What a crappy post. You are an arrogant shithead. Take your contempt for the people who disagree with you and stick it where the sun don't shine.

Posted at June 26, 2008 2:17 PM in response to Happy Now?

Immunity will prevent discovery. That's the issue.

Posted at June 25, 2008 6:24 PM in response to Obama On FISA: Telecom Immunity Issue Doesn't Override National Security

Obama IS taking public financing in the form of small contributions from members of the general public. Nothing wrong with that.

Posted at June 23, 2008 12:52 PM in response to RNC Retains $50 Million Cash Advantage Over DNC

"Why would someone do this to such a sincere person like Friedman?"

How about the clip in which he said, "Suck. On. This."?

Posted at June 23, 2008 2:42 AM in response to So Nice To Have You Back, Mr. Friedman

No. And the reason why Obama's statement is such a downer is that it's a tissue of lies from beginning to end. This is no compromise. This provides no safeguards. This effectively removes judicial oversight, eviscerating the 4th Amendment.

With this one catastrophically unprincipled, spineless, cowardly decision, Obama just went from being the most inspiring candidate since Bobby Kennedy to being the lesser of two evils, just like all the others.

Posted at June 20, 2008 5:52 PM in response to Why Obama's Support For FISA Cave-In Is Such A Downer

Exactly.

Posted at June 16, 2008 5:00 PM in response to Was The Media Unfair To Hillary? Here's Our Rundown.

And the above is only a very partial list. Does what I've compiled prove that the media as a whole was unfair to Hillary? I don't think that's an answerable question.

--snip--

Nor is it easy to answer the question of whether the media was more unfair to her than to Obama.

--snip--

As documented above, during multiple high-profile episodes during Campaign 2008, Hillary was subjected to an extraordinary amount of frivolous, crude, unfair, misleading, outright dishonest, and transparently mendacious media coverage that without question had a major impact on this campaign.

So you can't answer whether the overall coverage was unfair -- a question your headline promises to answer, by the way -- or, if it was, whether it was more unfair to Clinton than to Obama. And yet, the objectionable coverage "without question had a major impact on this campaign."

I'm afraid you have reached a new level of incoherence.

Posted at June 16, 2008 4:59 PM in response to Was The Media Unfair To Hillary? Here's Our Rundown.

You'd use it if you were running for Bush's third term.

Posted at June 14, 2008 8:45 AM in response to Whoops! McCain Campaign Plays Song Written By Obama-Backing Dem Congressman

Nah, just kick him out of the caucus and leave it at that. Just disown him and shun him.

Let him keep his chairmanship. Just don't let him criticize the nominee as a member of the caucus. Make him do it as an outsider.

Posted at June 10, 2008 2:35 PM in response to Harry Reid: We're Watching Lieberman's Conduct In Prez Race "Very Closely"

Appalachian blue-collar workers are the vanguard of feminism! If only it weren't for all those college-educated eggheads holding women back.

Steinem is a twit. She has her preexisting ideas and is immune to facts.

Posted at June 10, 2008 2:17 AM in response to Gloria Steinem is Unintentionally Funny