avatar

Recommended Posts

Details

Latest Comments

  • Does she actually believe this garbage? I mean, she actually thinks she is "better" than someone who has more support from the people in her party? I cannot believe that I am witnessing this. I know what the spin will be.

    "We are not fear mongering. We are portraying all the challenges that presidents have faced through out history."

    The problem is that she voted for Iraq and did not argue to stay on Osama Bin Laden, which she tries to use politically? Come on. I now will not vote for her even if she is the nominee. I cannot morally support someone who disguts me this much.

    Posted at April 21, 2008 11:52 AM in response to New Hillary Ad Shows Bin Laden, Asks: "Who Do You Think Has What It Takes?"

  • Remember, Hillary signed an oath stating that she would not campaign in FL and MI. Just think of what she would do if Obama won those states? She would be crying foul if he was to get those delagates. She knew what she was supporting when she signed that letter of intent. She is and agenda driven politician fighting for her political career, and she should it is all she can do. Take a second and imagine if both sides agreed to split the delagates 50 /50. There is no guarantee that they will stay the same. People can change their mind. Also, what if they were to go to a given precinct and 20 delegates could be awarded for each candidate. There is a chance that no Obama supporters would show up or vice versa. Anything is possible. Plus there would be no need for the disenfranchisement argument. But no, she wanted all of them based on the proportion of the election and then accused Obama of not letting the democratic proess work. They even accused him of running ads in Fl, when she won!!!! So it stalemated and may never get fixed. I would say that this is all Dean's fault. He should of allowed the state to make a choice for themselves and lived with it. But instead he played hardball and the Republicans in FL, for example, took advantage of it. So if he cannot fix this, then the 50 state strategy is bunk and he should be replaced.

    Posted at April 18, 2008 3:09 PM in response to Top Hillary Fundraisers Rip Into Howard Dean For Saying Super-Dels Should Announce Support "Starting Now"

  • A caucus is the will of the people. If a republican voted for Hilary in the Texas primary but not the caucus, they were being a pawn for Rush and only trying to manipulate the result. Only true real democrats participate in the caucus. remember you must state that you are a democrat at the caucus. If you are unwilling to sign a piece of paper at a caucus, like I did in Washington State, then don't go. Its the rules and like anyone is going to hunt you down if you really do not support the dems. There is nothing un-democratic about it the caucus. It has been a practice for a very long time. Just ask those in Iowa if the system they use is wrong. Or perhaps Nevada, who ended up picking Hillary. Its politics 101 to denounce a system that does not come in your favor. Its called spin and everyone knows slick willie and hrc are "pros" at making a pile of crap look like gold.

    Posted at April 18, 2008 2:56 PM in response to Hillary Closes To Within Three Points In Gallup National Tracking Poll

  • Why doesn't he just come out and say that she should be the nominee because he says so. That sounds better than that steaming pile of an explanation. I mean come on. I bet today or tomorrow Bill is gonna say, "If you don't make her the nominee, its your fault because you did not vote the right way." Oh wait that was already said.

    http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2008/story?id=4318311&page=1

    Posted at March 24, 2008 11:57 AM in response to Hillary-Backer Evan Bayh: Super-Delegates Should Back Hillary Because Of Electoral College

  • If Hillary does not fire her or ask her to leave her campaign, she will be ruined. She will then be associated with racism as McCain has with anti-catholic and anti-jewish bigotry. She cannot just say that they do not agree with this point of view. I mean come on. Remember politics 101 says that sometimes political gaffes sometimes can be the obvious truth, of which you cannot speak of. It would be exactly the same as if Obama came out and said Hillary is where she is today because of her husband. Everyone knows it but it is so bad to say because it is below the belt. BTW it was just announced by msnbc that Obama got blacks 9 to 1. Wonder if this had any effect on this?

    Posted at March 11, 2008 9:08 PM in response to Wolfson On Ferraro's Latest: "We Have Made Clear That We Reject Her Remarks"

  • The one thing that I find the most interesting is that there are people so dumb that they actually think that the system will work when it is already broken. I mean take a look at what chairman Dean did to the primary. Now the dems have to basically write off two very important states unless they count the votes. Also when you give upper class entitled feeling people, supedelegates, a second vote, it messes it all up. For example, What if I was a superdelegate and I wanted to participate in my local primary. I have the option and constitutional right. After doing so, I then can watch the primary transpire and if it turns out that my first vote was wrong, I can change my mind when it is time for my superdelegate vote. Ask the regular citezens of a non-caucus state if that is fair. What if average Joe from New Hampshire is upset that he voted for Clinton? He can't change his mind and get a second chance, unless he is a delegate that makes it to the National Convention, which is a slim chance. The system is total bull and there needs to be a uniform method done in every state and have it done in a popular vote with a winner take all delegate system.

    In regards to the he said she said controversy, Clinton needs to show some backbone and fire people for making stupid and inappropriate remarks. If not there is a sign of poor judgement and lack of leadership and moral authority. I know many people that are disgusted with her and will vote Republican if she is on the ticket in any position, even if Obama picks her. If the situation was the other way, Obama would be just like Huckabee and everyone would be saying daily to back out. I bet Hilary would pull a Lieberman and run as an independant because she wants to be president more than she actually cares about her party and country. If she cared and respected the process she would back down. How many times did she ignore Obama's victories and played politics as usual instead of saying, "good game" and congratulated Obama? I think the last straw will be the taxes and she is trying to avoid that like it is the plague. It is obvious there is something to hide. So for those of you who want her, go ahead support her but she has already lost and you know that the superdelegates would be the worst way to tell the party you don't know better. It will never happen and if it does, get ready for McCain as #44.

    Posted at March 11, 2008 3:11 PM in response to Top Obama Adviser: Hillary Must Remove Ferraro From Campaign

  • Her plan covers everyone because it will become a law like car insurance. She needs to stop now before she loses the small amount of credibility she has left. She even believes that the super delegates are more importnat than the regular folks who support her. What a disgrace.

    Posted at February 13, 2008 4:03 PM in response to Hillary Hits Obama With New Ad In Wisconsin

  • One other thing I wanted to add was that in some instances, the republicans did not have public venues to conduct the caucuses. I had a conversation with a good friend and he had to go to someone's home. He felt somewhat uncomfortable but he felt compelled to go and support Huckabee. He said it was too confusing and afterwards he felt that it was a waste of time. I on the other hand met with my neighborhood in a local elementary school, which was more than comfortable.

    Posted at February 12, 2008 12:17 PM in response to Today's Must Read

  • One other thing I wanted to add was that in some instances, the republicans did not have public venues to conduct the caucuses. I had a conversation with a good friend and he had to go to someone's home. He felt somewhat uncomfortable but he felt compelled to go and support Huckabee. He said it was too confusing and afterwards he felt that it was a waste of time. I on the other hand met with my neighborhood in a local elementary school, which was more than comfortable.

    Posted at February 12, 2008 12:17 PM in response to Today's Must Read

  • One other thing I wanted to add was that in some instances, the republicans did not have public venues to conduct the caucuses. I had a conversation with a good friend and he had to go to someone's home. He felt somewhat uncomfortable but he felt compelled to go and support Huckabee. He said it was too confusing and afterwards he felt that it was a waste of time. I on the other hand met with my neighborhood in a local elementary school, which was more than comfortable.

    Posted at February 12, 2008 12:17 PM in response to Today's Must Read

Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address