« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

Expert: Prosecution Just Cost of Biz For Iraq Security Contractors

Earlier today I guessed that a potential prosecution of Blackwater by the Iraqi government would cause a panic from other security contractors fearing a similar fate. But a leading expert on private military companies says I'm underestimating the allure of the financial score.

Peter W. Singer of the Brookings Institution has done pioneering work on the emerging role of private security, going back to his landmark 2003 book Corporate Warriors. Singer says that even in the unlikely event that Iraq prosecutes Blackwater, its rivals will look to take over its multi-million contract with the State Department rather than look to the next flight out of Baghdad (the contracts since 2003 have been worth approximately $678 million). "People are going to weigh risks differently," he says. "Just like [security firms] ask 'is moving a convoy worth the risk to life and limb?', they'll ask 'is making a certain amount of money worth it?' It'll be another weighting factor if there are prosecutions. Some will accept it, and some will say it's not worth ending up in an Iraqi jail."

If anything, Blackwater's rivals were angered not so much by the Iraqis' threatened expulsion of Blackwater, but by the Maliki government's flip-flopping on the issue, said Singer. "This was a business opportunity that opened up for them and then very quickly closed off. Blackwater has lots of competitors, and they didn't get a slice of the pie," Singer adds. "But if they are prosecuted, then yes, it's going to cause a lot of wringing of hands in the contractor corps, particularly among non-Iraqi nationals, and especially among western companies, including those from the U.S. 'Am I now going to potentially be prosecuted by an Iraqi kangaroo court?'"

With the Maliki government incensed over the Nisour Square shootings and the State Department attempting to simultaneously protect Blackwater and mollify the Iraqis, Singer observes that the long-simmering feud over security contracting has thrown the U.S. off its diplomatic game. Instead of pressuring Maliki on passing benchmark legislation, the U.S. is trying to appease the prime minister over the security company's continued role in Iraq, post-shooting. "We're damned if we do and damned if we don't," he says. "That's the corner we're painted into by outsourcing first and not even bothering to ask questions later."


Comments (4)

bholl wrote on September 24, 2007 8:13 PM:

Blackwater will let their employees fall on the sword and blame it all on them.

Watch for more pointless, unsuccessful lawsuits from penniless wives and children.

No jobs, no future, only way to survive for many Americans is the enlisted military or mercenary armies... Much like other third world countries: Columbia, Uraguay, Honduras, etc.

Anacher Forester wrote on September 25, 2007 1:18 AM:

A cost of business? That's a surprisingly naïve evaluation. Even if it turns out they cannot evade the law, we've already paid any of Black Water's potential legal fees well in advance.

Contractors in Iraq including the mercenary contractors charge us on a cost plus basis. They are reimbursed for whatever expenses they claim plus a percentage of those "expenses" as profit. With no oversight of these no-bid cost plus contracts, there's nothing to prevent Black Water and the like from padding their "costs" with whatever they feel is needed to establish their defense fund.

In this way "security" contractors not only get up front cash to cover any possible future legal fees but also charge us a percentage of it for the privilege. If Black Water manages to avoid the court room, this defense funds becomes pure profit.

AF

Publius Valerius Publicola wrote on September 25, 2007 2:26 AM:

None of the officers of Blackwater, Halliburton, Dyncorp, Titan, Custer Battles (or any other of the private armies created by, and secretly controlled by, VP Cheney) are ever going to spend a day in jail.

Bush will either handout another Scooter Libby crosstown-commute if some prosecutor somehow manages to give any of the mercs the bums rush towards jail.

And/or he'll handout last minute Christmas-gift pardons on his way out the door in 2008 (like his dear old dad did 1992 for the Iran-contra gang of six). In fact I bet the pardons have already been printed and signed and post dated by Bush and are sitting in Cheney's infamous walk-in safe just waiting to be handed out to everyone on Cheney's '08 Christmas list.

SadButTrue wrote on September 25, 2007 9:23 AM:

In the corporate world 'costs of business' encountered due to the consequences of being caught wrongdoing are simply passed on to the customer in higher prices. Had Exxon ever paid the fines levied over the Valdez oil spill, it would just have turned up as an extra cent or two at the pump. Life goes on.

They (corporate leaders) live in a world utterly devoid of meaningful consequences.

Post a comment

Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address