TPMMuckraker
Earmarks

Lobbyists

What The Lobbyists' Lobbyist Is Lobbying For


Howard Marlowe

Howard Marlowe thinks disclosure is important. Technically, the longtime lobbyist will tell you, he didn't even have to register on behalf of the American League of Lobbyists (ALL), since his position as president is on a volunteer basis. But register he did, on behalf of his own lobbying firm Marlowe & Company, a few months after taking over ALL in January.

Read more »

PERMALINK | COMMENTS | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (1)
Topics: Earmarks, Howard Marlowe, Lobbyists

Jeff Greene

Greene's DC Ad: Investigate Meek Over Earmark Scandal (VIDEO)

Jeff Greene, the eccentric billionaire running for Senate in Florida, has released a new ad calling for an investigation of his opponent in the Democratic Primary, Rep. Kendrick Meek (D-FL), over the earmarks the Congressman sought for a developer now facing fraud charges. The ad isn't targeted at voters, however. It's up in the DC market, making the case for Congress to look into the matter.

Read more »

PERMALINK | COMMENTS | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (1)
Topics: 2010 Elections, Earmarks, FL-SEN, Jeff Greene, Kendrick Meek

Alan Mollohan

Dem Who Was Subject Of Ethics Probe Loses Re-Election Bid


Rep. Alan Mollohan (D-WV)

Fourteen-term incumbent and longtime TPMmuckraker character Alan Mollohan lost his congressional re-election bid last night.

Rep. Mollohan (D-WV) lost to a more conservative Democrat in a year where incumbents seem particularly vulnerable. Mollohan's opponent repeatedly slammed him over a recently concluded ethics investigation into the congressman's financial disclosures and earmarks. No charges were filed, and the case was recently closed.

Read more »

PERMALINK | COMMENTS | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (1)
Topics: Alan Mollohan, Democrats, Earmarks, Ethics

Don Young

Don Young To GOP: Earmark Ban Schmearmark Ban


Rep. Don Young (R-AK)

Rep. Don Young (R-AK) praising earmarks is hardly news. After all, the Alaska lawmaker, whose "generous appetite for legislative pork," was once noted by the New Republic, is a co-sponsor of the Bridge to Nowhere, and bragged of an appropriations bill that he had "stuffed it like a turkey" with homestate spending items.

But these days, Young's pro-earmark position isn't jibing too well with the image the GOP caucus wants to project. Eager to present themselves as more restrained than House Democrats and the Obama administration, House Republicans last week announced a one-year earmark hiatus.

Read more »

PERMALINK | COMMENTS | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (3)
Topics: Alaska, Bridge To Nowhere, Don Young, Earmarks, Oil, Oil Business, Ted Stevens, VECO

PMA Group

Report: Lawmakers To Be Cleared In PMA Ethics Probe

There is no evidence that any members of Congress exchanged earmarks for campaign contributions with the PMA Group, the House Ethics committee has found, sources tell (sub. req.) Roll Call.

The paper reports that the committee will release a report on the matter later today, exonerating of wrongdoing seven Appropriations committee members who it had been looking into in connection with the now-defunct lobbying group.

Read more »

PERMALINK | COMMENTS | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (2)
Topics: Campaign Contributions, Earmarks, House Ethics Committee, John Murtha, PMA Group, Pete Visclosky

John Murtha

Murtha Taking Devil May Care Attitude To Corruption Probes

The Feds may be circling uncomfortably close to Rep. John Murtha as they probe kickbacks to defense contractors and possible earmarks-for-campaign-cash deals. But the veteran Democratic power-broker doesn't seem to be sweating it. In fact, he's acting as defiant as ever.

A Murtha spokesman tells TPMmuckraker that the Pennsylvania congressman has not hired a lawyer in connection with the investigations.

Read more »

PERMALINK | COMMENTS | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (1)
Topics: Defense Contractors, Defense Department, Earmarks, John Murtha, Lobbyists

John Murtha

Murtha: If Loving Constituents Is Wrong ... I Don't Wanna Be Right!

Backing down isn't Rep. John Murtha's style.

The cantankerous House power-broker is under fire for his ties to the PMA lobbying firm, which just shut down amid reports of an FBI probe into its campaign contributions to friendly lawmakers, including Murtha, who have steered millions in federal earmarks to PMA clients.

Read more »

PERMALINK | COMMENTS | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (4)
Topics: Earmarks, FBI, John Murtha, Lobbyists

Judd Gregg

Report: Gregg Steered Earmarks To Project In Which He Had Invested

Maybe Judd Gregg's withdrawal as Commerce Secretary nominee really was for the best.

In a lengthy and detailed investigative report, the Associated Press reveals today that the New Hamshire GOP senator funneled federal earmarks to a defunct Granite State air-force base, despite the fact that he and his brother had lucrative real estate investments there.

The key details:

Gregg, R-N.H., personally has invested hundreds of thousands of dollars in Cyrus Gregg's office projects at the Pease International Tradeport, a Portsmouth business park built at the defunct Pease Air Force Base, once home to nuclear bombers. Judd Gregg has collected at least $240,017 to $651,801 from his investments there, Senate records show, while helping arrange at least $66 million in federal aid for the former base.

So let's lay out what we know here.

On one side, Judd Gregg seems to have a significant personal financial stake in Pease.
Cyrus Gregg is a partner in a development firm, Two International Group, that has built roughly a dozen office buildings at Pease. And according to state corporate records and Senate disclosure reports, Judd Gregg has invested in several of his brother's projects.

How much has Judd Gregg made from those investments?. According to the AP, which looked at Gregg's Senate disclosure filings, "at least $240,017 and possibly as much as $651,801" between 1999 and 2007 in rent and capital gains.

Now, let's look at the other side: What has Gregg done to benefit Pease from the Senate?

Over to the AP again:

In the Senate, Gregg has repeatedly won federal money for Pease's redevelopment:
• At least $24.8 million for a new federal building. The senator said the city of Portsmouth wanted to move an unattractive federal building out of its picturesque downtown. The new building hasn't been built yet, he said.
• At least $24.5 million for other New Hampshire National Guard projects at the base, including a new fire and crash rescue station, a new medical training facility, repair to an aircraft parking ramp and the upgrade of an aircraft parking apron.
• $8.9 million for a new wing headquarters operations and training facility at Pease for the Air National Guard.
• At least $8 million to help Pease's airport transition from military to civilian use, including improving terminal security, buying snow removal equipment, building an aircraft deicing area and adding a parking lot.
• $475,000 to shield office buildings at Pease from noise from the former Air Force runway, which is now used by private planes and the New Hampshire Air National Guard. Earlier, Gregg lined up $25,000 in federal money for noise monitoring equipment at Pease.
• $400,000 for development of a photonics and laser technology program at the New Hampshire Community Technical College campus at Pease. Earlier, Gregg and then-Sen. John Sununu, R-N.H., won federal money to develop the college's biotechnology lab, and education and training center at Pease.

Gregg claims he broke no laws or ethics rules, and that the earmarks don't benefit him financially. But improvements to Pease's terminal security, and efforts to shield Pease's office buildings from noise, would appear, at least potentially, to increase the value of his investment.

It's not clear whether Gregg's interest in Pease played a role in his withdrawal as Commerce Secretary nominee. AP reports:

The senator has said his withdrawal had nothing to do with anything the White House uncovered in his background. A White House spokesman, Ben LaBolt, declined to discuss the matter with the AP. AP began looking into the Greggs' activities at Pease before then but had not yet contacted them or the White House before Judd Gregg withdrew.


PERMALINK | COMMENTS | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (23)
Topics: Earmarks, Judd Gregg

Sarah Palin

So What Did Palin Request in Federal Earmarks? Seal DNA Research!

As we've mentioned elsewhere on TPM, Sarah Palin was not quite as conservative as she claims in her requests for earmarks. And here's a great example from just this year.

According to Alaska's 2009 catalog of earmark requests the state's sea life are in great need of federal money. As Politico points out, Palin's office requested $2 million in federal monies to study crab mating habits; $494,900 for the recreational halibut harvest and $3.2 million for seal genetics research.

Those requests for the study of wildlife genetics and mating habits seems pretty antithetical to the long-standig views of Palin's running mate, John McCain.

"We're not going to spend $3 million of your tax dollars to study the DNA of bears in Montana," McCain said earlier this year, referring to a request from Montana for federal money to study the endangered grizzly bear. "I don't know if it was a paternity issue or criminal, but it was a waste of money."

PERMALINK | COMMENTS | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (44)
Topics: Alaska, Earmarks, Sarah Palin

John Murtha

FBI Investigation of PA Pentagon Contractors Reveals More Money, Contracts

What started as an FBI investigation into suspicious payments to an unconfirmed nominee for an Air Force position, has grown to include seven contracts between the Pentagon and two tax-exempt defense firms in Pennsylvania.

In 2007, the FBI began an internal investigation after an article in the Washington Post revealed that the Air Force had used Commonwealth Research Institute (CRI) to pay Charles Riechers, a senior civilian who was waiting on finalization of his White House nomination to principal deputy assistant secretary for acquisition.

In October 2007, Riechers was found dead in an apparent suicide.

Since then, the scope of the federal investigation has broadened, and the FBI and Pentagon's Defense Criminal Investigative Service issued subpoenas in April to CRI and its parent company, Concurrent Technologies.

Those subpoenas are seeking information about at least seven contracts between the two non-profits and the Pentagon. From the Post:

Contracting documents obtained by The Post show that four of the contracts, worth up to $130 million, were awarded to Concurrent over several weeks in May and June 2002. Investigators also are examining a Concurrent deal in 2006 that was worth up to $45 million.

Investigators also want to know about two CRI deals, one from 2003 worth up to $10 million and another awarded without competition in 2006 that is worth up to $45 million.

All seven contracts were awarded by the Department of the Interior's National Business Center. The center has an interesting track record on non-competitive contracts:

The Pentagon has used that center for billions of dollars in purchases in recent years, though audits have found that the center often awarded contracts without competition or checks to determine whether prices were reasonable. One audit in late 2006 found that the center "routinely violated rules designed to protect U.S. Government interests."

Perhaps one more interesting twist to the story, involves the $226 million in earmarks that CRI and Concurrent have received in recent years, through Rep. John Murtha (D-PA).

PERMALINK | COMMENTS | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (5)
Topics: Earmarks, John Murtha, Pentagon

Duncan Hunter

Duncan Hunters Keeping Donors in the Family

Can you inherit political donors from your father?

Duncan D. Hunter, a 31-year-old Marine reservist running for his dad's California congressional seat, may prove you can.

The son of Rep. Duncan Hunter, the San Diego-area lawmaker who is the ranking Republican on the House Armed Services Committee, is getting a lot of cash from defense contractors his dad helped out.

The San Diego Union-Tribune took a look at firms that got earmarks through the elder Hunter and found they're giving money to the younger one:

Records show connections between companies Rep. Hunter has worked with and some individuals who are contributing to his son's campaign.

Rep. Hunter added language to the 2008 Defense Appropriations bill awarding $19 million to L-3 Communications, which has an office in San Diego, for the development and testing of a missile system, according to data compiled by Taxpayers for Common Sense. Executives from that company contributed $2,750 to Duncan D. Hunter's campaign.

Rep. Hunter also earmarked San Diego-based Trex Enterprises Corp. $1.5 million for the development of a device that will help helicopter pilots navigate with limited visibility. Campaign finance records show Trex employees, including a scientist, donated $4,800 to Duncan D. Hunter's campaign.

Lobbyists working for the companies have also supported Hunter's campaign. Patrick McSwain and Frank Collins, who were listed as principals at the lobbying firm Northpoint Strategies, collectively donated $2,500. Northpoint worked on behalf of L-3. McSwain and Collins were both former [Rep. Duke] Cunningham chiefs of staff.

The younger Hunter has a strong fundraising lead over the three other Republicans vying for the nomination in the district, a GOP stronghold.

PERMALINK | COMMENTS | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (4)
Topics: Duncan Hunter, Earmarks