« previous | MUCK HOME | next »
CNN: Goodling to Resign from Justice Department
Monica Goodling's reign as the first ever sitting Justice Department official to plead the Fifth is over, CNN just reported. She'll resign tomorrow.
Update: More from the AP:
The top aide to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales abruptly quit on Friday, almost two weeks after telling Congress she would not testify about her role in the firings of federal prosecutors."I am hereby submitting my resignation to the office of attorney general," Monica M. Goodling said in a three-sentence letter. There was no immediate reason given, but her refusal to face Congress had intensified a controversy that threatens Gonzales' job...
Calling her five-year stint at Justice an honor, Goodling told Gonzales in her letter, "May God bless your richly as you continue your service to America."
Advertisement
Comments (189)
paul lukasiak wrote on April 6, 2007 5:10 PM:tomorrow? you mean Good Friday?
Does anyone else think she's trying to make herself out as some kind of Xtian martyr here?
Mark Z wrote on April 6, 2007 5:11 PM:It's an Easter Miracle!
obsessed wrote on April 6, 2007 5:11 PM:DOJ to the Buzz Saw: Buzz off.
Can executive privilege still be claimed to prevent her from testifying?
jdw wrote on April 6, 2007 5:14 PM:Someone needs to keep track of where she goes after she "Resigns". Remember what happened to Sampson after he resigned - he stuck around in the DOJ. Also remember that Rummy continued to work, and quite possibly continues to work even today, for the Admin after handing in his letter.
Arkansan wrote on April 6, 2007 5:18 PM:"In a brief letter to Alberto Gonzales, Goodling gave no reason for her resignation but said it was effective April 7th.
"I am hereby submit my resignation to the Office of the Attorney General, effective April 7, 2007. It has been an honor to have served at the Department of Justice for the past five years," Goodling said.
"May God bless you richly as you continue your service to America," she concluded."
http://www.cnn.com/POLITICS/blogs/politicalticker/2007/04/senior-justice-official-resigns.html
I'm rarely speechless, but her letter takes my breath away. At first I thought it had to be a joke, but it's real.
Dab wrote on April 6, 2007 5:35 PM:Finally, someone has done the right thing.
Michael Stevens wrote on April 6, 2007 5:39 PM:Who didn't see this coming? Goodling HAD to resign, she was out of options.
As I posted earlier this week, she's been on paid leave the past 2 weeks. This means she's been burning vacation time at a prodigious rate. I don't think it's any coincidence that her official resignation date is Saturday. I suspect that marks the last day of paid-leave she had remaining.
She simply could not go back to work at the DOJ. Mainly because she lost her national security clearance when she plead the 5th. Sure, the DOJ may have allowed her to use unpaid leave, but she isn't wealthy. She has a mortgage and mounting legal bills. Now that Goodling is no longer a government employee, her friends and associates can legally give her funds.
Her recent behavior suggests to me that Monica is doing what's best for Monica. Pleading the 5th wasn't good for the administration, it was good for Monica. Quitting so that she can accept legal-fund donations isn't necessarily good for the administration, but it is good for Monica.
I think we should at least be open to the possibility that she's put the kool-aid aside (for the moment) and has put her own well-being above all else. If this means she's willing to be a friendly witness in exchange for immunity, this could be a very good thing.
Anonymous wrote on April 6, 2007 5:46 PM:The carrot for cooperation the administration can create for her is to have a Libby-like trust fund created to pay the cost of Ken Mehlman's Akin Gump defending her. That's got to be colossal. Might buy continued loyalty and a lot of silence, or minimal cooperation if she's given immunity.
chuckles wrote on April 6, 2007 5:48 PM:Time for the Mexican...chuckle chuckle
El Camino wrote on April 6, 2007 6:00 PM:obsessed -
Obsessed with what? She hasn't invoked executive privilege. She's invoked the Fifth Amendment, which is not conditioned on her continued employment by the government. And Justice isn't keeping her from testifying. They want her to testify, just like Sampson. Your combined theory of (1) a Justice-led effort to keep her from testifying on grounds of executive privilege and (2) a retaliatory firing for her refusal to testify makes no sense.
jdw wrote on April 6, 2007 6:02 PM:"She has a mortgage and mounting legal bills."
It's highly unlikely that she's picking up the tab for Dowd & Co.'s fees. "Friends of Monica" or some such fund was instantly created.
ewastud wrote on April 6, 2007 6:02 PM:I believe the true reason for her resignation is that there is now an internal DoJ investigation into the attroney purge, and she is compelled by terms of her employment to provide information in that investigation, if she wants to stay in her job -- hence, she resigns.
draftedin68 wrote on April 6, 2007 6:10 PM:.
I thought I had some spiffy comments to add, but my Security Code trumped it:
...... goat ......
Priceless!
.
sally wrote on April 6, 2007 6:14 PM:So Goldilocks is going home. May God grant her a haircut.
And a hearing before Congress. Soon.
jdw wrote on April 6, 2007 6:14 PM:Good point by ewastud above.
Rob Z wrote on April 6, 2007 6:16 PM:God bless us, everyone!
bigcat wrote on April 6, 2007 6:18 PM:Monica's resigning simply to take advantage of the Republican largesse that will be coming her way to cover her legal bills. She is not out of the woods on this.
Security code: "Stiff", as in "the next stiff to go will be Senor Torturisto."
lampwick wrote on April 6, 2007 6:18 PM:What is it with this Children's Crusade over at the DOJ, anyway? Sampson, Goodling, Paulose - they're all in positions of incredible responsibility and power, and they're all like 30-something in terms of physical age, and maybe closer to 20-something in terms of competence, judgment, and maturity. Is it possible they just can't find any grown-ups willing to work under them?
Michael Stevens wrote on April 6, 2007 6:22 PM:jdq said: "It's highly unlikely that she's picking up the tab for Dowd & Co.'s fees. "Friends of Monica" or some such fund was instantly created."
Nope, as of today she's still on the hook for her legal fees.
Anyone starting or donating to such a legal fund *before* Goodling resigned would be breaking the law.
Which is probably one of the main reasons she resigned. As of Easter Sunday, her friends can donate away.
noshrub wrote on April 6, 2007 6:22 PM:Paulose shared w/Federal judge here in MN (Davis) in elevator that she was a virgin. Wow. Unconfirmed, but from a reliable source.
carsick wrote on April 6, 2007 6:24 PM:Sometimes soldiers in the Christian war need to sacrifice. She is a martyr.
One question though: Does she get 72 virgins in heaven, a job with Focus on the Family, or just a gift card for WalMart?
Austin Cooper wrote on April 6, 2007 6:26 PM:[Insert Bender laugh here] Hee hee hee hee hee hee.
Such a *shame*. Another upstanding, god-fearing, loyal Bushie, now having to bear so much embarrassment and legal risk...
... for actions *they* performed, and choices they made. Personal accountability? Feh; that's for others -- not the Dobson-blessed guardians of America.
Orwell's Intuition wrote on April 6, 2007 6:29 PM:May God smite you with justice, Monica. Oh, and your little dog Gonzo, too.
Richard L. Adlof wrote on April 6, 2007 6:31 PM:Resigned or not she still needs to testify.
cv wrote on April 6, 2007 6:32 PM:The White House only wants her to testify if she is willing to lie. Since she is not willing to lie, and perhaps go to jail like Libby, the WH would rather she do the next best thing and take the fifth.
Also, I imagine that the lies are so much bigger for her since she is the WH liaison in the DOJ. She talked to everyone involved about everything. She was the go-between. Rove and Gonzales can say they never talked to each other about this. I bet that Goodling talked to both.
parrot wrote on April 6, 2007 6:33 PM:There is something between jumping to conclusions and letting conclusions jump us.
--Parrot
phidda wrote on April 6, 2007 6:34 PM:"I am hereby submitting my resignation to the office of attorney general"
Hate to be a nitpicker Monica, but what does "hereby" add to this otherwise short and sweet resignation? Legelese is so third tier.
Twin Planets wrote on April 6, 2007 6:35 PM:I wonder if her resignation makes it easier for Congress to grant her immunity to compel testimony....? Pros: she's not in a position to misuse her immunity; she's been isolated from the flock (and the aegis of executive privilege). Cons: she not an insider anymore; harder to use against Administration.
Any thoughts?
litigatormom wrote on April 6, 2007 6:37 PM:It's Goodling Friday.
May the Lord bless your richly. What's a richly?
mk wrote on April 6, 2007 6:39 PM:um, lampwick:
Percival Mather wrote on April 6, 2007 6:43 PM:You need to read "Life in the Emerald City" and remember Katrina. Who said the DOJ (and other federal agencies) would be any different? These are jobs for true believers, children of contributors, people who know people -- all of whom seem to be uniformly incompetent -- or they can assume the appearance of incompetence when the TV cameras turn on.
And why are we seeing all these folks now? Because, thank God, we have oversight. And that's the Easter miracle this year!!
Possible headline:
GOODLING CUTS AND RUNS, EMBOLDENS ENEMIES
fronobulax wrote on April 6, 2007 6:43 PM:It's a children's crusade 'cause that's where they find the true believers. Either Falwell-oid or LDS - take your pick.
Security code: "weight"
bobkv wrote on April 6, 2007 6:43 PM:(she took the weight right off ... me?)
Wow, two White House scandals with a Monica involved !!
Anonymous wrote on April 6, 2007 6:45 PM:bobkv
Letter of resignation = shredding is finished.
Arkansan wrote on April 6, 2007 6:47 PM:"May the Lord bless your richly. What's a richly?"
Good question. I thought his name was Alberto.
Angel wrote on April 6, 2007 6:50 PM:security code: fact
It's a fact that she's as crooked as the rest of the gang.
Jonathan wrote on April 6, 2007 6:51 PM:Anyone wanna start a pool on the first usage of "Goodling Friday" by the cable news hacks?
Mark F. wrote on April 6, 2007 6:52 PM:Here's my guess: She's wearing Pampers 24 hours a day and changing them every half hour. She's sleeping about fifteen minutes a night. She's hoping she can make it to Rio before anyone figures out that she's missing. She happens to know who did Ken Lay's plastic surgery after he "died", and she'll be visiting him the minute she gets to Brazil. And Karl Rove will be picking up the tab.
zAmboni wrote on April 6, 2007 6:55 PM:"Someone needs to keep track of where she goes after she "Resigns"."
I say she resigned today because Congress is still on the Easter Recess, and will soon get a recess appointment, from Bush, to become ambassador to the Marianas Islands.
Helen Rainier wrote on April 6, 2007 6:55 PM:Hmmm, I think his "richly" is the male gonads.
jhickey wrote on April 6, 2007 6:57 PM:One word for Monica RECONILLATION.Oh and one question.How many people really care what happens to you.JHickey
Total Disarray wrote on April 6, 2007 6:59 PM:"May God bless you richly as you continue your service to America [for the next week or so]."
DB wrote on April 6, 2007 6:59 PM:Don't worry, she'll be reinstated Sunday morning
tbhull wrote on April 6, 2007 7:02 PM:Posted by: Michael Stevens
Date: April 6, 2007 05:39 PM
This is an important shift from a biblical point of view in that Monica Goodling is so tuned in with God. God must be dumping the administration and telling Monica to take the 5th. Does anyone know what God is telling GWB on this one? I'm catching a whiff of armageddon in the air. A good chance exists that the White House lawn soon resembles Jim Jones' Guyana as all the Kool-aide drinkers drop.
Hmmmmmm wrote on April 6, 2007 7:03 PM:Security code = cold as in,
This cold bitch deserves everything coming her way. I still want to see her testimony ON CAMERA. Of course, I hope she has body guards, remember all the evil things the Republicans ascribed to Hillary about Vince Foster; these were the dark deeds within their OWN hearts. Poor Monica had better watch out.
Robin wrote on April 6, 2007 7:03 PM:Hah! Does she think government is just some 'corporation' and that by quitting she doesn't have to show up at a meeting, like a Congressional hearing?
Thank god she is off the payroll.
I wonder Bush Ranger hired her for her new job, wherever that is?
schmed wrote on April 6, 2007 7:07 PM:And why are we seeing all these folks now?
Proverbial rats from the proverbial sinking ship (of state).
Security Code: "book," as in "Book 'em, Dano"
Larry Flint wrote on April 6, 2007 7:08 PM:Hustler is looking for someone from DoJ for upcoming "Frolicking with the Lawyers".
Allsburg wrote on April 6, 2007 7:08 PM:phidda--
"I am hereby submitting my resignation to the office of attorney general" = "this is the resignation."
"I am submitting my resignation to the office of attorney general" is ambiguous. Has the resignation come yet? Is it coming tomorrow? Etc.
signed,
First Tier Lawyer
tescht wrote on April 6, 2007 7:14 PM:I'm wondering if Monica Goodling's resignation date has something to do with how she is vested in her retirement benifits or pension plan...
Like after five years...she's 100% vested?
Just a thought
NRaleighLib wrote on April 6, 2007 7:16 PM:"May God bless you richly as you continue your service to America," she concluded."
You gotta love it. What she means... "May God, who we in no way believe in but invoke to strike fear into his followers, God that we use as a weapon to hide behind as we live anything but a God-like life, God who gave us the Commandments that we avoid like the plague, ..."
Is there any end to the hypocrisy of this foul bunch?
aReader wrote on April 6, 2007 7:18 PM:>"I am submitting my resignation to the office of attorney general" is ambiguous.
Good point. These loyal Bushies can't even resign with competence.
Ralf wrote on April 6, 2007 7:18 PM:Document dump, email dump, Monica dump -- these things happen on Friday so as to miss the weekly news cycle. Or so it is ferverently hoped.
jeffgee wrote on April 6, 2007 7:19 PM:Up next: a position in a winger think tank.
Mooser wrote on April 6, 2007 7:20 PM:My own personal biased opinion is that there is something more than this-I think there are two Monicas,collecting two salaries or something like that.
Nothing about her "story" will stand up.
power forward wrote on April 6, 2007 7:22 PM:phidda-
Not to stickle you right back, but "hereby" does add something to the sentence. It clarifies that this letter serves as her notice of resignation. If she said "I am submitting my resignation," the implication would be that she is submitting her resignation by some separate communication.
A better edit would be to change the tense from the verbose present progressive ("I am hereby submitting") to the simple present ("I hereby submit").
Code name: glove, and pass the special sauce.
Arkansan wrote on April 6, 2007 7:26 PM:You know, there haven't been the normal chorus of accolades for Ms. Buzz. Even Felon Scooter gets heaps of praise to this day, but nada for the crucified Monica, and on Good Friday too.
Soon they'll be telling us that she has strange habits, emotional issues and she is a divisive partisan. Poor Monica, she is about to learn her "Christian" compatriots are no more truly Christian than herself.
tres wrote on April 6, 2007 7:31 PM:I'd bet that this is related to the costs of her legal representation.
As a government employee, she can't receive gifts, but now every sleeze can contribute to her "legal defense fund" (which is already likely being paid by one or two people).
Jamey wrote on April 6, 2007 7:32 PM:Because innocent people resign from their jobs and announce that they're invoking the Fifth Amendment when called to testify. Happens ALL the time.
Anonymous wrote on April 6, 2007 7:37 PM:security code: Paint
As in, "Even if you paint the Administration with white wash, it will not hide the evidence of your illegal activity...You are doomed. "
[By MIIT, "Monica Is In Trouble," a non-partisan coalition protecting the Constitution from white-wash-throwing pagans, pretending to be God fearing white they “shred for Jesus.” ]
psyopswatcher wrote on April 6, 2007 7:44 PM:I agree, she must have burned up her paid leave.
This could also be called Podunk, PA... from Jordan's AP story:
"Goodling's mother, Cindy Fitt of Osceola Mills, Pa., said the resignation had been anticipated. "She told me I'm to say 'no comment' for everything," the mother said in a brief telephone interview."
This is about ten miles from where I live. Wondering if she's visiting mom for Easter?
SC: story (again! I just had it for the Wisconsin Case muckraker) Does that mean I should go get this story? Good old Verizon has her address in the phonebook and it's a very small town.
Arkansan wrote on April 6, 2007 7:44 PM:Her resignation letter has a typo,
"I am hereby submit my resignation to the Office of the Attorney General, effective April 7, 2007. It has been an honor to have served at the Department of Justice for the past five years," Goodling said.
"May God bless you richly as you continue your service to America," she concluded.
according to cnn http://www.cnn.com/POLITICS/blogs/politicalticker/2007/04/senior-justice-official-resigns.html
Assuming CNN is correct, she either intended to say, "I do hereby submit..." or "I am hereby submitting..." we'll never know. The observation that these people are to incompetent to resign properly is right on point.
You'd think she would have someone proof such an important document. She must be very upset.
Paul wrote on April 6, 2007 7:50 PM:Here's how it is done:
Effective immediately, I resign my employment with the Department of Justice.
I agree with those who say she'll be bought off. What is a 150k/yr. job when they have looted BILLIONS? The economics of the situation can be understood by even the worst attorneys - even the political appointees in the DOJ.
Arkansan wrote on April 6, 2007 7:55 PM:psyopswatcher,
Why don't you stop by with a tuna casserole and shoot the breeze with Mama Mon? There might be a Pulitzer in it for you.
Michael Stevens wrote on April 6, 2007 7:58 PM:Twin Planets, said: "I wonder if her resignation makes it easier for Congress to grant her immunity to compel testimony....? Pros: she's not in a position to misuse her immunity; she's been isolated from the flock (and the aegis of executive privilege) Cons: she not an insider anymore; harder to use against Administration."
I don't think her resignation will have any impact on any of the legal fundamentals. Not on her 5th amendment claim, her likelihood of receiving immunity, or even on any executive privilege claims. (Since she never advised the president, I don't think she ever had *any* chance of an executive privilege claim.)
I think the reasons for her resignations are abundantly clear. She'd use up all her vacation time, she couldn't go back to work, she couldn't afford to stay on unpaid leave, and now that she's leaving, others can assist with her legal defense.
Yours and other's comments suggest Goodlings actions are being well coordinated with those of the Administration.. I think that's a rather poor assumption. Think about it, this administration has been " the gang who couldn't shoot straight" throughout this entire mess.
I think we have to seriously consider that Goodling is now a lone operator who's sole motivation is staying out of jail. The White House and DOJ probably haven't talked to her in weeks. The minute she plead the 5th, she became politically radioactive.
Personally, I now think she's scared, on the run, and probably willing to make a deal. The Congressional lawyers need to have a private talk with Goodling's lawyers to find out what she has to trade.
ChiJay wrote on April 6, 2007 7:59 PM:NPR News tonight: Goodling has said through her lawyers that she will invoke her 5th Amendment right not to answer questions about the dismissal.
I cannot STAND that the media gets this one wrong so damn often. (Whether through idiocy or malice, I don't know.) How difficult is it to type "Fifth Amendment" into a search engine and read?
No person...shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself....
The Fifth Amendment confers protection against self-incrimination, not a blanket right to avoid any questioning. What's next out of these extremists' mouths? Congress doesn't even have the right to have hearings?
Nancy Pelosi sure did look and sound presidential during her Mideast trip.
giark65 wrote on April 6, 2007 8:03 PM:Does this mean she submitted it through the WH email system, the republican email system, or through god, who along with GWB is exempt from further scrutiny?
She will never turn away from the mountain but what are the real implications if she continues her path in view of the 'burning bush'?
anon wrote on April 6, 2007 8:04 PM:Re: ChiJay's comment above, when was the last time that NPR broke a big story? I listened to their dull
newscast tonight and wondered about that. Do they ever break news?
Security code: waste. Yup.
tbhull wrote on April 6, 2007 8:10 PM:If she is scared and on the run God will surely guide this poor frightened soul. I am praying for her.
Rich wrote on April 6, 2007 8:31 PM:She will wind up at some second string wingnut position paper mill. The resignation paves the way for that and for her legal defense fund. She probably won't make it to the license plate academy, but hopefully she'll be disbarred. She has no business representing the legal system ever again.
As for the mortgage (upthread)--who knows or cares. She wouldn't care if someone else was stuck with a lease or a mortgage they couldn't afford. And I like the idea of taking a casserole over to mom's to get the story. Since it's Easter bring chocolate, or better yet, bring a Honey Baked Ham (TM).
angrycynicalvietnamvet wrote on April 6, 2007 8:36 PM:tbhull...you pray that god will guide her....But, where has this god been while she elbowed her way to the top, probably had an affair with the former AG, engaged in unethical and possibly illegal activity while at the DOJ,abused her position and now doesn't want to talk about any of it for fear of incriminating herself....? Surely, god must have been on vacation during these many years and not available to guide this poor shark...
Hmmmmmm wrote on April 6, 2007 8:37 PM:Maybe she can get a job with an escort service out of California... Oh wait, they finally closed that ... I guess she will have to go to Congress and come clean....
She is invoking the 5th 'cause she knows she has committed felonies. She doesn't want to say which ones. Those felonies are a direct attack on our civil rights, honest government, and democratic governance. I, for one, am not too sympathetic.
Arkansan wrote on April 6, 2007 8:37 PM:Rich,
It's Good Friday, no meat. Fast tomorrow also. Easter Sunday is good for chocolate and ham.
Richard L. Adlof wrote on April 6, 2007 8:49 PM:tres,
Dead on . . . Of course this has to do with her legal defense fund . . .
Expect the Legal Defense Fund Web-site to be up by Monday . . .
Anyone else got ten bucks for this evil idiot?
chris miller wrote on April 6, 2007 8:54 PM:Watch, the RWAs won't go to bat for a woman.
bohdi wrote on April 6, 2007 8:56 PM:I would like to know how much is in the general slush fund, whos handling all the laundered dough what its original source is. Following the money is what created hell for the Nixon thugs.
There is no way they cut this chick loose. She knows far too much. She is familiar with dozens of secret points of their operation out of the white house. Rove must muzzle her as he would any racing dog. If she barks at all he goes down. She mustn't speak so she takes the 5th. She mustn't be investigated in house so she resigns. Now in order to insure she keeps her muzzle on 24/7 and doesn't dance with ole man Leahy they are forced to buy her silence.
19 billion vanish in Iraq and no one on the internet is yet raising the distinct possibility of a huge Slush Fund used to enforce the loyalty of hundreds of criminal participants.
Rusty Austin wrote on April 6, 2007 8:58 PM:How about, I quit? That's about as unambiguous as you can get, no offense to any of the lawyers here...
ahem wrote on April 6, 2007 8:58 PM:Did Akin Gump allow her to settle her legal bills two weeks in lieu?
And is there a nice big defense fund awaiting her? It's going to be called MILF: Monica's Impeachathon Legal Fund.
davis¹³ wrote on April 6, 2007 9:07 PM:She'll get hired at AEI with a 6 or 7 figure salary.
But in the meantime she just wants to "spend some time with her family".
Observer wrote on April 6, 2007 9:12 PM:Y'all are believing CNN again. Risky business.
The Oracle wrote on April 6, 2007 9:25 PM:Monica Goodling is resigning from the DOJ to pursue a lifelong dream of her's: missionary work. (Oh, wait, that's how she viewed her work at the DOJ).
Anyway, she's resigning to continue her missionary work, but this time she's shooting for a missionary position overseas, probably in a country far, far away and preferably without an extradition treaty with the U.S., effective immediately. She'll remain at this missionary post overseas until God gives her instructions on her next move, or until the heat is off.
Of course, two seemingly unrelated events this week, the recess appointment of Sam Fox to be the new lame duck ambassador to Belgium and the resignation of Monica "Goody Two Shoes" Goodling from the DOJ, could be connected.
In other words, Monica may be planning on assuming a missionary position under the new ambassador to Belgium, Sam Fox. (heehee)
Oh, and the security code word? CRIME...
...which perfectly describes the entire Bush administration, their policies, their practices and their personnel, including what Monica Goodling has been doing on the sly which now requires her to take the 5th in an attempt to obstruct anyone from questioning her. Ergo, Monica = Honey Baked Clam.
Propagandee wrote on April 6, 2007 9:26 PM:As for why Badling dated her resignation Holy Saturday rather than Good Friday, the former AG John Ashcroft spparently has a valid trademark on all matters related to DOJ 'crucifixions.'
Anonymous wrote on April 6, 2007 9:33 PM:The administration may be floundering, but it was coordinated enough to get Monica one of the top guns in white collar criminal defense work, who happens to be a partner at Ken Mehlman's firm, Akin Gump. It's not likely Monica sorted that out herself, or that she ever expected to pay for them herself. Kyle Sampson didn't get that much from them, and he was supposedly considered a Turd Blossom in training.
I imagine the admin. will continue to stay away and coordinate through proxies. My guess is they won't be surprised by her legal arguments or what she says. Ms. Goodling should not sleep well imagining they are protecting her; it's only what she knows.
Hermagoras wrote on April 6, 2007 9:37 PM:Keyword: "past." As in the DOJ's message -- all in the past, please. Nothing to see here. Let's look forward, shall we?
I'm thinking not so much.
convict wrote on April 6, 2007 9:44 PM:..slightly off topic, (but)
"...the official said, one document, several hundred pages long, was an internal administrative review of one of the fired prosecutors and was so sensitive that it would have been entirely redacted if it had been sent to Capitol Hill."
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/040607H.shtml
Anonymous wrote on April 6, 2007 9:55 PM:The administration may be floundering, but it was coordinated enough to get Monica one of the top guns in white collar criminal defense work, who happens to be a partner at Ken Mehlman's firm, Akin Gump. It's not likely that Monica sorted that out herself, or that she ever expected to pay for them herself. Kyle Sampson wasn't supported quite that closely, though as a Turd Blossom in training, he is probably considered more of a "stand alone" asset less in need of such close support.
I imagine the admin. will continue to coordinate through proxies. My guess is they won't be surprised by her legal arguments or what she says. Ms. Goodling should not sleep well imagining they are protecting her; it's what she knows. She has put herself among the pharoahs, not the Righteous.
And since Ms. Goodling remains curious, but has less to do, a hearty welcome. Her minders must already know us well.
Zang wrote on April 6, 2007 10:03 PM:FYI, came across a good retort to a tired talking point.
TP) There's no scandal here. The US Attorneys serve at the pleasure of the president. End of story.
R) So they weren't pleasuring the president?
ta-da
JD21 wrote on April 6, 2007 10:07 PM:MEET THE TRUTH
Orrin Hatch's blatant smear on US Attorney Carol Lam is basically what Hatch used to save himself from total embarrassment on Tim Russert’s Meet the Press last week.
See http://thinkprogress.org/2007/04/06/hatch-correction-mtp/
Hatch was going down hard. Russert letting Hatch get away with this just sends a message to other Republicans - when your lifeboat is sinking on this show throw the truth overboard.
Suggest everyone email Russert to ask for a correction and some accountability. It's quite simple. And you might cut and paste this message or some version of it:
I saw MTP last week. Hatch's smear on Lam is basically what he used to save himself. He was going down hard. Russert letting Hatch get away with this just sends a message to other Republicans - when your lifeboat is sinking on this show throw the truth overboard.
Suggest Russert issue correction about the lies on his show and hold his guests to some accountability to the truth when they are talking to him. Here are all the details about Hatch's lies which need to be corrected: \http://thinkprogress.org/2007/04/06/hatch-correction-mtp/
OhSnap! wrote on April 6, 2007 10:13 PM:Recall Lessons Learned From the Scooter Trial:
Timmeh is the best bread to smear the GOP jelly on.
tom hyland wrote on April 6, 2007 10:17 PM:From the D*ck's mouth.
Has anybody checked to see if Goodling is licensed to practice law? I checked with all states that Sampson claimed to have practiced law and could find find no evidence of his having been licensed or being a member of the bar.
EH wrote on April 6, 2007 10:17 PM:"Well isn't that just special?"
KY3 Democrat wrote on April 6, 2007 10:19 PM:noshrub said: "Paulose shared w/Federal judge here in MN (Davis) in elevator that she was a virgin. Wow. Unconfirmed, but from a reliable source."
Yo dude, I'd hit that, even though it might cost me a large donation to a Democratic candidate to retrieve my self-respect.
KY3 Democrat: "LA face with a Minnesota booty.."
shrubsy wrote on April 6, 2007 10:22 PM:May the Sweet Lord Jaysus bless you richly.
Right back atcha, Hose Anna, and don't call me Richly.
codeword:parcel
Arkansan wrote on April 6, 2007 10:28 PM:as in that Monica Goodling is a real parcel of work
"Yo dude, I'd hit that.."
Have you seen her photograph? Yuck.
The reason she is a virgin is manifest. Too bad for her that the burden has made her too mean to manage professionally as well.
JD21 wrote on April 6, 2007 10:31 PM:Link to email Meet the Press to ask for corrections: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6872152/
slancio wrote on April 6, 2007 10:36 PM:Security Code: nation
I mean... c'mon... is the computer generating these codes showing signs of artificial intelligence?
BushLips SinxShips wrote on April 6, 2007 10:44 PM:Gonzales note to self: resign.
Security code: army! as in Gonzales sends-in the army.
Wait! that would be Chertoff
slancio wrote on April 6, 2007 10:44 PM:OK OK... WAIT... I SWEAR... I was gonna comment on the whole Paulose/virgin flap... then I thought... let's see what codes the computer generates... so I hit it twice... and I SWEAR it came up with:
Security Code: woman
Security Code: tight
I kid you not. "Dave... I can feel my mind going..."
Anonymous wrote on April 6, 2007 11:09 PM:Akin Gump is Mehlman's firm... How can she use Akin Gump for representation when they're going to be busy trying to squelch the very communication that would expose her? And as former head of the RNC, won't that be problematic if it turns out the use of RNC emails for White House correspondance was illegal?
KY3 Democrat wrote on April 6, 2007 11:20 PM:Arkansan says: "Have you seen [Paulose's] photograph? Yuck."
I searched for "Paulose" in Google images, and came up with a picture of some old hairy guy wearing a robe and turban and posing with a cross.
I did hear she was religious, quoted the bible, and had an investiture ceremony, so this must be her. You say YUCK, I say CHALLENGE.
You know I'd never let a little facial hair get in the way of doing my duty as a Democrat.
KY3 Democrat: "I'll just use my wallet snap of Phyllis Schlafly in leather to see me through.."
Slippery Slope wrote on April 6, 2007 11:21 PM:Monica (and others) must be impeached. If not now then reasonably soon; when enough evidence is available.
I understand that if impeached an individual cannot be pardoned. If impeached they cannot serve in government again. I presume that if impeached they cannot "practice" law in any State or hold a security clearance.
Previous posts on other threads indicate that there is precedence for impeachment even after a resignation.
Future generations of Americans must not learn a grave lesson from this sorry, sorry tail that one can "get away with" subverting the constitution by simply walking away in resignation and eventual pardon.
For years I’ve been disgusted with seeing Oli North and the like enjoy the prestige of TV hosting or “service” in current government positions.
This cannot be a witch-hunt (And I do not believe it is), but America will be forever weakened if the Constitution, the Rule of Law and true consequences of freely elected representatives do not prevail.
RobinMichael wrote on April 6, 2007 11:28 PM:Anyone here remember the circumstances of the sinking of the Titanic? You know, the ship so massive, so much a monument of man's indominability, that supposedly "God himself couldn't sink her"? And of how everyone initially breathed a sigh of relief when they thought they'd narrowly missed that iceburg, going much to fast for those ice-infested waters as they were? And then it was, "oh, it's a small leak, nothing we can't contain."
In the end, the sinking was such a fustercluck that the huge boat broke apart before actually going down.
This time, that passengers that go down with the ship "Democrats themselves couldn't sink" won't be such innocent souls. This time, they'll deserve it -- every last one of them.
Security code: bent. You betcha.
Wretched Refuse wrote on April 6, 2007 11:35 PM:phidda--
"I am hereby submitting my resignation to the office of attorney general" = "this is the resignation."
"I am submitting my resignation to the office of attorney general" is ambiguous. Has the resignation come yet? Is it coming tomorrow? Etc.
signed,
First Tier Lawyer
Posted by: Allsburg
Actually,
Clovis wrote on April 6, 2007 11:50 PM:If it is not "here is my fucking resignation letter" it should be "I hereby submit my letter of resignation...
"Submitting" is incorrect.
Can anybody tell me what happens after the Senate concludes their "investigations" of this Purgegate mess? Is it the Senate that is investigating this one or is it Waxman and the House? There are so many investigations I can't keep them straight. I did enjoy the GSA Q and A on C-Span a couple of weeks ago and watching the "evil Radar" testifying, got a little tired of hearing "I don't remember.", though. Can they send anybody to prison? What exactly are they looking for? Liars? It seems like that is obvious (liars) to anybody who has been following this. How far up can Leahy/Schumer/Waxman go with this. Could this possibly lead to the OVP or even the Shrub? What happens if Rove loses his Teflon covering and something sticks to him? Can any of these players ever hope to see any real jail time, I mean seriously? Thanks to anybody who can give me some real hope in seeing justice served in all of this mess.
Wretched Refuse wrote on April 6, 2007 11:51 PM:"Because innocent people resign from their jobs and announce that they're invoking the Fifth Amendment when called to testify. Happens ALL the time.
Posted by: Jamey
Date: April 6, 2007 07:32 PM"
Oh really name one. I hope you were being cute.
Anonymous wrote on April 7, 2007 12:31 AM:Clovis says: "Thanks to anybody who can give me some real hope in seeing justice served in all of this mess."
Clovis, I do not think we'll ever see real *judicial* justice in any of this: no or little jail time for the big fish, no fines, few impeachments, no property seizures, etc. Nothing like that. Maybe even lots of pardons in January 2009. Nothing is going to stick to Rove, I'm sorry to say. That's not how this game is played.
I think what we *can* expect, if the Democrats can stay united and keep the country united and governed, is *political* justice. The Repubs may come out of this wearing a type of hairshirt, a deep, well-earned perception among the electorate that Repubs CANNOT GOVERN FOR THE GOOD OF THE NATION, that we cannot afford Repub governance in the way they currently package it.
I once heard a Yellow Dog Democrat say once, "I can vote Republican, but I'd have to cut a joint off one of my fingers afterwards." Somehow, ordinary Joe 6-pack Americans are going to wake up and say, "I'm not a Republican, these guys don't represent me." God speed the day...
Everytime someone bitches to me about health care costs, I ask who they voted for last election; about half the time, they voted Republican. I just shrug and say, "If you are a Republican, you can afford your own health care plan, you have no right to complain."
Keep in mind, as you talk with friends: Repubs can afford their own clean water, they don't have to take it out of the common well... Everyone else can drink water laced with lead and PVCs. Repubs don't support Social Security because they've earned enough money washing dishes for a lifetime that they can afford to fund their own retirement. Repubs will send your son to die for oil, but won't support even moderate CAFE standards. On down the line: you vote Repub, you get to live the Repub dream. Justice is political, your vote is your warrant.
KY3 Democrat: "I sent my goddamn Repub animal back home in the last election; you can too."
Skeptic wrote on April 7, 2007 1:01 AM:That mom sure doesn't listen!
"She told me to say no comment to everything" is saying a whole lot than "no comment."
Did Monica spill it all to mommy? Has mommy become an accomplice?
Or Monica, are you sending us a religious signal?
As Jesus was crucified on Good Friday, you too were crucified by losing your job?
Please, Monica, enlighten us. Would Jesus have fired the Eight?
Wretched Refuse wrote on April 7, 2007 1:57 AM:phidda--
"I am hereby submitting my resignation to the office of attorney general" = "this is the resignation."
"I am submitting my resignation to the office of attorney general" is ambiguous. Has the resignation come yet? Is it coming tomorrow? Etc.
signed,
First Tier Lawyer
Posted by: Allsburg
Actually,
Anonymous wrote on April 7, 2007 2:04 AM:If it is not "here is my fucking resignation letter" it should be "I hereby submit my letter of resignation...
"Submitting" is incorrect.
"May God bless you richly as you continue your service to America," Goodling added.
Isn't he rich enough already?
(code word: profit)
bigcat wrote on April 7, 2007 2:39 AM:Code name: glove, and pass the special sauce.
Posted by: power forward
Date: April 6, 2007 07:22 PM
Power, I'm not sure anyone else got the ref, but I did.
Security Code: Foot. As in, "Boy, I'd sure like to put my foot up these jackasses' asses!"
Nancy Irving wrote on April 7, 2007 5:51 AM:Give her immunity. Make her choose between ratting out her friends (and thus ending forever her career in law and/or politics) and committing perjury--setting herself up for indictment and conviction, like Libby.
PJ White wrote on April 7, 2007 9:22 AM:security code: profit. How to screw the American public for fun and profit.
I want Monica to wear her best red dress when she sucks one for the prez.
Ninbus wrote on April 7, 2007 9:48 AM:Didn't Monica Goodling and "Bible Quotin'" Pelose both attend Pat Robertson's (cough.cough) 'law school' - Regent University School of Law?
I heard on some report yesterday where this 'law school' was described as teaching a combination of law with Christian religious principles, in an attempt to narrow the gap between Church and State.
So encouraging to learn that some 150 graduates of this learned institution are now on the government payroll.
Security code: emesis
Sally wrote on April 7, 2007 11:16 AM:So can congress subpoena No-Comment-Mama? She does sound like she would easily spill all the beans.
Pelose and Goodling are reportedly BFF. It is so sweet that these two Robertson Stepford lawyers are making their media debuts together.
security code: basin.
As in the wonderful Washington Tidal Basin scandal.
bawahahahahaha!
AnnieW wrote on April 7, 2007 11:35 AM:Paulose has better creds than Goodling, did not come from Regent University.
She has the same mindset, though.
jimbo92107 wrote on April 7, 2007 2:35 PM:I wonder why Goodling thinks resigning will take the pressure off her or her boss?
Odd duck. Get her on the stand, and on with the hearings.
Michael Stevens wrote on April 7, 2007 5:27 PM:jimbo92107, said: "I wonder why Goodling thinks resigning will take the pressure off her or her boss?"
-
I don't think that was her motivation.
The posts above explain it fully. Basically, it appears she resigned today because it was her final day of paid leave, she couldn't go back to work, and as a government employee, couldn't afford to pay her very expensive lawyers.
noshrub wrote on April 7, 2007 5:33 PM:NYT article today re: Paulose implies that older lawyers in the Mpls office had a hard time dealing with a young assertive, aggressive woman. Hmmm....Erica Monzangue (the head of the civil division and one of the 3 lawyers who resigned her position because of Paulose's behavior) is a young African American woman--guess the NYT just goes with the sound bite from gwb43 on that one. More research needs to be done...
Mr.Murder wrote on April 7, 2007 9:09 PM:She could not afford to pay her lawyer while employed. This is only a move to limit the perceived proximity to AWOL's lawbreaking cabal.
So she is using the 5th?
That's too bad because every other Bushevik is using the memory defense.
How will they ever conciliate those two versions ethical trespass?
tekel wrote on April 7, 2007 9:47 PM:good point Mr. Murder: "I don't recall" is very different from "I remember, but if I tell you you'll put me in jail." The first one makes you look stupid. The second one sounds like pride to me.
and I think the attention was getting to be a little too "much" for her.
steambomb wrote on April 7, 2007 10:19 PM:"She has a mortgage and mounting legal bills."
B F frickin! D. Half of America has a mortgage and mounting health care bills. Honestly why is the media trying to make her into some kind of charity case? It is high time for some accountability by each and every person in this administration.
jimbobuddy wrote on April 7, 2007 11:45 PM:hereby = "by this action, or communication"
Laxmi wrote on April 8, 2007 12:54 AM:Paulose went to Yale, not Regent.
steambomb wrote on April 8, 2007 3:16 AM:Paulose went to Yale, not Regent.
Posted by: Laxmi
Date: April 8, 2007 12:54 AM
Was she on the cheerleader team?
Anonymous wrote on April 8, 2007 8:42 AM:GWB demonstrates that garbage in = garbage out, even at Yale.
Even if we assume she was not unqualified for admission and moved to the front of the line anyway, as was the President, the Yale degree does not ordain her as suitable as a USA. Neither does her credintials as a virgin or a loyal Bushie, but none of mattered.
chuckles wrote on April 8, 2007 9:07 AM:I just hope Monica is enjoying her Easter...chuckle chuckle
B W wrote on April 8, 2007 9:41 AM:But what did the Senate do after receiving Paulose's nomination on August 3, 2006?
Nothing.
The Judiciary Committee did not vote on her nomination. They did not send her nomination to the full Senate for a confirmation vote. Instead, on the last day of the 109th Congress, Bill Frist, then Senate Majority Leader of the Republican controlled Senate, asked that the Judiciary Committee be "discharged" from further consideration of Ms. Paulose's nomination. This from the congressional record on December 8, 2006:
[ Mr. FRIST. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the Senate immediately proceed to executive session to consider the following nominations on today’s Executive Calendar: Calendar Nos. 62, 63, 407, 670, 783, 900, 901, 904, 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005 through 1008, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 1023, 1024, and all nominations on the Secretary’s desk.
I further ask consent that the following committees be discharged from further consideration of listed nominations and the Senate proceed to their consideration en bloc:
Judiciary Committee, Rachel Paulose PN1905; Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, Paul Schneider PN2127; Foreign Relations, Dianne Moss PN1846, foreign service promotion lists PN 2097, PN 2130, and PN 2085.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered. ]
With that discharge resolution, a rarely used procedure in the United States Senate, Bill Frist brought Ms. Paulose's nomination to the floor without any committee hearing or committee vote. A few hours later the United States Senate confirmed Ms. Paulose's nomination along with over a hundred other nominations before heading out of town and before a new Democratic Senate took over. ...
Kathleen McCook wrote on April 8, 2007 10:58 AM:http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/4/8/13949/87592
Leahy Must Subpoena Biskupic
U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Wisconsin Steven Biskupic
obtained a conviction last September of State of Wisconsin purchasing
agent Georgia Thompson. The timing could not have been worse for
Democrats as the case made headlines through out the state in the months
preceding the November elections after the September sentencing.
foggylady wrote on April 8, 2007 12:34 PM:http://www.waxingamerica.com/2007/04/leahy_must_subp.html
RE Regent Law School...which is ranked a "tier four" school by US News & World Report, the lowest score and essentially a tie for 136th place --
sekdco bxmkrdtu wrote on April 19, 2007 7:44 AM:60 percent of the class of 1999 -- Goodling's class -- failed the bar exam on the first attempt.
http://www.boston.com/news/education/higher/articles/2007/04/08/scandal_puts_spotlight_on_christian_law_school/?page=3
rnikjome irmhcfkbg qinctvhj qgfldb imxb alftebxcr yamzfpkv
qfyaz mowzqupcb wrote on April 19, 2007 7:46 AM:imljqzp pkwjegmc nerqw qwfyri ltvgho tyxpkruhm nbxfja http://www.gdynrsxbi.jxmlpqg.com
dkbpwnyge pnys wrote on April 19, 2007 7:47 AM:rpsjh umdltqhe nsaz gjnubyai jzdqc mzudkcqb hfnkgm exsqkjc orhjg
uenc ipqu wrote on April 19, 2007 7:47 AM:cbpf whiuleb wcoyskip vjmwu gepuqza welj gcbaqt [URL=http://www.vcfup.gfrzulc.com]uygxb preaug[/URL]
whjpboat mlikswge wrote on April 19, 2007 7:48 AM:ngjotsq tsneh zpleyn fcivon xtacl ifyr mzyafn [URL]http://www.vrzywn.xzqjoirdw.com[/URL] lgmzubxhk ecpvh
willy@gmail.com wrote on April 30, 2007 8:17 PM:hello
andrey@gmail.com wrote on May 1, 2007 8:38 AM:hello
andrey@gmail.com wrote on May 1, 2007 8:39 AM:hello
andrey@gmail.com wrote on May 1, 2007 8:39 AM:hello
Anna wrote on May 27, 2007 7:55 PM:Monica is a graduate of an unaccredited law
school. Could she sit for the bar in DC?
She is not licensed in Virginia where the law
was she graduated from. Anyway, to be a federal
attorney the requirements are "graduation from
an ABA accredited law school", so how did she
get that job?
any comments?
Anna wrote on May 27, 2007 8:01 PM:Monica is a graduate of an unaccredited law
school. Could she sit for the bar in DC?
She is not licensed in Virginia where she graduated from law school. Anyway, to be a federal
attorney the requirements are "graduation from
an ABA accredited law school", so how did she
get that job?
any comments?
Anna wrote on May 27, 2007 8:01 PM:Monica is a graduate of an unaccredited law
school. Could she sit for the bar in DC?
She is not licensed in Virginia where she graduated from law school. Anyway, to be a federal
attorney the requirements are "graduation from
an ABA accredited law school", so how did she
get that job?
any comments?
asigurarea wrote on June 3, 2007 2:09 PM:Good afternoon friends
kilka wrote on July 31, 2007 12:51 PM:we should will be united for rescue.....
----------------------------------------------------------------
gmc trucks here www.gmctruck.fora.pl
gmc from america www.gmctruck.fora.pl
real gmc www.gmctruck.fora.pl
Chessie Moore wrote on August 7, 2007 1:13 PM:and www.emeraldring.fora.pl rings
Chessie Moore
tkzp hxewnmlgr wrote on August 7, 2007 3:08 PM:ykrfpb njbgxml dbeatopfz pmilg pzhqbykvc dfmrcoj ghknp
Letha Weapons wrote on August 7, 2007 3:30 PM:Letha Weapons
Dani Woodward wrote on August 7, 2007 4:06 PM:dani woodward 512.4 /day
Anna Nova wrote on August 10, 2007 5:44 PM:dani video woodward 13.4 /day
dani free movie woodward 11.8 /day
dani pic woodward 10.4 /day
dani free video woodward 7.5 /day
dani movie woodward 6.0 /day
dani friend hot sister woodward 4.5 /day
anal dani woodward 4.1 /day
dani torrent woodward 3.5 /day
bio dani woodward 3.0 /day
dani lesbian woodward 3.0 /day
dani freeones woodward 3.0 /day
dani interracial woodward 2.6 /day
dani rapidshare woodward 2.5 /day
bitch book dani woodward worm 2.3 /day
dani gallery woodward 2.0 /day
dani north peter woodward 1.7 /day
clip dani woodward 1.7 /day
dani interview woodward 1.7 /day
dani porn star woodward 1.6 /day
dani porn woodward 1.4 /day
dani fucking woodward 1.3 /day
adventure dani doctor woodward 1.3 /day
dani mb woodward 1.2 /day
dani myspace woodward 1.2 /day
america dani naughty woodward 1.2 /day
dani free woodward 1.0 /day
bookwormbitches dani woodward 1.0 /day
dani hardcore woodward 0.9 /day
dani mask woodward
Anna Nova
Kranton wrote on September 8, 2007 5:40 AM:The Best.
Iton wrote on September 8, 2007 6:39 AM:Ok! Best regards!
It's fine.
I visited your web site.
Super!
Ok! Best regards!
Thanks.
Hubert wrote on September 8, 2007 6:53 AM:This is super.
Fabulous Website!
The Best.
Looks interesting.
It is very creative.
Moon Freddie.
Kole wrote on September 8, 2007 7:05 AM:It's vonderful.
Looks interesting.
It's fine.
Sample design...
Moon Freddie.
Is cool and to say hello.
Iton wrote on September 8, 2007 7:29 AM:Best site!
It's vonderful.
Ok! Beautyful.
It's vonderful.
Is cool and to say hello.
I visited your web site.
Markos wrote on September 8, 2007 8:49 AM:This is super.
Ok! Master!
Ok! Beautyful.
Checking in to see if everybody.
Its the second time.
It's fine.
Mooner wrote on September 8, 2007 9:04 AM:And my grandpa is a train finatic.
It's fine.
Thanks.
Its the second time.
Glad to see other.
Sample design...
Tory wrote on September 8, 2007 10:02 AM:It's vonderful.
The Best.
And my grandpa is a train finatic.
Ok! Beautyful.
Super!
Ok! Master!
Minko wrote on September 8, 2007 10:21 AM:It's fine.
It's fine.
Fine!
Ok! Beautyful.
Super!
Ok! Best regards!
Saeko wrote on September 8, 2007 10:37 AM:Glad to see other.
Checking in to see if everybody.
Thanks.
Sample design...
This is super.
Fabulous Website!
Mooner wrote on September 8, 2007 10:47 AM:It's fine.
Fine!
Dimos wrote on September 8, 2007 11:13 AM:The Best.
The Best.
Freddie wrote on September 8, 2007 11:27 AM:It is very creative.
And includes a wealth of information.
Dimos wrote on September 8, 2007 9:10 PM:Best site!
Ok! Beautyful.
Iton wrote on September 8, 2007 9:25 PM:I visited your web site.
Is cool and to say hello.
Tory wrote on September 8, 2007 9:36 PM:And my grandpa is a train finatic.
Ok! Master!
Robert wrote on September 8, 2007 10:09 PM:It's vonderful.
It is very creative.
Pink wrote on September 8, 2007 10:48 PM:Glad to see other.
Thanks.
Dopler wrote on September 8, 2007 11:27 PM:Checking in to see if everybody.
Best site!
Iuuper wrote on September 8, 2007 11:39 PM:Thanks.
Best site!
Mungo wrote on September 8, 2007 11:53 PM:And my grandpa is a train finatic.
It's fine.
Freddie wrote on September 9, 2007 12:26 AM:It's vonderful.
Its the second time.
Robert wrote on September 9, 2007 3:36 AM:Best site!
I really enjoyed your page.
Saeko wrote on September 9, 2007 4:25 AM:It's fine.
Ok! Beautyful.
Mungo wrote on September 9, 2007 5:11 AM:Sample design...
Thanks.
Saturn wrote on September 9, 2007 8:53 AM:Sample design...
It's fine.
Robert wrote on September 9, 2007 9:07 AM:Sample design...
The Best.
Mungo wrote on September 9, 2007 1:14 PM:I visited your web site.
Best site!
Grad wrote on September 9, 2007 1:30 PM:I really enjoyed your page.
Is cool and to say hello.
Tory wrote on September 9, 2007 1:46 PM:I really enjoyed your page.
I really enjoyed your page.
Dimos wrote on September 9, 2007 2:37 PM:Thanks.
Glad to see other.
Pink wrote on September 9, 2007 2:48 PM:Checking in to see if everybody.
Super!
Erman wrote on September 9, 2007 3:00 PM:Ok! Best regards!
And includes a wealth of information.
Jim wrote on September 9, 2007 3:13 PM:And my grandpa is a train finatic.
Fine!
Grad wrote on September 9, 2007 3:23 PM:Ok! Beautyful.
Moon Freddie.
Diter wrote on September 9, 2007 10:24 PM:Glad to see other.
Sample design...
VIRJIN85 wrote on October 22, 2007 11:00 AM:It is very creative.
Helo !!! You not have adult friend finder ?
VIRJIN87 wrote on October 24, 2007 10:47 PM:Women's and man's, see this
Good luck !
Helo !!! You not have adult friend finder ?
Women's and man's, see this
Good luck !
VIRJIN8 wrote on October 29, 2007 10:43 PM:Helo !!! You not have adult friend finder ?
ViRgINs wrote on November 1, 2007 6:17 PM:Women's and man's, see this
Good luck !
Helo !!! You not have adult friend finder ?
betting wrote on November 26, 2007 10:16 PM:Women's and man's, see this
Good luck !
Large betting portal with daily FREE predictions and analysis,
bookmaker reviews and info.