Torture

What's Behind CIA Decision To Release Torture Briefings Document?

Zachary Roth | May 13, 2009, 4:14PM

On the issue of the torture briefings, is the main story starting to give way to the back story?

Here's what we mean:

The main story, reduced to its key elements, is that by the end of 2003, it seems clear that Nancy Pelosi and other top Dems had learned that we had water-boarded detainees. Whether Pelosi did enough in response to that information, or whether she was legitimately constrained by congressional protocol and by the atmosphere of fear that prevailed at the time is a matter for debate.

Read more »

Nancy Pelosi

Pelosi Camp: She Didn't Sign Torture Protest Letter Out Of Respect For "Appropriate" Channels

Zachary Roth | May 12, 2009, 11:00AM

Some progress in the debate over what Nancy Pelosi knew about torture and when she knew it...

The Pelosi camp is now telling The Politico that Pelosi learned in early 2003 that we were waterboarding detainees, but took no real action out of respect for "appropriate" legislative channels.

Read more »

Jane Harman

Report: Top Gossling Pushed To Declassify Info To "Embarrass The Democrats"

Zachary Roth | May 6, 2009, 12:20PM

The other day we took a look at the modus operandi of the team of aides around Porter Goss. The Gosslings, as they were known to their many detractors, developed a reputation, both on the House intelligence committee and at the CIA, for partisan knife-fighting and a willingness to do the bidding of the Bush White House.

In recent days, there's been speculation -- though only speculation -- that the Gosslings may have been involved in the leak to CQ about Rep. Jane Harman's wiretapped conversation with a suspected Israeli agent.

But there was one interesting story we missed in that roundup. In November 2004, Newsweek reported on the clash between top Gossling Patrick Murray, and Steve Kappes, a high-ranking CIA official, which led to Kappes's resignation. We've noted that incident before, of course, but the Newsweek story had a particularly interesting passage about the way that Murray -- who was Goss's chief of staff at CIA -- operated while he was a top Goss staffer on the committee.

Reported the magazine:

"He was just impossible," says one staffer who dealt with him. "He was sarcastic, snide and had this uncanny ability to push people's buttons." One former CIA official told NEWSWEEK that Murray leaned on him more than once to declassify information so he could use it to "embarrass the Democrats." Murray was irritated when the agency declined. He regarded much of the CIA as a nest of obstructionist bureaucrats, time-servers who had schemed to undermine the administration's policies--especially in Iraq.

Again, it's worth repeating that there's no solid evidence that Murray, or any of the other Gosslings, were behind the leak. But at the very least, the Newsweek story offers additional evidence of just what kind of political hardball the Gosslings were capable of playing.

AIPAC

Parsing Goss's Role In The Harman Story

Zachary Roth | May 5, 2009, 12:37PM

It's worth trying to clear up some of the confusion on a key point that came out of yesterday's post.

We wrote that, after reading the transcript of Jane Harman's wiretapped conversation with the suspected Israeli agent, then-CIA director Porter Goss signed off on the Justice Department's application for a FISA warrant to wiretap Harman herself.

Read more »

AIPAC

Secrecy Expert: Harman Leakers Likely Committed Felony

Zachary Roth | May 4, 2009, 6:08PM

Did the people -- whoever they may be -- who leaked details about Rep. Jane Harman's wiretapped conversation with a suspected Israeli agent, break the law?

The law quite clearly prohibits the unauthorized disclosure of classified information "concerning the communication intelligence activities of the United States or any foreign government." And Steven Aftergood, the director of the Project on Government Secrecy, confirmed to TPMmuckraker: "It seems crystal clear that if this was a FISA wiretap," as appears to be the case, "then whoever disclosed it committed a felony."

Read more »

AIPAC

Harman To AIPAC: I'm A "Warrior On Behalf Of Our Constitution"

Zachary Roth | May 4, 2009, 9:20AM

Jane Harman isn't backing off her call to have information about her wiretapped conversation with a suspected Israeli agent released publicly.

In fact, in a speech to AIPAC's annual policy convention, Harman doubled down on that demand. "I want it all out there. I want it in public. I want everyone to understand, including me, what has happened," she said, according to the Washington Post.

Read more »

AIPAC

Who Are The Gosslings?

Zachary Roth | May 1, 2009, 3:50PM

In recent days, speculation about who leaked to CQ the news about Jane Harman's wiretapped conversation with a suspected Israel agent has seemed to focus on former CIA director Porter Goss -- or, more precisely, the group of Goss aides known as the Gosslings.

So we thought it was worth taking a closer look at this crew. And it looks like they have quite a reputation...

Read more »

AIPAC

Report: AIPAC Case Dropped

Zachary Roth | May 1, 2009, 9:51AM

The AIPAC case -- which provided the backdrop for the current flap over Jane Harman's wiretapped conversation -- has been dropped, reports the Jewish Telegraphic Agency:

A source with intimate knowledge of the case against two ex-AIPAC staffers accused of passing along classified information says the case has been dropped.

Keith Weissman, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee's former Iran analyst, and Steve Rosen, its former foreign policy chief, were charged under a rarely used section of the 1917 Espionage Act that makes it a crime for civilians to receive and distribute closely held defense information. Both men were later dismissed by AIPAC, with the organization claiming the two had violated its rules; Rosen, in turn has filed a multi-million dollar lawsuit against AIPAC.

Federal prosecutors reportedly had been considering dropping the criminal case in the wake of a number of recent judicial decisions that make the prosecution more difficult. Among these was an appeals court rejection of a prosecution request to review the trial judge's order that prosecutors make the case that the defendants harmed the United States and not merely benefited Israel. Some Democrats see the case as a piece with Bush-era efforts to expand government secrecy powers, but the Post quoted its sources as saying that the review would have occurred whether or not Barack Obama had won election as president.

More on this and its significance in a little while...