Comments (71)

chuckles wrote on March 24, 2007 5:42 PM:

too funny...chuckle chuckle

FMArouet wrote on March 24, 2007 5:46 PM:

Remember that this OPR is the same office which found absolutely no wrongdoing in the Big Tobacco case, in which prosecuting attorney Sharon Eubank was micromanaged and ordered to reduce the requested damages from $130 billion to $10 billion and was given a a summation to be read word-for-word. One of the micromanagers was Associate AG Robert McCallum, a political appointee with an RJR background. He is now the U.S. Ambassador in Australia. Nice reward.

There is no reason to expect a real investigation this time, either. Bet the fix is in again, unless Glenn Fine turns out to have a modicum of integrity.

Here is a link concerning the OPR's whitewash in the Big Tobacco case.

http://www.tobacco-on-trial.com/2006/06/08/doj-clears-mccallum-of-misconduct-charges/

Too Much Monkey Business! wrote on March 24, 2007 5:54 PM:

What about Monica? Very suspicious that the DOJ liason to the WH takes an extended leave of absence just as an internal investigation starts up.

If I were on the SJC, she would be one of the first people I hauled in to testify. Monica went to Pat Robertson's third-rate law school so guaranteed she's made lots and lots of dumb CYA mistakes.

From her photos, Monica looks like the type to have a nervous stomach and she definitely does not look like a Susan McDougal, willing to take a hit for the team.

For anyone who missed TPM MR's first post about Monica, I pasted a link to photos of her in happier times below.

JD21 wrote on March 24, 2007 5:57 PM:

Karl's secret purge study?

Man things are looking terrible for them. Someone told me that Karl Rove did a careful analysis of why the Republicans lost the last election and found it was Republican scandals that were uncovered in key districts. Then he purged the prosecutors in those districts. We'll be hearing more of this.

Anyway, Karl's solution - to purge the prosecutors instead of cleaning up the Republicans' acts - is exactly the problem. The Republicans need to change their attitude to avert disaster in 2008. They need to fix their party rather than just trying to cover up their flaws. They can't or won't do it. The problem is their leadership. It's rotten. The best thing for the Republicans in the long run would be to impeach and remove Bush/Cheney before they can do more damage, fire our AG, and see Rove held accountable for his illegal acts. Boehner and the other rotten Republican leadership in Congress also need to come to God or hit the road.

But all indications are the Republicans will not clean up their act and actually focus on doing a good job for America. Instead, it will just be more of the same from these Republicans. They are just digging their own . . .

dmh wrote on March 24, 2007 6:05 PM:

This is dreadful news. "We will not comment on this matter so long as there is an investigation ongoing." And the press will accpet this and move on.

carole wrote on March 24, 2007 6:08 PM:

David Kurtz provides a good overview of Minnesota's (one of Karl Rove's purple states) USA, Rachel Paulose. He notes that "Her previous experience has included time in DOJ's Civil Rights Division and a stint as senior counsel to Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty, for two months before her interim appointment..."

She worked for DAG McNulty for a two whole months.

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/013236.php

Compare that to Monica Goodling's plan to put Tim Griffin, who was on the WH payroll at the time, in as USA of Arkansas.

"I asked Elston to feel out the DAG on bringing Tim into one of the vacant ADAG spots there, just for a short time before we install him in Arkansas".

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/docs/sampson-jennings/?resultpage=1&

BigD wrote on March 24, 2007 6:09 PM:

With all these other important people taking a break (i.e. Goodling), I'm really beginning to question the timing of Tony Snow's surgery. Is he maybe implicit in some of this? Is the "growth" a convenient story (especially given Ms. Edward's news on Thurs)? Or maybe the WH doesn't want him tainted by the fallout over this, they want someone more expendable to put out their BS.

bross wrote on March 24, 2007 6:31 PM:

Steve Parent is new in the position of acting director of EOUSA. As of February 18, it was one Michael Battle:
http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:0phkwn1e--IJ:wd.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/+%22steve+parent%22+site:usdoj.gov&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=5&gl=us

Also, as General Counsel, Jay Macklin has replaced Scott Schools.

Mrs Panstreppon wrote on March 24, 2007 6:51 PM:

Michael Battle left the DOJ to take a position with the Washington office of Fulbright & Jaworski but there is no press release about him on the F&J website nor is he listed there.

F&J must have issued a press release about Battle because there is a Google cache of the F&J news feed naming the "Honorable Michael Battle, Director of the Executive Office of U.S. Attorneys" but the press release seems to have disappeared into cyberspace.

When the news about the purge first broke, it seemed like Michael Battle's entire role in the matter was informing the USAs that they were fired. But based on the dumped docs, Battle was a bit more involved than it initially appeared.

I bet F&J is thrilled to have one of their attorneys in the headlines.

cars wrote on March 24, 2007 7:10 PM:

Regarding Rachel Paulose, the US Attorney in MN, all you can see if that besides been a Republican, she is also a Federalist Society member. Those bastards are everywhere in the administration, especially in the Dept. of Justice and what they are aiming at is eventually to fill the entire judiciary branch of government with them. Remember, a US Attorney today could become a federal judge quite easily tomorrow.

If there's a conspiracy here, the Federalist Society are at the heart of it. Rove knows the deal, he facilitates the enterprise with his bag of old tricks.

While Bush remains in office this has to be stopped. The damage is long-term.

cars wrote on March 24, 2007 7:12 PM:

I wonder if the DOJ IG investigation concludes that the purged US Attorneys were at fault. You can't trust internal investigations with these band of crooks.

JD21 wrote on March 24, 2007 7:16 PM:

More breaking news: http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Top_Justice_spokesperson_told_White_House_0324.html

PS, to clarify my post about Rove's goings on is just my speculation to myself. It will be interesting to see what comes out.

EH wrote on March 24, 2007 8:00 PM:

Of course there's going to be an internal DoJ investigation. It's crucial to keeping the controversy within the DOJ and away from the White House.

Robin Boerner wrote on March 24, 2007 8:02 PM:

Just ask Pat Tillman's dad how much you can trust Inspector General investigations.

Foggylady wrote on March 24, 2007 8:15 PM:

Time for a laugh..

White House has "Tools for Success" for the Pres-nit's team....
( George Carlin couldn't do better)

pick any of the 3 topics from this White House
page..
http://www.whitehouse.gov/results/tools/index.html
meself, I liked 2 and 3..
Maybe we should forward it to Gonzo's office? We do have his e-mail address, don't we, hmmmmmmmm?
Code word is nail, as in
Nail, nail, the gang's all here.....

Smartypants wrote on March 24, 2007 9:09 PM:

Interesting, if not ironic, that this is being announced by Roehrkasse. Based on yesterday's documents release he was actively involved in the preparation for the House Judiciary hearings in early March:

3/2/07 prep mtg 11:30am-1:00pm
3/5/07 prep mtgs 11:00am-12:30pm, 3:00pm-4:30pm

Any word on who's leading the internal investigation? What that person's connection is with all this?

denise k wrote on March 24, 2007 9:09 PM:

Rachel Paulouse's appointment does not pass the smell test. She barely had 7 years experience of private law practice to say nothing of running a large office prosecuting federal crimes.

Note that Paulouse was confirmed by the (still) Republican-run senate on December 6, 2006 -- the DAY before all of the others got axed. Coincidence? I don't think so.

Curiously, an article in one of the local papers made a big deal about how she would not conduct any press interviews until she was "confirmed" -- "a department policy". This policy is curious, since it coincides with the department not seeking confirmation -- at all. So unconfirmed AGs were not going to allow interviews -- EVER? Wha???

Mrs. K8 wrote on March 24, 2007 9:16 PM:

Two points:

Everyone, understandably, has focused on the headlines in the Big Tobacco case concerning the change in fine to something ridiculously low in comparison, and on the fact that the prosecutor had to read a closing statement dictated to her.

The point in the original story which made my eyes boggle was Eubanks' statement that the thugs made the WITNESS CHANGE THEIR TESTIMONY.

Now, the perps can argue all day long that the amount of the fine and the form of the closing argument to the jury fall into the category of "prosecutorial discretion."

But getting witnesses to change their testimony IS A CRIME, is it not?

Second point: I've been reading at a number of different blogs the breaking results of sleuthing into the server for gwb43.com. It seems that there's a huge amount of slimy stuff under that particular rock -- the "real time" Ohio election results in 2004 were carried by the same server. And that's just one little tidbit amongst hundreds of hinky sites.

I'm not a techie and don't understand all the implications of this, but I have a feeling that pulling at the thread of gwb43.com will unravel an amazing amount of orchestrated, networked shenanigans. Or to fall back on the old cliche, the "tip of the iceberg" is gwb43.com.

They threaten to drown us in a tsunami of corruption. Or as my mom, rest her soul, used to put it: "These are the sins that cry out to heaven."

Giant Teapot wrote on March 24, 2007 9:20 PM:

@ denisek:

ITA. I was wondering how they got Paulouse, such an obvious hack, and only 33 years old, *confirmed by the Senate*?? WTF?? Thanks for the answer: they kept her under wraps and used MN's Norm Coleman to slip her through as the Republican-controlled 109th Congress was adjourning, and then the *very next day* they lowered the boom on the USA-8.

I'm believing that the USA-8 were a subplot to a larger strategy, and just the latest move in a game they've been winning for years. They didn't figure in losing both the House and Senate.

mswsm at Dailykos has a great diary showing that up to 30 USA's might be involved in this plot, not just 8.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/3/22/5326/71374

Steambomb wrote on March 24, 2007 9:28 PM:

To have a governmental agency investigating itself is as ridiculous as allowing law breakers to avoid prosecution simply because they resign.

FMArouet wrote on March 24, 2007 10:40 PM:

Mrs. K8:

Excellent, succinct post. I failed to mention in my comment above what you rightly point out is a critical point: perverting justice by instructing witnesses to change their testimony in the Big Tobacco case.

Suggest that you cross-post your trenchant comment in appropriate threads around the net, i.e. especially at dailykos.com and MyDD.com.

Giant Teapot wrote on March 24, 2007 11:28 PM:

@ Too Much Monkey Business:

The pics of Monica and pals look like a white supremacy hoedown. These people are creepy, and so many of them in the D.C. alumni chapter. From the admission page of Pat Robertson's "law school" :

"Regent Law School seeks to admit students who are serious about the critical roles they will assume as future counselors, conciliators, defenders of the faith, effective client advocates and followers of Christ."

How do these people pass bar exams, unless the tests allow Biblical answers these days?

FMArouet wrote on March 24, 2007 11:46 PM:

Giant Teapot:

Think Monica Goodling would tell the truth in testimony under oath?

Let's see whether Congress can find out if she fears opening herself up to charges of perjury.

Giant Teapot wrote on March 25, 2007 1:02 AM:

@ FMArouet:

I'll bet the fundies have some Biblical "ethical" equivalent of the Moonie and Scientology approaches to lying: Lies are a-okay, even encouraged, as long as they're to promote or protect their Dear Leaders.

If Monica and Kyle tell the truth, the whole house of cards falls. Kyle was in the WH Counsel's office and undoubtedly knows plenty of dirt about how the many scandals are connected to or originated in the OVP.

I can't decide if I think Monica and Kyle will lie or take the Fifth. I don't think Truth is even on the menu, unless they're given immunity and forced to testify.

Richard L. Adlof wrote on March 25, 2007 1:11 AM:

Dudes look behind you . . . The barn door is already closed . . . Actually, I meant to type, "FINALLY."

PlaceboDomingo wrote on March 25, 2007 6:50 AM:

Thanks to Teapot for pointing out mswsm's story at dailyKos - http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/3/22/5326/71374

it's a little tough to follow (especially this late at night) but it really seems to shed some light on the cockroaches who've been robbing us all blind these past few years.

from mswsm's intro:
'Once you see the pattern of how rove applies his craft, you to can pick a career USA that "resigned" and you too can figure out the Disruption in Corruption Investigations.'

almcq wrote on March 25, 2007 9:17 AM:

K8, can't agree with point 1 on big tobacco; the witnesses were their witnesses; it was a court case and crafting testimony from your witnesses is prosecutorial strategy; they weren't asking them to make misstatements of fact, they were deciding how to elicit facts. What I got from the story is a career public servant calling it quits after 22 years because of political hacks illustrates Roves' uberplan to leave it all on the battlefield. Subversion abounds.

TMMB wrote on March 25, 2007 9:38 AM:

@Giant Teapot

"A white supremacy hoedown" is a bit over the top. Boring picnic is more like it.

The Bush administration has lots of holly rollers in it but most of them have gone to good schools. Regent U. is not in Newsweek's Top 100 law schools.

If Goodling got her job as a favor to Pat Robertson to enhance his faith-based law school's rep, Bush might have made a mistake.

Goodling may very well be a topnotch lawyer but if she isn't, she could have left the WH vulnerable on a number of issues.

I am curious as to whether Goodling's extended leave of absence was voluntary and if she is still on the DOJ payroll. I doubt Goodling is ever going back to the DOJ.

FMArouet wrote on March 25, 2007 9:41 AM:

almcq,

Thanks for clarifying a significant point. They were clearly the prosecution witnesses who were coached to alter testimony.

I do wonder, though, if the instructions from on high included guidance on misstating or omitting key facts in order to weaken the prosecution's case. If so, would not that be the subornation of perjury by the DOJ to pursue its political aim of delivering a $120 billion favor to Big Tobacco?

sagacious wrote on March 25, 2007 10:54 AM:

Why does this investigation need to be shut down Paul?

The Office of Professional Responsibility is headed by a GOP hack.

Recall that OPR ruled against Sharon Eubanks when they investigated the Justice Department's interference into the tobacco case, where there was clear tampering witness testimony, where the DOJ had tried to strangle the investigation with a shortage of fund, where the then Associate General Robert McCallum, then Assistant AG Peter Kiesler and his deptut Don Meron, wrote the closing argument AND reduced the AWARD request, by having a CAREER AG, read VERBATIM the closing argument THEY wrote for her?!!!

In June 2006, the OPR cleared McCallum, consluding the his "actions in seeking and directing changes in the remedies sought were not influenced by any political considerations"

Let's ask Sharon Y. Eubanks, a 22 year retired USA, that now works for CREW and has said about the purge:

"Congress should not limit the investigation to the dismissal of USA's as political interference is happening at Justice across the department when decisions are made...the primary consideration is political..the rule of law has gone out the window"

Today's question, in fact is:

In a democracy where the rule of law is the fundation for the system of governance under the democracy what recourse do citizens have when the rule of law has been usurped, corrupted and politicized with political operatives within and throughout the entire DOJ?

Where do citizens in that democracy go to seek redress...when no such thing as justice under the law exists UNDER the LAW any longer?

elrapierwit wrote on March 25, 2007 11:06 AM:

Ahhhh, yess Sagacious

"Let's not forget that everything Hitler did in Germany was legal"...MLK 63

Certainly seems like John Roberts, the youngest Chief Justice, ever appointed by Bush, along with Alito, Scalia and Kennedy...will not ever rule against the rise of the reich in America.

Justice has been subverted...today, tomorrow and forever.

Amos Anan wrote on March 25, 2007 11:24 AM:

I'll wait for the release of the DVD of Bush looking under his desk and then standing up and saying, "No White House wrong doing here." I'll bet it'll be a laugh riot - at least for the White House correspondents.

Al in Austex wrote on March 25, 2007 2:32 PM:

So elrapierwit, before we get our panty's too much bunched up about the rightwing putsche and infer from that we have an American Reich on our hands now & forver - Well you might want to take a deep breath & remember that Leahy Schumer Sanchez & Waxman already have career G 14s all across the Foggy Bottom landscape ratting out Rove & the rest of BushCo . This is far far from over - its being said that many of the Evil Minions who have been convicted are also turning states evidence - the latest being Griles formerly of the Interior Dept.
Finally -- elrapierwit draw comfort that even the far right wing of our polity is prepared to defend our Republic against the neo fascist Bushiveks. Go google ex Cong Bob Barr 's take on what BushCo has been doing- Heck ex Congressman Bob Barr introduced Al Gore when the former Veep gave a scathing speech regarding the illegal NSA .
So no elrapierwit we have a Republic if we can keep it, and me & Bob Barr intend to keep it-by any means necessary .

mbbsdphil wrote on March 25, 2007 3:20 PM:

This DOJ investigating itself? Perhaps, after they're through giving the FBI a non-slap on the wrist for its illegal campaign of issuing NSL's without the required facts or controls, and lying to Congress about it. Just the usual George Bush, "Do Over". Screw up, lie about it. Screw up and get caught, lie about it more.

Such announcements should be treated with the derision and Congressional subpoenas they deserve.

elrapierwit wrote on March 25, 2007 6:22 PM:

@ Al in AusTex

I saw Bob Barr on TV and read his protest. I was shocked to be in agreement with him, and could not believe that he was given air time to address how this is a democracy vs. a partisian issue.

The speech Gore gave was awesome, yet we have continued to watch our democracy crumble from within the Justice department.

I do hope that Leahy, schumer and Waxman can create such a hue and cry in this republic that Cheney, Bush, Rove, Gonzales and Yoo all are sentenced to Abu for torture without habeus corpeus.

Unfortunately with Robers, Scalia, Alito and Kennedy on the bench, the prospects of them being convicted are slim to none.

Particularly, when you consider that Since Mar of 06, Rove has appointed well over 17 USA's all in areas to contest electoral votes and many in minority areas.
in addition to the eight 'purgegate' USA's here nine others:
Griffin(ARK) Paulouse(MN) Taylor (DC) Wood (KS), Rhodes (Mobile,Al), Acosta (Miami), Richter (Ok,City) McNally (S.ILL) Dummermyth (IA)

this tells me that we may very well have a GOP elected majority in Congress and possibly Guiliani in the WH due to massive voter fraud. In this republic citizens have no power without the vote.

So, while I hold out hope I am not holding my breath.

After all, who does a citizen turn to for redress under the law when our democracy built on the rule of law has suberted justice under the law from within and there is no longer is justice under the law? rather there is just us, (GOP operatives)

Devon wrote on March 25, 2007 8:48 PM:

I've been impressed with Glenn Fine's independence in the past - he released a damning report on the treatment of the hundreds of Muslim immigrants rounded up after 9/11 and held basically until they could be shown to be not guilty. There was another good report lately. If this is really going to be done by IG Fine, it's a good sign.

Al in Austex wrote on March 25, 2007 9:09 PM:

Hey Elrapierwit again Dude take a breathe, there is a huge political dimension to this Showdown with BushCo. First the Democratic Party is now in charge of how the criminals are treated in the Commmitte Hearings. Two the American Voter is now turning rapidly against the Strategerrry in Iraq. Three, even corrupt USA's , handpicked by TurdBlossom cannot not prosecute clear criminal activity - ie obstructing justice.Four there is so very much more that will be hitting the Newswire from the Foggy Bottom bureaucrats that have all the goods on the Neo Thugs . The institutional memory is long in DC - and even Turd Blossom & Darth Cheney cannot indefinately bend the bureaucrats to such nefarious ends as the Iraqi Prevarication-without getting substantial blowback. The whole dynamic is changing to protect Our Republic-its called again Checks & Balances . Me & Bob Barr ,although at odds about most issues ( none of my bidness Bill got a BJ ) ..we ain't skeered of Turd Blossom & Shooter . So elrapier go get some more popcorn its all going to be OK .

SeeDee wrote on March 25, 2007 10:19 PM:

Wish we were all JUSTIFIABLY as sanguine as al in Austex, but the old line, "Eternal vigilance is the price of Liberty" keeps running thru' my mind.

There has been damned little 'vigilance' on the part of those GOP Congress-people, including Barr, over the past six years.

Just don't allow Lee Hamilton anywhere near any chairmanship(s) of ANY investigations which are purportedly aimed at un-covering and punishing the Bushco b/s of the past six years.

The Oracle wrote on March 26, 2007 3:56 AM:

Apparently we have another Monica at the center of a White House scandal, except this time it is Monica Goodling, the DOJ's White House liaison.

She would know where all the skeletons are buried, whether involving the U.S. Attorney firings, the insertion of a provision into the Patriot Act Reauthorization Bill passed early last year that stripped from the U.S. Senate any say in the hirings of U.S. Attorneys, or how the White House and DOJ reacted to the Mark Foley scandal before the elections last November.

So, where is our newest Monica? On an "extended leave of absence"? Right when the plot thickens, especially with her holding a central, pivotal position between Karl Rove in the White House and Alberto Gonzales in the DOJ? Will she testify truthfully under oath before Congress, once she is served with a subpoena? Will she having to enter the witness protection program afterward if she does so testify? (Just thought I'd throw in that last snarky bit, but one never knows about the Republican thugs in the neo-con White House and to what lengths they'd go to hide their corruption from the public...remember Valerie Plame-Wilson?).

Al in Austex wrote on March 26, 2007 5:26 AM:

Hi SeeDee,
Lee Hamilton ain't no Henry Waxman, plus Pelosi & company have passed most of the 9-11 commission 's recommendations. The Progressives have had only a shortwhile to discover & clean up nearly six years of corruption. I agree with you(and Thomas Jefferson ) we do need diligence to protect Liberty --part of that diligence is not to get freaked and start saying we have the American Reich in power now and forever.
Ex Cong Barr has always stood for limited government. We on the Left have more in Common with some on the Right then we acknowledge. At this point defeating BushCo is not a partisan issue -its an American issue.
I just want us all to keep our eye on the prize -restoring our Good Governance with aggressive checks & balances- This is a very good lesson in Civics for every American .
And if it comes true that we are really in as dire of straits as having a facist government still in charge after all the "checks are balanced" - well gee that's when We the People can & must take it to the next level of active dissent .But we are a long way from that yet .

kriss@hotmail.com wrote on April 26, 2007 7:15 AM:

itch on penis lip

michael@gmail.com wrote on May 1, 2007 1:17 AM:

hello

michael@gmail.com wrote on May 1, 2007 1:18 AM:

hello

michael@gmail.com wrote on May 1, 2007 1:18 AM:

hello

andrey@gmail.com wrote on May 6, 2007 12:51 PM:

hello

andrey@gmail.com wrote on May 6, 2007 12:51 PM:

hello

autr qpbgysav wrote on September 6, 2007 1:38 PM:

ibwca ztdo ejbol swifgy gbctr xjndcs kjvozha

zhcq qjvhw wrote on September 6, 2007 1:40 PM:

tafgp cvghs qpxgswoi dtolpr bqroaskmj cavd sthn http://www.ecug.fxztm.com

zhcq qjvhw wrote on September 6, 2007 1:41 PM:

tafgp cvghs qpxgswoi dtolpr bqroaskmj cavd sthn http://www.ecug.fxztm.com

zhcq qjvhw wrote on September 6, 2007 1:42 PM:

tafgp cvghs qpxgswoi dtolpr bqroaskmj cavd sthn http://www.ecug.fxztm.com

cykhiw wnfpqex wrote on September 6, 2007 1:43 PM:

jloirsvzh kvln ernwcyh zpain ryjmcua ujhxnkwtf zdlrpwts wfjbk vmjtfukn

cykhiw wnfpqex wrote on September 6, 2007 1:44 PM:

jloirsvzh kvln ernwcyh zpain ryjmcua ujhxnkwtf zdlrpwts wfjbk vmjtfukn

tupo jnxywbl wrote on September 6, 2007 1:45 PM:

nyzsv rnst wbhlsdkxz meyp ewsq eylsj hauwxq [URL=http://www.skoqhwyn.jgexouni.com]obeswdlz wrkyfgj[/URL]

nxhfypbz leivrc wrote on September 6, 2007 1:46 PM:

nzld tjsiecbw knlydsxbu vqzmjkpes zlxnwk cgrpm atlre [URL]http://www.shfqa.xivonwrz.com[/URL] jhmofb nfhelwyqr

1995 lt1 wrote on September 19, 2007 1:14 PM:

Very good site. Thanks:-)

1995 lt1 wrote on September 19, 2007 1:15 PM:

Very good site. Thanks:-)

1997 ford ranger trucks wrote on September 19, 2007 6:51 PM:

Very good site. Thank you.

1997 ford ranger trucks wrote on September 19, 2007 6:52 PM:

Very good site. Thank you.

6 months after surgery for nose cancer wrote on September 23, 2007 6:51 PM:

Very good site. Thank you.

alfred sisley a meadow at springtime wrote on September 25, 2007 3:08 AM:

Very good site. Thanks.

alta performance wrote on September 25, 2007 7:19 AM:

Cool site. Thank you:-)

ant virus online wrote on September 25, 2007 8:04 PM:

Very good site. Thank you!!!

area rugs custom colors wrote on September 26, 2007 5:37 AM:

Good site. Thanks!!!

area rugs custom colors wrote on September 26, 2007 5:38 AM:

Good site. Thanks!!!

bag bed discount in wrote on September 27, 2007 10:29 AM:

Good site. Thank you!!!

belkin hi speed usb2 15 in 1 wrote on September 28, 2007 7:01 AM:

Cool site. Thanks:-)

black people who achieved great things in the past wrote on September 29, 2007 2:25 AM:

Good site. Thank you.

black people who achieved great things in the past wrote on September 29, 2007 2:25 AM:

Good site. Thank you.

burning fireplace lennox wood wrote on September 30, 2007 12:04 PM:

Cool site. Thank you:-)

burning fireplace lennox wood wrote on September 30, 2007 12:04 PM:

Cool site. Thank you:-)

hh4000 wrote on November 22, 2007 10:11 AM:

Very good site. Thanks.