Earlier today we told you about the near-constant phone contact between then-Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and his successor as Goldman Sachs CEO, Lloyd Blankfein, during the height of the financial crisis last September.
Now, we've obtained from the Treasury Department Paulson's ethics agreement, in which he pledged not to participate in matters involving Goldman Sachs, and the waiver to that agreement granted by White House counsel Fred Fielding. You can read the agreement here and the waiver here.
Of the dozens of phone calls between Paulson and Blankfein, 26 occurred before Paulson requested and obtained a waiver to deal with matters relating to Goldman Sachs, the New York Times reported Sunday. The content of the calls is unknown. But two were the morning of Sept. 17, a day after the AIG bailout, which ultimately handed Goldman $13 billion of taxpayers' money -- before Paulson obtained the ethics waiver.
In Paulson's ethics agreement, written after President Bush plucked him from Goldman to be Treasury Secretary, all but two of eight pages mention Goldman. He concludes it by saying "these steps will ensure that I avoid even the appearance of a conflict of interest."
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (10) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (6)Blockbuster stuff from the New York Times Sunday on stunningly frequent contacts during the height of the financial crisis between Henry Paulson and his successor as CEO of Goldman Sachs, Lloyd Blankfein.
The then-Treasury Secretary and Blankfein spoke by phone two dozen times in one week in September 2008 when AIG was bailed out -- a deal that handed Goldman, a key counterparty of AIG, $13 billion in federal money.
Perhaps the most remarkable thing about the Times' account of the contacts between the two men, for which Paulson belatedly sought and received an ethics waiver, is that the phone calls were often coming from the Treasury Secretary.
In one day, Sept. 17, Paulson called Blankfein four times. Then after taking a call from President Bush in the evening, the Treasury Secretary called Blankfein yet again -- almost as if he felt obliged to keep the Goldman CEO constantly abreast of his progress. He spoke with Blankfein "far more" than with other executives, the Times reports.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (5) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (9)Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank have received subpoenas from a Senate committee that's probing whether they committed fraud in connection to last year's financial collapse, the Wall Street Journal reports (sub. req.).
The Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, chaired by Carl Levin, is said to be looking into whether those firms, and perhaps others, had private doubts about the mortgage-backed securities they were putting together, despite their rosy public pronouncements about the complex products.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (8) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (7)Remember our old friend Charles Millard? He's the former Lehman investment banker who, after taking over the federal agency that guarantees our pension systems, had the genius idea to ignore a host of warnings and switch the agency's investment portfolio from conservative bonds to risky stocks -- just as last year's financial storm was gathering.
We also learned -- thanks to an inquiry by the inspector general for the agency, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation -- that Millard had had extensive contacts with staff at Goldman Sachs, BlackRock Capital, and JP Morgan, during the period that the P.B.G.C. was choosing firms to hire as managers for its fund. And that Millard also raised the issue of getting a job with these firms once he left government. All three firms ended up winning contracts -- which were recently revoked, thanks to concern about those contacts.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (10) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (17)There's another big reason -- besides AIG -- that Wall Street trading desks have been booking such fat profits lately: fees they're collecting closing out interest rate swaps that have been exploding in the faces of cities, states, towns and public utilities over the past year.
Put another way: they're not just booking those billions soaking the government, they're booking them soaking...the government. Along with hospitals, utilities, park authorities, pretty much every other realm of the public or nonprofit sector...
Including Harvard! In December the university raised $2.5 billion dollars in a bond offering partially designed to give them the capital to buy out of $570 million in underwater interest rate swaps it had invested in back in 2005. The swaps were expressly endorsed by then-president Larry Summers, now head of the National Economic Council.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (8) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (12)On Monday afternoon Goldman Sachs posted a miserable first quarter for most of its typical investment banking divisions -- and a record $6.56 billion in revenue for its trading unit, giving the bank a net profit nearly double Wall Street expectations. Mere seconds into the question and answer session of yesterday's conference call with analysts, Guy Moszkowski of Merrill Lynch asked the question on everyone's lips: what did the $180 billion money vortex called AIG have to do with those numbers? Nothing, insisted chief financial officer David Viniar, who said the impact of the unwind for the quarter "rounded to zero" and later professing to Bloomberg he was "mystified" over the public fascination with the question.
Was Viniar lying? Yesterday we explained how Goldman appeared to have booked the cash flow from the bailout in its "orphan month" of December, making Viniar possibly technically truthful. But then Peter Fisher, who heads fixed income trading for the hedge fund BlackRock, all but accused Viniar of flat-out lying. With the seen-everything tone one might expect of the longtime central banker Fortune once described as "one of those behind-the-scenes guys who keep Wall Street from coming apart at the seams," Fisher told Bloomberg Surveillance host Tom Keane in an audio segment uploaded by the blog ZeroHedge that Goldman, as
rumored, had reaped huge "one-off" profits on the AIG unwind.
"So," Keane asked sarcastically, "did [Goldman] make those trading gains by taking the hide out of BlackRock?" That got a laugh, so Keane pressed:
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (3) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (8)What's it like, the laborious job of "unwinding" hundreds of thousands of mind-numbingly complex derivatives contracts amassed over the years by the inimitable AIG Financial Products? Ask the Wall Street investment banks to whom they've been farming out the work -- it's so painful and time-consuming it feels like the old days, especially the "massively profitable" part. An anonymous derivatives trader tells the blog Zero Hedge:
During Jan/Feb AIG would call up and just ask for complete unwind prices from the credit desk in the relevant jurisdiction. These were not single deal unwinds as are typically more price transparent - these were whole portfolio unwinds.The size of these unwinds were enormous, the quotes I have heard were "we have never done as big or as profitable trades - ever".Sort of undermines the notion that AIGFP employees needed retention bonuses so that the Great Unwinding might be an "orderly" and modest process conducted by cool heads and not, god forbid, subject to raids from ex-AIGers who'd left to trade against the company's book. Nah, they pretty much "threw in the towel," as Zero Hedge points out, and gave the "winners" on all those bad trades a chance to really earn their bonuses again.
But is the big payout the real shadowy force behind the recent runup in stock prices? Today's stock traders seem worried. Because even if reports that AIG FP has only unwound a quarter of its total trades are true, most investors agree the Treasury is too cash-strapped to do this forever.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (1) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (3)Hank Paulson has a book deal. And if there is demand in the marketplace for yet another score-settling insider account by a flawed but well-meaning Bush appointee, we guess it is Hank. Since the centimillionaire is generously refusing an advance and donating the proceeds to a hotline that helps homeowners prevent foreclosure -- an endeavor he did not have much time for as Treasury Secretary -- we'll put a copy on hold. But a Hank Paulson book is veritably guaranteed to disappoint, right? Or should we hedge that statement?
After all, Paulson is a competitive guy, and the "Bush Administration Treasury Secretary Tell-All" genre has formidable competition in The Price Of Loyalty, Ron Suskind's account of Paul O'Neill's tenure in that post -- plus Paulson has the advantages of having presided over the spectacular financial crisis that begat the current depression and Goldman Sachs. Paulson doesn't seem to have pent-up literary ambitions -- instituting the short selling ban was his equivalent to "burning books," he told the Post -- but he will undoubtedly submit himself to the editorial judgments of his daughter, a journalist who writes about public education. And in interviews, as his willingness to admit to burning books suggests, Paulson has seemed less of an ideologue than an ambitious business man who had never given ideology much thought -- so we won't be getting Ten Minutes From Normal here. (Although it would be awesome if he ripped off that title.)
On the other hand...
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (9) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (5)Is the momentum building for an investigation into the real beneficiaries of AIG's latest bailout?
Earlier this month, the Treasury Department announced it was rescuing the fallen insurance giant yet again, bringing the total amount of taxpayer assistance given to the firm since last September to $170 billion. It soon became clear that much of that money -- over $49 billion, to be exact -- was going right through AIG to the counter-parties on its credit default swaps, both American banks like Goldman Sachs, and foreign ones like DeutscheBank.
Defenders of the move have argued that not giving the counter-parties this indirect bailout would have risked a wider financial collapse.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (9) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (3)Yes, that was an actual sentence spoken -- or more specifically "groused" -- by an anonymous Wall Street executive concerned for his "personal safety," though not enough to be dissuaded from attending or talking to a reporter at yesterday's Wall Street Journal 'Future Of Finance' Conference, where the future sounded like it had gone back in time and purchased a hundred billion dollars worth of extra credit protection, which is to say suspiciously like Finance Past.
It looks like Wall Street, no doubt emboldened by the recent 20% runup in the S&P 500, the fourteen bucks in matching leverage the government is offering them for every dollar they invest in toxic/"legacy" assets and the prospect of better-than-awful numbers at Citigroup and Credit Suisse, got its hubris back along with its proverbial groove. In the six months since it nearly triggered global financial Armageddon, the investment banking community has seemed, if not quite chastened, at least somewhat subdued amidst the nation's ever-heightening awareness that their industry engineered the ever-intensifying economic morass. But not anymore!
This morning the New York Times ran as an op-ed the resignation letter of one Jake DeSantis, a securities trader and executive vice president at AIG's infamous financial products division and recipient of one of those million dollar bonuses ($742,006.40 after taxes.) That's right: he's keeping it. And don't ask him if he feels guilty about it because he will tell you: NO.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (153) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (23)Goldman Sachs is planning to give back the TARP money it got last fall, "ideally in the next month," reports the New York Times.
The firm is saying it just can't handle the level of government oversight that comes along with the funds, especially amid the outrage over AIG bonuses. "It's just impossible to run our business in this environment," one exec told the Times' Andrew Ross Sorkin.
Sounds great.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (23) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (9)
TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com
