if Karl Rove won't agree to testify before his committee about his involvement in the prosecution of former Alabama Gov. Don Siegelman (D), then he'll be forced to consider issuing a subpoena.

He'll be forced to consider? What's to consider? And Rove shouldn't be given the choice to "agree to testify". Issue a fekking subpoena and hold him in comtempt if he doesn't show, end of story.

Posted at May 2, 2008 8:26 AM in response to Conyers Threatens Rove with Subpoena for Testimony on Siegelman