« previous | MUCK HOME | next »
White House Investigator Short on Funds
Back in April, Scott Bloch, the head of the Office of Special Counsel, announced that his office would "leave no stone unturned" in pursuing White House malfeasance. In fact, a special task force was assembled to handle all of Karl Rove's alleged dirty doings.
Problem is, Bloch apparently forged ahead without actually having the money to fund the task force. And as Justin reports over at The Blotter, it's not looking like he'll be able to land that extra $3 million. So some of those stones might just have to stay right where they are.
Without a last-minute infusion of nearly $3 million, the special task force may be unable to pay its staff and buy the kind of technical equipment it needs to investigate allegations that White House political operatives may have improperly injected politics into government activities, according to Jim Mitchell, spokesman for the U.S. Office of Special Counsel....The cost of the task force for 2008 would be $2.89 million, according to OSC estimates. But Bloch started the probe long after he submitted his 2008 budget request. And now he's having a hard time convincing those holding the nation's purse strings to loosen up and give him some last-minute extra funding.
The OSC is an odd creature -- it's actually a White House office, and the House of Representatives apparently told Bloch to go ask for the extra money from the White House's Office of Management and Budget. So now Bloch is in the odd position of asking for more money from the White House in order to fund this extra investigation. On top of all that, there's certainly no guarantee that the White House will do anything if Bloch were to actually complete his investigation. Back in June, Bloch delivered a report to the White House that the head of the General Services Administration should be punished "to the fullest extent" (i.e. fired) for her politicization of the agency. It's been radio silence from the White House since then. It seems likely that he'll get the same response this time around.
As for why Bloch is getting the cool response from Congress, Justin points out that Bloch himself is under investigation.
Comments (307)
Anonymous wrote on September 17, 2007 3:22 PM:Just like the DOJ cut back funds to US Attorneys offices resulting in fewer cases - here we have an even more perverse example.
I don't think this is going to stand.
don de drain wrote on September 17, 2007 3:34 PM:Maybe Bloch's office could send someone over to Iraq to find a few million $$ out of all of the $$ that has disappeared over there. I'm sure that some of this money remains unlaundered, er, I mean unspent.
Jake D. wrote on September 17, 2007 4:01 PM:Money don't grow on trees . . .
Anonymous wrote on September 17, 2007 4:21 PM:"money don't [sic] grow on trees"? the sweet sound of "rule of law" apologists.
Anonymous wrote on September 17, 2007 4:32 PM:Ah, Jake.
Soon your Social Security will run out. Then we'll see if you sing the same song.
Ironic that, during Clinton, there was a federal surplus - and hundreds of millions were spent on investigations on the Clinton family and administration. Investigations that were baseless and mean spirited.
Now, today, the Federal treasury is broke, and, surprise, no money to investigate the rampant GOP corruption.
Bil Biloxi wrote on September 17, 2007 4:38 PM:Interesting... The OSC doesn't have the money to pursue the investigation in connection to Karl Rove and the DOJ is short staff of convicting Congressman Jerry Lewis in California. And we all know where the Judge Dept.'s budget has gone to:
a) Iraq
jeffgee wrote on September 17, 2007 4:47 PM:b) The Clown President's pet projects.
Another way to gum it up until the Chimp is back in Crawford.
Susan Kitchens wrote on September 17, 2007 4:56 PM:Now, if we were to consider each of those to-be-turned-over stones to be, say, a meatball, the cost would be $4 per meatball. Right?
Candyce wrote on September 17, 2007 5:30 PM:So, the Repubs could find 50 million to investigate Clinton's sex life, but we can't find a paltry 3 million to investigate corruption? Is that about right?
wagonjak wrote on September 17, 2007 5:36 PM:Geez-what a surprise...this illegal, immoral and down-right criminal administration won't fund an investigation of its own misdeeds!
Will wonders never cease!
Long Memory wrote on September 17, 2007 5:41 PM:And just when we thought Fiscal Responsibility had died a slow death. Of course, the Republicans have never liked unfunded mandates -- unless they were their own.
null wrote on September 17, 2007 6:24 PM:Where can I send my donation?
Prairie Vista wrote on September 17, 2007 7:03 PM:This sounds like a robber bragging after a robbery, "They can't chase us without gas money."
Bob wrote on September 17, 2007 8:00 PM:So it's "please give me money, so that I can investigate all of your illegal acts." The OSC has an unavoidable conflict of interest when it comes to investigating the people they answer to. It's time for a new Independent Counsel that's actually independent.
Roberta wrote on September 17, 2007 8:04 PM:You got it, null. Five bucks from every person who feels outraged by the malfeasance should fund them for awhile.
Anyone know about the legality of funding a particular department without the WH--or Bloch--being able to get the money?
The contacts for the Hatch Act office are: (800) 85-HATCH or (800) 854-2824, and (202) 254-3650.
The contacts for the Prohibited Practices office are: (800) 872-9855 and (202) 254-3670.
They've got regional offices in Oakland ((510) 637-3460, Fax: (510) 637-3474), Dallas ((214) 747-1519 Fax: (214) 767-2764), and Detroit ((313) 226-4441
regular lurker wrote on September 17, 2007 8:35 PM:Fax: (313) 226-5606), so maybe there can be some sort of "change of venue" for investigations due to a conflict of interest.
Easy solution.
There is no corruption in the Bush administration because there is no Bush administration. On the day he leaves office, his name and all of the names of his cabinet and staff and everyone who worked for them should simply be struck from the records.
I mean, look, they pretty much aren't interested in leaving any kind of legacy given that the RNC has all of the Presidential records.
Let's just call it one big misunderstanding and pretend the 8 year little arbustito nightmare never happened.
Ex DOJ wrote on September 17, 2007 11:56 PM:Scott Bloch is a flake who is not respected by many of the conservatives to whom he has tried to ingratiate himself. He has very few friends on either side of the aisle. He is deeply compromised and is the wrong man to lead any serious investigation.
Anonymous wrote on September 18, 2007 7:26 AM:Haven't seen anything of Mrs. Pantstreppon (sorry if I misspelled her name); rather miss her. Sorry for going off-topic.
JD wrote on September 18, 2007 8:29 AM:OSC's budget requests are established by the President through OMB but that's true of every federal agency. That’s the way the budget process works in any administration. Also, the Office of Special Counsel is part of the executive branch of government but it’s not a White House office. OSC is an independent federal agency like the EEOC or the Federal Trade Commission.
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 6:33 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 6:51 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 7:10 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 7:31 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 7:50 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 8:11 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 8:13 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 8:29 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 8:29 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 8:50 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 9:09 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 9:32 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 9:33 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 10:14 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 10:14 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 10:57 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 10:58 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 11:14 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 11:39 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 11:55 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 12:21 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 12:37 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 1:04 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 1:08 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 1:20 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 1:20 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 1:50 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 1:51 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 2:06 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 2:06 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 2:38 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 2:52 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 2:52 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 3:23 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 3:38 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 4:23 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 4:54 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 5:08 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 5:40 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 5:41 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 5:41 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 5:53 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 5:54 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 6:23 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 6:35 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 7:15 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 7:46 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 7:57 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 8:28 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 8:38 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 9:08 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 9:17 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 9:47 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 10:36 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 11:14 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 11:47 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 5, 2007 11:57 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 12:31 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 12:39 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 1:13 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 1:21 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 1:51 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 1:51 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 1:58 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 2:30 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 2:37 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 3:09 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 3:47 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 3:54 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 4:28 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 4:34 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 4:34 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 5:08 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 5:13 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 5:53 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 6:26 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 6:30 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 7:04 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 7:07 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 7:41 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 7:44 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 7:44 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 8:18 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 8:20 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 8:58 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 8:59 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 9:34 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 2:34 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 2:34 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 2:55 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 3:17 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 3:39 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 3:40 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 4:00 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 4:00 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 4:00 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 4:22 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 4:23 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 4:42 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 5:05 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 5:24 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 5:24 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 5:24 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 5:46 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 6:27 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 6:42 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 7:06 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 7:21 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 7:45 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 7:59 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 8:24 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 8:25 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 8:36 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 9:01 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 9:13 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 9:41 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 9:50 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 9:53 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 10:19 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 10:30 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 10:58 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 11:09 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 11:36 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 6, 2007 11:45 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 12:15 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 12:25 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 12:54 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 1:04 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 1:44 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 2:16 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 2:25 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 2:58 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 3:07 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 3:39 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 5:08 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 5:28 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 5:48 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 6:08 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 6:08 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 6:26 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 6:46 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 7:04 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 7:25 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 7:42 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 7:42 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 8:02 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 8:18 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 8:57 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 9:20 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 9:20 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 9:37 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 10:01 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 10:02 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 10:18 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 10:44 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 11:00 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 11:00 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 11:27 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 11:43 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 12:12 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 12:28 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 12:28 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 12:56 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 12:56 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 1:12 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 1:43 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 1:58 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 1:59 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 2:31 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 2:31 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 2:45 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 3:21 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 3:25 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 3:36 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 4:07 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 4:21 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 5:08 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 5:43 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 5:56 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 5:56 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 5:56 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 6:27 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 6:27 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 7:10 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 7:20 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 7:51 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 8:00 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 8:31 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 8:39 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 9:14 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 9:22 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 7, 2007 10:00 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 8, 2007 2:02 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 8, 2007 2:43 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 8, 2007 3:02 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 8, 2007 3:22 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 8, 2007 3:41 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 8, 2007 4:42 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 8, 2007 5:01 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 8, 2007 5:22 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 8, 2007 5:40 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 8, 2007 6:03 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 8, 2007 6:45 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 8, 2007 7:02 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 8, 2007 7:30 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 8, 2007 7:44 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 8, 2007 8:08 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 8, 2007 8:22 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 8, 2007 8:29 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 8, 2007 8:49 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 8, 2007 8:49 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 8, 2007 9:01 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 8, 2007 9:02 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 8, 2007 9:28 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 8, 2007 9:40 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 8, 2007 10:10 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 8, 2007 10:22 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 8, 2007 10:54 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 8, 2007 11:08 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 8, 2007 11:38 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 8, 2007 11:49 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 8, 2007 12:21 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 8, 2007 12:21 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 8, 2007 12:32 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 8, 2007 12:35 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 8, 2007 1:15 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 8, 2007 1:46 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 8, 2007 1:55 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 8, 2007 2:27 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 8, 2007 2:35 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 8, 2007 3:06 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 8, 2007 3:06 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 8, 2007 3:06 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 10, 2007 3:36 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 10, 2007 3:57 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 12, 2007 9:47 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 12, 2007 10:07 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 12, 2007 10:31 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 12, 2007 10:54 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 12, 2007 11:40 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 12, 2007 12:02 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 12, 2007 12:28 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 12, 2007 12:48 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 12, 2007 12:48 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 12, 2007 1:17 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 12, 2007 1:40 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 12, 2007 2:06 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 12, 2007 2:49 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 12, 2007 3:07 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 12, 2007 3:32 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 12, 2007 3:49 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 12, 2007 4:11 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 12, 2007 4:31 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 12, 2007 4:55 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 12, 2007 5:36 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 12, 2007 6:17 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 12, 2007 6:17 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 12, 2007 6:33 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 12, 2007 6:57 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 12, 2007 7:11 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 12, 2007 7:35 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 12, 2007 8:14 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 12, 2007 8:28 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 12, 2007 8:54 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 12, 2007 9:09 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 12, 2007 9:35 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 12, 2007 9:49 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 12, 2007 10:17 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 12, 2007 10:31 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 12, 2007 11:05 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 12, 2007 11:19 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 13, 2007 10:48 AM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 13, 2007 11:12 AM:
Anonymous wrote on November 13, 2007 12:01 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 13, 2007 12:26 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 13, 2007 12:56 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 13, 2007 1:19 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 13, 2007 1:45 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 13, 2007 2:08 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 13, 2007 2:37 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 13, 2007 2:59 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 13, 2007 3:32 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 13, 2007 4:27 PM:
Anonymous wrote on November 13, 2007 4:27 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 13, 2007 4:50 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 13, 2007 5:19 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 13, 2007 5:19 PM:[URL=][/URL]
Anonymous wrote on November 13, 2007 5:39 PM:[URL=][/URL]