« previous | MUCK HOME | next »
The Daily Muck
Senate Ethics Confirms Domenici Probe Over US Attorney Firing
"The Senate, thanks to a resolution it just adopted, has confirmed that Sen. Pete Domenici (R-N.M.) is the subject of "preliminary inquiry" over his involvement in the firing of former U.S. Attorney David Iglesias. The Senate just adopted a resolution (S. Res. 153) stating that "for matters before the Select Committee on Ethics involving the preliminary inquiry arising in connection with alleged communications by persons within the committee's jurisdiction with and concerning David C. Iglesias, then United States Attorney for the District of New Mexico, and the subsequent action by the committee with respect to that matter, if any, the Senator from Colorado (Mr. Salazar) shall be replaced by the Senator from Ohio (Mr. Brown)." (The Politico)
Ex-AG Aide Says Buchanan Consulted on Firing
"The Justice Department consulted with U.S. Attorney Mary Beth Buchanan in Pittsburgh when it was drawing up a list of prosecutors to be fired, a former top aide to the attorney general told investigators, and now a House committee wants to interview her. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales' former chief of staff, Kyle Sampson, told Senate investigators Sunday that Buchanan was one of the senior officials he consulted about which U.S. attorneys should be asked to resign, according to a Senate Judiciary Committee aide who read a transcript of the interview." (The Pittsburgh Channel)
White House Seeks to Review GOP Emails
"President Bush's lawyers told the Republican National Committee on Tuesday not to turn over to Congress any e-mails related to the firings last year of eight U.S. attorneys before showing them to the White House. Democrats and Republican critics of the administration said the move suggests that the White House is seeking to develop a strategy to block the release of the non-government e-mails to congressional investigators by arguing that they're covered by executive privilege and not subject to review." (McClatchy Newspapers)
Did Agency Play Politics with Voter ID Study?
"While Missouri and other states wrangled over controversial voter identification laws last year, a study sponsored by a federal elections agency concluded that such measures dampened voter turnout among minorities. But that report didn't see the light of day until two weeks ago, long after the November elections and not until Congress forced its release." (St Louis Post Dispatch)
Politicization of Career Hiring at Justice Department?
"Have top political appointees at the Justice Department politicized the hiring of new career employees there? That's what a number of longtime Justice Department employees want to know as Attorney General Alberto Gonzales heads to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday to testify about the sacking of eight U.S. attorneys." (The Politico)
Prosecutors Owe Loyalty to the Public
"When Atty. Gen. Alberto Gonzales testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee to explain his role in the firing of eight U.S. attorneys, it is important to keep in mind that what is really at stake goes far beyond Gonzales' own fate as the country's top law official. At root, this inquiry poses a fundamental question, one that every attorney general in every presidential administration must squarely confront: To whom, or to what interests, does a U.S. attorney -- or, for that matter, any prosecutor -- owe professional loyalty?" (Chicago Tribune)
Government Worker's Private Emails Need Some Safeguards
"Like many information technologies before it, e-mail has found its way to the center of a Washington controversy. TV made Kennedy look better and the Vietnam War look worse. Tape recording helped do in Richard Nixon. An Internet video brought down Senator George Allen." (Boston Globe)
Mystery as Disclosure Bill is Held
"Just days after Congressional campaigns had to file financial reports with the Federal Election Commission, the Senate put the brakes on a bill that would make its financial records more accessible. Senate Rules and Administration Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) moved Tuesday to approve legislation by unanimous consent that would require Senate candidates to file their reports electronically, but a Republican Senator anonymously objected, stalling the bill indefinitely." (Roll Call)
Meet Gregory Nickerson
"Remember that huge $140 billion corporate tax break Congress passed in 2004 that John McCain called, 'the worst example of the influence of special interests that I have ever seen'? A key architect of that bill was Gregory Nickerson, who later became a lobbyist who placed firms with contracts from the Act." (Harper's)
Byrd Pledges to Enforce Earmarks Rule
"Facing growing pressure from conservatives, Senate Appropriations Chairman Robert Byrd (D-W.Va.) unexpectedly announced Tuesday that he would enforce new disclosure and conflict of interest rules for earmarks. But while Byrd pledged to follow those guidelines for projects included in fiscal 2008 appropriations bills during the initial committee drafting and markup process, Democrats continued to resist efforts by a small group of conservative Republicans to have the disclosure package apply to the entire Senate and to every step of the appropriations process." (Roll Call)
European Lawmakers Rail CIA Tactics
"Members of the European Parliament told U.S. lawmakers Tuesday that
CIA tactics for spiriting away terrorism suspects are illegal. The parliamentarians' briefing for House members concerned CIA renditions, the practice of grabbing terror suspects in one country and delivering them to another country for questioning." (Associated Press)

Comments (33)
Anonymous wrote on April 18, 2007 9:39 AM:The Senate, thanks a resolution it just adopted, has confirmed that Sen. Pete Domenici (R-N.M.)
Check that sentence again
noshrub wrote on April 18, 2007 10:07 AM:Looks like Normie's doing a little flip-flopping on Paulose.
http://www.startribune.com/587/story/1127416.html
Security code wind as in finger to it.
bordersmuggler wrote on April 18, 2007 10:08 AM:Deservedly so, when the dust settles David Iglesias will emerge a true hero.
Citizen 92 wrote on April 18, 2007 10:14 AM:On politicization of hiring at DOJ...
There is a pretty solid body of evidence now that final point of signoff for all career hires at DOJ (and many other agencies) now rests with the Bush political appointees instead of the career executives. This is a major departure from past practice. Prior to Bush, the axiom was that career staff would choose the most qualified career staff - since careerists serve regardless of whatever President is in office.
Once someone serves in a politically appointed position for a period of time, he/she becomes elegible to receive hiring preferences in the federal civil service. This is known as the Ramspect provision or, informally, "burrowing in." Effectively, this provision gives these job seekers preference over the general public competing for these jobs. Other preferences that figure in is Veterans' status, disabled status, or prior career government service. On Ramspect, Congress used to ask GAO to report on these "non-competative appointments" all the time, especially under Clinton. Schedule C political appointees become elegible for the preference after, I belive, 1 year. White House staffers have tougher requirements - I think it's 3 years.
Citizen 92 wrote on April 18, 2007 10:15 AM:Now that there's pretty widespread information out there that the Bush Administration has moved the hiring decisionmaking for career jobs away from career staff and now require political appointees' final signoff, it becomes more sinister.
Only one report has been issued since Bush took office, and it is interesting. It appears as though there have been a lot of "burrowers in" early and consistently throughout the Bush Administration (usually they come at the end of an Administration when appointees would otherwise be out of a job).
Here's the GAO report:
http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d06381.pdf
(continued):
It's necessary to get in the weeds and look at the individual conversions. And there are a lot at DOJ - in my mind particularly suspect are the ones from US Attorney (a political position) to Assistant US Attorney (a career position, and most definitely a step down). Why would a US Attorney want to become an AUSA? Usually the USA slots are stepping stones to bigger things.
bordersmuggler wrote on April 18, 2007 10:30 AM:Also ask you to consider the case of Gary Malphrus. He was a young White House policy aide who used his preference and became a career immigration judge, doubling his salary. He had no immigration experience. And, as the GAO report says, they found it impossible to determine if his hiring was proper. With political appointees signing off on career hires, you really have to wonder.
Bush appointee job:
Associate Director
Domestic Policy Council
The White House
3 U.S.C. 105
AD-0301-00/00
salary per year -- $61,000
end of job term -- 01/21/2009
After the obscure preference appointment:
Immigration Judge
Executive Office for
Immigration Review
IJ-0905-00/01
salary per year -- $113,904
end of job term -- never; it's a career job
Here's a law.com article on Gary and his appointment: http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1150794314407
Interestingly, he was also part of the so-called "Brooks Brothers riot" in Florida in 2000: http://www.democrats.com/joel-kaplan
From the Star Tribune story
http://www.startribune.com/587/story/1127416.html
Friedrich's statements last week that Paulose's nomination came from the Justice Department, not from Coleman, surprised Paulose. "That's not what I was told," she said in an interview.
What is going on here?
DF wrote on April 18, 2007 10:32 AM:House Judiciary Committee postpones issuing the immunity by a week.
Anonymous wrote on April 18, 2007 10:38 AM:Key word tooth...as in pulling teath.
Coleman has a reputatation so to speak.
Maybe he made a Wolfowitz-style "recommendation?"
k9brain wrote on April 18, 2007 10:40 AM:What I want to know is; what did the AG know and when did he forget it.
Buck Batard wrote on April 18, 2007 11:15 AM:What's the deal with the Research in Motion's servers going down, and only in North America? Perhaps it's coincidence. Do all emails run through a Blackberry go through their servers in Candada?
Does anyone know if the SEC investigation of RIMM's option backdating have any recent Bush appointees involved?
Codeword seem
ColoradoDem wrote on April 18, 2007 12:05 PM:Can someone help me with the significance of Salazar's having been replaced on the Ethics Committee by Brown? I don't quite understand, but suspect it's important.
Mrs Panstreppon wrote on April 18, 2007 4:06 PM:Great work, C92!
1st alaska bank national wrote on September 20, 2007 6:41 AM:Cool site. Thanks!
200 gram scale wrote on September 20, 2007 5:53 PM:Very good site. Thanks:-)
2000 cadilac dts wrote on September 20, 2007 7:02 PM:Very good site. Thanks!!!
2000 cadilac dts wrote on September 20, 2007 7:02 PM:Very good site. Thanks!!!
2002 robert mondavi cabernet sauvignon wrote on September 21, 2007 10:26 AM:Cool site. Thank you:-)
660 color driver epson printer stylus wrote on September 23, 2007 7:37 PM:Very good site. Thank you.
a nice warm glass of shut the hell up wrote on September 24, 2007 1:17 AM:Nice site. Thank you!!!
a nice warm glass of shut the hell up wrote on September 24, 2007 1:17 AM:Nice site. Thank you!!!
aia healthshield wrote on September 24, 2007 7:44 PM:Very good site. Thank you:-)
aia healthshield wrote on September 24, 2007 7:44 PM:Very good site. Thank you:-)
air pollution control equipment for trichloroethylene wrote on September 24, 2007 9:10 PM:Good site. Thanks!
air pollution control equipment for trichloroethylene wrote on September 24, 2007 9:10 PM:Good site. Thanks!
ark music productions wrote on September 26, 2007 6:51 AM:Cool site. Thank you.
ark music productions wrote on September 26, 2007 6:52 AM:Cool site. Thank you.
beer brewing at home wrote on September 28, 2007 6:03 AM:Cool site. Thank you!
beer brewing at home wrote on September 28, 2007 6:03 AM:Cool site. Thank you!
berlin catholic churches wrote on September 28, 2007 10:40 AM:Cool site. Thank you!
bob the builder playhouse wrote on September 29, 2007 10:12 AM:Good site. Thanks!!!
rheinmetall wrote on November 21, 2007 1:20 PM:Very good site. Thanks.
benz slk amg wrote on November 22, 2007 6:15 AM:Cool site. Thanks.
anti depressant wrote on November 22, 2007 10:49 AM:Nice site. Thank you!!!