Michael Hickman

Details

  • : New York City
  • : 39
  • : Moderate
  • : Democratic

Latest Comments

  • Exactly HusseinTenaX....thank you President Carter. The Clinton's can't even lose the right way. Who should Obama pick as his veep?

    Posted at June 4, 2008 1:36 PM in response to Pelosi Says The Dem Primary Is Over, Declares Obama The "Nominee"

  • Exactly Josephcast. They should drop off the whore Judith Miller as well.

    Posted at May 15, 2008 11:20 AM in response to Today's Must Read

  • Feinstein suggests here that Hillary promised as much to her privately (not to destroy the party). We'll see what happens.


    -- Don't count on it!

    Posted at May 9, 2008 3:12 PM in response to Dianne Feinstein: I'm Sticking By Hillary

  • Late Update: The Clinton campaign is adamantly denying the existence of any such internal poll --and accusing Drudge of trying to inflate expectations for Hillary in Pennsylvania. --gs

    So, Drudge is trying to punk PA voters to vote against Hillary. Sweet.


    Posted at April 21, 2008 3:49 PM in response to Obama Camp On New Hillary Ad: "We Already Have A President Who Plays The Politics Of Fear"

  • I'm seriously confused that Matt Drudge would post that Hill's got an 11-point lead. It's internal voting by her campaign, no? And today Obama has recouped his lead in a national Gallup poll, right? I thought he made his bones bludgeoning Bill Clinton during "Monicagate"? Drudge is still right-of-center and no lover of Hillary (look at all the negative articles about her that he posts on his website). Is he hoping by posting that headline that he'll motivate PA voters to go to the poll and vote against her? She needs a double digit win in PA but as of last week, polling didn't have it there. I know Josh wrote about this but it's a seriously weird headline post for Matt Drudge in my view.

    Posted at April 21, 2008 3:28 PM in response to Obama Camp On New Hillary Ad: "We Already Have A President Who Plays The Politics Of Fear"

  • Hillary was First Lady not NSD back in 2000. So her claims that she has all of this experience because she was the wife of the POTUS falls short -- just as laying the blame at her feet, eight years later, for Bill not taking out Osama when he apparently could have.

    The truth is both Bill Clinton and George W. missed opportunities to take out OBL.

    Posted at April 21, 2008 1:27 PM in response to Clinton missed chance to get Bin Laden in 2000

  • exactly

    Posted at April 21, 2008 1:17 PM in response to New Hillary Ad Shows Bin Laden, Asks: "Who Do You Think Has What It Takes?"

  • Yo, BDiddy. You are totally trippin'.

    Billary cried after she lost Iowa in order to get some sympathy and complained about being asked tough questions first during one of the debates. Now she runs an ad essentially saying that Obama's a pu**y? And you don't see anything hypocritical about that (the others on this site sure seem to)?

    Every leader of every country has to be prepared to deal with crises of every sort. That's part of the job. If you don't like peeps putting Obama on a pedestal, that's understandable - he's not a Christ like figure. But you should equally understand why many feel Billary is completely full of sh*t. All you have to do is review how she's conducted her campaign over the past few months.

    Posted at April 21, 2008 1:05 PM in response to New Hillary Ad Shows Bin Laden, Asks: "Who Do You Think Has What It Takes?"

  • Yo, BDiddy. You are totally trippin'.

    Billary cried after she lost Iowa in order to get some sympathy and complained about being asked tough questions first during one of the debates. Now she runs an ad essentially saying that Obama's a pu**y? And you dont' see anything hypocritical about that (the others on this site sure seem to).

    Every leader of every country has to be prepared to deal with crises of every sort. That's part of the job. If you dont' like peeps putting Obama on a pedestal, that's understandable - he's not a christ like figure. But you should equally understand why many feel Billary is completely full of sh*t. All you have to do is review how she's conducted her campaign over the past few months.

    Posted at April 21, 2008 1:04 PM in response to New Hillary Ad Shows Bin Laden, Asks: "Who Do You Think Has What It Takes?"

  • What's extremely redonculous about Hill's kitchen sink comment regarding Obama is the fact that she cried for the cameras after she lost Iowa (and before the New Hampshire primary). And now her campaign is trying to scare voters? Liam's right -- she is the new Lieberman.

    Posted at April 21, 2008 12:17 PM in response to New Hillary Ad Shows Bin Laden, Asks: "Who Do You Think Has What It Takes?"

Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address