Comments (73)

Anonymous wrote on April 23, 2007 3:42 PM:

Sounds a little like Alice in Wonderland. Saying "I don't recall" 60-some times is a sign of honesty. Right.

me wrote on April 23, 2007 3:43 PM:

Good Grief.

I miss Tony.. How sad is that?

Security Code: Dana Peroxide

bobh wrote on April 23, 2007 3:47 PM:

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Former President George Bush told CNN Monday that the electorate may be experiencing "Bush fatigue."

And it may be the reason his son, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, is sitting out the 2008 presidential election, the 41st president said.

"There's something to that -- there might be a little Bush fatigue now," former President Bush told CNN's Larry King when asked if he agreed with a recent assessment from GOP presidential hopeful Mitt Romney that Jeb Bush would currently be a frontrunner for the Republican party's presidential nomination if his last name wasn't Bush.

But the former president predicted his youngest son may enter politics again in the future.

"I hope that Jeb, who left office looking good, is not through with politics," the elder Bush said. " I think he's a good man, most other people think that, a man of principle. And I think he's got a future."

The elder Bush also said he is happy with the current GOP presidential field, but does not have a favorite.

"I have no dog in that hunt," he said "But three good men are leading and there are some others too. Any I can't talk bad about the Democrats. It's very, very early, but it's comfortable to be on the sidelines. "

Asked if voters should be weary of Romney being a Mormon, the former president's wife, Barbara, said "not at all," noting there are "wild people" in many religions.

"I mean it was in 1897 that bigamy was outlawed in that church," she said. "You know we have a lot of Christian wild people too, and a lot of Jewish wild people and a lot of Muslim wild people. The Mormon religion takes care of it's own, they don't have people on welfare.

At a campaign appearance in South Carolina last month, Romney, who has absorbed several of Jeb Bush's former aides, said, "Down in Florida, that Jeb Bush. He's quite a guy, isn't he? I love him. If his name weren't Bush, he'd be running for president, I'm convinced. And we'd all have to stand aside because he'd be such a sure-fire winner."

Watch Larry's full interview with George and Barbara Bush tonight at 9 p.m. ET.

-- CNN Ticker Producer Alexander Mooney
Posted 4/23/2007 02:43:00 PM | Permalink

http://www.cnn.com/POLITICS/blogs/politicalticker/

Bush Fatigue....I experienced this in the first bush's presidency. No...I think a lot of people are waking up now. They aren't tired anymore.

dkm wrote on April 23, 2007 3:51 PM:

People are surprised that Bush is so happy with Gonzales' performance and that he could have increased confidence in him. It is quite logical. From way back in the very beginning in Texas, Gonzales' obligation and sole duty has been to protect Bush from the consequences of his own behavior. This has carried through to the present, and now Gonzales has managed to get through a whole session with the pressure and the strobe lights on him without giving away the involvement of the Bushies in the political firing of the attorneys. Why wouldn't Bush be happy?! He was afraid that Gonzales would accidentally spill the beans.

bordersmuggler wrote on April 23, 2007 3:51 PM:

Condoleezza Rice blew off Henry Waxman's request to appear before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform last Wednesday to answer questions about the Niger forgeries. Now what could she possibly be hiding?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/20/AR2007042002009.html?nav=rss_politics

kis wrote on April 23, 2007 3:51 PM:

She nailed that strawman to the wall!

locus wrote on April 23, 2007 3:53 PM:

For Brutus is an honourable man;
So are they all, all honorable men,--

az5762 wrote on April 23, 2007 3:53 PM:

i keep getting the best code words today! First it was "screw" and now it's "fire"! You all can do with those words as you wish. how does she look herself in the mirror and take herself seriously? this whole project, know as the bush administration, is a really bad production. i have friends in theatre and i ask them, when you are in a really BAD show, do you know? and almost all say "yes". i just can't imagine how self-containded this moron must be to not know just how badly he is performing as well as his supporting cast. I WANT MY MONEY BACK.

Jost Lunstroth wrote on April 23, 2007 3:54 PM:

He didn't lie by making things up.

Therefore he is honest.

Therefore he stays.

biltud wrote on April 23, 2007 3:54 PM:

He already brought dishonor on himself by making shit up, and making people unhappy with his memory failure.

As a result, he's sitting in front of a Congressional Committee.

Code word: Idiocy.

StephenH wrote on April 23, 2007 4:00 PM:

Liars always find a way to justify their lying. That's what makes them liars. Honest people, OTOH, can't find ways to rationalize lying, which is why they tell the truth.

It makes perfect sense that the liars in the White House would think that Gonzales' lying about a memory loss is much better and more honorable than making up something else. They rationalize their own lies in the same way.

Everything this administration says is some version of a lie. But because they know it was theoretically possible to lie even more, they always congradulate themselves for telling the relative truth.

RW wrote on April 23, 2007 4:00 PM:

Come on, is that what they now saying they make up things if they don't like the answer?

Wilkeneson said it was a cabal. He also described some of them as gaulitiers as in the Nazi venicular. The Dems and Congress including some Republicans with conscience need to keep probing and ratcheting up this group and get underneath to find the whole measure of corruptness. Save our nation, oh that is the code word---nation

MsInformed wrote on April 23, 2007 4:03 PM:

Is Mitt gay for Jeb? Not that there's any thing wrong with.... oh, wait! Hell yes there is!

pat wrote on April 23, 2007 4:04 PM:

But Dana, when he was answering, "I don't recall" he really was making stuff up, because he does recall.

Anonymous wrote on April 23, 2007 4:04 PM:

"what would have been dishonorable is if [he] had made it up."

His inability to recall is made up.

Richard L. Adlof wrote on April 23, 2007 4:04 PM:

Another brick in the great wall calls government shattered by the person specifically appointed to care for it.

Heckava job, Gon-lawless.

Heckava job, Press Poodle Perino.

jt wrote on April 23, 2007 4:04 PM:

I love when she says "if you don't remember something, you shouldn't make it up to satisfy someones curiosity"

This coming from someone who said only a handful of persons used the RNC email. And later, when it was pointed out that more people were using the RNC email, she pretty much admitted she had lied about the original number.

dumbstruck wrote on April 23, 2007 4:09 PM:

How would he have known if he made it up?

Dreggas wrote on April 23, 2007 4:11 PM:

Someone who had to spend so many weeks preparing for their testimony sounds exactly like someone who makes things up.

Code Word: Door

As in don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out Gonezales.

jeffgee wrote on April 23, 2007 4:13 PM:

She defends him by saying that there were over 7 hours of questions and nobody could remember everything.
He also had a month to prepare for the hearings. Presumably, someone else was doing Gonzo's job while he was prepping.
Dana is more irritating than all of the other press secs. She's got the smugness of Ari Fleischer and the condescension of Lynn Cheney. As Tony and Ari did, (Scotty was in over his head) Perino appears to have imbibed deeply of the Bush Kool Aid.

apeman wrote on April 23, 2007 4:20 PM:

Who in their right mind would hire a lawyer
who can't remember shit CRS

oh yeah, gwb

rmadilo wrote on April 23, 2007 4:20 PM:

Did anyone notice how Bush phrased Gonzo's testimony? He answered all the questions he could answer truthfully. In other words, if he couldn't answer a question truthfully, he didn't answer.

TheraP wrote on April 23, 2007 4:22 PM:

Rewriting history - again!

What are we gonna do - believe the White House - or our lying eyes? (and ears...)

William Dunbar wrote on April 23, 2007 4:22 PM:

Repeating my previous comment...
Dana needs to start wearing a cheerleading outfit (with a big 'W')...pompoms included.

Anonymous wrote on April 23, 2007 4:31 PM:

It is a lie to swear you don’t know when you do know.

Tommy D wrote on April 23, 2007 4:33 PM:

What PR firm has the WH hired to drill into these koolaid snorters the ability to smirk and smile at the completely wrong times? W, Bill Kristol, Rove, Dana, etc are all alike in the tendency to laugh while lying, stealing or killing. Or, are they merely all insane or psychotic?

Yes.

The crimes against reason are too many to count at this point. But, the real tragedy is that for years after being turfed out of power, these arrogant fools will hound legitimate gov't with the same kind of trash talk (and drag their 30% of US mouth breathers with them).

Jason Shapiro wrote on April 23, 2007 4:35 PM:

Today's multiple choice question concerns the psychological identity of the chief law enforcement officer of the United States.
Gonzo is:
A. A mentally deficient individual who honestly cannot remember what he said last week, last month, or last year;
B. A pathological liar whose condition is marked by an inability to understand the difference between truth and not truth;
C. A Soprano-like family consigliere who understands his role and is willing to put up with humiliation and ridicule in order to serve his capo di tutti capo;
D. All of the above.

Deadeye Dick Cheney wrote on April 23, 2007 4:40 PM:

"The Attorney General and Kyle Sampson are two of the most honorable people I know." --Dana Perino

Perhaps Dana needs to widen her circle of acquaintances to include those who actually ARE honorable.

nofltwlt wrote on April 23, 2007 4:40 PM:

Perino should run as fast as she can from this position before she becomes a tired old hag - lying does that to folks.

Gonzales would have a difficult time making "nothing" up.

david wrote on April 23, 2007 4:40 PM:

crazy is as crazy does... but she's still cute as hell

regular lurker wrote on April 23, 2007 4:47 PM:

Well Jason, since I seem to know more about law than Gonzales (and that's really sayin' somethin') I'd have to go with A.) A mentally deficient individual who honestly cannot remember what he said last week, last month, or last year.

anonymous wrote on April 23, 2007 4:47 PM:

Has anybody asked Dana if the President is worried about Gonzalez's health?

Forgetting his involvement in the decision to fire AGs, forgetting entire meetings that occurred in the past few months...if Gonzalez has actually forgotten these things, it is not normal memory loss. It may be a sign of organic brain dysfunction, like Alzheimers or a brain tumor.

Does the President plan to keep Gonzalez on, given that he is displaying signs of organic brain dysfunction?

From WebMD:

When to See a Doctor

Alzheimer's disease is a progressive condition that damages areas of the brain involved in memory, intelligence, judgment, language, and behavior. While there is no definitive way to pinpoint an Alzheimer's brain -- short of autopsy -- there are some diagnostic ways doctors distinguish normal memory loss from that which should raise concern. Normal forgetfulness includes:

* Forgetting parts of an experience
* Forgetting where you park the car
* Forgetting events from the distant past
* Forgetting a person's name, but remembering it later

While research shows that up to half of people over age 50 have mild forgetfulness linked to age-associated memory impairment, there are signs when more serious memory conditions, such as Alzheimer's disease, are happening, including:

* Forgetting an experience
* Forgetting how to drive a car or read a clock
* Forgetting recent events
* Forgetting ever having known a particular person
* Loss of function, confusion, or decreasing alertness
* Symptoms become more frequent or severe

714Day wrote on April 23, 2007 4:58 PM:

A previous AG used "I can't recall" and "I don't remember" as if it were a mantra or a litany, too.
John Mitchell was forced to take a powder, also.
Let's hope that Alberto will find as many companions in the roll out as Martha's husband did.

Gadfly wrote on April 23, 2007 5:09 PM:

We've reached a new low-point in American politics with the neo low-life in the Oval Office, the Mad King George & his corrupt minions vomitting such non-sense about the corrupt, half-witted and unfit Alberto "Torture Guy -cum- 'Fredo'" Gonzales.

It should be clear to all that poor little Mad King George simply cannot survive unless surrounded by his crime-family consigliere to protect him from his myriad crimes (like Gonzales did for the Mad King George in Texas, where his DUIs were expunged from the public record, as well as that of Bush's sluttish daughter Jenna).

Also, the Mad King George cannot survive without his "brains", the pig-faced Karl "Turd Blossom" Rove.

This neo-con regime replete with traitors, dim-wits, and crooks, should be impeached and put on trial for treason. They stink!

mbbsdphil wrote on April 23, 2007 5:12 PM:

Ms. Perino's comment may be a Freudian slip, but she seems to have it backwards. Why should Mr. Bush be offended if Mr. Gonzales made stuff up? He and Ms. Perino do it all the time.

Adam Cole wrote on April 23, 2007 5:13 PM:

"what would have been dishonorable is if [he] had made it up."

Why does the phrase "soft bigotry of low expectations" spring so readily to mind here?

Gadfly wrote on April 23, 2007 5:16 PM:

"Condoleezza Rice blew off Henry Waxman's request to appear before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform last Wednesday to answer questions about the Niger forgeries. Now what could she possibly be hiding?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/20/AR2007042002009.html?nav=rss_politics

Posted by: bordersmuggler"

bordersmuggler is right...

And, why does Condo-sleezy Rice get a pass??? This incompetent, corrupt oil whore:--

* Was the worst National Security Adviser in our nation's history-- ignorning the August 6th 2001 PDB warning about Osama bin Laden's attacks; lying about WMDs; betraying national security secrets to AIPAC criminals Rosen & Weismann who passed them onto Israel.

* Is a laughing stock as Secretary of State-- where she is known as a clothes horse, a fashion victim; devoid of any diplomatic skill. Rice vomits inanities that are ignored by the rest of the world because she is pandering to the neo-cons; AIPAC; and, her Oil Pimps.

* Has absolutely no accomplishments of note-- except for betraying our nation- lying- travelling around the world making a fool of herself & disgracing the U.S. at the U.S. taxpayer's expense.

Why do the main-stream media toadies give Rice a pass??? Could it be that a black woman in American can do anything- absolutely anything- including collude in mass-murder, neo-Bushy-style-- so long as she prostitutes herself for the Bush Crime Family???

GWN wrote on April 23, 2007 5:16 PM:

GOP Troubles May Hurt Bid To Retake Congress in 2008....

now there is an understatement

courtesy of Washington Post

grip.... as in slipping out of their grip.... finally

Jason Shapiro wrote on April 23, 2007 5:20 PM:

Hey anonymous, what's wrong with someone with Alzheimer's having a responsible position. Ronnie Reagan ran the whole damn country and he suffered from Alzheimer's for years before it was "officially" diagnosed. Some people STILL think he did a wonderful job.

As for Perino, she gets paid to be condescending and smug. More than other other administration in modern history, this one literally has CONTEMPT for the press. If they can get people pissed off at the flak-catcher because she is annoying and evasive, the White House crew considers that a virtue.

I'm just curious where all these Stepford-clones came from and how they all got into the government. They all remind me of Reese Witherspoon's character in "Election."

Joe wrote on April 23, 2007 5:30 PM:

She's right. Usually members of the Bush Administration just make shit up even when testifying under oath before the representatives of the people of the US. So come on. Give 'em a break. They didn't do a Cheney and lie their asses off. Okay?

Anonymous wrote on April 23, 2007 5:51 PM:

I totally agree - when you say you don't recall, when really you do, you are bold-faced lying. Once again : Lying. Either lying or so stupid you should never be in this job. Perhaps any job. Would a business retain any employee who couldn't remember any meeting of importance? Who couldn't remember who they met or what was said? Fire him. What a despicable sleaze-bag. The vast majority of Americans are totally disgusted with this man, but Bush loves him. Pathetic.

Anonymous wrote on April 23, 2007 5:52 PM:

I totally agree - when you say you don't recall, when really you do, you are bold-faced lying. Once again : Lying. Either lying or so stupid you should never be in this job. Perhaps any job. Would a business retain any employee who couldn't remember any meeting of importance? Who couldn't remember who they met or what was said? Fire him. What a despicable sleaze-bag. The vast majority of Americans are totally disgusted with this man, but Bush loves him. Pathetic.

Anon, A Mouse wrote on April 23, 2007 6:25 PM:

"'what would have been dishonorable is if [he] had made it up.'--

"His inability to recall is made up."

Damn straight. The downside to this Reagan-pioneered strategy is it's implicit dare for the questioners to prove the subject's brain ISN'T defective.

Of course, all their brains are defective. I like the Organic Brain Dysfunction theory.

antimatter wrote on April 23, 2007 7:06 PM:

Making up answers is what got Gonzales in trouble in the first place.

chimpy wrote on April 23, 2007 7:58 PM:

Perino fights like a badger... I don't know how long her half snarly half sociopathic tone is really going to help Bush's image. She utterly lacks charm, nevermind the absurdities that come out her mouth. she's certainly not the one to convince us up is down and summer is winter.

Austin Cooper wrote on April 23, 2007 9:44 PM:

This isn't concern trolling -- I have a very bad feeling that the Sucker-Puncher-In-Chief won't tell the torturer's apprentice to leave; the apprentice won't quit; and the Rethug Congressional leadership won't march to the White House and demand that he leave.

Bush's response: We're Stayin' The Course. What're *you* gonna do? **Fuck You**.

The old Yale Bulldog photo of Bush sucker-punching an opposing rugby player, when he thought no one was looking, tells you everything you need to know about him, and his rule: Regarding Gonzales, Iraq, corruption; torture, the environment; responsibility... Bush acts in secret, uses misdirection and smokescreens when exposed -- then, his ultimate response is to say Fuck You -- to the American People; to the Congressional Democratic leadership; to our former allies; to everyone and anyone.

To whom the government of this country for, then? These unindicted criminals, or the People of the United States of America through their representatives in Congress? *When will this stop?*

steambomb wrote on April 23, 2007 9:58 PM:

Isn't the beauty of having an incompetent commander in chief that it sets a standard of incompetence within the administration. You have to figure that a little voice in the back of their heads is saying "well if Bush is such a boob we dont have to perform all that well do we?" Look at how Perino just characterized what she talked about. They sure are aiming for the base of the target aren't they? Damn Republicans should be the ones calling for impeachment. If not just to save their party. When (code word) the republicans call for it. It will change the whole paradigm and we might get back to a more civil discourse and start repairing our nation.

Anonymous wrote on April 23, 2007 10:16 PM:

We recently placed a bid in on a house, with the bid we required the standard seller disclosures.

In response, the seller, who was a lawyer practicing as a prosecutor, checked the unknown box after about every question, even where a blind man could see the defect. It was clear his "unknown" claims were a lie, but we didn't know which claim was the BIG lie. We debated it and chose not to spend thousands of dollars to discover what he wished to hide. The contract was voidable if disclosure was unsatisfactory to the us, so we exercised that option.

We'll never know which "I don't know" was the $640,000? lie, but one of them was.

The point of this vignette is to remind that liars lie in all kinds of ways, but the best of them muddy the waters with lots of distraction.

Scott L wrote on April 23, 2007 10:50 PM:

Why can't Congress drag out one of this goverments favorite tools ( Lie Detector ) and start getting to the bottom of all this stuff. Sounds fair to me.

Sparrow86 wrote on April 23, 2007 10:58 PM:

If what he did was illegal it would be one thing. The 8 people that were fired serve at the presidents pleasure and can be fired for ANY reason. clinton got rid of over 90 of em. Some were investigating HIM at the time. nothing fishy about that?????

StephenH wrote on April 23, 2007 11:12 PM:

It's ironic that when terrorist suspects say they don't know anything, they're tortured. But when Gonzales does it, he is praised.
In a more perfect world, torture-boy would have been treated to his own medicine.

matchoo wrote on April 23, 2007 11:34 PM:

I posted this URL before, but look at the video from senator Whitehouse from RI. He talks about how this whole problem was created by lax rules implemented by Gonzales' staff themselves. I think it is the 3rd or 4th clip down...

http://snuffmonkey.com/gonzales/

Wretched Refuse wrote on April 23, 2007 11:40 PM:

I predict that Jeb will be assassinated in the construct of any Presidential run he ever makes.

Karl Fogel wrote on April 23, 2007 11:41 PM:

Wait a minute. I hate Gonzales and this administration as much as anyone here, but Perino had a point. She wasn't saying that Gonzales repeatedly claimed faulty memory "because the senators asked so very many questions", she was saying he did it was because the senators asked the same questions over and over.

Those are two different things.

I have no idea whether it's true that the Senators kept asking the same questions in different words (I didn't watch the grilling, since I already know Gonzales is an obsequious mediocrity and don't need to waste time confirming it yet again). But if it is true, then Perino is correct to claim that the number 64 is too high. And if it's not true, then attack Perino on that point, instead of gratuitously misunderstanding what Perino was saying.

Pile on Perino for having a weak defense, or for changing the subject, if you want, but don't just reflexively bash her for something she didn't actually say.

-Karl Fogel

milo sf wrote on April 24, 2007 8:20 AM:

And just below Dana Perino's comments about Gonzales' testimoney on this page, an ad for "Hemorrhoid Removal." Hm. Maybe someone should show this to the White House.

Lisa wrote on April 24, 2007 12:12 PM:

When Reagan forgot stuff, people loved him even more. Gonzales was probably expecting a hug.

jeff wrote on April 24, 2007 7:51 PM:

I thought that Republicans "Never forget." Or did I forget?

plooger wrote on April 24, 2007 9:44 PM:

Well, you gotta take Bush's words literally. He *did* say that Gonzales "answered every question he could possibly answer, honestly answer, in a way that increased my confidence in his ability to do the job."

Gonzo was as honest as he could afford to be and still retain his job.

thqb soptafuk wrote on May 13, 2007 10:13 PM:

leqiwpx rcmy xmofvek siedqvcbw wqmrxzoja klpy cqsuyl

ptqla katfj wrote on May 13, 2007 10:14 PM:

zobcestw qyaznkjlv bjoqt mjebpvzlk plkexftjs wiha bnrxkcosu http://www.mnvbx.wivdxjs.com

hfrik msoegn wrote on May 13, 2007 10:15 PM:

dpgj pjwmkh yehrmf mouqp vegnslb nvrjqcl qtfesw tngyhj wsikomhn

ifqygc cvxi wrote on May 13, 2007 10:16 PM:

ruvl narydgbc inqj fzqdnmu beui qmsaye almvyqr [URL=http://www.udcemsfgx.xkaqpbi.com]sirpzj utvgras[/URL]

bqxs eoduhzkn wrote on May 13, 2007 10:16 PM:

djktnqzv fordupgeq xgbakev dsoqlwpmx aovm pqlwt qnfzw [URL]http://www.ougv.ojisengq.com[/URL] uiljbqom yfmjxow

vasu wrote on June 18, 2007 7:29 PM:

[url=][/url]

Susana Spears wrote on August 5, 2007 7:54 PM:

susana spears 430.4 /day
susana spears video 15.0 /day
susana spears hardcore 6.1 /day
susana spears movie 6.0 /day
susana spears pic 3.6 /day
susana spears nude 3.5 /day
susana spears picture 3.1 /day
susana spears free movie 2.6 /day
susana spears viewpornstars 2.6 /day
blog spear susana 2.4 /day
susana spears gallery 2.3 /day
susana spears forum 2.1 /day
free spear susana video 2.0 /day
susana spears clip 1.8 /day
eurobabeindex spear susana 1.6 /day
actiongirls spear susana 1.5 /day
susana spears lesbian 1.5 /day
susana spears sex 1.5 /day
spear spear susana susana 1.5 /day
susana spears fucking 1.4 /day
susana spears twistys 1.4 /day
susana spears pussy 1.4 /day
susana spears freeones 1.3 /day
susana spears ass 1.2 /day
susana spears workout 1.2 /day
susana spears video clip 1.2 /day
susana spears dvd 1.1 /day
susana spears action 1.0 /day
of spears susana wallpaper 1.0 /day
andrea spear susana torres 1.0 /day
ass new photo spear susana 1.0 /day
susana spears foto 0.9 /day
susana spears dildo 0.9 /day
susana spears fuck 0.9 /day
ass great spear susana 0.9 /day
susana spears photo 0.9 /day
susana spears action girl

Chessie Moore wrote on August 7, 2007 12:52 PM:

Chessie Moore

Alana Evans wrote on August 7, 2007 4:07 PM:

Alana Evans

exsmoker wrote on August 28, 2007 8:53 PM:

Hello Everyone,
My wife was finally able to kick the habit before she got pregnant with our now first born beautiful baby gilr, so I tought I'll share the resource that she has used to help her quit the smoking habit with as many people as I can.
She was a heavy smoker for about ten years and just a couple of weeks after finding out about the program that I have researched online, she was able to quit smoking permanently and now can't stop telling people about how she had kicked the habit for good.
Anyway if somebody want to check it out the site is; http://endthehabitnow.com

exsmoker wrote on August 31, 2007 3:36 AM:

Hello Everyone,
My wife was finally able to kick the habit before she got pregnant with our now first born beautiful baby gilr, so I tought I'll share the resource that she has used to help her quit the smoking habit with as many people as I can.
She was a heavy smoker for about ten years and just a couple of weeks after finding out about the program that I have researched online, she was able to quit smoking permanently and now can't stop telling people about how she had kicked the habit for good.
Anyway if somebody want to check it out the site is; http://endthehabitnow.com

free music downloads wrote on September 26, 2007 5:32 PM:

Hi boys!0afdea5e09c8d667e306fb5178e7c3e9

travel planning wrote on December 21, 2007 9:05 PM:

dkhs770btmvi travel planning travel planning

travel planning wrote on December 21, 2007 9:05 PM:

dkhs770btmvi travel planning travel planning

epenisa wrote on January 11, 2008 1:29 AM:

Hello
Nice work from your side... have a nice time with yoru blog :)
Bye