Details

Latest Comments

  • Wah, wah, quit looking at Saint Obambi's actual statements. Now is not the time to look too closely at this candidate we know nothing about, just vote for him. If you actually think for yourself then you're a trolling McCain supporter!

    Posted at July 3, 2008 12:40 PM in response to A Time-line Of Obama's Statements On FISA

  • And Saint Obambi also said he would never vote for the civil immunity FISA bill last Spring and look how he conveniently has changed his position on that.

    No past quote from Saint Obambi can be believed in light of his numerous and insistent flip-flopping

    Posted at July 2, 2008 1:27 PM in response to Story Of Anti-FISA Group On Obama's Web Site Goes National

  • What a crock of s%&t!

    "Of course Spain could still indict the chairman of AT&T and have him extradited to the European Union for a criminal trial so Saint Obama is really protecting our rights for us."

    If you insist on parroting the "criminal charges are still possible" canard at least educate yourself on the fallacy of it.

    Posted at July 2, 2008 1:24 PM in response to Story Of Anti-FISA Group On Obama's Web Site Goes National

  • And of course when your "criminal" charges theory fails we can always count on some magistrate in Spain to indict them and have them extradited to Spain for trial.

    Jeesh, did you idiots ever pay attention during your civics class in junior high school. The utter lack of knowledge of our judicial system is mindboggling.

    Posted at June 30, 2008 11:31 AM in response to Networking Group Opposing FISA Cave On Obama's Web Site Grows And Grows

  • Isn't this the exact thing that Obama ran against Senator Clinton on? That even though he wasn't a senator at the time, he would have voted against the Use of Force Resolution in 2002? That he would never have been cowed by the Republican charges of being soft on national security ... In fact, this Obama told us made him "Right on Day One".

    Of course, he wasn't a Senator then and never had to actually cast that vote and as we now see, it was all a lot of empty bluster because now that he is a Senator he's all about national security and going slow so that the Republicans don't call him names.

    This is the kind of lying, spineless, candidate our party has nominated? We deserve what we get and I'm through being calm and not rocking the boat so that our candidates can save face in front of their Republican counterparts. If he's not about Change We Can Trust then say that, don't lie your way to a nomination.

    Posted at June 27, 2008 2:49 PM in response to FISA Grumblers, Get the Hell Over It

  • Obama - Wrong on Day One (And Each Day After)
    This is a man, who during the primaries, used every chance he could to lecture Senator Clinton on the fact that if he had been a Senator when the Use of Force Resolution against Iraq was voted on (he was not a Senator in 2002) he most assuredly would have voted against it. This served as notice that he was "Right on Day One" for leading the country. Of course mere days after bamboozling enough voters to lock up the Democratic nomination and now that he actually is a Senator all of a sudden things like "national security" creep into his vocabulary as excuses for his breaking a promise from just months ago to vote against telcomm immunity.

    Posted at June 26, 2008 7:34 PM in response to CHANGE WE CAN BELIEVE IN?

  • But this is exactly what he accused Senator Clinton of during the primaries and claimed he was the stronger candidate because he was going to be "right on day one" and wouldn't be susceptible to being called weak on defense. He claimed that when he wasn't even a Senator he knew enough to be against the resolution authorizing force against Iraq. What happened to him between last Spring when he claimed he would vote no on any immunity and last week? Oh right, he got the Democratic nomination for President and moved the DNC apparatus to his hometown of Chicago.

    Posted at June 26, 2008 11:48 AM in response to Obama On FISA: Telecom Immunity Issue Doesn't Override National Security

  • This from the troll with a troll for his personal picture? Look in the mirror, you're the only troll on this site.

    "9/11, troll, 9/11, troll, change we can believe in, 9/11, troll, McCain supporter!!"

    There, I just gave your entire argument for you, idiot.

    Posted at June 26, 2008 11:31 AM in response to Obama On FISA: Telecom Immunity Issue Doesn't Override National Security

  • Oh, I get it ... you're the troll that runs through postings and shouts "Why are you for McCain" or "You're the troll" when you really have no response to my actual posting. Good job, really adds to the discussion. Why don't you just shout "9/11, 9/11, 9/11!!!" and show your true colors.

    No where do I suggest that McCain is the logical alternative but of course in order to fire up the other idiots that troll these diaries you need to throw that out, right?

    Posted at June 26, 2008 10:52 AM in response to Obama On FISA: Telecom Immunity Issue Doesn't Override National Security

  • Your reading comprehension is poor. My point was that during the primaries Obama would have us believe that he was not going to be frightened by charges of national security in order to be cowed into voting for the use of force resolution.

    Now that he is actually a Senator he raises that very same meme as the reason for going against his promise to vote against blanket immunity.

    Perhaps the sarcasm was too think.

    Posted at June 26, 2008 10:49 AM in response to Obama On FISA: Telecom Immunity Issue Doesn't Override National Security

Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address