As Zack noted in great detail here, the Obama administration is investigating the activities of health insurance giant Humana--a participant in Medicare Advantage that's been telling its aging consumers that the government plans to slash benefits, and urging them to tell Congress not to touch the program as it reforms the U.S. health care system.
Medicare Advantage plans are private health care plans that seniors can buy into with federal assistance in lieu of participating in traditional Medicare. Under terms the government erected when it created the system, those insurers face strict limits on how they communicate to beneficiaries--regulations that exist to protect seniors from acting under the pressures of insurers, who control their benefits. In response to a request from Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT), the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services has demanded the lobbying effort cease, and is investigating the company to determine whether it violated those rules.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (13) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (4)Health insurer Humana Inc. portrays itself as a guide through the treacherous waters of health-care coverage. The company's tagline is "Guidance When You Need It Most," and switchboard operators at its Louisville headquarters answer the phone by asking callers: "How can I guide you?"
But is Humana guiding its customers a little too much in enlisting them to oppose a key aspect of health-care reform?
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (6) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (5)LATE UPDATE: A BAUCUS SPOKESMAN TELLS TPMMUCKRAKER THE DONATION WAS RETURNED.
Gotcha's don't come much purer than this one.
Today, the Washington Post reported that although Sen. Max Baucus, who chairs the Senate Finance committee, has raked in big bucks from private health-care interests, he has taken one step to in the direction of good government:
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (19) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (16)Remember that bill we told you about last week, the one that was designed to crack down on offshore tax havens and might have helped stop Allen Stanford's alleged $8 billion scam? Well, it's back.
As we reported, the bill, introduced in 2007 by Sen. Carl Levin, died in the Senate Finance committee. A committee aide later told us that Committee chair Max Baucus never took it up because he favored a different approach to the problem.
But now Levin -- joined by Senators Sheldon Whitehouse, Claire McCaskill, D-Mo. and Bill Nelson -- has come back with an improved version of the legislation, the "Stop Tax Haven Abuse Act."
According to a press release, the bill now has three new provisions, that would:
(1) treat foreign corporations managed and controlled in the United States as domestic corporations for income tax purposes; (2) close an offshore tax dividend loophole that enables non-U.S persons to dodge payment of U.S. taxes on U.S. stock dividends; and (3) expand the tax return reporting requirements for passive foreign investment corporations (PFICs) to include U.S. persons who don't own a PFIC, but have formed, sent assets to, received assets from, or benefitted from a PFIC.
Baucus has already announced that he intends to introduce his own version of the legislation, that's more targeted at giving the IRS the tools it needs to detect tax cheats. So we'll have to see how that plays out.
But it seems like one silver lining in the Allen Stanford case is that it's gotten lawmakers into gear to try to fix the problem once and for all.
Yesterday, we revealed how a bill that might have sought to close off-shore tax loopholes -- and which might have helped catch Allen Stanford -- died in Max Baucus' Senate Finance committee in 2007.
Now, a Finance committee aide has provided an emailed statement to TPMmuckraker, making the case that the committee didn't take up the bill, sponsored by Carl Levin, because Baucus differed with some aspects of the bill's approach, and noting that Baucus is working on a separate bill to address the problem.
In a nutshell, according to the statement, Baucus favors an approach more targeted at giving the IRS the necessary tools to detect tax cheats than was the Levin bill, which took a broader tack.
The Chairman announced in 2008 that he is writing legislation to address the use of tax havens by individuals. In particular, Senator Baucus and his staff are working with Treasury and the IRS to give them the right tools to detect the tax abuse we are all concerned about. Senator Baucus's goal is to move the sharpest possible bill that will give the IRS tools -- including additional reporting requirements -- to determine when a taxpayer uses a tax haven and the identity of the user.It will be important to move legislation that gives the IRS the best chance to find abusers in the first place, in order to apply certain rebuttable presumptions that would make income US-sourced income on which US taxes should be paid.
The bill you mention is quite broad, and while it creates a series of changes to the burden of proof, that only helps once the IRS has detected the use of a tax haven.
The Finance Committee actively fights offshore tax havens - in the JOBS bill with inversions policy, tax shelter penalties, and increased transparency with regard to tax shelter promoters; in last year's military bill, with provisions to stop US companies with Federal contracts from setting up entities in tax havens to run employees through in order to avoid employment taxes. FOGEI/FORI in the energy bill tightened up a bit the way oil and gas pay US tax on foreign-earned income. Other proposals have been made public as well, particularly with regard to Bermuda reinsurance. The Committee also sent the GAO to Ugland House in the Cayman Islands to investigate one of the most notorious suspected tax havens in the world. And the Committee will take this issue up again at a hearing in March.
In other words, according to the aide, this was an issue of legitimate policy differences -- not an effort by Baucus to kill legislation opposed by a contributor.
We'll be watching for those hearings in March.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS (5) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (9)
TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com
