11:19 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy cheap viagra wrote on October 29, 2007 12:57 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy viagra generic wrote on October 29, 2007 2:52 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

online viagra wrote on October 29, 2007 5:06 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

viagra prescription wrote on October 29, 2007 7:35 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

viagra cheap wrote on October 29, 2007 9:55 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

viagra generic wrote on October 29, 2007 11:26 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy levitra wrote on October 30, 2007 1:53 AM:

cheap@levitra.com

cheap levitra wrote on October 30, 2007 3:45 AM:

cheap@levitra.com

generic levitra wrote on October 30, 2007 5:33 AM:

cheap@levitra.com

order levitra wrote on October 30, 2007 7:11 AM:

cheap@levitra.com

buy viagra wrote on October 30, 2007 6:20 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

generic viagra wrote on October 30, 2007 7:53 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

cheap viagra wrote on October 30, 2007 9:22 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

discount viagra wrote on October 30, 2007 10:55 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

purchase viagra wrote on October 31, 2007 12:23 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy generic viagra wrote on October 31, 2007 2:06 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy cheap viagra wrote on October 31, 2007 4:04 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy viagra generic wrote on October 31, 2007 6:02 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

online viagra wrote on October 31, 2007 8:21 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

viagra prescription wrote on October 31, 2007 11:03 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

viagra discount wrote on November 17, 2007 5:16 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

viagra generic wrote on November 17, 2007 7:02 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy levitra wrote on November 18, 2007 2:53 AM:

cheap@levitra.com

cheap levitra wrote on November 18, 2007 4:56 AM:

cheap@levitra.com

generic levitra wrote on November 18, 2007 7:16 AM:

cheap@levitra.com

order levitra wrote on November 18, 2007 9:47 AM:

cheap@levitra.com

buy viagra wrote on November 18, 2007 1:59 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

generic viagra wrote on November 18, 2007 3:58 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

cheap viagra wrote on November 18, 2007 6:32 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

discount viagra wrote on November 18, 2007 9:41 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy generic viagra wrote on November 19, 2007 12:07 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

purchase viagra wrote on November 19, 2007 1:57 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy cheap viagra wrote on November 19, 2007 3:59 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

order online viagra wrote on November 19, 2007 5:40 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

cheap viagra uk wrote on November 19, 2007 7:09 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

viagra cheap wrote on November 19, 2007 10:19 AM:

cheap@viagra.com

viagra generic wrote on November 19, 2007 12:08 PM:

cheap@viagra.com

buy levitra wrote on November 20, 2007 7:31 AM:

cheap@levitra.com

cheap levitra wrote on November 20, 2007 10:01 AM:

cheap@levitra.com

generic levitra wrote on November 20, 2007 12:55 PM:

cheap@levitra.com

order levitra wrote on November 20, 2007 3:53 PM:

cheap@levitra.com

Eagles wrote on December 12, 2007 9:27 PM:

sale@mp3.com

Eagles wrote on December 12, 2007 11:35 PM:

sale@mp3.com