- : Uhmerican
- : Yes
- : When I can
OMG We Might Disagree
Can you imagine that we might disagree? What an idea. I am absolutely certain that everyone here that doesn't agree with every one of my statements is a troll, a republican, or, even worse, an invader from kos. Of course,...more »
Posted on July 1, 2008 9:06 PM
Time to Move ON
Please folks. Time to move on. Post about McCain. Post about your favorite policy. Post your favorite Veep candidate. Post your favorite local muck story. Tell us why our NOMINEE, Barry Obama, inspires you. Tell Obama what he should be...more »
Posted on June 4, 2008 5:01 PM
Okay, That's It (second try)
Obama's site shows 346 SD. Election Central credits him with a bonus 5 from Montana if he wins as he will and the "Pelosi Club" should add another 6, that makes 357. The latest polls, excluding the perennially wrong ARG,...more »
Posted on June 3, 2008 2:06 PM
McCain's Assets
There is so much back and forth about Obama and Clinton that I thought I would post something about what McCain has going for him....Unpopular war? CheckLinked to least popular president ever? CheckLobbyist scandal(s)? CheckFlip/Flop? CheckBiggest recession since the 70s...more »
Posted on May 28, 2008 2:50 AM
Liberal Republican
I note that some anti-Obama corespondent has notified Josh Marshall that he prefers a liberal republican (John McCain) to Barack Obama. I don't suppose we should be terribly surprised that in every election some supposed members of each party vote...more »
Posted on March 22, 2008 12:08 AM
-
Since there is a war on terror which is everywhere, i suppose the feds can now (once passing a law) house soldiers everywhere... I'd best pretend I don't have a second bedroom.
Posted at July 5, 2008 12:46 PM in response to Is There a Fourth Amendment?
-
May he burn in hell.
Posted at July 4, 2008 10:49 AM in response to Jesse Helms, Dead.
-
Are there 9 or 11?
Posted at July 3, 2008 11:54 AM in response to Rudy Pops Up, Recites China-Cuba Oil Myth
-
You are an excellent example of the hopelessly stupid to which you refer.
Posted at July 3, 2008 11:44 AM in response to Class Warfare and the New Gilded Age
-
You are in fact wrong. The poor have no need for many of the governmental institutions that we are all taxed to support. Why should the poor care about the purposes to which the military is put, for example. Manipulated pride? Maybe. But actual interests? Not at all. Let ONLY THE RICH pay for the military. Likewise, the manipulated social security trust fund is used to reduce taxes on the wealthy, a subsidy paid by the poor.
Offensive, you are not really offensive, just stupid.
Posted at July 3, 2008 11:43 AM in response to Class Warfare and the New Gilded Age
-
Oh, I am not a secularist, either. Not sure what that is. Seems like if I accepted this sort of categorization I would next have to decide whether I was or wasn't a crystal ballist.
Posted at July 3, 2008 10:54 AM in response to Obama is NOT sympathetic to atheists/secularists
-
Ah the atheist wars... why I am not an atheist... because that allows theists to determine the terms of the discussion... As I see it, I simply don't have that superstition. Theists are welcome to their superstition as long as it in no way causes me or anyone I care about any harm.
Posted at July 3, 2008 10:53 AM in response to Obama is NOT sympathetic to atheists/secularists
-
Bush, Cheney, and ... the Supreme Junta
Posted at July 3, 2008 10:33 AM in response to How Politically Stupid Are We?
-
I feel the earth move (landslide) under my feet.
Posted at July 3, 2008 10:04 AM in response to Poll: Obama Leading In Red State Of Montana
-
Not a word on how raising the FICA in the 1980s directly offset reducing other taxes, thus creating the most regressive tax policy in American history.
Posted at July 3, 2008 10:02 AM in response to Class Warfare and the New Gilded Age
