« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

The Daily Muck

House members have already begun finding ways around recently passed ethics reforms on earmarking. With respect to the upcoming budget bill, Democrats are holding off on funding pet projects until it is too late to challenge their addition. (USA TODAY)

With a no-confidence vote impending for Gonzales, it is not clear which way critics in the GOP will vote(sub. req.). Meanwhile, the Republican leadership is looking to avoid the vote altogether. (Roll Call)

Machine politics henchmen handing out cold George Washingtons for votes is what we should picture when we hear voter fraud, or is it? (The New Republic)

Staff members of the House Oversight Committee appear to be close to an agreement (sub. req.) with the RNC that will allow limited access to past emails from White House staff. (Roll Call)

As the Defense Department probes how techniques from the Navy’s SERE program were reverse engineered to create today’s enhanced interrogation tactics, findings from an article as early as 1956 remind us that torture techniques produce false and unreliable information. (NY Times)

The first comprehensive look at the surge’s efforts to stabilize Iraq finds that already, U.S. and Iraqi forces have fallen behind their initial operational goals. (NY Times)

The Boston Globe reports that the low pay in the security industry dangerously undermines it's ability to attract good candidates to adequately protect the US from domestic acts of terrorism.

Now that Dan Bartlett has left the White House, Karl Rove is the last of President Bush’s Texas confidants to remain. (LA Times)

On August 14, 2002, the CIA sent the White House a white paper called “The Perfect Storm” that outlined the worst case scenarios in a post-invasion Iraq, which seems frighteningly similar to the country now. (Washington Post)

Federal wildlife officials intend to hunt an Oregon species of owl whose aggressive behavior has threatened the existence of another species. Critics, however, maintain the strategy inures the logging industry from responsibility, and claim that the shortage of land is the true explanation for the species’ vulnerability. (LA Times)

Both the House and Senate are clamoring for testimony from former Attorney General John Ashcroft to discuss his late-night hospital encounter with then White House Counsel Alberto Gonzales. (Newsweek)


Comments (5)

Anonymous wrote on June 4, 2007 10:46 AM:

Frankly, in light of the scope and depth of Gonzales’s crimes a “no confidence” resolution is such an embarrassment that it would be better for the Democrats to let the Republicans block it. There is a reason Gonzales can’t wipe that smirk off his face-he won and he knows it.

Samsara wrote on June 4, 2007 11:50 AM:

I don’t need to buy a subscription to Roll Call to know that Mitch McConnell is not going to allow a no confidence vote on AGAG. Forget loyalty to President Bush, there is none left. The fact is that Senate Republicans gain nothing politically by having a vote. The only question is which brand Senatorial red tape they will wrap this up in.

Anonymous wrote on June 4, 2007 1:48 PM:

Isn't Schlozman supposed to testify tomorrow? Not that anything will come of it other than perhaps public humiliation but at this point I'll take whatever crumbs the much vaunted "Oversight" can give me.

Eric Ferguson wrote on June 4, 2007 5:10 PM:

Regarding the story about the CIA "Perfect Storm" whitepaper which Bush ignored, the crime here isn't that Bush ignored the warnings, but that he withheld them from the public. If someone sold an investment using a prospectus that left out the warnings, they'd go to prison. If the seller of a house fails to tell the buyer of known problems, he faces some sort of legal consequences. All right then, Bush sold us a war without sharing the warnings of possible problems. What should be the remedy here?

tjallen wrote on June 4, 2007 6:58 PM:

The CIA "Perfect Storm" whitepaper is a perfect example of intelligence the President saw but Congress did not see.

So once again, to repeat the obvious, it is FALSE that Congress saw all the same intelligence that the President did.

False False False. The big lie. Again.

Post a comment

Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address