William Jefferson

William Jefferson Convicted On 11 Counts

Zachary Roth | August 5, 2009, 6:18PM

Former Rep. William Jefferson -- the Louisiana Democrat in whose freezer the FBI found $90,000 during a 2005 raid -- has been found guilty on 11 out of 16 federal charges.

The charges against the former lawmaker concerned a web of schemes in which he used political contacts to help American companies win contracts in West African countries. In return, payments or other financial benefits were given to Jefferson family members' companies.

Read more »

PERMALINK | COMMENTS (6) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (6)
Topics: Dennis Hastert, FBI, William Jefferson

William Jefferson

Ex GOP Lawmaker -- And Social Security Bamboozler -- To Testify For Defense In Jefferson Trial

Zachary Roth | June 10, 2009, 10:55AM

Finally, some bipartisanship in these polarized times!

William Jefferson, the Democratic former congressman who's facing trial on corruption charges after being found with $90,000 in his freezer, will get help from a Republican fellow ex-lawmaker from Louisiana.

Read more »

PERMALINK | COMMENTS (2) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (3)
Topics: William Jefferson

William Jefferson

Rep. Jefferson Named As Unindicted Conspirator In Another Louisiana Corruption Probe

Andrew Tilghman | July 14, 2008, 3:05PM

Rep. William Jefferson is is already facing his own federal corruption case.

And one of his little sisters has one, too.

Now we've learned that the two of them are unindicted conspirators in a completely separate federal investigation down in New Orleans.

The target of that case is one of Jefferson's political rivals and a challenger from his 2006 reelection bid, Louisiana state Sen. Derrick Shepherd.

Shepard is accused of fabricating records at his law firm to receive illegal payments that helped him pay off his campaign debt. He faces five criminal charges, including mail fraud, conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud, and conspiracy to commit money laundering.

When that indictment was handed up in April, it made reference to "Public Official A" and "Public Official B," which the Times-Picayune now says are Jefferson and his sister, Orleans Parish Assessor Betty Jefferson.

After Shepard dropped out of the race in 2006, Jefferson steered him toward a bond broker and convicted felon named Gwen Moyo, who arranged to give Shepard about $65,000 out of her account that was frozen by state officials, the indictment says.

Shepard allegedly used some of the money to pay off his campaign debt.

Shepard claims the payments were just bills for legitimate legal services he provided for Moyo.

Jefferson's sister was also accused of accepting wire payments totaling about $320,000 from Moyo.

PERMALINK | COMMENTS (1) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (1)
Topics: William Jefferson

William Jefferson

More Jefferson Family Indictments?

Andrew Tilghman | June 4, 2008, 1:59PM

The New Orleans Times-Picayune reports that a sister of Rep. William Jefferson is facing imminent indictment:

U.S. Attorney Jim Letten is expected to announce this afternoon that 4th District Assessor Betty Jefferson, an elder sister of U.S. Rep. William Jefferson, has been indicted on fraud-related charges by a federal grand jury. At least one other sibling, the previously indicted Mose Jefferson, is also expected to face additional charges, sources close to the case said.

Letten has scheduled a news conference for 2 p.m. He declined to comment.
Sources close to the investigation say the charges are the culmination of a probe into charities run by members of the Jefferson family and their allies. In a rare move, the FBI announced it was investigating the nonprofits after a 2006 Times-Picayune story revealed apparent self-dealing at them.

Jefferson is still fighting his own federal corruption charges.

PERMALINK | COMMENTS (0) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (1)
Topics: William Jefferson

William Jefferson

Judge rejects Jefferson's claim

Andrew Tilghman | May 27, 2008, 4:56PM

A federal judge has rejected Rep. William Jefferson's latest effort to have the case against him dismissed:

But U.S. District Court Judge T.S. Ellis III said that the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that bribery charges can be brought even if the acts don't fit into the "responsibilities explicitly assigned by law."

He said it will be up to a jury to determine whether the actions alleged by the government relate to the performance of official duties or "settled customary duty or practice" and relates to a government decision or action."

"Whether or not the government is able to prove each of these elements ... is a question properly addressed at trial, not on a motion to dismiss an indictment," Judge Ellis wrote.

Jefferson's trial has been delayed indefinitely while the Louisiana Democrat appeals other pre-trial motions.

PERMALINK | COMMENTS (4) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (1)
Topics: William Jefferson

William Jefferson

House, Justice Department Hashing out Process for Hill Searches

Paul Kiel | April 1, 2008, 12:05PM

From Roll Call (sub. req.):

The House of Representatives and the Justice Department are in negotiations over new protocols and procedures for law enforcement searches of Congressional offices — talks that began in the wake of the controversial May 2006 raid on Rep. William Jefferson’s (D-La.) Capitol Hill office.

An appeals court has ruled that raid was unconstitutional and the Supreme Court on Monday refused a Justice Department request to reconsider that ruling.

According to House General Counsel Irv Nathan, discussions between the House and DOJ are in “preliminary” stages, but “we have put forward concrete proposals.” Nathan said the goal of the discussions — led by his office and by Assistant Attorney General Alice Fisher — is to produce “either a set of procedures, a memorandum of understanding or perhaps legislation, that would make clear the rules for law enforcement actions in Congressional offices.” Nathan would not set a timetable for the talks, but said he hoped a resolution could be reached this year.

PERMALINK | COMMENTS (0) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)
Topics: William Jefferson

William Jefferson

Supreme Court Refuses Appeal of Jefferson Decision

Paul Kiel | March 31, 2008, 11:18AM

Roll Call reports (sub. req.) that the court has rebuffed the Justice Department's request for an appeal of last summer's decision.

That decision by the D.C. Court of Appeals in Rep. William Jefferson's (D-LA) case found that Constitutional protections meant that the feds could only search a Congressional office if the lawmaker was consulted. The lawmaker would also have the right to review materials. So instead of the feds raiding an office and taking material relevant to the investigation, the court suggested that FBI agents could lock down the office, and then allow the lawmaker to set aside Constitutionally protected documents. A judge would decide whether the records could be taken.

Because of the apparent strength of the feds' case against Jefferson, the decision is not likely to strike much of a blow there. But prosecutors and watchdogs were dismayed with a ruling that was a definite blow to public corruption prosecutions in general. As CREW's Melanie Sloan put it, "If I were Ted Stevens, and I had some evidence of wrongdoing, I'd be putting it in my Congressional office, because the court basically just issued a blanket cover against searches.... It's such a help to any corrupt members of Congress, since it offers so much more protection than was previously offered."

The Justice Department had argued in its request for an appeal that the decision "'threatens to complicate numerous ongoing and future investigations' and hinder the ability to use electronic surveillance" as a means of investigating lawmakers.

Rep. Rick Renzi's (R-AZ) lawyers have already signaled that the decision will play a role in their defense. And you can be sure that it will play a role in every prosecution of a lawmaker from here on out. Does the decision mean that prosecutors can't use wiretaps against lawmakers? Does it mean that the feds can't speak to legislative aides?

PERMALINK | COMMENTS (14) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (6)
Topics: William Jefferson

William Jefferson

Jefferson Bid to Have Case Dismissed Denied

Paul Kiel | February 7, 2008, 10:12AM

Rep. William Jefferson's (D-LA) case seems on track to be the most litigated criminal case in Congressional corruption history, it seems. From The Times-Picayune:

A federal judge Wednesday refused to dismiss bribery charges against Rep. William Jefferson, D-New Orleans, rejecting arguments that grand jury testimony had improperly involved "speech and debate" issues protected by the Consitution.

The decision could delay the scheduled Feb. 25 start of the trial if Jefferson chooses to appeal the ruling to the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. A ruling there also could be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

PERMALINK | COMMENTS (3) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)
Topics: William Jefferson

William Jefferson

Feds Subpoena Jefferson Staffers

Paul Kiel | January 25, 2008, 1:28PM

From The Hill:

The Department of Justice has subpoenaed six current and former House aides to testify in next month’s trial of Rep. William Jefferson (D-La.), who faces a wide array of public corruption and bribery charges, according to a knowledgeable source.

PERMALINK | COMMENTS (2) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)
Topics: William Jefferson

William Jefferson

"Where Is My Goddamn Money?"

Paul Kiel | January 18, 2008, 10:48AM

From The Washington Post:

Rep. William J. Jefferson (D-La.) testified yesterday that an FBI agent cursed at him and told him that "this is going to be the worst day of your life," just before agents searched his Louisiana home as part of the investigation that led to corruption charges against him.

At one point during the tense interview at his house in August 2005, Jefferson said, an FBI agent followed him to the bathroom. "I told him, 'Are you going to the bathroom with me?' " Jefferson said in U.S. District Court in Alexandria. "He said, 'Yes.' "

Minutes later, another agent informed Jefferson that $100,000 he had accepted from a government informant -- allegedly used to bribe the vice president of Nigeria -- had been supplied by the FBI. Leaning forward, the agent yelled, "Where is my [expletive] money?" Jefferson testified.

(The Hill helpfully fills in the expletive.) Jefferson didn't reply, "in the freezer." Instead, he says, he refused to answer any more questions at that point.

PERMALINK | COMMENTS (9) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (1)
Topics: William Jefferson

William Jefferson

Jefferson Trial Set for Late February

Paul Kiel | December 14, 2007, 1:54PM

From Roll Call (sub. req.):

U.S. District Judge T.S. Ellis on Friday morning delayed for six weeks the beginning of Rep. William Jefferson’s corruption trial, rejecting a request from the Louisiana Democrat’s lawyers to push the start date back four to six months.

The trial is now scheduled to begin Feb. 25.

So nearly two and a half years after the feds found $90,000 in Jefferson's freezer (he'd accepted a briefcase full of $100,000 in cash from an FBI informant in a hotel parking lot), he'll finally get his day in court. We're looking forward to it.

PERMALINK | COMMENTS (2) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)
Topics: William Jefferson

William Jefferson

Jefferson Wants Bribery Charges Tossed, Cites Speech and Debate Grounds

lkmcgann | October 12, 2007, 10:00AM

In a motion filed this week, Rep. William "Cold Cash" Jefferson (D-LA) wants the bulk of his bribery charges thrown out, saying it was unconstitutional for the FBI to speak with his aides about legislative matters, the Crypt reports.

In August, a DC Circuit court called the FBI's raid of his Congressional office a violation of the Speech and Debate Clause. The day should have sparked a celebration for corrupt politicians, one watchdog said at the time.

No doubt Sen. Ted Stevens' (R-AK) lawyers are watching this case closely, since news broke that the FBI listened in on phone calls between the senator and Veco CEO Bill Allen. Some legal experts say the earlier Jefferson decision might be interpreted to mean it is illegal to tap Congressional phones. Stay tuned.

PERMALINK | COMMENTS (1) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)
Topics: William Jefferson

Ted Stevens

Prosecutors Worry Court Decision May Threaten Pol Wiretaps

lkmcgann | September 21, 2007, 3:32PM

Keep your fingers crossed, Ted. The AP is reporting that a recent decision in the Rep. William Jefferson (D-LA) case could make it impossible to tap lawmakers' phones in corruption cases. That's good news for Sen. Ted Stevens (R-AK), since it was just reported that he was secretly recorded by the FBI while on the phone with former Veco CEO Bill Allen.

The decision, which one watchdog group worried would be a boon for corrupt politicians, dealt with the FBI's raid of Jefferson's Congressional office. The court found the raid unconstitutional on the grounds that it violated the Speech or Debate Clause because agents thumbed through protected legislative documents.

And in an appeal of that decision last week, the Justice Department argued that the ruling "'threatens to complicate numerous ongoing and future investigations' and hinder the ability to use electronic surveillance."

The decision is already starting to affect federal investigations. The AP also reported that some members of Congress interpret the ruling as protecting staffers from speaking to the FBI.

PERMALINK | COMMENTS (13) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)
Topics: Ted Stevens, William Jefferson

William Jefferson

Jefferson Argues Prosecutors Picked Virginia Venue to Ensure White Jury

lkmcgann | September 7, 2007, 4:03PM

From The AP:

Rep. William Jefferson accused the Justice Department of bringing corruption charges against him in Virginia to reduce the chance of drawing black jurors.

Jefferson, a Louisiana Democrat who has been charged in an international bribery case, made the argument Friday in federal court documents seeking to move the case to Washington.

"The court has an obligation to ensure that the forum selection in this case was not tainted by racially discriminatory motive," Jefferson's attorney, Robert P. Trout wrote.

PERMALINK | COMMENTS (7) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)
Topics: William Jefferson

William Jefferson

Watchdog: Jefferson Court Opinion "Such a Help" for Corrupt Pols

Paul Kiel | August 3, 2007, 11:57AM

Well, here's a clear verdict on this morning's appeals court opinion on the FBI's raid of Rep. William Jefferson (D-LA). It's a great day for corrupt lawmakers, says Melanie Sloan of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. CREW filed an amicus brief in the case arguing for the search's constitutionality.

It's a "devastating opinion," Sloan says. "If I were Ted Stevens, and I had some evidence of wrongdoing, I'd be putting it in my Congressional office, because the court basically just issued a blanket cover against searches.... It's such a help to any corrupt members of Congress, since it offers so much more protection than was previously offered."

In a previous circuit opinion ruling against Jefferson, a judge had called this sort of protection "a taxpayer-subsidized sanctuary for crime."

"I cannot believe that the Justice Department won't appeal this to the Supreme Court," Sloan said. "It's a very expansive readings of the Speech or Debate Clause [of the Constitution]."

The opinion said that FBI agents were wrong to have taken privileged (i.e. legislative) documents, the ones protected by the Speech or Debate Clause, from Jefferson's office. But by saying that, the court effectively prohibits the FBI from entering a Congressional office without the say-so of the lawmaker. Doing that creates a "fox guarding the henhouse problem," says Sloan.

PERMALINK | COMMENTS (24) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)
Topics: William Jefferson

William Jefferson

Court Rules against FBI Raid of Jefferson Office

Paul Kiel | August 3, 2007, 10:39AM

From the AP:

The FBI violated the Constitution when agents raided U.S. Rep. William Jefferson's office last year and viewed legislative documents, a federal appeals court ruled Friday.

The court ordered the Justice Department to return any privileged documents it seized from the Louisiana Democrat's office on Capitol Hill. The court did not order the return of all the documents seized in the raid.

The raid last May of Jefferson's office, remember, caused a furor on Capitol Hill, provoking the rare alliance of then-Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-IL) and Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), who demanded that the FBI return the documents seized from Jefferson's office.

It seems clear that Jefferson didn't quite get what he wanted here, which was return of all documents seized in the raid. Our legal eagle readers are invited to write in or comment with their reactions or interpretations of the ruling's impact. Are Congressional offices now safe from the FBI's prying fingers?

The introduction to the ruling (pdf) is posted below.

Note: This decision dealt exclusively with the raid of Jefferson's Congressional office. So it shouldn't substantially affect the government's case against him.

Update: Here's some interpretation from CREW, who filed an amicus brief in the case.

Update: Here's the Justice Department's reaction to the ruling, from spokesman Brian Roehrekasse:

“The Department of Justice is pleased that the D.C. Circuit opinion does not find that the search of a congressional office is unconstitutional. We are disappointed with the ruling that requires that a member of Congress be provided advance notice and the right to review materials before the execution of a search warrant. Because of the procedures that were put in place for the execution of the search warrant, the indictment and prosecution of Congressman Jefferson will not be negatively impacted by this decision. The Court of Appeals notes that there is no indication the Executive Branch did not act based on a good-faith interpretation of the law, as reflected in the District Court’s prior approval. The Department of Justice will continue to prepare for trial, scheduled for January 2008, and we are pleased that the D.C. Circuit opinion allows the prosecutors to retain non-Speech or Debate clause documents. The Department will review the decision and evaluate further action.”

Read more »

PERMALINK | COMMENTS (17) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)
Topics: William Jefferson

Must Read

Today's Must Read

Spencer Ackerman | June 26, 2007, 9:00AM

Wouldn't you know it. Where there's a corruption investigation, there's also the Solomonic wisdom of Dick Cheney. And so it went with the William Jefferson affair, according to part three of Bart Gellman and Jo Becker's Cheney series. Had Cheney not changed his mind on the FBI's power to seize Jefferson's files, the top tier of Justice Department and FBI officials would have quit.

In May 2006, the FBI executed a warrant on Jefferson's House office, seizing numerous documents relevant to its bribery investigation. House Republicans -- and, let's not forget, now-Speaker Nancy Pelosi -- demanded the FBI relinquish what they'd taken from Jefferson, fearing the precedent the raid would set for other members of Congress and elevating the dispute to a separation of powers issue.

According to Gellman and Becker, Cheney sided with Congress, one of the few times that he's done so since joining the executive ... er, since becoming vice president. And, as the series has demonstrated, Cheney more often than not gets his way with the administration. This time, however, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, his deputy Paul McNulty, and FBI Director Robert Mueller all threatened to resign if forced to return Jefferson's files.

Here's what happened next:

White House Chief of Staff Joshua B. Bolten called a meeting on May 25, 2006, to resolve the political and legal crisis. The president's lawyers and congressional liaison were in the room, and so was Cheney. Once again, it was the vice president who came up with a solution, according to a participant. Cheney's plan met his goal of keeping the files from federal investigators. The files would be placed under seal for 45 days. Within hours of the meeting, Bush made Cheney's recommendation official.

The irresistible question: has Cheney inserted himself in the investigation of any other high-profile corruption scandals?

PERMALINK | COMMENTS (22) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)
Topics: Dick Cheney, Must Read, William Jefferson

William Jefferson

Jefferson's Brother Fingered in 2nd Federal Probe

Paul Kiel | June 20, 2007, 11:20AM

From The Times-Picayune:

Former Orleans Parish School Board president and self-styled corruption fighter Ellenese Brooks-Simms will plead guilty in federal court today to charges that she accepted more than $100,000 in bribes from Mose Jefferson -- the eldest brother of indicted U.S. Rep. William Jefferson -- in exchange for supporting a multi-million dollar math curriculum contract, according to sources close to the case....

This month, in the 16-count indictment handed up against William Jefferson in Virginia, [Mose Jefferson] emerged as a key player who was hired by firms that his brother, the congressman, allegedly helped with trade deals.

Just to help you tell the two brothers apart: William is accused of accepting bribes, and Mose is accused of giving them.

PERMALINK | COMMENTS (9) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)
Topics: William Jefferson

William Jefferson

Rep. William Jefferson Pleads Not Guilty

lkmcgann | June 8, 2007, 2:56PM

Rep. William Jefferson (D-LA) pled not guilty today to 16 federal charges related to 11 separate bribery schemes.

Video of Jefferson saying: "Im going to fight my heart out to clear my name," is on the way.

Jefferson's case became famous when federal investigators found nearly $100,000 in cash in his freezer. He allegedly took the money from an FBI informant in a scheme to bribe a Nigerian official.

The judge has set a trial date for Jan. 16, 2008.

Late Update: Here's Jefferson speaking for the first time following the indictments:

PERMALINK | COMMENTS (6) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)
Topics: William Jefferson

William Jefferson

William Jefferson Indicted On Corruption Charges

lkmcgann | June 4, 2007, 2:29PM

Rep. William Jefferson (D-LA) has officially been indicted on racketeering, soliciting bribes and money-laundering according to the Associated Press.

The indictment handed up Monday in federal court in Alexandria, Virginia, is more than an inch thick and lists 16 alleged violations of federal law that could keep Jefferson in prison for up to 200 years.

Almost two years ago, in August 2005, investigators raided Jefferson's home in Louisiana and found $90,000 in cash stuffed into a box in his freezer.

Jefferson, 63, whose Louisiana district includes New Orleans, has said little about the case publicly but has maintained his innocence. He was re-elected last year despite the looming investigation.

Jefferson's case has become best known for the nearly $100,000 in cash found in his freezer that he took from a videotaped encounter with an FBI informant.

His House office was searched by the FBI in 2006, which raised bipartisan outrage amongst Congressional leadership who called the raide unconstitutional on the grounds of the "speech and debate" clause.

PERMALINK | COMMENTS (29) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)
Topics: William Jefferson

William Jefferson

But, The Law Protects Congressmen From The Law

lkmcgann | May 15, 2007, 11:45AM

Rep. William Jefferson (D-LA) takes his case before a Washington, D.C. appeals court panel today, in a move to get back documents the congressman’s lawyers say were wrongfully snatched from his office by the FBI in a raid.

Jefferson has been the brunt of FBI searches and a battery of allegations after he accepted $100,000 from an undercover FBI informant last year, and then stashed the money meant to bribe the Vice President of Nigeria, in his freezer, wrapped in frozen food packaging and aluminum foil.*

The freezer cash isn’t at issue today, though.

Jefferson’s lawyers are going to argue that the Constitution’s “Speech or Debate” clause should have shielded their client from the search of his Congressional office. Politicians on both sides of the aisle rallied around Jefferson last year in support of his argument.

The clause, found here in Article 1, Section 6, reads:

They shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their Attendance at the Session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place.

*Update: This post originally stated that Jefferson has been charged. He has not.

PERMALINK | COMMENTS (22) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)
Topics: William Jefferson

U.S. Attorneys

Sensenbrenner: Hurry Up and Indict Dem. Politician

Paul Kiel | May 10, 2007, 10:54AM

Apparently deaf to the improper tone of the request in the context of a hearing on the firings of the U.S. attorneys, Rep. James Sensenbrenner (R-WI) encouraged Alberto Gonzales to hurry up and indict Rep. William Jefferson (D-LA). The Jefferson case has dragged on for nearly two years and is awaiting the decision of an appeals court on the FBI's seizure of evidence from Jefferson's congressional office.

"I hope that you will tell your prosecutors to wrap this thing up," said Sensenbrenner.

PERMALINK | COMMENTS (20) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)
Topics: Alberto Gonzales, U.S. Attorneys, William Jefferson

William Jefferson

Admitted Bribers Head to The Slammer... and Jefferson Waits

Paul Kiel | February 26, 2007, 1:53PM

On Thursday, two businessmen will head to prison for conspiring to bribe Rep. William Jefferson (D-LA). And Jefferson himself? He'll most likely be enjoying an indictment-free spring as his lawyers battle with prosecutors over documents seized from his congressional office last May.

Read more »

PERMALINK | COMMENTS (10) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)
Topics: William Jefferson

William Jefferson

Hail The Conquering Hero

Paul Kiel | January 5, 2007, 11:29AM

From CNN:

On the same day that the 110th Democratic-led Congress convenes with a plan to immediately pass lobbyist and ethics reforms, the Congressional Black Caucus Thursday gave a standing ovation to Rep. William Jefferson, the Louisiana Democrat who faces an FBI probe into bribery allegations.

"The haters... and negative nabobs...the people who spoke against him couldn't prevail against the people who spoke for him," Dr. Michael Eric Dyson, master of ceremonies for the CBC's celebratory event, said Thursday morning.

PERMALINK | COMMENTS (9) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)
Topics: William Jefferson

William Jefferson

"Dollar Bill" Abuses Taxpayer Money for Appeal to Colleagues

Paul Kiel | January 4, 2007, 2:13PM

Ah, Rep. William Jefferson (D-LA).

From Roll Call:

You might think that a guy who’s still the subject of a federal bribery investigation would be more careful than to use taxpayer resources to raise campaign money. But nope, not Jefferson. And heck, he still hasn’t provided us with that “honorable explanation” he promised for the bizarro (and alleged) $90,000 in cash federal agents confiscated from a freezer in his Capitol Hill home.

Last week, House Democrats were shocked to receive a letter from Jefferson — on his official Congressional stationery, no less — asking colleagues to donate money to help him retire his campaign debt.

“As you know,” the letter, dated Dec. 29, 2006, began, “I recently won a grueling race for re-election.” (And won resoundingly in a runoff, despite the ongoing federal probe in which two people have already pleaded guilty.) “In order to get our message out and otherwise compete, we incurred over $200,000 in debt.

“Therefore, I would deeply appreciate it if you would assist me in retiring my debt by contributing $1,000 (or whatever amount you can afford) to my campaign,” Jefferson wrote.

To use public resources to make a fundraising pitch is against House rules, of course. As an explanation, Jefferson's office said it was "a tremendous — tremendous — staff error."

PERMALINK | COMMENTS (34) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)
Topics: William Jefferson

William Jefferson

AP: No Powerful Seat for Jefferson

Paul Kiel | December 12, 2006, 2:59PM

As predicted earlier, it's official. William Jefferson won't be getting his plum spot back.

PERMALINK | COMMENTS (0) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)
Topics: William Jefferson

William Jefferson

Jefferson To Trouble Dems Far into 2007

Paul Kiel | December 12, 2006, 11:00AM

What should the Democrats do about Rep. William Jefferson (D-LA)? Today's Washington Post seems to hold Nancy Pelosi's final answer.

Last year, of course, Nancy Pelosi, backed by a majority vote from the Democratic caucus, yanked Jefferson off of the powerful Ways and Means Committee. But now that New Orleans-area voters have spoken with one voice that they don't mind if their rep keeps thousands of dollars of intended bribe money in his freezer, the Congressional Black Caucus has been pressuring Pelosi to reinstate Jefferson.

Today's Post quotes "a source close to Pelosi" as saying that she won't reinstate his powerful seat, but won't shut him out altogether. He'll get a spot on "a lower-profile committee" instead. Compromise! The source adds that Pelosi hopes "the controversy dies down" with such a solution.

Fat chance. For months, Jefferson has been on the cusp of indictment for bribery charges. The only thing that's saved him was the FBI's raid of his congressional office, which, because it involved the seizure of possibly Constitutionally protected materials, ignited a litigation battle that still rages on. Until that gets sorted out, there will likely be no indictment. And when will that be? The Post piece does some inside baseball figuring as to what the prosecutors options are -- but the bottom line is the indictment will come down "probably in the first half of 2007." Meanwhile, prosecutors continue to fatten their case against Jefferson: the Post reports that they're "looking at about a dozen business deals in the United States and Africa in which Jefferson allegedly used his official position for financial gain." About a dozen? Not so long ago, it was in the neighborhood of eight.

When that indictment comes down, of course, the controversy will fire back up again. And Jefferson's been very clear that he won't be stepping down when that happens. We may very well have a trial of a sitting congressman.

PERMALINK | COMMENTS (0) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)
Topics: William Jefferson

William Jefferson

Jefferson Ad: "I Have Never Taken A Bribe"

Paul Kiel | November 30, 2006, 12:55PM

It might not work as a campaign slogan, but it gets your attention.

Facing stiff competition in a runoff election just nine days away, Rep. William Jefferson (D-LA) has begun running an ad in which he asserts, "I have never taken a bribe from anyone." Jefferson, under FBI investigation for taking bribes, is trying to hold onto his seat representing Louisiana's 2nd District. But Democratic state Rep. Karen Carter is giving him a run for his money. No pun intended.

In the ad, Jefferson disputes Carter's claim that he was videotaped by the FBI taking a bribe. "Her newspaper source got the facts wrong," he says. You can watch the ad here:



Though the laundry list of damning quotes captured by FBI wiretaps do include such gems as "I make a deal for my children" and "I'm gonna get your deal out of the way... and I probably won't last long after that," we do have some sympathy for Jefferson here.

On the videotape to which Jefferson is referring, the FBI informant actually is captured giving Jefferson the briefcase filled with $100,000 in cash as an intended bribe for the Vice President of Nigeria -- not Jefferson himself, so he does have a point.

Of course, despite the fact that Jefferson subsequently told the informant that he'd passed on the cash (which he cryptically referred to as "African art") to Nigerian VP Atiku Abubakar as discussed, a FBI raid of Jefferson's home found $90,000 of the intended bribe in Jefferson's freezer.

PERMALINK | COMMENTS (0) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)
Topics: William Jefferson

William Jefferson

Will Voters Still Bet on "Dollar Bill"?

Paul Kiel | November 27, 2006, 12:26PM

In a little less than two weeks, we'll learn if the growing cloud of corruption allegations surrounding Rep. William Jefferson (D-LA) will motivate his constituents to end his career before the Justice Department gets its shot to do the same.

On Saturday, December 9th, Jefferson's fate will be decided by a runoff election in which he faces Democratic state Rep. Karen Carter. Will voters be content to wait around for Jefferson's promised "honorable explanation" for why federal agents found $90,000 cash in his freezer?

No polls seem to be available, only a wide expectation that the race will be close. Jefferson led Carter 30%-22% in the general election, where there were a host of other Dem challengers.

To make matters even more interesting, the muck hasn't stopped coming on Jefferson, despite the fact that the DoJ's mammoth bribery investigation has gotten tied up in the courts over the FBI's raid of Jefferson's congressional office.

Read more »

PERMALINK | COMMENTS (0) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)
Topics: William Jefferson

Reform

Burns, Frist, Santorum Top List of Corrupt Pols

Justin Rood | September 20, 2006, 10:56AM

What do Sens. Conrad Burns (R-MT), Bill Frist (R-TN) and Rick Santorum (R-PA) have in common? (Hint: they're frequent subjects on TPMmuckraker.)

The three men are the most corrupt senators in Congress, according to a new list of the most corrupt lawmakers in Washington.

It's the second year now that Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) has released its list of 20 muckiest senators and congresspeople.

Although the group names the trio as "most corrupt," it doesn't rank the 17 House members they finger.

The group also identified five "members to watch" -- that is, folks with muck in their past that could be a harbinger of muck to come.

The list, in no particular order, is after the jump.

Read more »

PERMALINK | COMMENTS (0) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)
Topics: Alan Mollohan, Conrad Burns, Curt Weldon, Dennis Hastert, John Doolittle, Reform, William Jefferson

William Jefferson

Roll Call: "Dollar Bill" May Not Get Indicted before Election

Paul Kiel | September 13, 2006, 12:04PM

Rep. William Jefferson (D-LA) is unlikely to be indicted before Election Day.

That's not due to weakness in the Justice Department's case -- documents from the investigation show that the government has a wealth of evidence based on surveillance, an FBI informant's taping of conversations, and the testimony of two men who've pled guilty to bribing Jefferson. Prosecutors are reportedly very close to an indictment. Rather, the case is bogged down in litigation resulting from the FBI's raid of Jefferson's congressional office.

Sources close to the case tell Roll Call's John Bresnahan that the DoJ is unlikely to indict Jefferson without the documents seized from his office. They're still waiting to get those. A judge ruled in July that Jefferson must see them first; he gets a chance to contest certain materials being handed over based on his constitutional privilege. At issue is whether the docs qualify as legislative materials under the Speech or Debate Clause. The whole process is likely to go on through October, meaning Jefferson won't be forced to campaign under federal indictment.

Jefferson's district is heavily Democratic, but his weakness from the damning revelations of the feds' investigation has inspired a dozen candidates to enter the race, eight of them Dems. If nobody gets a majority on Election Day, there will be a December runoff.

PERMALINK | COMMENTS (0) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)
Topics: William Jefferson

William Jefferson

Businessman Gets 7 Years for Jefferson Bribery

Paul Kiel | September 11, 2006, 4:26PM

We seem to begin a number of our posts about Rep. William Jefferson (D-LA) with phrases like "[his] case just got even uglier" and "This does not bode well for [him]." Oh well, here's another.

In another bad omen of Rep. Jefferson's fate, businessman Vernon Jackson was sentenced (sub. req.) to seven years in prison Friday on bribery charges. If this is the penalty for someone who pleads guilty and cooperates with prosecutors, what can Jefferson, who's refused to admit wrongdoing, expect?

Despite Jackson's cooperation, the judge was not moved to mercy, calling "public corruption" the "worst kind of a virulent and malignant cancer." He said pretty much the same thing when he sentenced Brett Pfeffer, another conspirator in the Jefferson case, to eight years in prison.

Jefferson, remember, is cruising to indictment on a slew of bribery-related charges including bribery and bribery of a foreign official. Jackson's sentence is just another sign that should Jefferson be convicted, he'll most likely shatter the record for longest sentence given a congressman, currently held by Duke Cunningham (8 years, 4 months).

Jackson admitted to funneling more than $400,000 to the congressman through a company owned by Jefferson's wife and children. In return, Jefferson allegedly helped Jackson "obtain telecommunications contracts from the U.S. Army and several African nations, including Nigeria and Ghana," according to Roll Call.

Update: I have to add that Jackson had apparently intended to retire from the telecom business and join the ministry before he got tangled up in a federal bribery investigation.

PERMALINK | COMMENTS (0) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)
Topics: William Jefferson

William Jefferson

"Dollar Bill" Gets a Run for His Money

Paul Kiel | August 9, 2006, 5:40PM

Three Democrats have jumped into the race against Rep. William Jefferson (D-LA) and a fourth is on the way, the AP reports. The district is heavily Democratic, but there is no primary. If no candidate gets over 50 percent on Election Day in November, the top two would go to a December run-off. There is also a Republican candidate in the race, Joseph Lavigne, a political new-comer.

Meanwhile, the criminal investigation of Jefferson remains hung up in the courts, as Justice Department prosecutors still haven't obtained the documents seized from Jefferson's congressional office in May. Jefferson won an appeals decision awarding him a first look at the seized material; and now both sides are waiting on United States Magistrate Judge John Facciola from the District Court of D.C. to set up a procedure for handing the documents over to Jefferson.

PERMALINK | COMMENTS (0) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)
Topics: William Jefferson

William Jefferson

Appeals Court Gives Jefferson a Peek at Seized Docs

Paul Kiel | July 28, 2006, 6:00PM

The latest twist in Rep. William Jefferson (D-LA) case...

Following up on their earlier move to block Justice Department prosecutors from reviewing the documents seized in an FBI raid from Jefferson's office, an appeals court has ruled that Jefferson gets to take a look at them before prosecutors can review them. At issue is whether the materials might be protected under the Speech or Debate clause of the Constitution.

PERMALINK | COMMENTS (0) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)
Topics: William Jefferson

William Jefferson

Jefferson Legal Saga Continues

Paul Kiel | July 26, 2006, 11:38AM

What was up with that $90,000 in the freezer? You -- along with the Justice Department -- are just going to have to keep on waiting to find out: a judge today decided to keep a bevy of Jefferson's documents on ice, just like his cash.

For weeks, federal prosecutors have wanted to get their mitts on the documents seized from Rep. William Jefferson's (D-LA) congressional office by the FBI. The files are thought to contain the final pieces of evidence they need to complete their indictment of Jefferson.

It seemed likely to happen after a federal judge ruled that the raid was constitutional. But Jefferson has appealed the decision, and today the appeals court said that the DOJ will have to keep sitting on its thumbs while they consider Jefferson's appeal.

PERMALINK | COMMENTS (0) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)
Topics: William Jefferson

William Jefferson

Nigerian VP: No Bribes for Me

Paul Kiel | July 20, 2006, 1:59PM

Nigerian Vice President Atiku Abubakar, whose Maryland home was searched as part of the FBI's investigation of Rep. William Jefferson (D-LA) last August, has finally spoken.

He's innocent, he says. And his lawyer told The New York Times that “there is nothing linking the vice president with Congressman Jefferson except Mr. Jefferson’s own false, self-serving statements.”

By that, I assume the lawyer is referring to the many statements Jefferson made to the FBI's informant about getting Abubakar's help with a Nigerian business deal. Jefferson and Lori Mody, a businesswoman who wore a wire during their many conversations, discussed paying Abubakar $500,000 up front and much more after the deal went through. The $90,000 found in Jefferson's freezer was part of a bribe intended for Abubakar, according to FBI transcripts. It remains a mystery whether Jefferson decided to simply keep the bribe for himself.

Read my earlier post on Abubakar for the complete rundown.

PERMALINK | COMMENTS (0) | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)
Topics: William Jefferson