I'd put him in the running for G.W.'s next probable appropriate employment opportunity: HipHop Clown

Posted at April 14, 2008 3:11 PM in response to Wanted: Disgraced Former Administration Official with Zero Credibility

Way to go Pelosi and HOUSE Dems!
I'm excited to see who BushCo has "Spitzer-ed" in retaliation.

"Spitzer-ed" = 1.)leaking/exposing a (technically) "real" crime due to a political agenda. 2.) The direct result of BushCo's politicization of the Justice Dept.

Posted at March 14, 2008 3:07 PM in response to House Passes Surveillance Bill without Retroactive Immunity

Could the Spitzer ordeal be an indirect "warning" for Senator Rockefeller to "do all he can" to protect this rogue administration or face his own wire-tapped dirty laundry being "aired?"

It seems to be that the only sensible reason Rockefeller is acting like Bush's lap dog on this Immunity crap. What a TOOL!

Posted at March 11, 2008 12:18 PM in response to House Surveillance Bill Contains Provision to Aid Telecom Suits

After being attacked for "throwing my vote away" when I voted for Nader in 2000, I bucked up and voted Demo-crass across the board in the last two elections.

Funny, but I've never understood what "throwing my vote away" meant until now; can you say "HUSTLED"?

(note: full disclosure= I am VERY happy with my vote for Keith Ellison. And my vote for Feingold when I used to live in WI, back when he first ran)

Posted at March 6, 2008 1:36 PM in response to Pelosi: Surveillance Bill Focus Should Be on "Exclusivity"

Such a simple solution:
Obama needs to have the MSM over and BBQ some ribs.

Posted at March 6, 2008 7:51 AM in response to Report: NAFTA-Gate Leaker Said Hillary's People Were Reassuring Canada, Too

Bush is obviously using "PRIMARY FEVER" to smokescreen this final blow to any semblance of "freedom" left in USA.

Sorry to Russ Feingold as he/we didn't realize Harry Reid is a Republican mole working against any vital act to hold Bush accountable...

but let's use the law to "bust them druggie baseball players."
...pathetic!

Posted at February 13, 2008 1:21 PM in response to Bush: Dem Effort to Extend Surveillance Law That Must Not Lapse Is Unacceptable

Just asking here amongst all the "OBAMA-CLINTON Primary Uproar" that seems to dominate today's blogosphere,

But "Riddle me This, Batman:"

?How in the "F" is any Democrat going to be elected President if the Republican Administration can SNEAK/PEEK on all communications without oversight?

The Democrats are shooting themselves in the foot if this passes and OBAMA and CLINTON can give us all the "HOPE for CHANGE" they want and...IT WON'T AMOUNT TO A VICTORY IN NOVEMBER!
or,
? If They(Repubs) can see all the cards(Obama's/Clinton's strategies via his/her communications), how can a Democrat EVER win in November?

Posted at February 13, 2008 1:01 PM in response to Bush: Dem Effort to Extend Surveillance Law That Must Not Lapse Is Unacceptable