« previous | MUCK HOME | next »
The Daily Muck
Rep. Rick Renzi (R-AZ), following months of battling scandal that has prompted an FBI investigation, has decided not to seek reelection. Here are all of Renzi's highlights. (Arizona Star)
U.S. House Officials still won't allow investigators access to Mark Foley's computers, but they have told the Florida Department of Law Enforcement that there are no sexually explicit photos on the former lawmaker's hard drive. Of course, the investigators wanted to look for inappropriate emails from Foley, but I suppose that is still reassuring information. (Associated Press)
The secret's out. Private telecommunication companies did in fact play an integral role in the NSA warrantless surveillance program. We just thought we'd bring it up again, seeing as the man who informed the country is the same one who said openly discussing the program would cost American lives. Thanks, Mike Mcconnell. Democrats, towards whom some of McConnell's attacks were leveled, were duly shocked that the intelligence chief would be so cavalier in discussing information that was, well, classified. (Boston Globe)
The U.S. is preparing to scan all containers that enter the country at their port of origin. Never mind that the 11 million annual containers represent 95% of the imported goods, or that an evaluation of the scanning technology two months found it was accurate only half the time, its a step. In some direction, at least. (USA TODAY)
I can't believe there are still stories to write about FEMA trailers. Roughly one thousand families in Louisiana are asking FEMA to move them out of the trailers in which they are currently still living. Because despite the evidence that these trailers are dangerous, despite allegations that FEMA tried to cover up the reports, despite the fact that FEMA has finally agreed not to use any more of the formaldehyde-lined homes, the agency has still not taken steps to actually get people out of the government-provided hazardous trailers. (Associated Press)
It only took two decades, but Congress has finally killed funding for the DP2, a protoype plane designed to take off vertically that to date crashes on a third of its test runs. The Defense Department will be pleased, as they haven't been asking for money for the project for years. But Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA) has for years been convinced that the $63 million was well invested (the plane is also built and researched in his district), as he has been the source of the earmarks that have kept the project alive. (ABC's The Blotter)

Comments (9)
Mark wrote on August 24, 2007 10:40 AM:Foley's emails would be on the House email server, not any of his own office's computers.
Ballerina X wrote on August 24, 2007 11:49 AM:Florida Local Muck
very sad
very strange
http://www.miamiherald.com/news/breaking_news/story/213964.html
roxanne wrote on August 24, 2007 12:40 PM:http://www.strategumusa.com/staff.html
Hmm, confiscating House computers was fine when it came to William Jefferson (corrupt Dem), but it's a no-no when it comes to (Republican pedophile) Foley?
bob wrote on August 24, 2007 12:46 PM:Why does Mike McConnell hate America and want us to die?
We should really end DoD earmarks completely. The normal reasoning behind earmarks doesn't apply to them b/c there is no reason a local Congressperson would know what DoD needs better than DoD itself, as with, say, road improvements or something. And we've already seen the massive mischief that they can cause (see Cunningham, Duke).
mo2 wrote on August 24, 2007 1:58 PM:The House lost the right to police itself in the Foley matter - when it did not police itself in the Foley matter for year after year, complaint after complaint, warning after warning.
Foley did not want to run for re-election, but was asked to by the RNC. We know the RNC = Rove. So the President's advisor advised a predator to stay in Congress. Party first - heil Bush.
Who are these House officials - and do they have any kids who stick cameras in their panties for grubby old men? How do they feel about that?
Anonymous wrote on August 24, 2007 2:41 PM:What would the House have done if they HAD found porn on Foley's computers? They don't seem disposed to turn over any info, regardless of crimnal behavior.
Anonymous wrote on August 24, 2007 4:08 PM:It would appear to me that in cases of Congressional computer crime, a Sergeant at Arms gets involved.
Of course, this was a Senate case involving a staffer (contrast to a House case involving a Member) but where Bill Frist staffer Manuel Miranda was caught stealing Democratic policy documents, Senate SSA Bill Pickle investigated:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A17502-2003Nov27
judyinnm wrote on August 24, 2007 4:14 PM:It is only when one of their own is being investigated that congress actually stands up to the executive branch on Constitutional grounds; first Jefferson,now Foley. Kinda wish they'd protect OUR rights, as well. So far, they've blithely signed away all but #2 of the Bill of Rights, for the rest of us.
Rodney Lamprey wrote on August 24, 2007 8:38 PM:Florida Law Enforcement needs to subpoena the RNC computers if they want to find Foley's child pornography. Foley must have followed the Republican playbook to keep illegal transactions off the official network, and the RNC has loaned their computer networks to enable and cover up other crimes.