« previous | MUCK HOME | next »
House Dems to State: Stop Suppressing Iraq Corruption Info
It's not just Henry Waxman anymore. The Democratic chairmen of the House armed services, international relations and appropriations committees have joined the oversight committee chair in demanding that Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice stop suppressing internal State Department assessments of corruption in Iraq.
Iraq's former top anti-corruption judge testified to Waxman's committee last week that corruption had "stopped" reconstruction outright, and claimed that political figures close to the Maliki government (including the PM's own brother) are robbing the country blind. In response, the State Department sent a representative to the committee to say . . . he couldn't talk about it in open session.
That's not good enough for Waxman or his new allies, Ike Skelton (D-MO), Tom Lantos (D-CA) and David Obey (D-WI). Keeping corruption information classified, they write in a letter today to Rice, "will undermine our ability to work together to find solutions to this significant problem."
Full text after the jump.
Here's the joint letter:
Dear Madam Secretary:We are writing to express our concern that endemic corruption in Iraq may be fueling the insurgency, endangering our troops, and undermining the chances for success. We are equally concerned that the refusal of State Department officials to answer questions about the extent of corruption in the government of Iraq undermines our ability to work together to eliminate this source of support for the insurgency and to enhance our chances of success in Iraq.
Last week, leading experts described corruption in the Iraqi government as a widespread problem that is imperiling our mission, but that is not being effectively addressed. Stuart Bowen, the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction, testified before the Oversight Committee on October 4, 2007, that the “rising tide of corruption in Iraq” is “a second insurgency” that
“stymies the construction and maintenance of Iraq’s infrastructure, deprives people of goods and services, reduces confidence in public institutions, and potentially aids insurgent groups reportedly funded by graft derived from oil smuggling or embezzlement.” David Walker, the Comptroller General of the United States, made similar statements, testifying that “widespread corruption undermines efforts to develop the government’s capacity by robbing it of needed resources, some of which are used to fund the insurgency.”
Judge Radhi Hamza al-Radhi, the former Commissioner of the Iraqi Commission on Public Integrity, also testified on October 4, 2007, that “corruption in Iraq today is rampant across the government, costing tens of billions of dollars, and has infected virtually every agency and ministry, including some of the most powerful officials in Iraq,” that “the Ministry of Oil [is] effectively financing terrorism,” and that Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki “has protected some of his relatives that were involved in corruption.”
The Independent Commission on the Security Forces of Iraq, chaired by General James L. Jones, U.S.M.C. (Ret.), reported similar concerns on September 6, 2007, writing that “sectarianism and corruption are pervasive in the MOI [Ministry of Interior] and cripple the ministry’s ability to accomplish its mission to provide internal security of Iraqi citizens.”
At the October 4, 2007, hearing, the State Department witness, Ambassador Lawrence Butler, was asked whether “the Government of Iraq currently has the political will or the capability to root out corruption within its Government,” whether “the Maliki Government is working hard to improve the corruption situation so that he can unite his country,” and whether Prime Minister Maliki “obstructed any anticorruption investigations in Iraq to protect his political allies.” Ambassador Butler refused to answer because “questions which go to the broad nature of our bilateral relationship with Iraq are best answered in a classified setting.” He did, however, answer questions that portrayed the Iraqi government positively.
The State Department has taken other steps to suppress information about the extent of corruption within the Maliki government. We have learned that, on September 25, 2007, the State Department instructed officials not to answer questions in an open setting that ask for
“Broad statements/assessments which judge or characterize the quality of Iraqi governance or the ability/determination of the Iraqi government to deal with corruption, including allegations that investigations were thwarted/stifled for political reasons.” The Department also retroactively classified two important reports on corruption in Iraq that had been distributed widely as “sensitive but unclassified.”
Incredibly, the State Department even retroactively classified portions of a report on Iraqi corruption and ministry capacity that Comptroller General Walker released at last week’s hearing and that had previously been cleared for release by the State Department.
It may be reasonable to classify some information containing allegations about specific individuals in the Iraqi government, but the wholesale and even retroactive classification of all information is wrong and a misuse of the official classification procedures. It will undermine our ability to work together to find solutions to this significant problem. Over 3,800 of our bravest men and women have made the ultimate sacrifice in Iraq, and over 28,000 have been injured. Over $450 billion has been appropriated to fund the Iraq War, and the President is asking for over $150 billion more.
The American people and Congress deserve honest answers about the extent of corruption in the Maliki government and whether corruption is fueling the insurgency and endangering our troops. It is essential that we know whether entrenched corruption threatens the ability of the Maliki government to succeed.
We urge you to reconsider these misguided directives so that we can work together to find solutions to the corruption that may well be funding attacks on our troops.
Henry A. Waxman
Chairman
Committee on Oversight and Government ReformTom Lantos
Chairman
Committee on Foreign AffairsIke Skelton
Chairman
Committee on Armed ServicesDavid R. Obey
Chairman
Committee on Appropriations

Comments (11)
Dennis wrote on October 12, 2007 12:37 PM:This committee can ask and inquire all they want, but Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, isn't going to cooperate. She is a part of the problem, and if she can just stall for another sixteen months, she and Bush and many others are out the door without any accountability or recompense for what they have done.
You don't have to be a blind conservative not to see it, just an ignorant one to deny it.
v. popvli wrote on October 12, 2007 1:04 PM:we're all rooting for them to crash and burn before the clock runs out.
Nell wrote on October 12, 2007 1:26 PM:Hm. I'm a little perturbed that the chairs don't seem nearly so upset about the _U.S. / State Dept_ corruption that the so-called IG Krongard is also covering up (by short-circuiting investigations, punishing and silencing whistleblowers, and stonewalling Congress).
EvilPoet wrote on October 12, 2007 1:40 PM:This administration lacks a lot of things - hubris is not one of them.
reflectionsv37 wrote on October 12, 2007 2:19 PM:Here we go again! Another Sternly Worded Letter!!
Eric Ferguson wrote on October 12, 2007 3:03 PM:As frustrated as I was by the long time it took to remove Gonzales and I still don't understand why there was no move to impeach him, I realize they have to go through the steps of having witnesses refuse to answer questions and appealing to their superiors, of asking for documents and raising a stink when they don't get them. I still think Congress, even Waxman, shows too much patience given the damage these bushies do while in office, but they seem to be going hard after the State Department, and I'm hopeful Nisour Square will turn out to be Rice's equivalent of the fired USAs. I'm also glad TPMMuckraker is keeping on top of this.
Tanvir wrote on October 12, 2007 3:20 PM:I was born in South Asia, where corruption is an “acceptable” part of government. In a place like Iraq, where a new government needs guidance, the people need good examples. For example I just saw a website about Estonia’s Singing Revolution – http://singingrevolution.com. They seem to have come a long way since they gained their independence from Russia in 1991.
Tanvir wrote on October 12, 2007 3:21 PM:I was born in South Asia, where corruption is an “acceptable” part of government. In a place like Iraq, where a new government needs guidance, the people need good examples. For example I just saw a website about Estonia’s Singing Revolution – http://singingrevolution.com. They seem to have come a long way since they gained their independence from Russia in 1991.
Anonymous wrote on October 12, 2007 4:01 PM:"..will undermine our ability to work together to find solutions to this significant problem."
Wow. If that doesn't put the fear of God in the administration, nothing will.
The GOP has evidenced utter contempt for the democratic party since 1994. In turn, the democrats have suffered their abuse like a battered wife terrified of making waves.
The Truffle wrote on October 12, 2007 5:53 PM:The Democrats have proved themselves less a political party than a f**kin' junior high school debate club.
Thing is, would these investigations even be taking place if the GOP still controlled Congress?
Richard L. Adlof wrote on October 14, 2007 8:27 AM:War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is Strength
George Orwell, 1984
c. 1949 Harcourt, Inc.