Graham is a loon. Not a chance in hell. Plus, he's a tired old white man.

Granholm would be a GREAT choice - if she hadn't been born a Canadian, thereby making it impossible for her to succeed Obama in the event of a catastrophe.

Richardson is a nice nod to the Hispanic vote.

Sibelius is another (more remote) possibility.

Posted at May 11, 2008 7:34 PM in response to Rahm: Obama Is "Presumptive Nominee." Rahm Flack: That's Not News!

Shush! What's that sound?

That's the sound of Team HRC collectively crying into their lattes!

So sad!

Posted at May 6, 2008 10:32 PM in response to Obama Campaign Aide: Tonight's Results Make It More Likely That May 20th Will Be Our D-Day

The cost of empire?

Oh, I'd say it's about $4.00 per gallon.

Heckuva job there, Bushie!

Could anyone possibly run a an invasion and occupation of another country any WORSE!?

Posted at March 26, 2008 11:22 AM in response to Today's Must Read

WOW! This is huge news. And, with this, a cascade effect should now be in place to sweep the remaining superdelegates to BHO's side.

It looks increasingly clear that no matter what happens next for HRC, she's done.

Stand back and watch the cascade begin!

Posted at March 21, 2008 8:04 AM in response to Breaking: Bill Richardson Endorses Obama

Sounds like a desperate cry for solvency.

Posted at March 10, 2008 11:29 PM in response to NRCC to Dems: Return Spitzer's "Sleazy Money"

Sure, sure, Hillary is shameless. But, really, did any of us expect any less?

After all, she's the junior senator from NYS in name only. Everyone knew all along that this whole stunt was just a ruse to allow her a more ascendant position from which to run for president.

So, really, why should she have a position on this? After all, this is all about Hillary and should NOT for a second have to do with Spitzer.

Let's let a few days pass; let a few news cycles cycle. And then we can get back to all Hillary all the time.

It's not that she doesn't have a position on Spitzer, it's that she just doesn't fucking care! Duh!

Posted at March 10, 2008 11:18 PM in response to Hillary: "Let's Wait And See" On Spitzer

I'm confused: if it comes down to a brokered convention, isn't this PRECISELY what BOTH candidates will be attempting?

Much ado about nonsense to me.

Posted at March 10, 2008 8:46 AM in response to Clinton Spokesperson Rules Out Pursuit Of Obama's Pledged Delegates

Yes, and once those pigs start flying, all bets are off. I love the outrageous hypotheticals Clintonistas have been reduced to in order to bend logic.

Face it, she's done. Her Royal Clown is done.

Posted at March 4, 2008 9:04 PM in response to Hillary's Long-Shot Strategy -- Get Super-Dels To See Obama As "Paper Tiger"

Yes, and once those pigs start flying, all bets are off. I love the outrageous hypotheticals Clintonistas have been reduced to in order to bend logic.

Face it, she's done. Her Royal Clown is done.

Posted at March 4, 2008 8:56 PM in response to Hillary's Long-Shot Strategy -- Get Super-Dels To See Obama As "Paper Tiger"

I'm now convinced that Obama has this wrapped up. I mean, C'MON!: 8 consecutive landslides, some in places where Hillary was supposed to WIN or, at the very least, be seriously competitive!?

For the first time since I have seen her on TV, I see FEAR in her eyes, real fear! She KNOWS she's lost this thing, but she just can't bring herself to admit it.

And Obama's crowds!? Dear lord, Obamamania has taken over! Hillary's crowds don't even come close to this level of orgasmic passion.

And, seriously, WTF is with this seemingly constant 3rd rate dump of "news" re her staffers? Does this now qualify as substantive "change" on the part of the Clinton campaign?

Any one of these things, ALONE, would be bad news for Clinton; together, they are the kiss of death.

Here's one disaffected Dem that will be out in full force for Obama. Godspeed!

Posted at February 13, 2008 12:29 AM in response to In Victory Speech, Obama Trains Fire On McCain