Must Read

Today's Must Read

Kate Klonick | July 7, 2008, 9:58AM

For those hoping investigations by the DOJ's Office of Professional Responsibility might shine some light on the scurrilous activities at the Bush Justice Department, today's Los Angeles Times piece doesn't offer much solace.

The OPR, a watchdog of the Justice Department's lawyers and activities, has ceased to issue regular public reports of its investigations, some of which have resulted in the exoneration of attorneys accused of professional misconduct.

From the U.S. Attorney firing scandal; to selective prosecution of Democratic political figures; to unlawful detainment of terrorist suspects, the OPR is facing increasingly weighty caseloads, and meeting their investigations with decreasing transparency.

As the Times reports, the changes in disclosure have come with a new administration:

After President Bush took office in 2001, the Justice Department reversed a decade-old policy of publicly disclosing detailed summaries of OPR investigations of department lawyers found to have committed professional misconduct. Janet Reno, attorney general since 1993, had believed that publicizing the information would bolster confidence in the department; and during her tenure she had authorized the release of two dozen public summaries of misconduct cases -- including one against then-FBI Director William S. Sessions.

The OPR also has been far behind in producing required annual public reports summarizing its activities. Last month, it released its report covering fiscal year 2005. That means many investigations undertaken during the tenure of former Atty. Gen. Alberto R. Gonzales remain under wraps.

Two weeks ago the OPR issued a report, along with the Office of the Inspector General, that found that the two attorneys in the Justice Department broke federal law when they hired new lawyers for the DOJ's Honors Program based on "political and ideological" factors.

But besides the report with the Inspector General, the OPR has failed to disclose the results of its investigations of misconduct relating to the war on terrorism.

According the documents obtained by the Times, the OPR has exonerated lawyers involved in two high-profile terrorism investigations:

According to a redacted copy of a confidential OPR report obtained by The Times, the office found that department lawyers had not engaged in misconduct in connection with the controversial practice of using special warrants to round up and incarcerate men after Sept. 11 who were considered witnesses to crimes. Human rights groups said the technique was a way to illegally detain, sometimes for months, dozens of Muslims whom the government suspected but could not prove were engaged in criminal activity.

The report, issued more than a year ago, concluded: "Department of Justice attorneys involved did not misuse the material witness statute, and thus did not commit professional misconduct or exercise poor judgment."

There's nothing sinister going on in the lack of reports, insists Associate Deputy Attorney General David Margolis. He says that the decision was merely made to conserve resources and protect the privacy of accused attorneys:

"My goal is to get fair and speedy dispositions of allegations against our attorneys," he said, "and, to the extent possible, let the public know what we did and why we did it without unnecessarily or gratuitously . . . publicly humiliating our line attorneys as individuals."

Must Read

Today's Must Read

Kate Klonick | July 1, 2008, 10:00AM

A former senior executive at UBS, who pleaded guilty to conspiring to assist a wealthy client in hiding millions of dollars from taxes, is aiding the Justice Department in their fight to force the Swiss banking giant to give up their ultra-secret client list.

As the Wall Street Journal reports today, the former UBS executive, Bradley Birkenfeld, has shed light on the shady dealings of UBS with its wealthiest clients. Birkenfeld explained how the Zurich-based banking giant coached its executives to conceal assets, from lying on customs forms to smuggling jewels in toothpaste tubes:

Mr. Birkenfeld told U.S. prosecutors that UBS holds an estimated $20 billion in assets for U.S. clients in undeclared accounts. These accounts generated $200 million a year in revenues for the bank, prosecutors said.

. . . UBS trained private bankers in techniques to avoid detection by U.S. law enforcement, including instructing them to indicate on customs forms that they were coming to the U.S. on vacation instead of business, according to court documents.

Prosecutors say Mr. Birkenfeld also explained how bankers advised clients to hide their wealth by purchasing artwork and jewels with funds from Swiss accounts. For one client, Mr. Birkenfeld told prosecutors he smuggled diamonds into the U.S. inside a toothpaste tube.

After weeks of talking with UBS and Swiss banking authorities on divulging the identity of U.S. account holders, the DOJ has finally sought a court order. The so-called "John Doe" summons is usually used by the government to investigate tax fraud "by people whose identities are unknown." It has never been used before against a non-U.S. bank.

Revealing client lists would be a huge blow to UBS and all Swiss banks, who pride themselves on the secrecy and privacy for its clients. The DOJ's filing is likely to spark a long and tedious legal battle-- something not unfamiliar to UBS:

In a 2002 memorandum to clients following UBS's acquisition of PaineWebber, UBS bankers tried to assuage clients' worries that their secrets might be breached as a result of the bank's new connection to a U.S. firm. The memo, filed in court by prosecutors, reads in part: "information relative to your Swiss banking relationship is as safe as ever..."

The memo went on to point out that UBS has been doing business in the U.S. since 1939, without having U.S. authorities gaining "jurisdiction over assets booked abroad....Please note that our bank has a successful track record of challenging such attempts."

And perhaps being caught in the DOJ bear trap has convinced UBS to gnaw off its U.S. brokerage arm, leave the U.S. and head for the safety of the Alps. As the International Herald Tribune reported, UBS is currently in talks to sell off its U.S. wealth management base, PaineWebber.